2022-11-04 15:13:33

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 00/16] timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a pull at expiry model

Placing timers at enqueue time on a target CPU based on dubious heuristics
does not make any sense:

1) Most timer wheel timers are canceled or rearmed before they expire.

2) The heuristics to predict which CPU will be busy when the timer expires
are wrong by definition.

So placing the timers at enqueue wastes precious cycles.

The proper solution to this problem is to always queue the timers on the
local CPU and allow the non pinned timers to be pulled onto a busy CPU at
expiry time.

Therefore split the timer storage into local pinned and global timers:
Local pinned timers are always expired on the CPU on which they have been
queued. Global timers can be expired on any CPU.

As long as a CPU is busy it expires both local and global timers. When a
CPU goes idle it arms for the first expiring local timer. If the first
expiring pinned (local) timer is before the first expiring movable timer,
then no action is required because the CPU will wake up before the first
movable timer expires. If the first expiring movable timer is before the
first expiring pinned (local) timer, then this timer is queued into a idle
timerqueue and eventually expired by some other active CPU.

To avoid global locking the timerqueues are implemented as a hierarchy. The
lowest level of the hierarchy holds the CPUs. The CPUs are associated to
groups of 8, which are seperated per node. If more than one CPU group
exist, then a second level in the hierarchy collects the groups. Depending
on the size of the system more than 2 levels are required. Each group has a
"migrator" which checks the timerqueue during the tick for remote expirable
timers.

If the last CPU in a group goes idle it reports the first expiring event in
the group up to the next group(s) in the hierarchy. If the last CPU goes
idle it arms its timer for the first system wide expiring timer to ensure
that no timer event is missed.


Testing
~~~~~~~

The impact of wasting cycles during enqueue by using the heuristic in
contrast to always queueing the timer on the local CPU was measured with a
micro benchmark. Therefore a timer is enqueued and dequeued in a loop with
1000 repetitions on a isolated CPU. The time the loop takes is measured. A
quater of the remaining CPUs was kept busy. This measurement was repeated
several times. With the patch queue the average duration was reduced by
approximately 25%.

145ns plain v6
109ns v6 with patch queue


Furthermore the impact of residence in deep idle states of an idle system
was investigated. The patch queue doesn't downgrade this behavior.


During testing on a mostly idle machine a ping pong game could be observed:
a process_timeout timer is expired remotely on a non idle CPU. Then the CPU
where the schedule_timeout() was executed to enqueue the timer comes out of
idle and restarts the timer using schedule_timeout() and goes back to idle
again. This is due to the fair scheduler which tries to keep the task on
the CPU which it previously executed on.


Next Steps
~~~~~~~~~~

Simple deferrable timers are no longer required as they can be converted to
global timers. If a CPU goes idle, a formerly deferrable timer will not
prevent the CPU to sleep as long as possible. Only the last migrator CPU
has to take care of them. Deferrable timers with timer pinned flags needs
to be expired on the specified CPU but must not prevent CPU from going
idle. They require their own timer base which is never taken into account
when calculating the next expiry time. This conversation and required
cleanup will be done in a follow up series.



v3..v4:
- address review feedback of Frederic Weisbecker
- address kernel test robot fallout
- Move patch 16 "add_timer_on(): Make sure callers have TIMER_PINNED
flag" at the begin of the queue to prevent timers to end up in global
timer base when they were queued using add_timer_on()
- Fix some comments and typos

v2..v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
- Minimize usage of locks by storing data using atomic_cmpxchg() for
migrator information and information about active cpus.


Thanks,

Anna-Maria





Anna-Maria Behnsen (13):
tick-sched: Warn when next tick seems to be in the past
timer: Move store of next event into __next_timer_interrupt()
timer: Split next timer interrupt logic
add_timer_on(): Make sure callers have TIMER_PINNED flag
timer: Keep the pinned timers separate from the others
timer: Retrieve next expiry of pinned/non-pinned timers seperately
timer: Rename get_next_timer_interrupt()
timer: Split out "get next timer interrupt" functionality
timer: Add get next timer interrupt functionality for remote CPUs
timer: Check if timers base is handled already
timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model
timer_migration: Add tracepoints
timer: Always queue timers on the local CPU

Richard Cochran (linutronix GmbH) (2):
timer: Restructure internal locking
tick/sched: Split out jiffies update helper function

Thomas Gleixner (1):
timer: Rework idle logic

arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c | 3 +-
drivers/char/random.c | 2 +-
include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 +
include/linux/timer.h | 5 +-
include/trace/events/timer_migration.h | 277 ++++++
kernel/time/Makefile | 3 +
kernel/time/clocksource.c | 2 +-
kernel/time/tick-internal.h | 12 +-
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 50 +-
kernel/time/timer.c | 372 +++++--
kernel/time/timer_migration.c | 1263 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/time/timer_migration.h | 123 +++
kernel/workqueue.c | 7 +-
13 files changed, 2011 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/trace/events/timer_migration.h
create mode 100644 kernel/time/timer_migration.c
create mode 100644 kernel/time/timer_migration.h

--
2.30.2



2022-11-04 15:13:40

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 09/16] timer: Split out "get next timer interrupt" functionality

forward_and_idle_timer_bases() includes the functionality for getting the
next timer interrupt. To reuse it, it is splitted into an separate function
"get_next_timer_interrupt()".

This is preparatory work for the conversion of the NOHZ timer
placement to a pull at expiry time model. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
---
v4: Fix typo in comment
---
kernel/time/timer.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 680a0760e30d..853089febf83 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1704,6 +1704,46 @@ static unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
return base->next_expiry;
}

+static unsigned long get_next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base_local,
+ struct timer_base *base_global,
+ unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
+ struct timer_events *tevt)
+{
+ unsigned long nextevt_local, nextevt_global;
+ bool local_first;
+
+ nextevt_local = next_timer_interrupt(base_local);
+ nextevt_global = next_timer_interrupt(base_global);
+
+ /*
+ * Check whether the local event is expiring before or at the same
+ * time as the global event.
+ *
+ * Note, that nextevt_global and nextevt_local might be based on
+ * different base->clk values. So it's not guaranteed that
+ * comparing with empty bases results in a correct local_first.
+ */
+ if (base_local->timers_pending && base_global->timers_pending)
+ local_first = time_before_eq(nextevt_local, nextevt_global);
+ else
+ local_first = base_local->timers_pending;
+
+ /*
+ * Update tevt->* values:
+ *
+ * If the local queue expires first, then the global event can
+ * be ignored. If the global queue is empty, nothing to do
+ * either.
+ */
+ if (!local_first && base_global->timers_pending)
+ tevt->global = basem + (u64)(nextevt_global - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+
+ if (base_local->timers_pending)
+ tevt->local = basem + (u64)(nextevt_local - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+
+ return local_first ? nextevt_local : nextevt_global;
+}
+
/*
* Forward base clock is done only when @basej is past base->clk, otherwise
* base-clk might be rewind.
@@ -1738,7 +1778,7 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
{
unsigned long nextevt, nextevt_local, nextevt_global;
struct timer_base *base_local, *base_global;
- bool local_first, is_idle;
+ bool is_idle;

/* Preset local / global events */
tevt->local = tevt->global = KTIME_MAX;
@@ -1756,8 +1796,11 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
raw_spin_lock(&base_local->lock);
raw_spin_lock_nested(&base_global->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);

- nextevt_local = next_timer_interrupt(base_local);
- nextevt_global = next_timer_interrupt(base_global);
+ nextevt = get_next_timer_interrupt(base_local, base_global,
+ basej, basem, tevt);
+
+ nextevt_local = base_local->next_expiry;
+ nextevt_global = base_global->next_expiry;

/*
* We have a fresh next event. Check whether we can forward the
@@ -1766,21 +1809,6 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
forward_base_clk(base_local, nextevt_local, basej);
forward_base_clk(base_global, nextevt_global, basej);

- /*
- * Check whether the local event is expiring before or at the same
- * time as the global event.
- *
- * Note, that nextevt_global and nextevt_local might be based on
- * different base->clk values. So it's not guaranteed that
- * comparing with empty bases results in a correct local_first.
- */
- if (base_local->timers_pending && base_global->timers_pending)
- local_first = time_before_eq(nextevt_local, nextevt_global);
- else
- local_first = base_local->timers_pending;
-
- nextevt = local_first ? nextevt_local : nextevt_global;
-
/*
* Bases are idle if the next event is more than a tick away. Also
* the tick is stopped so any added timer must forward the base clk
@@ -1793,43 +1821,24 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
/* We need to mark both bases in sync */
base_local->is_idle = base_global->is_idle = is_idle;

+ raw_spin_unlock(&base_global->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&base_local->lock);
+
/*
* If the bases are not marked idle, i.e one of the events is at
* max. one tick away, then the CPU can't go into a NOHZ idle
* sleep. Use the earlier event of both and store it in the local
* expiry value. The next global event is irrelevant in this case
- * and can be left as KTIME_MAX. CPU will wakeup on time.
+ * and can be reset as KTIME_MAX. CPU will wakeup on time.
*/
if (!is_idle) {
/* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
if (time_before(nextevt, basej))
nextevt = basej;
tevt->local = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
- goto unlock;
+ tevt->global = KTIME_MAX;
}

- /*
- * If the bases are marked idle, i.e. the next event on both the
- * local and the global queue are farther away than a tick,
- * evaluate both bases. No need to check whether one of the bases
- * has an already expired timer as this is caught by the !is_idle
- * condition above.
- */
- if (base_local->timers_pending)
- tevt->local = basem + (u64)(nextevt_local - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
-
- /*
- * If the local queue expires first, then the global event can be
- * ignored. The CPU wakes up before that. If the global queue is
- * empty, nothing to do either.
- */
- if (!local_first && base_global->timers_pending)
- tevt->global = basem + (u64)(nextevt_global - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
-
-unlock:
- raw_spin_unlock(&base_global->lock);
- raw_spin_unlock(&base_local->lock);
-
cmp_next_hrtimer_event(basem, tevt);
}

--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:15:50

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/16] timer: Retrieve next expiry of pinned/non-pinned timers seperately

For the conversion of the NOHZ timer placement to a pull at expiry time
model it's required to have seperate expiry times for the pinned and the
non-pinned (movable) timers. Therefore struct timer_events is introduced.

No functional change

Originally-by: Richard Cochran (linutronix GmbH) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
---
kernel/time/tick-internal.h | 8 ++++-
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 20 ++++++++----
kernel/time/timer.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
index 649f2b48e8f0..fcb2d45c2934 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
@@ -8,6 +8,11 @@
#include "timekeeping.h"
#include "tick-sched.h"

+struct timer_events {
+ u64 local;
+ u64 global;
+};
+
#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS

# define TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE -1
@@ -163,7 +168,8 @@ static inline void timers_update_nohz(void) { }

DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct hrtimer_cpu_base, hrtimer_bases);

-extern u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem);
+extern void get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
+ struct timer_events *tevt);
void timer_clear_idle(void);

#define CLOCK_SET_WALL \
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 7ffdc7ba19b4..78f172d1f3d2 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -784,7 +784,8 @@ static inline bool local_timer_softirq_pending(void)

static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
{
- u64 basemono, next_tick, delta, expires;
+ struct timer_events tevt = { .local = KTIME_MAX, .global = KTIME_MAX };
+ u64 basemono, delta, expires;
unsigned long basejiff;
unsigned int seq;

@@ -809,7 +810,11 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
*/
if (rcu_needs_cpu() || arch_needs_cpu() ||
irq_work_needs_cpu() || local_timer_softirq_pending()) {
- next_tick = basemono + TICK_NSEC;
+ /*
+ * If anyone needs the CPU, treat this as a local
+ * timer expiring in a jiffy.
+ */
+ tevt.local = basemono + TICK_NSEC;
} else {
/*
* Get the next pending timer. If high resolution
@@ -818,17 +823,18 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
* disabled this also looks at the next expiring
* hrtimer.
*/
- next_tick = get_next_timer_interrupt(basejiff, basemono);
- ts->next_timer = next_tick;
+ get_next_timer_interrupt(basejiff, basemono, &tevt);
+ tevt.local = min_t(u64, tevt.local, tevt.global);
+ ts->next_timer = tevt.local;
}

/*
* If the tick is due in the next period, keep it ticking or
* force prod the timer.
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE(basemono > next_tick);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(basemono > tevt.local);

- delta = next_tick - basemono;
+ delta = tevt.local - basemono;
if (delta <= (u64)TICK_NSEC) {
/*
* Tell the timer code that the base is not idle, i.e. undo
@@ -861,7 +867,7 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
else
expires = KTIME_MAX;

- ts->timer_expires = min_t(u64, expires, next_tick);
+ ts->timer_expires = min_t(u64, expires, tevt.local);

out:
return ts->timer_expires;
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 0e2abd906916..d272672935da 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1664,7 +1664,7 @@ static void next_expiry_recalc(struct timer_base *base)
* Check, if the next hrtimer event is before the next timer wheel
* event:
*/
-static u64 cmp_next_hrtimer_event(u64 basem, u64 expires)
+static void cmp_next_hrtimer_event(u64 basem, struct timer_events *tevt)
{
u64 nextevt = hrtimer_get_next_event();

@@ -1672,15 +1672,17 @@ static u64 cmp_next_hrtimer_event(u64 basem, u64 expires)
* If high resolution timers are enabled
* hrtimer_get_next_event() returns KTIME_MAX.
*/
- if (expires <= nextevt)
- return expires;
+ if (tevt->local <= nextevt)
+ return;

/*
* If the next timer is already expired, return the tick base
* time so the tick is fired immediately.
*/
- if (nextevt <= basem)
- return basem;
+ if (nextevt <= basem) {
+ tevt->local = basem;
+ return;
+ }

/*
* Round up to the next jiffie. High resolution timers are
@@ -1690,7 +1692,7 @@ static u64 cmp_next_hrtimer_event(u64 basem, u64 expires)
*
* Use DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL to prevent gcc calling __divdi3
*/
- return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(nextevt, TICK_NSEC) * TICK_NSEC;
+ tevt->local = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(nextevt, TICK_NSEC) * TICK_NSEC;
}


@@ -1718,26 +1720,31 @@ static void forward_base_clk(struct timer_base *base, unsigned long nextevt,
}

