Added information about the S4 SOC PLL Clock controller in DT.
Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
index ff213618a598..a816b1f7694b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
@@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ apb4: apb4@fe000000 {
#size-cells = <2>;
ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x480000>;
+ clkc_pll: pll-clock-controller@8000 {
+ compatible = "amlogic,s4-pll-clkc";
+ reg = <0x0 0x8000 0x0 0x348>;
+ clocks = <&xtal>;
+ clock-names = "xtal";
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ };
+
periphs_pinctrl: pinctrl@4000 {
compatible = "amlogic,meson-s4-periphs-pinctrl";
#address-cells = <2>;
--
2.33.1
On 05/08/2022 10:57, Yu Tu wrote:
> Added information about the S4 SOC PLL Clock controller in DT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
> index ff213618a598..a816b1f7694b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
> @@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ apb4: apb4@fe000000 {
> #size-cells = <2>;
> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x480000>;
>
> + clkc_pll: pll-clock-controller@8000 {
Node names should be generic - clock-controller.
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof,
Thank you for your reply.
On 2022/8/5 17:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> On 05/08/2022 10:57, Yu Tu wrote:
>> Added information about the S4 SOC PLL Clock controller in DT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>> index ff213618a598..a816b1f7694b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>> @@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ apb4: apb4@fe000000 {
>> #size-cells = <2>;
>> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x480000>;
>>
>> + clkc_pll: pll-clock-controller@8000 {
>
> Node names should be generic - clock-controller.
> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>
I will change to clkc_pll: clock-controller@8000, in next version.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> .
On Fri 05 Aug 2022 at 17:39, Yu Tu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> On 2022/8/5 17:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>> On 05/08/2022 10:57, Yu Tu wrote:
>>> Added information about the S4 SOC PLL Clock controller in DT.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>> index ff213618a598..a816b1f7694b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>> @@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ apb4: apb4@fe000000 {
>>> #size-cells = <2>;
>>> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x480000>;
>>> + clkc_pll: pll-clock-controller@8000 {
>> Node names should be generic - clock-controller.
>> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>>
> I will change to clkc_pll: clock-controller@8000, in next version.
Same comment applies to the binding doc.
Also it would be nice to split this in two series.
Bindings and drivers in one, arm64 dt in the other. These changes goes
in through different trees.
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>> .
Hi Jerome，
On 2022/8/10 21:32, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
>
> On Fri 05 Aug 2022 at 17:39, Yu Tu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>> Thank you for your reply.
>>
>> On 2022/8/5 17:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>> On 05/08/2022 10:57, Yu Tu wrote:
>>>> Added information about the S4 SOC PLL Clock controller in DT.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>> index ff213618a598..a816b1f7694b 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>> @@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ apb4: apb4@fe000000 {
>>>> #size-cells = <2>;
>>>> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x480000>;
>>>> + clkc_pll: pll-clock-controller@8000 {
>>> Node names should be generic - clock-controller.
>>> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>>>
>> I will change to clkc_pll: clock-controller@8000, in next version.
>
> Same comment applies to the binding doc.
OKay.
>
> Also it would be nice to split this in two series.
> Bindings and drivers in one, arm64 dt in the other. These changes goes
> in through different trees.
At present, Bindings, DTS and drivers are three series. Do you mean to
put Bindings and drivers together? If so, checkpatch.pl will report a
warning.
>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>> .
>
> .
On Mon 15 Aug 2022 at 14:17, Yu Tu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Jerome，
>
> On 2022/8/10 21:32, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>> On Fri 05 Aug 2022 at 17:39, Yu Tu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>> Thank you for your reply.
>>>
>>> On 2022/8/5 17:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>> On 05/08/2022 10:57, Yu Tu wrote:
>>>>> Added information about the S4 SOC PLL Clock controller in DT.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <[email protected]>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>> index ff213618a598..a816b1f7694b 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ apb4: apb4@fe000000 {
>>>>> #size-cells = <2>;
>>>>> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x480000>;
>>>>> + clkc_pll: pll-clock-controller@8000 {
>>>> Node names should be generic - clock-controller.
>>>> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>>>>
>>> I will change to clkc_pll: clock-controller@8000, in next version.
>> Same comment applies to the binding doc.
> OKay.
>> Also it would be nice to split this in two series.
>> Bindings and drivers in one, arm64 dt in the other. These changes goes
>> in through different trees.
> At present, Bindings, DTS and drivers are three series. Do you mean to put
> Bindings and drivers together? If so, checkpatch.pl will report a warning.
Yes because patches are not in yet so there is a good reason to ignore
the warning. Warning will never show up on the actual tree if the
patches are correctly ordered.
>
>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>> .
>> .
On 2022/8/29 17:43, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
>
> On Mon 15 Aug 2022 at 14:17, Yu Tu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jerome，
>>
>> On 2022/8/10 21:32, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>> On Fri 05 Aug 2022 at 17:39, Yu Tu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>> Thank you for your reply.
>>>>
>>>> On 2022/8/5 17:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>>> On 05/08/2022 10:57, Yu Tu wrote:
>>>>>> Added information about the S4 SOC PLL Clock controller in DT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <[email protected]>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>>> index ff213618a598..a816b1f7694b 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>>> @@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ apb4: apb4@fe000000 {
>>>>>> #size-cells = <2>;
>>>>>> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x480000>;
>>>>>> + clkc_pll: pll-clock-controller@8000 {
>>>>> Node names should be generic - clock-controller.
