2022-07-02 19:02:49

by Samuel Holland

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: Limit legacy clocks to 32-bit ARM

The sunxi legacy clocks were never compatible with any 64-bit SoC,
so there is no point in building them as part of a 64-bit ARM kernel.
They make even less sense being built in to a 64-bit RISC-V kernel.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>
---

drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig
index 3fba3d3ac9a2..a5c237610357 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
menuconfig CLK_SUNXI
bool "Legacy clock support for Allwinner SoCs"
- depends on ARCH_SUNXI || COMPILE_TEST
+ depends on (ARM && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST
default y

if CLK_SUNXI
--
2.35.1


2022-07-02 19:25:01

by Samuel Holland

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] clk: sunxi: Do not select the PRCM MFD

The PRCM MFD driver is already selected by the two platforms where it is
actually used (MACH_SUN6I and MACH_SUN8I). Selecting it here builds it
unnecessarily on the rest of the Allwinner platforms.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>
---

drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig
index a5c237610357..1c4e543366dd 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ config CLK_SUNXI_CLOCKS

config CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN6I
bool "Legacy A31 PRCM driver"
- select MFD_SUN6I_PRCM
default y
help
Legacy clock driver for the A31 PRCM clocks. Those are
@@ -27,7 +26,6 @@ config CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN6I

config CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN8I
bool "Legacy sun8i PRCM driver"
- select MFD_SUN6I_PRCM
default y
help
Legacy clock driver for the sun8i family PRCM clocks.
--
2.35.1

2022-07-02 19:26:52

by Jernej Škrabec

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: Limit legacy clocks to 32-bit ARM

Dne sobota, 02. julij 2022 ob 21:01:34 CEST je Samuel Holland napisal(a):
> The sunxi legacy clocks were never compatible with any 64-bit SoC,
> so there is no point in building them as part of a 64-bit ARM kernel.
> They make even less sense being built in to a 64-bit RISC-V kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>

Best regards,
Jernej


2022-07-02 19:27:13

by Jernej Škrabec

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: sunxi: Do not select the PRCM MFD

Dne sobota, 02. julij 2022 ob 21:01:35 CEST je Samuel Holland napisal(a):
> The PRCM MFD driver is already selected by the two platforms where it is
> actually used (MACH_SUN6I and MACH_SUN8I). Selecting it here builds it
> unnecessarily on the rest of the Allwinner platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>

Best regards,
Jernej


2022-07-04 20:32:54

by Jernej Škrabec

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: Limit legacy clocks to 32-bit ARM

Dne sobota, 02. julij 2022 ob 21:09:18 CEST je Jernej Škrabec napisal(a):
> Dne sobota, 02. julij 2022 ob 21:01:34 CEST je Samuel Holland napisal(a):
> > The sunxi legacy clocks were never compatible with any 64-bit SoC,
> > so there is no point in building them as part of a 64-bit ARM kernel.
> > They make even less sense being built in to a 64-bit RISC-V kernel.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>

Applied both, thanks!

Best regards,
Jernej