/**
- * get_next_timer_interrupt - return the time (clock mono) of the next timer
+ * get_next_timer_interrupt
* @basej: base time jiffies
* @basem: base time clock monotonic
+ * @tevt: Pointer to the storage for the expiry values
*
- * Returns the tick aligned clock monotonic time of the next pending
- * timer or KTIME_MAX if no timer is pending.
+ * Stores the next pending local and global timer expiry values in the
+ * struct pointed to by @tevt. If a queue is empty the corresponding field
+ * is set to KTIME_MAX.
*/
-u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)
+void get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
+ struct timer_events *tevt)
{
unsigned long nextevt, nextevt_local, nextevt_global;
struct timer_base *base_local, *base_global;
bool local_first, is_idle;
- u64 expires = KTIME_MAX;
+
+ /* Preset local / global events */
+ tevt->local = tevt->global = KTIME_MAX;

/*
* Pretend that there is no timer pending if the cpu is offline.
* Possible pending timers will be migrated later to an active cpu.
*/
if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()))
- return expires;
+ return;

base_local = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);
base_global = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL]);
@@ -1782,16 +1789,44 @@ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)
/* We need to mark both bases in sync */
base_local->is_idle = base_global->is_idle = is_idle;

- if (base_local->timers_pending || base_global->timers_pending) {
+ /*
+ * If the bases are not marked idle, i.e one of the events is at
+ * max. one tick away, then the CPU can't go into a NOHZ idle
+ * sleep. Use the earlier event of both and store it in the local
+ * expiry value. The next global event is irrelevant in this case
+ * and can be left as KTIME_MAX. CPU will wakeup on time.
+ */
+ if (!is_idle) {
/* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
if (time_before(nextevt, basej))
nextevt = basej;
- expires = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+ tevt->local = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+ goto unlock;
}
+
+ /*
+ * If the bases are marked idle, i.e. the next event on both the
+ * local and the global queue are farther away than a tick,
+ * evaluate both bases. No need to check whether one of the bases
+ * has an already expired timer as this is caught by the !is_idle
+ * condition above.
+ */
+ if (base_local->timers_pending)
+ tevt->local = basem + (u64)(nextevt_local - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+
+ /*
+ * If the local queue expires first, then the global event can be
+ * ignored. The CPU wakes up before that. If the global queue is
+ * empty, nothing to do either.
+ */
+ if (!local_first && base_global->timers_pending)
+ tevt->global = basem + (u64)(nextevt_global - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+
+unlock:
raw_spin_unlock(&base_global->lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&base_local->lock);

- return cmp_next_hrtimer_event(basem, expires);
+ cmp_next_hrtimer_event(basem, tevt);
}

/**
--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:17:37

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 12/16] timer: Check if timers base is handled already

Due to the conversion of the NOHZ timer placement to a pull at expiry
time model, the per CPU timer bases with non pinned timers are no
longer handled only by the local CPU. In case a remote CPU already
expires the non pinned timers base of the local cpu, nothing more
needs to be done by the local CPU. A check at the begin of the expire
timers routine is required, because timer base lock is dropped before
executing the timer callback function.

This is a preparatory work, but has no functional impact right now.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
---
kernel/time/timer.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 641e7284f0d7..f8b2065df79b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1912,6 +1912,9 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct timer_base *base)

lockdep_assert_held(&base->lock);

+ if (!!base->running_timer)
+ return;
+
while (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->clk) &&
time_after_eq(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) {
levels = collect_expired_timers(base, heads);
--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:19:55

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 04/16] timer: Rework idle logic

From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

To improve readability of the code, split base->idle calculation and
expires calculation into separate parts.

Thereby the following subtle change happens if the next event is just one
jiffy ahead and the tick was already stopped: Originally base->is_idle
remains true in this situation. Now base->is_idle turns to false. This may
spare an IPI if a timer is enqueued remotely to an idle CPU that is going
to tick on the next jiffy.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
---
v4: Change condition to force 0 delta and update commit message (Frederic)
---
kernel/time/timer.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 4547d2efcb86..0e9f609f5a38 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1727,21 +1727,20 @@ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)
base->clk = nextevt;
}

- if (time_before_eq(nextevt, basej)) {
- expires = basem;
- base->is_idle = false;
- } else {
- if (base->timers_pending)
- expires = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
- /*
- * If we expect to sleep more than a tick, mark the base idle.
- * Also the tick is stopped so any added timer must forward
- * the base clk itself to keep granularity small. This idle
- * logic is only maintained for the BASE_STD base, deferrable
- * timers may still see large granularity skew (by design).
- */
- if ((expires - basem) > TICK_NSEC)
- base->is_idle = true;
+ /*
+ * Base is idle if the next event is more than a tick away. Also
+ * the tick is stopped so any added timer must forward the base clk
+ * itself to keep granularity small. This idle logic is only
+ * maintained for the BASE_STD base, deferrable timers may still
+ * see large granularity skew (by design).
+ */
+ base->is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
+
+ if (base->timers_pending) {
+ /* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
+ if (time_before(nextevt, basej))
+ nextevt = basej;
+ expires = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
}
raw_spin_unlock(&base->lock);

--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:23:58

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 03/16] timer: Split next timer interrupt logic

Logic for getting next timer interrupt (no matter of recalculated or
already stored in base->next_expiry) is split into a separate function
"next_timer_interrupt()" to make it available for new call sites.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
---
kernel/time/timer.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 2fd5de648d7c..4547d2efcb86 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1681,6 +1681,15 @@ static u64 cmp_next_hrtimer_event(u64 basem, u64 expires)
return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(nextevt, TICK_NSEC) * TICK_NSEC;
}

+
+static unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
+{
+ if (base->next_expiry_recalc)
+ next_expiry_recalc(base);
+
+ return base->next_expiry;
+}
+
/**
* get_next_timer_interrupt - return the time (clock mono) of the next timer
* @basej: base time jiffies
@@ -1703,9 +1712,8 @@ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)
return expires;

raw_spin_lock(&base->lock);
- if (base->next_expiry_recalc)
- next_expiry_recalc(base);
- nextevt = base->next_expiry;
+
+ nextevt = next_timer_interrupt(base);

/*
* We have a fresh next event. Check whether we can forward the
--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:24:06

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/16] timer: Rename get_next_timer_interrupt()

get_next_timer_interrupt() does more than simply getting the next timer
interrupt. The timer bases are forwarded and also marked as idle when
possible and the next timer interrupt information is required for this.

To get not confused, rename function to a more descriptive name. No
functional change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
---
kernel/time/tick-internal.h | 4 ++--
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 16 ++++++++--------
kernel/time/timer.c | 10 +++++++---
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
index fcb2d45c2934..6f5f164506d5 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
@@ -168,8 +168,8 @@ static inline void timers_update_nohz(void) { }

DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct hrtimer_cpu_base, hrtimer_bases);

-extern void get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
- struct timer_events *tevt);
+extern void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
+ struct timer_events *tevt);
void timer_clear_idle(void);

#define CLOCK_SET_WALL \
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 78f172d1f3d2..7f7bfe8b498d 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -802,11 +802,11 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
* Keep the periodic tick, when RCU, architecture or irq_work
* requests it.
* Aside of that check whether the local timer softirq is
- * pending. If so its a bad idea to call get_next_timer_interrupt()
- * because there is an already expired timer, so it will request
- * immediate expiry, which rearms the hardware timer with a
- * minimal delta which brings us back to this place
- * immediately. Lather, rinse and repeat...
+ * pending. If so its a bad idea to call
+ * forward_and_idle_timer_bases() because there is an already
+ * expired timer, so it will request immeditate expiry, which
+ * rearms the hardware timer with a minimal delta which brings us
+ * back to this place immediately. Lather, rinse and repeat...
*/
if (rcu_needs_cpu() || arch_needs_cpu() ||
irq_work_needs_cpu() || local_timer_softirq_pending()) {
@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
* disabled this also looks at the next expiring
* hrtimer.
*/
- get_next_timer_interrupt(basejiff, basemono, &tevt);
+ forward_and_idle_timer_bases(basejiff, basemono, &tevt);
tevt.local = min_t(u64, tevt.local, tevt.global);
ts->next_timer = tevt.local;
}
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
if (delta <= (u64)TICK_NSEC) {
/*
* Tell the timer code that the base is not idle, i.e. undo
- * the effect of get_next_timer_interrupt():
+ * the effect of forward_and_idle_timer_bases():
*/
timer_clear_idle();
/*
@@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ void tick_nohz_idle_retain_tick(void)
{
tick_nohz_retain_tick(this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched));
/*
- * Undo the effect of get_next_timer_interrupt() called from
+ * Undo the effect of forward_and_idle_timer_bases() called from
* tick_nohz_next_event().
*/
timer_clear_idle();
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index d272672935da..680a0760e30d 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1720,7 +1720,7 @@ static void forward_base_clk(struct timer_base *base, unsigned long nextevt,
}

/**
- * get_next_timer_interrupt
+ * forward_and_idle_timer_bases
* @basej: base time jiffies
* @basem: base time clock monotonic
* @tevt: Pointer to the storage for the expiry values
@@ -1728,9 +1728,13 @@ static void forward_base_clk(struct timer_base *base, unsigned long nextevt,
* Stores the next pending local and global timer expiry values in the
* struct pointed to by @tevt. If a queue is empty the corresponding field
* is set to KTIME_MAX.
+ *
+ * If required, base->clk is forwarded and base is also marked as
+ * idle. Idle handling of timer bases is allowed only to be done by
+ * CPU itself.
*/
-void get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
- struct timer_events *tevt)
+void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
+ struct timer_events *tevt)
{
unsigned long nextevt, nextevt_local, nextevt_global;
struct timer_base *base_local, *base_global;
--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:24:53

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 13/16] tick/sched: Split out jiffies update helper function

From: "Richard Cochran (linutronix GmbH)" <[email protected]>

The logic to get the time of the last jiffies update will be needed by
the timer pull model as well.

Move the code into a global funtion in anticipation of the new caller.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran (linutronix GmbH) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
---
kernel/time/tick-internal.h | 1 +
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
index 7b65abc9d803..8f99e35e75b4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ static inline void tick_nohz_init(void) { }
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
extern unsigned long tick_nohz_active;
extern void timers_update_nohz(void);
+extern u64 get_jiffies_update(unsigned long *basej);
# ifdef CONFIG_SMP
extern struct static_key_false timers_migration_enabled;
# endif
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 7f7bfe8b498d..868679ff3421 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -782,19 +782,31 @@ static inline bool local_timer_softirq_pending(void)
return local_softirq_pending() & BIT(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
}

-static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
+/*
+ * Read jiffies and the time when jiffies were updated last
+ */
+u64 get_jiffies_update(unsigned long *basej)
{
- struct timer_events tevt = { .local = KTIME_MAX, .global = KTIME_MAX };
- u64 basemono, delta, expires;
unsigned long basejiff;
unsigned int seq;
+ u64 basemono;

- /* Read jiffies and the time when jiffies were updated last */
do {
seq = read_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
basemono = last_jiffies_update;
basejiff = jiffies;
} while (read_seqcount_retry(&jiffies_seq, seq));
+ *basej = basejiff;
+ return basemono;
+}
+
+static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
+{
+ struct timer_events tevt = { .local = KTIME_MAX, .global = KTIME_MAX };
+ u64 basemono, delta, expires;
+ unsigned long basejiff;
+
+ basemono = get_jiffies_update(&basejiff);
ts->last_jiffies = basejiff;
ts->timer_expires_base = basemono;

--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:24:56

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 01/16] tick-sched: Warn when next tick seems to be in the past

When the next tick is in the past, the delta between basemono and the next
tick gets negativ. But the next tick should never be in the past. The
negative effect of a wrong next tick might be a stop of the tick and timers
might expire late.

To prevent expensive debugging when changing underlying code, add a
WARN_ON_ONCE into this code path.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index b0e3c9205946..7ffdc7ba19b4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -826,6 +826,8 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
* If the tick is due in the next period, keep it ticking or
* force prod the timer.
*/
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(basemono > next_tick);
+
delta = next_tick - basemono;
if (delta <= (u64)TICK_NSEC) {
/*
--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:25:08

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 15/16] timer_migration: Add tracepoints

The timer pull logic needs proper debugging aids. Add tracepoints so the
hierarchical idle machinery can be diagnosed.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
---
include/trace/events/timer_migration.h | 277 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/time/timer_migration.c | 24 +++
2 files changed, 301 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/trace/events/timer_migration.h