>>>>> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>>>>>
>>>> I will change to clkc_pll: clock-controller@8000, in next version.
>>> Same comment applies to the binding doc.
>> OKay.
>>> Also it would be nice to split this in two series.
>>> Bindings and drivers in one, arm64 dt in the other. These changes goes
>>> in through different trees.
>> At present, Bindings, DTS and drivers are three series. Do you mean to put
>> Bindings and drivers together? If so, checkpatch.pl will report a warning.
>
> Yes because patches are not in yet so there is a good reason to ignore
> the warning. Warning will never show up on the actual tree if the
> patches are correctly ordered.
I think Binding, DTS and drivers use three series and you said two
series is not a big problem. Three series are recommended for
checkpatch.pl, I think it should be easy for that to separate and merge。
I've sent it to V4. Please look at V4 and give some comments.
>
>>
>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>> .
>>> .
>
> .
On Tue 30 Aug 2022 at 14:05, Yu Tu <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2022/8/29 17:43, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>> On Mon 15 Aug 2022 at 14:17, Yu Tu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jerome，
>>>
>>> On 2022/8/10 21:32, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>> On Fri 05 Aug 2022 at 17:39, Yu Tu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>>> Thank you for your reply.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2022/8/5 17:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>>>> On 05/08/2022 10:57, Yu Tu wrote:
>>>>>>> Added information about the S4 SOC PLL Clock controller in DT.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>>>> index ff213618a598..a816b1f7694b 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>>>> @@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ apb4: apb4@fe000000 {
>>>>>>> #size-cells = <2>;
>>>>>>> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x480000>;
>>>>>>> + clkc_pll: pll-clock-controller@8000 {
>>>>>> Node names should be generic - clock-controller.
>>>>>> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>>>>>>
>>>>> I will change to clkc_pll: clock-controller@8000, in next version.
>>>> Same comment applies to the binding doc.
>>> OKay.
>>>> Also it would be nice to split this in two series.
>>>> Bindings and drivers in one, arm64 dt in the other. These changes goes
>>>> in through different trees.
>>> At present, Bindings, DTS and drivers are three series. Do you mean to put
>>> Bindings and drivers together? If so, checkpatch.pl will report a warning.
>> Yes because patches are not in yet so there is a good reason to ignore
>> the warning. Warning will never show up on the actual tree if the
>> patches are correctly ordered.
>
> I think Binding, DTS and drivers use three series and you said two series
> is not a big problem. Three series are recommended for checkpatch.pl, I
> think it should be easy for that to separate and merge。
No - There is only 2 series. 1 for the bindings and clock drivers and
one for the DT once things are in
>
> I've sent it to V4. Please look at V4 and give some comments.
>
That's not how it works. You sent that before v3 review was done. There
are still comments that needed to be addressed
Given the time it takes to make that review I going to completly skip v4
and I'd like on the comment to addressed before you send another version
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>> .
>>>> .
>> .
On 2022/8/30 14:36, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
>
> On Tue 30 Aug 2022 at 14:05, Yu Tu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 2022/8/29 17:43, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>> On Mon 15 Aug 2022 at 14:17, Yu Tu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jerome，
>>>>
>>>> On 2022/8/10 21:32, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>>>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>>> On Fri 05 Aug 2022 at 17:39, Yu Tu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>>>> Thank you for your reply.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2022/8/5 17:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>>>>> On 05/08/2022 10:57, Yu Tu wrote:
>>>>>>>> Added information about the S4 SOC PLL Clock controller in DT.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>>>>> index ff213618a598..a816b1f7694b 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
>>>>>>>> @@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ apb4: apb4@fe000000 {
>>>>>>>> #size-cells = <2>;
>>>>>>>> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x480000>;
>>>>>>>> + clkc_pll: pll-clock-controller@8000 {
>>>>>>> Node names should be generic - clock-controller.
>>>>>>> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will change to clkc_pll: clock-controller@8000, in next version.
>>>>> Same comment applies to the binding doc.
>>>> OKay.
>>>>> Also it would be nice to split this in two series.
>>>>> Bindings and drivers in one, arm64 dt in the other. These changes goes
>>>>> in through different trees.
>>>> At present, Bindings, DTS and drivers are three series. Do you mean to put
>>>> Bindings and drivers together? If so, checkpatch.pl will report a warning.
>>> Yes because patches are not in yet so there is a good reason to ignore
>>> the warning. Warning will never show up on the actual tree if the
>>> patches are correctly ordered.
>>
>> I think Binding, DTS and drivers use three series and you said two series
>> is not a big problem. Three series are recommended for checkpatch.pl, I
>> think it should be easy for that to separate and merge。
>
> No - There is only 2 series. 1 for the bindings and clock drivers and
> one for the DT once things are in
All right, we'll do it your way.
>
>>
>> I've sent it to V4. Please look at V4 and give some comments.
>>
>
> That's not how it works. You sent that before v3 review was done. There
> are still comments that needed to be addressed
Yes. But can you reply faster?
>
> Given the time it takes to make that review I going to completly skip v4
> and I'd like on the comment to addressed before you send another version
>
What can I say? It's up to you.
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>>> .
>>>>> .
>>> .
>
> .