diff --git a/include/trace/events/timer_migration.h b/include/trace/events/timer_migration.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0c4824056930
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/trace/events/timer_migration.h
@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
+#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
+#define TRACE_SYSTEM timer_migration
+
+#if !defined(_TRACE_TIMER_MIGRATION_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
+#define _TRACE_TIMER_MIGRATION_H
+
+#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
+
+/* Group events */
+TRACE_EVENT(tmigr_group_set,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_group *group),
+
+ TP_ARGS(group),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field( void *, group )
+ __field( unsigned int, lvl )
+ __field( unsigned int, numa_node )
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->group = group;
+ __entry->lvl = group->level;
+ __entry->numa_node = group->numa_node;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("group=%p lvl=%d numa=%d",
+ __entry->group, __entry->lvl, __entry->numa_node)
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(tmigr_connect_child_parent,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_group *child),
+
+ TP_ARGS(child),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field( void *, child )
+ __field( void *, parent )
+ __field( unsigned int, lvl )
+ __field( unsigned int, numa_node )
+ __field( unsigned int, num_childs )
+ __field( u32, childmask )
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->child = child;
+ __entry->parent = child->parent;
+ __entry->lvl = child->parent->level;
+ __entry->numa_node = child->parent->numa_node;
+ __entry->numa_node = child->parent->num_childs;
+ __entry->childmask = child->childmask;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("group=%p childmask=%0x parent=%p lvl=%d numa=%d num_childs=%d",
+ __entry->child, __entry->childmask, __entry->parent,
+ __entry->lvl, __entry->numa_node, __entry->num_childs)
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(tmigr_connect_cpu_parent,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_cpu *tmc),
+
+ TP_ARGS(tmc),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field( void *, parent )
+ __field( unsigned int, cpu )
+ __field( unsigned int, lvl )
+ __field( unsigned int, numa_node )
+ __field( unsigned int, num_childs )
+ __field( u32, childmask )
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->parent = tmc->tmgroup;
+ __entry->cpu = tmc->cpuevt.cpu;
+ __entry->lvl = tmc->tmgroup->level;
+ __entry->numa_node = tmc->tmgroup->numa_node;
+ __entry->numa_node = tmc->tmgroup->num_childs;
+ __entry->childmask = tmc->childmask;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("cpu=%d childmask=%0x parent=%p lvl=%d numa=%d num_childs=%d",
+ __entry->cpu, __entry->childmask, __entry->parent,
+ __entry->lvl, __entry->numa_node, __entry->num_childs)
+);
+
+DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(tmigr_group_and_cpu,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_group *group, union tmigr_state state, u32 childmask),
+
+ TP_ARGS(group, state, childmask),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field( void *, group )
+ __field( void *, parent )
+ __field( unsigned int, lvl )
+ __field( unsigned int, numa_node )
+ __field( u8, active )
+ __field( u8, migrator )
+ __field( u32, childmask )
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->group = group;
+ __entry->parent = group->parent;
+ __entry->lvl = group->level;
+ __entry->numa_node = group->numa_node;
+ __entry->active = state.active;
+ __entry->migrator = state.migrator;
+ __entry->childmask = childmask;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("group=%p lvl=%d numa=%d active=%0x migrator=%0x "
+ "parent=%p childmask=%0x",
+ __entry->group, __entry->lvl, __entry->numa_node,
+ __entry->active, __entry->migrator,
+ __entry->parent, __entry->childmask)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(tmigr_group_and_cpu, tmigr_group_set_cpu_inactive,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_group *group, union tmigr_state state, u32 childmask),
+
+ TP_ARGS(group, state, childmask)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(tmigr_group_and_cpu, tmigr_group_set_cpu_active,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_group *group, union tmigr_state state, u32 childmask),
+
+ TP_ARGS(group, state, childmask)
+);
+
+/* CPU events*/
+DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(tmigr_cpugroup,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_cpu *tmc),
+
+ TP_ARGS(tmc),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field( void *, parent)
+ __field( unsigned int, cpu)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->cpu = tmc->cpuevt.cpu;
+ __entry->parent = tmc->tmgroup;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("cpu=%d parent=%p", __entry->cpu, __entry->parent)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(tmigr_cpugroup, tmigr_cpu_new_timer,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_cpu *tmc),
+
+ TP_ARGS(tmc)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(tmigr_cpugroup, tmigr_cpu_active,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_cpu *tmc),
+
+ TP_ARGS(tmc)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(tmigr_cpugroup, tmigr_cpu_online,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_cpu *tmc),
+
+ TP_ARGS(tmc)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(tmigr_cpugroup, tmigr_cpu_offline,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_cpu *tmc),
+
+ TP_ARGS(tmc)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(tmigr_cpugroup, tmigr_handle_remote_cpu,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_cpu *tmc),
+
+ TP_ARGS(tmc)
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(tmigr_cpu_idle,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_cpu *tmc, u64 nextevt),
+
+ TP_ARGS(tmc, nextevt),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field( void *, parent)
+ __field( unsigned int, cpu)
+ __field( u64, nextevt)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->cpu = tmc->cpuevt.cpu;
+ __entry->parent = tmc->tmgroup;
+ __entry->nextevt = nextevt;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("cpu=%d parent=%p nextevt=%llu",
+ __entry->cpu, __entry->parent, __entry->nextevt)
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(tmigr_update_events,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_group *child, struct tmigr_group *group,
+ union tmigr_state childstate, union tmigr_state groupstate,
+ u64 nextevt),
+
+ TP_ARGS(child, group, childstate, groupstate, nextevt),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field( void *, child )
+ __field( void *, group )
+ __field( u64, nextevt )
+ __field( u64, group_next_expiry )
+ __field( unsigned int, group_lvl )
+ __field( u8, child_active )
+ __field( u8, group_active )
+ __field( unsigned int, child_evtcpu )
+ __field( u64, child_evt_expiry )
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->child = child;
+ __entry->group = group;
+ __entry->nextevt = nextevt;
+ __entry->group_next_expiry = group->next_expiry;
+ __entry->group_lvl = group->level;
+ __entry->child_active = childstate.active;
+ __entry->group_active = groupstate.active;
+ __entry->child_evtcpu = child ? child->groupevt.cpu : 0;
+ __entry->child_evt_expiry = child ? child->groupevt.nextevt.expires : 0;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("child=%p group=%p group_lvl=%d child_active=%0x group_active=%0x "
+ "nextevt=%llu next_expiry=%llu child_evt_expiry=%llu child_evtcpu=%d",
+ __entry->child, __entry->group, __entry->group_lvl, __entry->child_active,
+ __entry->group_active,
+ __entry->nextevt, __entry->group_next_expiry, __entry->child_evt_expiry,
+ __entry->child_evtcpu)
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(tmigr_handle_remote,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct tmigr_group *group),
+
+ TP_ARGS(group),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field( void * , group )
+ __field( unsigned int , lvl )
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->group = group;
+ __entry->lvl = group->level;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("group=%p lvl=%d",
+ __entry->group, __entry->lvl)
+);
+
+#endif /* _TRACE_TIMER_MIGRATION_H */
+
+/* This part must be outside protection */
+#include <trace/define_trace.h>
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer_migration.c b/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
index bb0eecae3390..838fc4a6d62e 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
#include "timer_migration.h"
#include "tick-internal.h"

+#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
+#include <trace/events/timer_migration.h>
+
/*
* The timer migration mechanism is built on a hierarchy of groups. The
* lowest level group contains CPUs, the next level groups of CPU groups
@@ -317,6 +320,8 @@ static bool tmigr_active_up(struct tmigr_group *group,
*/
set_bit(0, &group->groupevt.ignore);

+ trace_tmigr_group_set_cpu_active(group, newstate, childmask);
+
return walk_done;
}

@@ -341,6 +346,7 @@ void tmigr_cpu_activate(void)
raw_spin_lock(&tmc->lock);
tmc->idle = 0;
tmc->wakeup = KTIME_MAX;
+ trace_tmigr_cpu_active(tmc);
__tmigr_cpu_activate(tmc);
raw_spin_unlock(&tmc->lock);
}
@@ -435,6 +441,9 @@ static bool tmigr_update_events(struct tmigr_group *group,
data->nextexp = tmigr_next_groupevt_expires(group);
}

+ trace_tmigr_update_events(child, group, data->childstate,
+ data->groupstate, nextexp);
+
unlock:
raw_spin_unlock(&group->lock);

@@ -478,6 +487,8 @@ static u64 tmigr_new_timer(struct tmigr_cpu *tmc, u64 nextexp)
if (tmc->remote)
return KTIME_MAX;

+ trace_tmigr_cpu_new_timer(tmc);
+
clear_bit(0, &tmc->cpuevt.ignore);

data.groupstate.state = atomic_read(tmc->tmgroup->migr_state);
@@ -576,6 +587,8 @@ static bool tmigr_inactive_up(struct tmigr_group *group,
}
}

+ trace_tmigr_group_set_cpu_inactive(group, data->childstate, childmask);
+
return walk_done;
}

@@ -652,6 +665,7 @@ u64 tmigr_cpu_deactivate(u64 nextexp)
tmc->idle = 1;

unlock:
+ trace_tmigr_cpu_idle(tmc, ret);
raw_spin_unlock(&tmc->lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -678,6 +692,8 @@ static u64 tmigr_handle_remote_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u64 now,
return next;
}

+ trace_tmigr_handle_remote_cpu(tmc);
+
tmc->remote = 1;

/* Drop the lock to allow the remote CPU to exit idle */
@@ -728,6 +744,7 @@ static bool tmigr_handle_remote_up(struct tmigr_group *group,

childmask = data->childmask;

+ trace_tmigr_handle_remote(group);
again:
/*
* Handle the group only if @childmask is the migrator or if the
@@ -963,6 +980,7 @@ static struct tmigr_group *tmigr_get_group(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int node,
tmigr_init_group(group, lvl, node, migr_state);
/* Setup successful. Add it to the hierarchy */
list_add(&group->list, &tmigr_level_list[lvl]);
+ trace_tmigr_group_set(group);
return group;
}

@@ -981,6 +999,8 @@ static void tmigr_connect_child_parent(struct tmigr_group *child,
raw_spin_unlock(&parent->lock);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&child->lock, flags);

+ trace_tmigr_connect_child_parent(child);
+
/*
* To prevent inconsistent states, active childs needs to be active
* in new parent as well. Inactive childs are already marked
@@ -1067,6 +1087,8 @@ static int tmigr_setup_groups(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int node)

raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&group->lock, flags);

+ trace_tmigr_connect_cpu_parent(tmc);
+
/* There are no childs that needs to be connected */
continue;
} else {
@@ -1135,6 +1157,7 @@ static int tmigr_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
tmc->wakeup = KTIME_MAX;
}
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tmc->lock, flags);
+ trace_tmigr_cpu_online(tmc);
__tmigr_cpu_activate(tmc);
tmc->online = 1;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tmc->lock, flags);
@@ -1148,6 +1171,7 @@ static int tmigr_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
raw_spin_lock_irq(&tmc->lock);
tmc->online = 0;
__tmigr_cpu_deactivate(tmc, KTIME_MAX);
+ trace_tmigr_cpu_offline(tmc);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&tmc->lock);

return 0;
--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:25:24

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/16] timer: Move store of next event into __next_timer_interrupt()

Both call sides of __next_timer_interrupt() store return value directly in
base->next_expiry. Move the store into __next_timer_interrupt() and to make
purpose more clear, rename function to next_expiry_recalc().

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
---
v4: rename function as suggested by Frederic Weisbecker
---
kernel/time/timer.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 717fcb9fb14a..2fd5de648d7c 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1571,8 +1571,10 @@ static int next_pending_bucket(struct timer_base *base, unsigned offset,
/*
* Search the first expiring timer in the various clock levels. Caller must
* hold base->lock.
+ *
+ * Store next expiry time in base->next_expiry.
*/
-static unsigned long __next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
+static void next_expiry_recalc(struct timer_base *base)
{
unsigned long clk, next, adj;
unsigned lvl, offset = 0;
@@ -1638,10 +1640,11 @@ static unsigned long __next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
clk += adj;
}

+ base->next_expiry = next;
base->next_expiry_recalc = false;
base->timers_pending = !(next == base->clk + NEXT_TIMER_MAX_DELTA);

- return next;
+ return;
}

#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
@@ -1701,7 +1704,7 @@ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)

raw_spin_lock(&base->lock);
if (base->next_expiry_recalc)
- base->next_expiry = __next_timer_interrupt(base);
+ next_expiry_recalc(base);
nextevt = base->next_expiry;

/*
@@ -1784,7 +1787,7 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct timer_base *base)
WARN_ON_ONCE(!levels && !base->next_expiry_recalc
&& base->timers_pending);
base->clk++;
- base->next_expiry = __next_timer_interrupt(base);
+ next_expiry_recalc(base);

while (levels--)
expire_timers(base, heads + levels);
--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:25:25

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/16] timer: Add get next timer interrupt functionality for remote CPUs

To prepare for the conversion of the NOHZ timer placement to a pull at
expiry time model it's required to have functionality available getting the
next timer interrupt on a remote CPU.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
---
kernel/time/tick-internal.h | 3 +++
kernel/time/timer.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
index 6f5f164506d5..7b65abc9d803 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
@@ -170,6 +170,9 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct hrtimer_cpu_base, hrtimer_bases);

extern void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
struct timer_events *tevt);
+extern void get_next_timer_interrupt_remote(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
+ struct timer_events *tevt,
+ unsigned int cpu);
void timer_clear_idle(void);

#define CLOCK_SET_WALL \
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 853089febf83..1b82661f6172 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1759,6 +1759,47 @@ static void forward_base_clk(struct timer_base *base, unsigned long nextevt,
}
}

+/**
+ * get_next_timer_interrupt_remote
+ * @basej: base time jiffies
+ * @basem: base time clock monotonic
+ * @tevt: Pointer to the storage for the expiry values
+ * @cpu: Remote CPU
+ *
+ * Stores the next pending local and global timer expiry values in the
+ * struct pointed to by @tevt. If a queue is empty the corresponding
+ * field is set to KTIME_MAX. If local event expires before global
+ * event, global event is set to KTIME_MAX as well.
+ */
+void get_next_timer_interrupt_remote(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
+ struct timer_events *tevt,
+ unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct timer_base *base_local, *base_global;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /* Preset local / global events */
+ tevt->local = tevt->global = KTIME_MAX;
+
+ /*
+ * Pretend that there is no timer pending if the cpu is offline.
+ * Possible pending timers will be migrated later to an active cpu.
+ */
+ if (cpu_is_offline(cpu))
+ return;
+
+ base_local = per_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL], cpu);
+ base_global = per_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL], cpu);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&base_local->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_nested(&base_global->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+
+ get_next_timer_interrupt(base_local, base_global, basej, basem, tevt);
+
+ raw_spin_unlock(&base_global->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base_local->lock, flags);
+}
+
/**
* forward_and_idle_timer_bases
* @basej: base time jiffies
--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:41:52

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 06/16] timer: Keep the pinned timers separate from the others

Separate the storage space for pinned timers. Deferrable timers (doesn't
matter if pinned or non pinned) are still enqueued into their own base.

This is preparatory work for changing the NOHZ timer placement from a push
at enqueue time to a pull at expiry time model.

No functional change.

Originally-by: Richard Cochran (linutronix GmbH) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
---
v4:
- split out logic to forward base clock into a helper function
forward_base_clk() (Frederic)
- ease the code in run_local_timers() and timer_clear_idle() (Frederic)
---
kernel/time/timer.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 0e9f609f5a38..0e2abd906916 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -187,12 +187,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(jiffies_64);
#define WHEEL_SIZE (LVL_SIZE * LVL_DEPTH)

#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
-# define NR_BASES 2
-# define BASE_STD 0
-# define BASE_DEF 1
+/*
+ * If multiple bases need to be locked, use the base ordering for lock
+ * nesting, i.e. lowest number first.
+ */
+# define NR_BASES 3
+# define BASE_LOCAL 0
+# define BASE_GLOBAL 1
+# define BASE_DEF 2
#else
# define NR_BASES 1
-# define BASE_STD 0
+# define BASE_LOCAL 0
+# define BASE_GLOBAL 0
# define BASE_DEF 0
#endif

@@ -902,7 +908,10 @@ static int detach_if_pending(struct timer_list *timer, struct timer_base *base,

static inline struct timer_base *get_timer_cpu_base(u32 tflags, u32 cpu)
{
- struct timer_base *base = per_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD], cpu);
+ int index = tflags & TIMER_PINNED ? BASE_LOCAL : BASE_GLOBAL;
+ struct timer_base *base;
+
+ base = per_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[index], cpu);

/*
* If the timer is deferrable and NO_HZ_COMMON is set then we need
@@ -915,7 +924,10 @@ static inline struct timer_base *get_timer_cpu_base(u32 tflags, u32 cpu)

static inline struct timer_base *get_timer_this_cpu_base(u32 tflags)
{
- struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]);
+ int index = tflags & TIMER_PINNED ? BASE_LOCAL : BASE_GLOBAL;
+ struct timer_base *base;
+
+ base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[index]);

/*
* If the timer is deferrable and NO_HZ_COMMON is set then we need
@@ -1690,6 +1702,21 @@ static unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
return base->next_expiry;
}

+/*
+ * Forward base clock is done only when @basej is past base->clk, otherwise
+ * base-clk might be rewind.
+ */
+static void forward_base_clk(struct timer_base *base, unsigned long nextevt,
+ unsigned long basej)
+{
+ if (time_after(basej, base->clk)) {
+ if (time_after(nextevt, basej))
+ base->clk = basej;
+ else if (time_after(nextevt, base->clk))
+ base->clk = nextevt;
+ }
+}
+
/**
* get_next_timer_interrupt - return the time (clock mono) of the next timer
* @basej: base time jiffies
@@ -1700,9 +1727,10 @@ static unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
*/
u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)
{
- struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]);
+ unsigned long nextevt, nextevt_local, nextevt_global;
+ struct timer_base *base_local, *base_global;
+ bool local_first, is_idle;
u64 expires = KTIME_MAX;
- unsigned long nextevt;

/*
* Pretend that there is no timer pending if the cpu is offline.
@@ -1711,38 +1739,57 @@ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)
if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()))
return expires;

- raw_spin_lock(&base->lock);
+ base_local = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);
+ base_global = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL]);
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&base_local->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_nested(&base_global->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);

- nextevt = next_timer_interrupt(base);
+ nextevt_local = next_timer_interrupt(base_local);
+ nextevt_global = next_timer_interrupt(base_global);

/*
* We have a fresh next event. Check whether we can forward the
- * base. We can only do that when @basej is past base->clk
- * otherwise we might rewind base->clk.
+ * base.
*/
- if (time_after(basej, base->clk)) {
- if (time_after(nextevt, basej))
- base->clk = basej;
- else if (time_after(nextevt, base->clk))
- base->clk = nextevt;
- }
+ forward_base_clk(base_local, nextevt_local, basej);
+ forward_base_clk(base_global, nextevt_global, basej);
+
+ /*
+ * Check whether the local event is expiring before or at the same
+ * time as the global event.
+ *
+ * Note, that nextevt_global and nextevt_local might be based on
+ * different base->clk values. So it's not guaranteed that
+ * comparing with empty bases results in a correct local_first.
+ */
+ if (base_local->timers_pending && base_global->timers_pending)
+ local_first = time_before_eq(nextevt_local, nextevt_global);
+ else
+ local_first = base_local->timers_pending;
+
+ nextevt = local_first ? nextevt_local : nextevt_global;

/*
- * Base is idle if the next event is more than a tick away. Also
+ * Bases are idle if the next event is more than a tick away. Also
* the tick is stopped so any added timer must forward the base clk
* itself to keep granularity small. This idle logic is only
- * maintained for the BASE_STD base, deferrable timers may still
- * see large granularity skew (by design).
+ * maintained for the BASE_LOCAL and BASE_GLOBAL base, deferrable
+ * timers may still see large granularity skew (by design).
*/
- base->is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
+ is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);

- if (base->timers_pending) {
+ /* We need to mark both bases in sync */
+ base_local->is_idle = base_global->is_idle = is_idle;
+
+ if (base_local->timers_pending || base_global->timers_pending) {
/* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
if (time_before(nextevt, basej))
nextevt = basej;
expires = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
}
- raw_spin_unlock(&base->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&base_global->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&base_local->lock);

return cmp_next_hrtimer_event(basem, expires);
}
@@ -1754,15 +1801,14 @@ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)
*/
void timer_clear_idle(void)
{
- struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]);
-
/*
* We do this unlocked. The worst outcome is a remote enqueue sending
* a pointless IPI, but taking the lock would just make the window for
* sending the IPI a few instructions smaller for the cost of taking
* the lock in the exit from idle path.
*/
- base->is_idle = false;
+ __this_cpu_write(timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL].is_idle, false);
+ __this_cpu_write(timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL].is_idle, false);
}
#endif

@@ -1808,11 +1854,13 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct timer_base *base)
*/
static __latent_entropy void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
{
- struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]);
+ struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);

__run_timers(base);
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON))
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON)) {
+ __run_timers(this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL]));
__run_timers(this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_DEF]));
+ }
}

/*
@@ -1820,19 +1868,17 @@ static __latent_entropy void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
*/
static void run_local_timers(void)
{
- struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]);
+ struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);

hrtimer_run_queues();
- /* Raise the softirq only if required. */
- if (time_before(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) {
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON))
- return;
- /* CPU is awake, so check the deferrable base. */
- base++;
- if (time_before(jiffies, base->next_expiry))
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < NR_BASES; i++, base++) {
+ /* Raise the softirq only if required. */
+ if (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) {
+ raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
return;
+ }
}
- raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
}

/*
--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:45:40

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 16/16] timer: Always queue timers on the local CPU

The timer pull model is in place so we can remove the heuristics which try
to guess the best target CPU at enqueue/modification time.

All non pinned timers are queued on the local CPU in the seperate storage
and eventually pulled at expiry time to a remote CPU.

When a timer is added via add_timer_on(), TIMER_PINNED flag is required to
ensure it expires on the specified CPU. Otherwise it will be enqueued in
the global timer base which could be expired by a remote CPU. WARN_ONCE()
is added to prevent misuse.

Originally-by: Richard Cochran (linutronix GmbH) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
---
v4: Update comment about TIMER_PINNED flag (heristic is removed)
---
include/linux/timer.h | 5 ++---
kernel/time/timer.c | 17 +++++------------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/timer.h b/include/linux/timer.h
index 648f00105f58..181a3d3fa45a 100644
--- a/include/linux/timer.h
+++ b/include/linux/timer.h
@@ -50,9 +50,8 @@ struct timer_list {
* workqueue locking issues. It's not meant for executing random crap
* with interrupts disabled. Abuse is monitored!
*
- * @TIMER_PINNED: A pinned timer will not be affected by any timer
- * placement heuristics (like, NOHZ) and will always expire on the CPU
- * on which the timer was enqueued.
+ * @TIMER_PINNED: A pinned timer will always expire on the CPU on which
+ * the timer was enqueued.
*
* Note: Because enqueuing of timers can migrate the timer from one
* CPU to another, pinned timers are not guaranteed to stay on the
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 214397d84747..bdff4be066e4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -947,17 +947,6 @@ static inline struct timer_base *get_timer_base(u32 tflags)
return get_timer_cpu_base(tflags, tflags & TIMER_CPUMASK);
}

-static inline struct timer_base *
-get_target_base(struct timer_base *base, unsigned tflags)
-{
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON)
- if (static_branch_likely(&timers_migration_enabled) &&
- !(tflags & TIMER_PINNED))
- return get_timer_cpu_base(tflags, get_nohz_timer_target());
-#endif
- return get_timer_this_cpu_base(tflags);
-}
-
static inline void forward_timer_base(struct timer_base *base)
{
unsigned long jnow = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
@@ -1093,7 +1082,7 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires, unsigned int option
if (!ret && (options & MOD_TIMER_PENDING_ONLY))
goto out_unlock;

- new_base = get_target_base(base, timer->flags);
+ new_base = get_timer_this_cpu_base(timer->flags);

if (base != new_base) {
/*
@@ -1228,6 +1217,10 @@ void add_timer_on(struct timer_list *timer, int cpu)

BUG_ON(timer_pending(timer) || !timer->function);

+ WARN_ONCE(!(timer->flags & TIMER_PINNED), "TIMER_PINNED flag for "
+ "add_timer_on() is missing: timer=%p function=%ps",
+ timer, timer->function);
+
new_base = get_timer_cpu_base(timer->flags, cpu);

/*
--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:52:32

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 05/16] add_timer_on(): Make sure callers have TIMER_PINNED flag

The implementation of the hierachical timer pull model will change the
timer bases per CPU. Timers, that have to expire on a specific CPU, require
the TIMER_PINNED flag. Otherwise they will be queued on the dedicated CPU
but in global timer base and those timers could also expire on other
CPUs. Timers with TIMER_DEFERRABLE flag end up in a separate base anyway
and are executed on the local CPU only.

Therefore add the missing TIMER_PINNED flag for those callers who use
add_timer_on() without the flag. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <[email protected]>
Cc: John Stultz <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
---
v4:
- Move patch before local and global base are introduced
- Add missing user (drivers/char/random.c) of add_timer_on() without
TIMER_PINNED flag (kernel test robot)
---
arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c | 3 ++-
drivers/char/random.c | 2 +-
kernel/time/clocksource.c | 2 +-
kernel/workqueue.c | 7 +++++--
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
index 9452dc9664b5..eab827288e0f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
@@ -110,7 +110,8 @@ static int __init start_sync_check_timer(void)
if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TSC_ADJUST) || tsc_clocksource_reliable)
return 0;

- timer_setup(&tsc_sync_check_timer, tsc_sync_check_timer_fn, 0);
+ timer_setup(&tsc_sync_check_timer, tsc_sync_check_timer_fn,
+ TIMER_PINNED);
tsc_sync_check_timer.expires = jiffies + SYNC_CHECK_INTERVAL;
add_timer(&tsc_sync_check_timer);

diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
index 69754155300e..2cae98dc86dc 100644
--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct fast_pool, irq_randomness) = {
#define FASTMIX_PERM HSIPHASH_PERMUTATION
.pool = { HSIPHASH_CONST_0, HSIPHASH_CONST_1, HSIPHASH_CONST_2, HSIPHASH_CONST_3 },
#endif
- .mix = __TIMER_INITIALIZER(mix_interrupt_randomness, 0)
+ .mix = __TIMER_INITIALIZER(mix_interrupt_randomness, TIMER_PINNED)
};

/*
diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
index 8058bec87ace..f8c310e62758 100644
--- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
+++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static inline void clocksource_start_watchdog(void)
{
if (watchdog_running || !watchdog || list_empty(&watchdog_list))
return;
- timer_setup(&watchdog_timer, clocksource_watchdog, 0);
+ timer_setup(&watchdog_timer, clocksource_watchdog, TIMER_PINNED);
watchdog_timer.expires = jiffies + WATCHDOG_INTERVAL;
add_timer_on(&watchdog_timer, cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask));
watchdog_running = 1;
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 7cd5f5e7e0a1..a0f7bf7be6f2 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1670,10 +1670,13 @@ static void __queue_delayed_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
dwork->cpu = cpu;
timer->expires = jiffies + delay;

- if (unlikely(cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND))
+ if (unlikely(cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)) {
+ timer->flags |= TIMER_PINNED;
add_timer_on(timer, cpu);
- else
+ } else {
+ timer->flags &= ~TIMER_PINNED;
add_timer(timer);
+ }
}

/**
--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 15:52:57

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 11/16] timer: Restructure internal locking

From: "Richard Cochran (linutronix GmbH)" <[email protected]>

Move the locking out from __run_timers() to the call sites, so the
protected section can be extended at the call site. Preparatory patch for
changing the NOHZ timer placement to a pull at expiry time model.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran (linutronix GmbH) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
---
kernel/time/timer.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 1b82661f6172..641e7284f0d7 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1910,11 +1910,7 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct timer_base *base)
struct hlist_head heads[LVL_DEPTH];
int levels;

- if (time_before(jiffies, base->next_expiry))
- return;
-
- timer_base_lock_expiry(base);
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&base->lock);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&base->lock);

while (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->clk) &&
time_after_eq(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) {
@@ -1934,21 +1930,36 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct timer_base *base)
while (levels--)
expire_timers(base, heads + levels);
}
+}
+
+static void __run_timer_base(struct timer_base *base)
+{
+ if (time_before(jiffies, base->next_expiry))
+ return;
+
+ timer_base_lock_expiry(base);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&base->lock);
+ __run_timers(base);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&base->lock);
timer_base_unlock_expiry(base);
}

+static void run_timer_base(int index)
+{
+ struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[index]);
+
+ __run_timer_base(base);
+}
+
/*
* This function runs timers and the timer-tq in bottom half context.
*/
static __latent_entropy void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
{
- struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);
-
- __run_timers(base);
+ run_timer_base(BASE_LOCAL);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON)) {
- __run_timers(this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL]));
- __run_timers(this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_DEF]));
+ run_timer_base(BASE_GLOBAL);
+ run_timer_base(BASE_DEF);
}
}

--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 16:20:43

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

Placing timers at enqueue time on a target CPU based on dubious heuristics
does not make any sense:

1) Most timer wheel timers are canceled or rearmed before they expire.

2) The heuristics to predict which CPU will be busy when the timer expires
are wrong by definition.

So placing the timers at enqueue wastes precious cycles.

The proper solution to this problem is to always queue the timers on the
local CPU and allow the non pinned timers to be pulled onto a busy CPU at
expiry time.

Therefore split the timer storage into local pinned and global timers:
Local pinned timers are always expired on the CPU on which they have been
queued. Global timers can be expired on any CPU.

As long as a CPU is busy it expires both local and global timers. When a
CPU goes idle it arms for the first expiring local timer. If the first
expiring pinned (local) timer is before the first expiring movable timer,
then no action is required because the CPU will wake up before the first
movable timer expires. If the first expiring movable timer is before the
first expiring pinned (local) timer, then this timer is queued into a idle
timerqueue and eventually expired by some other active CPU.

To avoid global locking the timerqueues are implemented as a hierarchy. The
lowest level of the hierarchy holds the CPUs. The CPUs are associated to
groups of 8, which are seperated per node. If more than one CPU group
exist, then a second level in the hierarchy collects the groups. Depending
on the size of the system more than 2 levels are required. Each group has a
"migrator" which checks the timerqueue during the tick for remote expirable
timers.

If the last CPU in a group goes idle it reports the first expiring event in
the group up to the next group(s) in the hierarchy. If the last CPU goes
idle it arms its timer for the first system wide expiring timer to ensure
that no timer event is missed.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
---
v4:
- Fold typo fix in comment into proper patch "timer: Split out "get next
timer interrupt" functionality"
- Update wrong comment for tmigr_state union definition
- Fix fallout of kernel test robot
---
include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 +
kernel/time/Makefile | 3 +
kernel/time/timer.c | 58 +-
kernel/time/timer_migration.c | 1239 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/time/timer_migration.h | 123 ++++
5 files changed, 1420 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 kernel/time/timer_migration.c
create mode 100644 kernel/time/timer_migration.h

diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
index f61447913db9..95e89495251a 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state {
CPUHP_AP_PERF_POWERPC_HV_24x7_ONLINE,
CPUHP_AP_PERF_POWERPC_HV_GPCI_ONLINE,
CPUHP_AP_PERF_CSKY_ONLINE,
+ CPUHP_AP_TMIGR_ONLINE,
CPUHP_AP_WATCHDOG_ONLINE,
CPUHP_AP_WORKQUEUE_ONLINE,
CPUHP_AP_RANDOM_ONLINE,
diff --git a/kernel/time/Makefile b/kernel/time/Makefile
index 7e875e63ff3b..4af2a264a160 100644
--- a/kernel/time/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/time/Makefile
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ endif
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK) += sched_clock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT) += tick-oneshot.o tick-sched.o
obj-$(CONFIG_LEGACY_TIMER_TICK) += tick-legacy.o
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_SMP),y)
+ obj-$(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON) += timer_migration.o
+endif
obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_GENERIC_VDSO) += vsyscall.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) += timekeeping_debug.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_UDELAY) += test_udelay.o
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index f8b2065df79b..214397d84747 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
#include <asm/io.h>

#include "tick-internal.h"
+#include "timer_migration.h"

#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/timer.h>
@@ -592,10 +593,13 @@ trigger_dyntick_cpu(struct timer_base *base, struct timer_list *timer)

/*
* We might have to IPI the remote CPU if the base is idle and the
- * timer is not deferrable. If the other CPU is on the way to idle
- * then it can't set base->is_idle as we hold the base lock:
+ * timer is pinned. If it is a non pinned timer, it is only queued
+ * on the remote CPU, when timer was running during queueing. Then
+ * everything is handled by remote CPU anyway. If the other CPU is
+ * on the way to idle then it can't set base->is_idle as we hold
+ * the base lock:
*/
- if (base->is_idle)
+ if (base->is_idle && timer->flags & TIMER_PINNED)
wake_up_nohz_cpu(base->cpu);
}

@@ -1859,6 +1863,36 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
*/
is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);

+ if (is_idle) {
+ u64 next_tmigr;
+
+ next_tmigr = tmigr_cpu_deactivate(tevt->global);
+
+ tevt->global = KTIME_MAX;
+
+ /*
+ * If CPU is the last going idle in timer migration
+ * hierarchy, make sure CPU will wake up in time to handle
+ * remote timers. next_tmigr == KTIME_MAX if other CPUs are
+ * still active.
+ */
+ if (next_tmigr < tevt->local) {
+ u64 tmp;
+
+ /* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
+ if (next_tmigr < basem)
+ next_tmigr = basem;
+
+ tmp = div_u64(next_tmigr - basem, TICK_NSEC);
+
+ nextevt = basej + (unsigned long)tmp;
+ tevt->local = next_tmigr;
+ is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
+ } else {
+ nextevt = nextevt_local;
+ }
+ }
+
/* We need to mark both bases in sync */
base_local->is_idle = base_global->is_idle = is_idle;

@@ -1898,6 +1932,9 @@ void timer_clear_idle(void)
*/
__this_cpu_write(timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL].is_idle, false);
__this_cpu_write(timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL].is_idle, false);
+
+ /* Activate without holding the timer_base->lock */
+ tmigr_cpu_activate();
}
#endif

@@ -1954,6 +1991,15 @@ static void run_timer_base(int index)
__run_timer_base(base);
}

+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+void timer_expire_remote(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct timer_base *base = per_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL], cpu);
+
+ __run_timer_base(base);
+}
+#endif
+
/*
* This function runs timers and the timer-tq in bottom half context.
*/
@@ -1963,6 +2009,9 @@ static __latent_entropy void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON)) {
run_timer_base(BASE_GLOBAL);
run_timer_base(BASE_DEF);
+
+ if (is_timers_nohz_active())
+ tmigr_handle_remote();
}
}

@@ -1977,7 +2026,8 @@ static void run_local_timers(void)

for (int i = 0; i < NR_BASES; i++, base++) {
/* Raise the softirq only if required. */
- if (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) {
+ if (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->next_expiry) ||
+ (i == BASE_DEF && tmigr_requires_handle_remote())) {
raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
return;
}
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer_migration.c b/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..bb0eecae3390
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
@@ -0,0 +1,1239 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Infrastructure for migrateable timers
+ *
+ * Copyright(C) 2022 linutronix GmbH
+ */
+#include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/timerqueue.h>
+
+#include "timer_migration.h"
+#include "tick-internal.h"
+
+/*
+ * The timer migration mechanism is built on a hierarchy of groups. The
+ * lowest level group contains CPUs, the next level groups of CPU groups
+ * and so forth. The CPU groups are kept per node so for the normal case
+ * lock contention won't happen accross nodes. Depending on the number of
+ * CPUs per node even the next level might be kept as groups of CPU groups
+ * per node and only the levels above cross the node topology.
+ *
+ * Example topology for a two node system with 24 CPUs each.
+ *
+ * LVL 2 [GRP2:0]
+ * GRP1:0 = GRP1:M
+ *
+ * LVL 1 [GRP1:0] [GRP1:1]
+ * GRP0:0 - GRP0:2 GRP0:3 - GRP0:5
+ *
+ * LVL 0 [GRP0:0] [GRP0:1] [GRP0:2] [GRP0:3] [GRP0:4] [GRP0:5]
+ * CPUS 0-7 8-15 16-23 24-31 32-39 40-47
+ *
+ * The groups hold a timer queue of events sorted by expiry time. These
+ * queues are updated when CPUs go in idle. When they come out of idle
+ * ignore bit of events is set.
+ *
+ * Each group has a designated migrator CPU/group as long as a CPU/group is
+ * active in the group. This designated role is necessary to avoid that all
+ * active CPUs in a group try to migrate expired timers from other cpus,
+ * which would result in massive lock bouncing.
+ *
+ * When a CPU is awake, it checks in it's own timer tick the group
+ * hierarchy up to the point where it is assigned the migrator role or if
+ * no CPU is active, it also checks the groups where no migrator is set
+ * (TMIGR_NONE).
+ *
+ * If it finds expired timers in one of the group queues it pulls them over
+ * from the idle CPU and runs the timer function. After that it updates the
+ * group and the parent groups if required.
+ *
+ * CPUs which go idle arm their CPU local timer hardware for the next local
+ * (pinned) timer event. If the next migrateable timer expires after the
+ * next local timer or the CPU has no migrateable timer pending then the
+ * CPU does not queue an event in the LVL0 group. If the next migrateable
+ * timer expires before the next local timer then the CPU queues that timer
+ * in the LVL0 group. In both cases the CPU marks itself idle in the LVL0
+ * group.
+ *
+ * If the CPU is the migrator of the group then it delegates that role to
+ * the next active CPU in the group or sets migrator to TMIGR_NONE when
+ * there is no active CPU in the group. This delegation needs to be
+ * propagated up the hierarchy so hand over from other leaves can happen at
+ * all hierarchy levels w/o doing a search.
+ *
+ * When the last CPU in the system goes idle, then it drops all migrator
+ * duties up to the top level of the hierarchy (LVL2 in the example). It
+ * then has to make sure, that it arms it's own local hardware timer for
+ * the earliest event in the system.
+ *
+ * Lifetime rules:
+ *
+ * The groups are built up at init time or when CPUs come online. They are
+ * not destroyed when a group becomes empty due to offlining. The group
+ * just won't participate in the hierachary management anymore. Destroying
+ * groups would result in interesting race conditions which would just make
+ * the whole mechanism slow and complex.
+ *
+ * Locking rules:
+ *
+ * For setting up new groups and handling events it's required to lock both
+ * child and parent group. The lock odering is always bottom up. This also
+ * includes the per CPU locks in struct tmigr_cpu. For updating migrator
+ * and active CPU/group information atomic_cmpxchg() is used instead and
+ * only per CPU tmigr_cpu->lock is held.
+ *
+ * During setup of groups tmigr_level_list is required. It is protected by
+ * tmigr_mutex.
+ */
+
+#ifdef DEBUG
+# define DBG_BUG_ON(x) BUG_ON(x)
+#else
+# define DBG_BUG_ON(x)
+#endif
+
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(tmigr_mutex);
+static struct list_head *tmigr_level_list __read_mostly;
+
+static unsigned int tmigr_cores_per_group __read_mostly;
+static unsigned int tmigr_hierarchy_levels __read_mostly;
+static unsigned int tmigr_crossnode_level __read_mostly;
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tmigr_cpu, tmigr_cpu);
+
+#define TMIGR_NONE 0xFF
+#define BIT_CNT 8
+
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(tmigr_enabled);
+
+static inline bool is_tmigr_enabled(void)
+{
+ return static_branch_unlikely(&tmigr_enabled);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Returns true, when @childmask corresponds to group migrator or when group
+ * is not active - so no migrator is set.
+ */
+static bool tmigr_check_migrator(struct tmigr_group *group, u32 childmask)
+{
+ union tmigr_state s;
+
+ s.state = atomic_read(group->migr_state);
+
+ if ((s.migrator != (u8)childmask) && (s.migrator != TMIGR_NONE))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+typedef bool (*up_f)(struct tmigr_group *, struct tmigr_group *, void *);
+
+static void __walk_groups(up_f up, void *data,
+ struct tmigr_cpu *tmc)
+{
+ struct tmigr_group *child = NULL, *group = tmc->tmgroup;
+
+ do {
+ DBG_BUG_ON(group->level >= tmigr_hierarchy_levels);
+
+ if (up(group, child, data))
+ break;
+
+ child = group;
+ group = group->parent;
+ } while (group);
+}
+
+static void walk_groups(up_f up, void *data, struct tmigr_cpu *tmc)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&tmc->lock);
+
+ __walk_groups(up, data, tmc);
+}
+
+/**
+ * struct tmigr_walk - data required for walking the hierarchy
+ * @evt: Pointer to tmigr_event which needs to be queued (of idle
+ * child group)
+ * @childmask: childmask of child group
+ * @nextexp: Next CPU event expiry information which is handed
+ * into tmigr code by timer code
+ * (forward_and_idle_timer_bases()); it is furthermore
+ * used for next event which is queued if timer
+ * migration hierarchy is completely idle
+ * @childstate: tmigr_group->migr_state of child - will be only reread
+ * when cmpxchg in group fails (is required for deactive
+ * path and new timer path)
+ * @groupstate: tmigr_group->migr_state of group - will be only reread
+ * when cmpxchg in group fails (is required for active,
+ * deactive and new timer path)
+ */
+struct tmigr_walk {
+ struct tmigr_event *evt;
+ u32 childmask;
+ u64 nextexp;
+ union tmigr_state childstate;
+ union tmigr_state groupstate;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct tmigr_remote_data - data required for (check) remote expiry
+ * hierarchy walk
+ * @basej: timer base in jiffies
+ * @now: timer base monotonic
+ * @childmask: childmask of child group
+ * @check: is set to 1 if there is the need to handle remote timers;
+ * required in tmigr_check_handle_remote() only
+ * @wakeup: returns expiry of first timer in idle timer migration hierarchy
+ * to make sure timer is handled in time; it is stored in per CPU
+ * tmigr_cpu struct of CPU which expires remote timers
+ */
+struct tmigr_remote_data {
+ unsigned long basej;
+ u64 now;
+ u32 childmask;
+ int check;
+ u64 wakeup;
+};
+
+/*
+ * Returns next event of timerqueue @group->events
+ *
+ * Removes timers with ignore bits and update next_expiry and event cpu
+ * value in group. Expiry value of group event is updated in
+ * tmigr_update_events() only.
+ */
+static struct tmigr_event *tmigr_next_groupevt(struct tmigr_group *group)
+{
+ struct timerqueue_node *node = NULL;
+ struct tmigr_event *evt = NULL;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&group->lock);
+
+ group->next_expiry = KTIME_MAX;
+
+ while ((node = timerqueue_getnext(&group->events))) {
+ evt = container_of(node, struct tmigr_event, nextevt);
+
+ if (!test_bit(0, &evt->ignore)) {
+ group->next_expiry = evt->nextevt.expires;
+ return evt;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Remove next timers with ignore bits, because group lock
+ * is held anyway
+ */
+ if (!timerqueue_del(&group->events, node))
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Return next event which is already expired of group timerqueue
+ *
+ * Event is also removed from queue.
+ */
+static struct tmigr_event *tmigr_next_expired_groupevt(struct tmigr_group *group,
+ u64 now)
+{
+ struct tmigr_event *evt = tmigr_next_groupevt(group);
+
+ if (!evt || now < evt->nextevt.expires)
+ return NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * Event is already expired. Remove it. If it's not the last event,
+ * then update all group event related information.
+ */
+ if (timerqueue_del(&group->events, &evt->nextevt))
+ tmigr_next_groupevt(group);
+ else
+ group->next_expiry = KTIME_MAX;
+
+ return evt;
+}
+
+static u64 tmigr_next_groupevt_expires(struct tmigr_group *group)
+{
+ struct tmigr_event *evt;
+
+ evt = tmigr_next_groupevt(group);
+
+ if (!evt)
+ return KTIME_MAX;
+ else
+ return evt->nextevt.expires;
+}
+
+static bool tmigr_active_up(struct tmigr_group *group,
+ struct tmigr_group *child,
+ void *ptr)
+{
+ union tmigr_state curstate, newstate;
+ struct tmigr_walk *data = ptr;
+ bool walk_done;
+ u32 childmask;
+
+ childmask = data->childmask;
+ newstate = curstate = data->groupstate;
+
+retry:
+ walk_done = true;
+
+ if (newstate.migrator == TMIGR_NONE) {
+ newstate.migrator = (u8)childmask;
+
+ /* Changes need to be propagated */
+ walk_done = false;
+ }
+
+ newstate.active |= (u8)childmask;
+
+ newstate.seq++;
+
+ if (atomic_cmpxchg(group->migr_state, curstate.state, newstate.state) != curstate.state) {
+ newstate.state = curstate.state = atomic_read(group->migr_state);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+
+ if (group->parent && (walk_done == false)) {
+ data->groupstate.state = atomic_read(group->parent->migr_state);
+ data->childmask = group->childmask;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Group is active, event will be ignored - bit is updated without
+ * holding the lock. In case bit is set while another CPU already
+ * handles remote events, nothing happens, because it is clear that
+ * CPU became active just in this moment, or in worst case event is
+ * handled remote. Nothing to worry about.
+ */
+ set_bit(0, &group->groupevt.ignore);
+
+ return walk_done;
+}
+
+static void __tmigr_cpu_activate(struct tmigr_cpu *tmc)
+{
+ struct tmigr_walk data;
+ data.childmask = tmc->childmask;
+ data.groupstate.state = atomic_read(tmc->tmgroup->migr_state);
+
+ set_bit(0, &tmc->cpuevt.ignore);
+
+ walk_groups(&tmigr_active_up, &data, tmc);
+}
+
+void tmigr_cpu_activate(void)
+{
+ struct tmigr_cpu *tmc = this_cpu_ptr(&tmigr_cpu);
+
+ if (!is_tmigr_enabled() || !tmc->tmgroup || !tmc->online || !tmc->idle)
+ return;
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&tmc->lock);
+ tmc->idle = 0;
+ tmc->wakeup = KTIME_MAX;
+ __tmigr_cpu_activate(tmc);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&tmc->lock);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Returns true, if there is nothing to be propagated to the next level
+ *
+ * @data->nextexp is reset to KTIME_MAX; it is reused for first global
+ * event which needs to be handled by migrator (in toplevel group)
+ *
+ * This is the only place where group event expiry value is set.
+ */
+static bool tmigr_update_events(struct tmigr_group *group,
+ struct tmigr_group *child,
+ struct tmigr_walk *data)
+{
+ struct tmigr_event *evt, *first_childevt;
+ bool walk_done;
+ u64 nextexp;
+
+ if (child) {
+ if (data->childstate.active)
+ return true;
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&child->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_nested(&group->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+
+ first_childevt = tmigr_next_groupevt(child);
+ nextexp = child->next_expiry;
+ evt = &child->groupevt;
+ } else {
+ nextexp = data->nextexp;
+
+ /*
+ * Set @data->nextexp to KTIME_MAX; it is reused for first
+ * global event which needs to be handled by migrator (in
+ * toplevel group)
+ */
+ data->nextexp = KTIME_MAX;
+
+ first_childevt = evt = data->evt;
+ if (test_bit(0, &evt->ignore))
+ return true;
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&group->lock);
+ }
+
+ if (nextexp == KTIME_MAX) {
+ set_bit(0, &evt->ignore);
+ walk_done = true;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ walk_done = !group->parent;
+
+ /*
+ * Update of event cpu and ignore bit is required only when @child
+ * is set (child is equal or higher than lvl0), but it doesn't
+ * matter if it is written once more to per cpu event; make the
+ * update unconditional.
+ */
+ evt->cpu = first_childevt->cpu;
+ clear_bit(0, &evt->ignore);
+
+ /*
+ * If child event is already queued in group, remove it from queue
+ * when expiry time changed only
+ */
+ if (timerqueue_node_queued(&evt->nextevt)) {
+ if (evt->nextevt.expires == nextexp)
+ goto check_toplvl;
+
+ if (evt->nextevt.expires != nextexp &&
+ !timerqueue_del(&group->events, &evt->nextevt))
+ group->next_expiry = KTIME_MAX;
+ }
+
+ evt->nextevt.expires = nextexp;
+
+ if (timerqueue_add(&group->events, &evt->nextevt))
+ group->next_expiry = nextexp;
+
+check_toplvl:
+ if (walk_done && (data->groupstate.migrator == TMIGR_NONE)) {
+ /*
+ * Toplevel group is idle and it has to be ensured global
+ * timers are handled in time. (This could be optimized by
+ * keeping track of the last global scheduled event and
+ * only arming it on CPU if the new event is earlier. Not
+ * sure if its worth the complexity.)
+ */
+ data->nextexp = tmigr_next_groupevt_expires(group);
+ }
+
+unlock:
+ raw_spin_unlock(&group->lock);
+
+ if (child)
+ raw_spin_unlock(&child->lock);
+
+ return walk_done;
+}
+
+static bool tmigr_new_timer_up(struct tmigr_group *group,
+ struct tmigr_group *child,
+ void *ptr)
+{
+ struct tmigr_walk *data = ptr;
+ bool walk_done;
+
+ walk_done = tmigr_update_events(group, child, data);
+
+ if (!walk_done) {
+ /* Update state information for next iteration */
+ data->childstate.state = atomic_read(group->migr_state);
+ if (group->parent)
+ data->groupstate.state = atomic_read(group->parent->migr_state);
+ }
+
+ return walk_done;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Returns expiry of next timer that needs to be handled. KTIME_MAX is
+ * returned, when an active CPU will handle all timer migration hierarchy
+ * timers.
+ */
+static u64 tmigr_new_timer(struct tmigr_cpu *tmc, u64 nextexp)
+{
+ struct tmigr_walk data = { .evt = &tmc->cpuevt,
+ .nextexp = nextexp };
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&tmc->lock);
+
+ if (tmc->remote)
+ return KTIME_MAX;
+
+ clear_bit(0, &tmc->cpuevt.ignore);
+
+ data.groupstate.state = atomic_read(tmc->tmgroup->migr_state);
+
+ walk_groups(&tmigr_new_timer_up, &data, tmc);
+
+ /* If there is a new first global event, make sure it is handled */
+ return data.nextexp;
+}
+
+static bool tmigr_inactive_up(struct tmigr_group *group,
+ struct tmigr_group *child,
+ void *ptr)
+{
+ union tmigr_state curstate, newstate;
+ struct tmigr_walk *data = ptr;
+ bool walk_done;
+ u32 childmask;
+
+ childmask = data->childmask;
+ newstate = curstate = data->groupstate;
+
+retry:
+ walk_done = true;
+
+ /* Reset active bit when child is no longer active */
+ if (!data->childstate.active)
+ newstate.active &= ~(u8)childmask;
+
+ if (newstate.migrator == (u8)childmask) {
+ /*
+ * Find a new migrator for the group, because child group
+ * is idle!
+ */
+ if (!data->childstate.active) {
+ unsigned long new_migr_bit, active = newstate.active;
+
+ new_migr_bit = find_first_bit(&active, BIT_CNT);
+
+ /* Changes need to be propagated */
+ walk_done = false;
+ data->childmask = group->childmask;
+
+ if (new_migr_bit != BIT_CNT)
+ newstate.migrator = BIT(new_migr_bit);
+ else
+ newstate.migrator = TMIGR_NONE;
+ }
+ }
+
+ newstate.seq++;
+
+ DBG_BUG_ON((newstate.migrator != TMIGR_NONE) && !(newstate.active));
+
+ if (atomic_cmpxchg(group->migr_state, curstate.state, newstate.state) != curstate.state) {
+ /*
+ * Something changed in child/parent group in the meantime,
+ * reread the state of child and parent; Update of
+ * data->childstate is required for event handling;
+ */
+ if (child)
+ data->childstate.state = atomic_read(child->migr_state);
+ newstate.state = curstate.state = atomic_read(group->migr_state);
+
+ goto retry;
+ }
+
+ data->groupstate = newstate;
+
+ /* Event Handling */
+ tmigr_update_events(group, child, data);
+
+ if (group->parent && (walk_done == false)) {
+ data->childstate = newstate;
+ data->groupstate.state = atomic_read(group->parent->migr_state);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * data->nextexp was set by tmigr_update_events() and contains the
+ * expiry of first global event which needs to be handled
+ */
+ if (data->nextexp != KTIME_MAX) {
+ DBG_BUG_ON(group->parent);
+ /*
+ * Toplevel path - If this cpu is about going offline wake
+ * up some random other cpu so it will take over the
+ * migrator duty and program its timer properly. Ideally
+ * wake the cpu with the closest expiry time, but that's
+ * overkill to figure out.
+ */
+ if (!(this_cpu_ptr(&tmigr_cpu)->online)) {
+ unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+ cpu = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, cpu);
+ smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return walk_done;
+}
+
+static u64 __tmigr_cpu_deactivate(struct tmigr_cpu *tmc, u64 nextexp)
+{
+ struct tmigr_walk data = { .childmask = tmc->childmask,
+ .evt = &tmc->cpuevt,
+ .nextexp = nextexp,
+ .childstate.state = 0 };
+
+ data.groupstate.state = atomic_read(tmc->tmgroup->migr_state);
+
+ /*
+ * If nextexp is KTIME_MAX, CPU event will be ignored because,
+ * local timer expires before global timer, no global timer is set
+ * or CPU goes offline.
+ */
+ if (nextexp != KTIME_MAX)
+ clear_bit(0, &tmc->cpuevt.ignore);
+
+ walk_groups(&tmigr_inactive_up, &data, tmc);
+ return data.nextexp;
+}
+
+/**
+ * tmigr_cpu_deactivate - Put current CPU into inactive state
+ * @nextexp: The next timer event expiry set in the current CPU
+ *
+ * Must be called with interrupts disabled.
+ *
+ * Return: next event of the current CPU or next event from the hierarchy
+ * if this CPU is the top level migrator or hierarchy is completely idle.
+ */
+u64 tmigr_cpu_deactivate(u64 nextexp)
+{
+ struct tmigr_cpu *tmc = this_cpu_ptr(&tmigr_cpu);
+ u64 ret = KTIME_MAX;
+
+ if (!is_tmigr_enabled() || !tmc->tmgroup || !tmc->online)
+ return ret;
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&tmc->lock);
+
+ /*
+ * CPU is already deactivated in timer migration
+ * hierarchy. tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() calls
+ * tick_nohz_next_event() and thereby timer idle path is
+ * executed once more. tmc->wakeup holds the first timer, when
+ * timer migration hierarchy is completely idle and remote
+ * expiry was done. If there is no new next expiry value
+ * handed in which should be inserted into the timer migration
+ * hierarchy, wakeup value is returned.
+ */
+ if (tmc->idle) {
+ ret = tmc->wakeup;
+
+ tmc->wakeup = KTIME_MAX;
+
+ if (nextexp != KTIME_MAX) {
+ if (nextexp != tmc->cpuevt.nextevt.expires ||
+ test_bit(0, &tmc->cpuevt.ignore))
+ ret = tmigr_new_timer(tmc, nextexp);
+ }
+
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * When tmigr_remote is active, set cpu inactive path and queuing of
+ * nextexp is done by handle remote path.
+ */
+ ret = __tmigr_cpu_deactivate(tmc, nextexp);
+
+ tmc->idle = 1;
+
+unlock:
+ raw_spin_unlock(&tmc->lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static u64 tmigr_handle_remote_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u64 now,
+ unsigned long jif)
+{
+ struct timer_events tevt;
+ struct tmigr_walk data;
+ struct tmigr_cpu *tmc;
+ u64 next = KTIME_MAX;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ tmc = per_cpu_ptr(&tmigr_cpu, cpu);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tmc->lock, flags);
+ /*
+ * Remote CPU is offline or no longer idle or other cpu handles cpu
+ * timers already or next event was already expired - return!
+ */
+ if (!tmc->online || tmc->remote || test_bit(0, &tmc->cpuevt.ignore) ||
+ now < tmc->cpuevt.nextevt.expires) {
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tmc->lock, flags);
+ return next;
+ }
+
+ tmc->remote = 1;
+
+ /* Drop the lock to allow the remote CPU to exit idle */
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tmc->lock, flags);
+
+ if (cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ timer_expire_remote(cpu);
+
+ /* next event of cpu */
+ get_next_timer_interrupt_remote(jif, now, &tevt, cpu);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tmc->lock, flags);
+ /*
+ * Nothing more to do when CPU came out of idle in the meantime - needs
+ * to be checked when holding the base lock to prevent race.
+ */
+ if (!tmc->idle)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ data.evt = &tmc->cpuevt;
+ data.nextexp = tevt.global;
+ data.groupstate.state = atomic_read(tmc->tmgroup->migr_state);
+ clear_bit(0, &tmc->cpuevt.ignore);
+
+ walk_groups(&tmigr_new_timer_up, &data, tmc);
+
+ next = data.nextexp;
+
+unlock:
+ tmc->remote = 0;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tmc->lock, flags);
+
+ return next;
+}
+
+static bool tmigr_handle_remote_up(struct tmigr_group *group,
+ struct tmigr_group *child,
+ void *ptr)
+{
+ struct tmigr_remote_data *data = ptr;
+ u64 now, next = KTIME_MAX;
+ unsigned long flags, jif;
+ struct tmigr_event *evt;
+ u32 childmask;
+
+ jif = data->basej;
+ now = data->now;
+
+ childmask = data->childmask;
+
+again:
+ /*
+ * Handle the group only if @childmask is the migrator or if the
+ * group has no migrator. Otherwise the group is active and is
+ * handled by its own migrator.
+ */
+ if (!tmigr_check_migrator(group, childmask))
+ return true;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&group->lock, flags);
+
+ evt = tmigr_next_expired_groupevt(group, now);
+
+ if (evt) {
+ unsigned int remote_cpu;
+
+ remote_cpu = READ_ONCE(evt->cpu);
+
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&group->lock, flags);
+
+ next = tmigr_handle_remote_cpu(remote_cpu, now, jif);
+
+ /* check if there is another event, that needs to be handled */
+ goto again;
+ } else {
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&group->lock, flags);
+ }
+
+ /* Update of childmask for next level */
+ data->childmask = group->childmask;
+ data->wakeup = next;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+/**
+ * tmigr_handle_remote - Handle migratable timers on remote idle CPUs
+ *
+ * Called from the timer soft interrupt with interrupts enabled.
+ */
+void tmigr_handle_remote(void)
+{
+ struct tmigr_cpu *tmc = this_cpu_ptr(&tmigr_cpu);
+ struct tmigr_remote_data data;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!is_tmigr_enabled() || !tmc->tmgroup || !tmc->online)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * NOTE: This is a doubled check because migrator test will be done
+ * in tmigr_handle_remote_up() anyway. Keep this check to fasten
+ * the return when nothing has to be done.
+ */
+ if (!tmigr_check_migrator(tmc->tmgroup, tmc->childmask))
+ return;
+
+ data.now = get_jiffies_update(&data.basej);
+ data.childmask = tmc->childmask;
+ data.wakeup = KTIME_MAX;
+
+ __walk_groups(&tmigr_handle_remote_up, &data, tmc);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tmc->lock, flags);
+ if (tmc->idle)
+ tmc->wakeup = data.wakeup;
+
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tmc->lock, flags);
+
+ return;
+}
+
+static bool tmigr_requires_handle_remote_up(struct tmigr_group *group,
+ struct tmigr_group *child,
+ void *ptr)
+{
+ struct tmigr_remote_data *data = ptr;
+ u32 childmask;
+
+ childmask = data->childmask;
+
+ /*
+ * Handle the group only if child is the migrator or if the group
+ * has no migrator. Otherwise the group is active and is handled by
+ * its own migrator.
+ */
+ if (!tmigr_check_migrator(group, childmask))
+ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * Racy lockless check for next_expiry
+ */
+ if (data->now >= group->next_expiry) {
+ data->check = 1;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ /* Update of childmask for next level */
+ data->childmask = group->childmask;
+ return false;
+}
+
+int tmigr_requires_handle_remote(void)
+{
+ struct tmigr_cpu *tmc = this_cpu_ptr(&tmigr_cpu);
+ struct tmigr_remote_data data;
+
+ if (!is_tmigr_enabled() || !tmc->tmgroup || !tmc->online)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!tmigr_check_migrator(tmc->tmgroup, tmc->childmask))
+ return 0;
+
+ data.now = get_jiffies_update(&data.basej);
+ data.childmask = tmc->childmask;
+
+ __walk_groups(&tmigr_requires_handle_remote_up, &data, tmc);
+
+ return data.check;
+}
+
+static void tmigr_init_group(struct tmigr_group *group, unsigned int lvl,
+ unsigned int node, atomic_t *migr_state)
+{
+ union tmigr_state s;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&group->lock);
+
+ group->level = lvl;
+ group->numa_node = lvl < tmigr_crossnode_level ? node : NUMA_NO_NODE;
+
+ group->num_childs = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * num_cores is required for level=0 groups only during setup and
+ * when siblings exists but it doesn't matter if this value is set
+ * in other groups as well
+ */
+ group->num_cores = 1;
+
+ s.migrator = TMIGR_NONE;
+ s.active = 0;
+ s.seq = 0;
+ atomic_set(migr_state, s.state);
+
+ group->migr_state = migr_state;
+
+ timerqueue_init_head(&group->events);
+ timerqueue_init(&group->groupevt.nextevt);
+ group->groupevt.nextevt.expires = KTIME_MAX;
+ group->next_expiry = KTIME_MAX;
+ set_bit(0, &group->groupevt.ignore);
+}
+
+static bool sibling_in_group(int newcpu, struct tmigr_group *group)
+{
+ int i, cpu;
+
+ /* Find a sibling of newcpu in group members */
+ for (i = 0; i < group->num_childs; i++) {
+ cpu = group->cpus[i];
+
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(newcpu, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)))
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+static struct tmigr_group *tmigr_get_group(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int node,
+ unsigned int lvl)
+{
+ struct tmigr_group *tmp, *group = NULL;
+ bool first_loop = true;
+ atomic_t *migr_state;
+
+reloop:
+ /* Try to attach to an exisiting group first */
+ list_for_each_entry(tmp, &tmigr_level_list[lvl], list) {
+ /*
+ * If @lvl is below the cross numa node level, check whether
+ * this group belongs to the same numa node.
+ */
+ if (lvl < tmigr_crossnode_level && tmp->numa_node != node)
+ continue;
+
+ /* Capacity left? */
+ if (tmp->num_childs >= TMIGR_CHILDS_PER_GROUP)
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * If this is the lowest level of the hierarchy, make sure
+ * that thread siblings share a group. It is only executed
+ * when siblings exist. ALL groups of lowest level needs to
+ * be checked for thread sibling, before thread cpu is
+ * added to a random group with capacity. When all groups
+ * are checked and no thread sibling was found, reloop of
+ * level zero groups is required to get a group with
+ * capacity.
+ */
+ if (!lvl && (tmigr_cores_per_group != TMIGR_CHILDS_PER_GROUP)) {
+ if (first_loop == true && !sibling_in_group(cpu, tmp)) {
+ continue;
+ } else if (first_loop == false) {
+ if (tmp->num_cores >= tmigr_cores_per_group)
+ continue;
+ else
+ tmp->num_cores++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ group = tmp;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (group) {
+ return group;
+ } else if (first_loop == true) {
+ first_loop = false;
+ goto reloop;
+ }
+
+ /* Allocate and set up a new group with corresponding migr_state */
+ group = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL, node);
+ if (!group)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ migr_state = kzalloc_node(sizeof(atomic_t), GFP_KERNEL, node);
+ if (!migr_state) {
+ kfree(group);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ }
+
+ tmigr_init_group(group, lvl, node, migr_state);
+ /* Setup successful. Add it to the hierarchy */
+ list_add(&group->list, &tmigr_level_list[lvl]);
+ return group;
+}
+
+static void tmigr_connect_child_parent(struct tmigr_group *child,
+ struct tmigr_group *parent)
+{
+ union tmigr_state childstate;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&child->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_nested(&parent->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+
+ child->parent = parent;
+ child->childmask = BIT(parent->num_childs++);
+
+ raw_spin_unlock(&parent->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&child->lock, flags);
+
+ /*
+ * To prevent inconsistent states, active childs needs to be active
+ * in new parent as well. Inactive childs are already marked
+ * inactive in parent group.
+ */
+ childstate.state = atomic_read(child->migr_state);
+ if (childstate.migrator != TMIGR_NONE) {
+ struct tmigr_walk data;
+
+ data.childmask = child->childmask;
+ data.groupstate.state = atomic_read(parent->migr_state);
+
+ /*
+ * There is only one new level per time. When connecting
+ * child and parent and set child active when parent is
+ * inactive, parent needs to be the upperst
+ * level. Otherwise there went something wrong!
+ */
+ WARN_ON(!tmigr_active_up(parent, child, &data) && parent->parent);
+ }
+}
+
+static int tmigr_setup_groups(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int node)
+{
+ struct tmigr_group *group, *child, **stack;
+ int top = 0, err = 0, i = 0;
+ struct list_head *lvllist;
+ size_t sz;
+
+ sz = sizeof(struct tmigr_group *) * tmigr_hierarchy_levels;
+ stack = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!stack)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ do {
+ group = tmigr_get_group(cpu, node, i);
+ if (IS_ERR(group)) {
+ err = IS_ERR(group);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ top = i;
+ stack[i++] = group;
+
+ /*
+ * When booting only less CPUs of a system than CPUs are
+ * available, not all calculated hierarchy levels are required.
+ *
+ * The loop is aborted as soon as the highest level, which might
+ * be different from tmigr_hierarchy_levels, contains only a
+ * single group.
+ */
+ if (group->parent || i == tmigr_hierarchy_levels ||
+ (list_empty(&tmigr_level_list[i]) &&
+ list_is_singular(&tmigr_level_list[i - 1])))
+ break;
+
+ } while (i < tmigr_hierarchy_levels);
+
+ do {
+ group = stack[--i];
+
+ if (err < 0) {
+ list_del(&group->list);
+ kfree(group);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ DBG_BUG_ON(i != group->level);
+
+ /*
+ * Update tmc -> group / child -> group connection
+ */
+ if (i == 0) {
+ struct tmigr_cpu *tmc = this_cpu_ptr(&tmigr_cpu);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&group->lock, flags);
+
+ tmc->tmgroup = group;
+ tmc->childmask = BIT(group->num_childs);
+
+ group->cpus[group->num_childs++] = cpu;
+
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&group->lock, flags);
+
+ /* There are no childs that needs to be connected */
+ continue;
+ } else {
+ child = stack[i - 1];
+ tmigr_connect_child_parent(child, group);
+ }
+
+ /* check if upperst level was newly created */
+ if (top != i)
+ continue;
+
+ DBG_BUG_ON(top == 0);
+
+ lvllist = &tmigr_level_list[top];
+ if (group->num_childs == 1 && list_is_singular(lvllist)) {
+ lvllist = &tmigr_level_list[top - 1];
+ list_for_each_entry(child, lvllist, list) {
+ if (child->parent)
+ continue;
+
+ tmigr_connect_child_parent(child, group);
+ }
+ }
+ } while (i > 0);
+
+ kfree(stack);
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int tmigr_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ unsigned int node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
+ int ret;
+ mutex_lock(&tmigr_mutex);
+ ret = tmigr_setup_groups(cpu, node);
+ mutex_unlock(&tmigr_mutex);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int tmigr_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct tmigr_cpu *tmc = this_cpu_ptr(&tmigr_cpu);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned int ret;
+
+ /* First online attempt? Initialize CPU data */
+ if (!tmc->tmgroup) {
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&tmc->lock);
+
+ ret = tmigr_add_cpu(cpu);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (tmc->childmask == 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ timerqueue_init(&tmc->cpuevt.nextevt);
+ tmc->cpuevt.nextevt.expires = KTIME_MAX;
+ set_bit(0, &tmc->cpuevt.ignore);
+ tmc->cpuevt.cpu = cpu;
+
+ tmc->remote = 0;
+ tmc->idle = 0;
+ tmc->wakeup = KTIME_MAX;
+ }
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tmc->lock, flags);
+ __tmigr_cpu_activate(tmc);
+ tmc->online = 1;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tmc->lock, flags);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int tmigr_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct tmigr_cpu *tmc = this_cpu_ptr(&tmigr_cpu);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&tmc->lock);
+ tmc->online = 0;
+ __tmigr_cpu_deactivate(tmc, KTIME_MAX);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&tmc->lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init tmigr_init(void)
+{
+ unsigned int cpulvl, nodelvl, cpus_per_node, i, ns;
+ unsigned int nnodes = num_possible_nodes();
+ unsigned int ncpus = num_possible_cpus();
+ int ret = -ENOMEM;
+ size_t sz;
+
+ /* Nothing to do if running on UP */
+ if (ncpus == 1)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Unfortunately there is no reliable way to determine the number of SMT
+ * siblings in a generic way. tmigr_init() is called after SMP bringup,
+ * so for the normal boot case it can be assumed that all siblings have
+ * been brought up and the number of siblings of the current cpu can be
+ * used. If someone booted with 'maxcpus=N/2' on the kernel command line
+ * and (at least x86) bring up the siblings later then the siblings will
+ * end up in different groups. Bad luck.
+ */
+ ns = cpumask_weight(topology_sibling_cpumask(raw_smp_processor_id()));
+ tmigr_cores_per_group = TMIGR_CHILDS_PER_GROUP;
+ if (ns >= 2 && ns < TMIGR_CHILDS_PER_GROUP)
+ tmigr_cores_per_group /= ns;
+
+ /*
+ * Calculate the required hierarchy levels. Unfortunately there is no
+ * reliable information available, unless all possible CPUs have been
+ * brought up and all numa nodes are populated.
+ *
+ * Estimate the number of levels with the number of possible nodes and
+ * the number of possible cpus. Assume CPUs are spread evenly accross
+ * nodes. We cannot rely on cpumask_of_node() because there only already
+ * online CPUs are considered.
+ */
+ cpus_per_node = DIV_ROUND_UP(ncpus, nnodes);
+
+ /* Calc the hierarchy levels required to hold the CPUs of a node */
+ cpulvl = DIV_ROUND_UP(order_base_2(cpus_per_node),
+ ilog2(TMIGR_CHILDS_PER_GROUP));
+
+ /* Calculate the extra levels to connect all nodes */
+ nodelvl = DIV_ROUND_UP(order_base_2(nnodes),
+ ilog2(TMIGR_CHILDS_PER_GROUP));
+
+ tmigr_hierarchy_levels = cpulvl + nodelvl;
+
+ /*
+ * If a numa node spawns more than one CPU level group then the next
+ * level(s) of the hierarchy contains groups which handle all CPU groups
+ * of the same numa node. The level above goes accross numa nodes. Store
+ * this information for the setup code to decide when node matching is
+ * not longer required.
+ */
+ tmigr_crossnode_level = cpulvl;
+
+ sz = sizeof(struct list_head) * tmigr_hierarchy_levels;
+ tmigr_level_list = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tmigr_level_list)
+ goto err;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < tmigr_hierarchy_levels; i++)
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmigr_level_list[i]);
+
+ pr_info("Timer migration: %d hierarchy levels; %d childs per group;"
+ " %d cores_per_group; %d crossnode level\n",
+ tmigr_hierarchy_levels, TMIGR_CHILDS_PER_GROUP,
+ tmigr_cores_per_group, tmigr_crossnode_level);
+
+ ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_TMIGR_ONLINE, "tmigr:online",
+ tmigr_cpu_online, tmigr_cpu_offline);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+
+ static_branch_enable(&tmigr_enabled);
+
+ return 0;
+
+err:
+ pr_err("Timer migration setup failed\n");
+ return ret;
+}
+late_initcall(tmigr_init);
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer_migration.h b/kernel/time/timer_migration.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ab2953c89ef2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/time/timer_migration.h
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+#ifndef _KERNEL_TIME_MIGRATION_H
+#define _KERNEL_TIME_MIGRATION_H
+
+/* Per group capacity. Must be a power of 2! */
+#define TMIGR_CHILDS_PER_GROUP 8
+
+/**
+ * struct tmigr_event - a timer event associated to a CPU
+ * @nextevt: The node to enqueue an event in the parent group queue
+ * @cpu: The CPU to which this event belongs
+ * @ignore: Hint whether the event could be ignored; it is set when
+ * CPU or group is active;
+ */
+struct tmigr_event {
+ struct timerqueue_node nextevt;
+ unsigned int cpu;
+ unsigned long ignore;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct tmigr_group - timer migration hierarchy group
+ * @lock: Lock protecting the event information
+ * @cpus: Array with CPUs which are member of group; required for
+ * sibling CPUs; used only when level == 0
+ * @parent: Pointer to parent group
+ * @list: List head that is added to per level tmigr_level_list
+ * @level: Hierarchy level of group
+ * @numa_node: Is set to numa node when level < tmigr_crossnode_level;
+ * otherwise it is set to NUMA_NO_NODE; Required for setup
+ * only
+ * @num_childs: Counter of group childs; Required for setup only
+ * @num_cores: Counter of cores per group; Required for setup only when
+ * level == 0 and siblings exist
+ * @migr_state: State of group (see struct tmigr_state)
+ * @childmask: childmask of group in parent group; is set during setup
+ * never changed; could be read lockless
+ * @events: Timer queue for child events queued in the group
+ * @groupevt: Next event of group; it is only reliable when group is
+ * !active (ignore bit is set when group is active)
+ * @next_expiry: Base monotonic expiry time of next event of group;
+ * Used for racy lockless check whether remote expiry is
+ * required; it is always reliable
+ */
+struct tmigr_group {
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
+ unsigned int cpus[TMIGR_CHILDS_PER_GROUP];
+ struct tmigr_group *parent;
+ struct list_head list;
+ unsigned int level;
+ unsigned int numa_node;
+ unsigned int num_childs;
+ unsigned int num_cores;
+ atomic_t *migr_state;
+ u32 childmask;
+ struct timerqueue_head events;
+ struct tmigr_event groupevt;
+ u64 next_expiry;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct tmigr_cpu - timer migration per CPU group
+ * @lock: Lock protecting tmigr_cpu group information
+ * @online: Indicates wheter CPU is online
+ * @idle: Indicates wheter CPU is idle in timer migration hierarchy
+ * @remote: Is set when timers of CPU are expired remote
+ * @tmgroup: Pointer to parent group
+ * @childmask: childmask of tmigr_cpu in parent group
+ * @cpuevt: CPU event which could be queued into parent group
+ * @wakeup: Stores the first timer when the timer migration hierarchy is
+ * completely idle and remote expiry was done; is returned to
+ * timer code when tmigr_cpu_deactive() is called and group is
+ * idle; afterwards a reset to KTIME_MAX is required;
+ */
+struct tmigr_cpu {
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
+ int online;
+ int idle;
+ int remote;
+ struct tmigr_group *tmgroup;
+ u32 childmask;
+ struct tmigr_event cpuevt;
+ u64 wakeup;
+};
+
+/**
+ * union tmigr_state - state of tmigr_group
+ * @state: Combined version of the state - only used for atomic
+ * read/cmpxchg function
+ * @struct: Splitted version of the state - only use the struct members to
+ * update information to stay independant of endianess
+ */
+union tmigr_state {
+ u32 state;
+ /**
+ * struct - splitted state of tmigr_group
+ * @active: Contains each childmask bit of active childs
+ * @migrator: Contains childmask of child which is migrator
+ * @seq: Seqence number to prevent race when update in child
+ * group are propagated in wrong order (especially when
+ * migrator changes are involved)
+ */
+ struct {
+ u8 active;
+ u8 migrator;
+ u16 seq;
+ } __packed;
+};
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON)
+extern void tmigr_handle_remote(void);
+extern int tmigr_requires_handle_remote(void);
+extern void tmigr_cpu_activate(void);
+extern u64 tmigr_cpu_deactivate(u64 nextevt);
+extern void timer_expire_remote(unsigned int cpu);
+#else
+static inline void tmigr_handle_remote(void) { }
+extern inline int tmigr_requires_handle_remote(void) { return 0; }
+static inline void tmigr_cpu_activate(void) { }
+static inline u64 tmigr_cpu_deactivate(u64 nextevt) { return KTIME_MAX; }
+extern inline void timer_expire_remote(unsigned int cpu) { }
+#endif
+
+#endif
--
2.30.2


2022-11-04 17:06:58

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/16] add_timer_on(): Make sure callers have TIMER_PINNED flag

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:26PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> The implementation of the hierachical timer pull model will change the
> timer bases per CPU. Timers, that have to expire on a specific CPU, require
> the TIMER_PINNED flag. Otherwise they will be queued on the dedicated CPU
> but in global timer base and those timers could also expire on other
> CPUs. Timers with TIMER_DEFERRABLE flag end up in a separate base anyway
> and are executed on the local CPU only.
>
> Therefore add the missing TIMER_PINNED flag for those callers who use
> add_timer_on() without the flag. No functional change.

You're fixing the current callers but what about the future ones?

add_timer_on() should always guarantee that a timer runs on the
right destination, which is not the case after your patchset if the
timer hasn't been set to TIMER_PINNED.

Therefore I think we should either have:

* add_timer_on() enforce TIMER_PINNED (doesn't work because if the timer is
later called with mod_timer(), we should expect it to run anywhere)

or

* add_timer_on() warns if !TIMER_PINNED

or

* have an internal flag TIMER_LOCAL, that is turned on when
add_timer_on() is called or add_timer()/mod_timer() is called
on a TIMER_PINNED. Otherwise it is turned off.

The last solution should work with existing API and you don't need to
chase the current and future users of add_timer_on().

Thanks.

2022-11-07 08:16:00

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/16] add_timer_on(): Make sure callers have TIMER_PINNED flag

On Fri, 4 Nov 2022, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:26PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > The implementation of the hierachical timer pull model will change the
> > timer bases per CPU. Timers, that have to expire on a specific CPU, require
> > the TIMER_PINNED flag. Otherwise they will be queued on the dedicated CPU
> > but in global timer base and those timers could also expire on other
> > CPUs. Timers with TIMER_DEFERRABLE flag end up in a separate base anyway
> > and are executed on the local CPU only.
> >
> > Therefore add the missing TIMER_PINNED flag for those callers who use
> > add_timer_on() without the flag. No functional change.
>
> You're fixing the current callers but what about the future ones?
>
> add_timer_on() should always guarantee that a timer runs on the
> right destination, which is not the case after your patchset if the
> timer hasn't been set to TIMER_PINNED.
>
> Therefore I think we should either have:
>
> * add_timer_on() enforce TIMER_PINNED (doesn't work because if the timer is
> later called with mod_timer(), we should expect it to run anywhere)
>
> or
>
> * add_timer_on() warns if !TIMER_PINNED

This is already part of the last patch of the queue where also the
crystalball logic is removed. But the patch where I added the WARN_ONCE()
might be the wrong patch, it should be better part of the next patch where
the new timer bases are introduced.

> or
>
> * have an internal flag TIMER_LOCAL, that is turned on when
> add_timer_on() is called or add_timer()/mod_timer() is called
> on a TIMER_PINNED. Otherwise it is turned off.
>
> The last solution should work with existing API and you don't need to
> chase the current and future users of add_timer_on().

With the last approach it doesn't matter how the timer is setup. Everything
is done by timer code implicitly. When a future caller uses add_timer_on()
and wants to modfiy this "implicitly pinned timer", he will call
mod_timer() and the timer is no longer pinned (if it do not end up in the
same bucket it was before). For a user this does not seems to be very
obvious, or am I wrong?

But if the caller sets up the timer correctly we do not need this extra
timer flag. With the WARN_ONCE() in place, callers need to do the timer
setup properly and it is more clear to the caller what should be done.

BTW, the hunk in this patch for the workqueue is also not a final fix in my
opinion. I'm preparing a cleanup queue (it's part of the deferrable cleanup
queue), where I want to set the timer flags properly when
initializing/defining the workers. I should have added a comment here...

Thanks,

Anna-Maria


2022-11-07 10:23:39

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/16] add_timer_on(): Make sure callers have TIMER_PINNED flag

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 09:11:11AM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2022, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:26PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > > The implementation of the hierachical timer pull model will change the
> > > timer bases per CPU. Timers, that have to expire on a specific CPU, require
> > > the TIMER_PINNED flag. Otherwise they will be queued on the dedicated CPU
> > > but in global timer base and those timers could also expire on other
> > > CPUs. Timers with TIMER_DEFERRABLE flag end up in a separate base anyway
> > > and are executed on the local CPU only.
> > >
> > > Therefore add the missing TIMER_PINNED flag for those callers who use
> > > add_timer_on() without the flag. No functional change.
> >
> > You're fixing the current callers but what about the future ones?
> >
> > add_timer_on() should always guarantee that a timer runs on the
> > right destination, which is not the case after your patchset if the
> > timer hasn't been set to TIMER_PINNED.
> >
> > Therefore I think we should either have:
> >
> > * add_timer_on() enforce TIMER_PINNED (doesn't work because if the timer is
> > later called with mod_timer(), we should expect it to run anywhere)
> >
> > or
> >
> > * add_timer_on() warns if !TIMER_PINNED
>
> This is already part of the last patch of the queue where also the
> crystalball logic is removed. But the patch where I added the WARN_ONCE()
> might be the wrong patch, it should be better part of the next patch where
> the new timer bases are introduced.

Ok.

>
> > or
> >
> > * have an internal flag TIMER_LOCAL, that is turned on when
> > add_timer_on() is called or add_timer()/mod_timer() is called
> > on a TIMER_PINNED. Otherwise it is turned off.
> >
> > The last solution should work with existing API and you don't need to
> > chase the current and future users of add_timer_on().
>
> With the last approach it doesn't matter how the timer is setup. Everything
> is done by timer code implicitly. When a future caller uses add_timer_on()
> and wants to modfiy this "implicitly pinned timer", he will call
> mod_timer() and the timer is no longer pinned (if it do not end up in the
> same bucket it was before). For a user this does not seems to be very
> obvious, or am I wrong?

That's right indeed.

>
> But if the caller sets up the timer correctly we do not need this extra
> timer flag. With the WARN_ONCE() in place, callers need to do the timer
> setup properly and it is more clear to the caller what should be done.

Yeah that sounds better.

> BTW, the hunk in this patch for the workqueue is also not a final fix in my
> opinion. I'm preparing a cleanup queue (it's part of the deferrable cleanup
> queue), where I want to set the timer flags properly when
> initializing/defining the workers. I should have added a comment here...

Ok, if we have some pinned initializers such as DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK_PINNED()
and DECLARE_DEFERRABKE_WORK_PINNED() then I think that cleans the situation.

Sounds good, thanks!

>
> Thanks,
>
> Anna-Maria
>

2022-11-07 12:51:54

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] timer: Retrieve next expiry of pinned/non-pinned timers seperately

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:28PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> For the conversion of the NOHZ timer placement to a pull at expiry time
> model it's required to have seperate expiry times for the pinned and the
> non-pinned (movable) timers. Therefore struct timer_events is introduced.
>
> No functional change
>
> Originally-by: Richard Cochran (linutronix GmbH) <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>

2022-11-07 13:05:34

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/16] timer: Split out "get next timer interrupt" functionality

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> forward_and_idle_timer_bases() includes the functionality for getting the
> next timer interrupt. To reuse it, it is splitted into an separate function
> "get_next_timer_interrupt()".
>
> This is preparatory work for the conversion of the NOHZ timer
> placement to a pull at expiry time model. No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
> ---
> v4: Fix typo in comment
> ---
> kernel/time/timer.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
> index 680a0760e30d..853089febf83 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
> @@ -1704,6 +1704,46 @@ static unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
> return base->next_expiry;
> }
>
> +static unsigned long get_next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base_local,

So perhaps forward_and_idle_timer_interrupt() could stay as
"get_next_timer_interrupt()" and the new get_next_timer_interrupt() above could
become fetch_next_timer_interrupt().

Just an idea.

From a functional POV:

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>

Thanks.

2022-11-07 13:40:53

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/16] timer: Rename get_next_timer_interrupt()

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:29PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> get_next_timer_interrupt() does more than simply getting the next timer
> interrupt. The timer bases are forwarded and also marked as idle when
> possible and the next timer interrupt information is required for this.

Right but the main role of that function is really to get the next timer
interrupt, the rest is rather about internal details of an API.

So I'm not sure about that change.

Thanks.

2022-11-07 22:29:29

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> @@ -1859,6 +1863,36 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
> */
> is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
>
> + if (is_idle) {
> + u64 next_tmigr;
> +
> + next_tmigr = tmigr_cpu_deactivate(tevt->global);
> +
> + tevt->global = KTIME_MAX;
> +
> + /*
> + * If CPU is the last going idle in timer migration
> + * hierarchy, make sure CPU will wake up in time to handle
> + * remote timers. next_tmigr == KTIME_MAX if other CPUs are
> + * still active.
> + */
> + if (next_tmigr < tevt->local) {
> + u64 tmp;
> +
> + /* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
> + if (next_tmigr < basem)
> + next_tmigr = basem;
> +
> + tmp = div_u64(next_tmigr - basem, TICK_NSEC);
> +
> + nextevt = basej + (unsigned long)tmp;
> + tevt->local = next_tmigr;
> + is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
> + } else {
> + nextevt = nextevt_local;

That else part look unecessary.

> + }
> + }
> +
> /* We need to mark both bases in sync */
> base_local->is_idle = base_global->is_idle = is_idle;

Do we still need to maintain base_global->is_idle ?

(I'm going to do daily reviews on this patch because it's quite dense :)

Thanks.

2022-11-08 05:05:46

by Pavan Kondeti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a pull at expiry model

Hi Anna-Maria,

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:21PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> Placing timers at enqueue time on a target CPU based on dubious heuristics
> does not make any sense:
>
> 1) Most timer wheel timers are canceled or rearmed before they expire.
>
> 2) The heuristics to predict which CPU will be busy when the timer expires
> are wrong by definition.
>
> So placing the timers at enqueue wastes precious cycles.
>
> The proper solution to this problem is to always queue the timers on the
> local CPU and allow the non pinned timers to be pulled onto a busy CPU at
> expiry time.
>
> Therefore split the timer storage into local pinned and global timers:
> Local pinned timers are always expired on the CPU on which they have been
> queued. Global timers can be expired on any CPU.
>
> As long as a CPU is busy it expires both local and global timers. When a
> CPU goes idle it arms for the first expiring local timer. If the first
> expiring pinned (local) timer is before the first expiring movable timer,
> then no action is required because the CPU will wake up before the first
> movable timer expires. If the first expiring movable timer is before the
> first expiring pinned (local) timer, then this timer is queued into a idle
> timerqueue and eventually expired by some other active CPU.
>
> To avoid global locking the timerqueues are implemented as a hierarchy. The
> lowest level of the hierarchy holds the CPUs. The CPUs are associated to
> groups of 8, which are seperated per node. If more than one CPU group
> exist, then a second level in the hierarchy collects the groups. Depending
> on the size of the system more than 2 levels are required. Each group has a
> "migrator" which checks the timerqueue during the tick for remote expirable
> timers.
>
> If the last CPU in a group goes idle it reports the first expiring event in
> the group up to the next group(s) in the hierarchy. If the last CPU goes
> idle it arms its timer for the first system wide expiring timer to ensure
> that no timer event is missed.
>
>
> Testing
> ~~~~~~~
>
> The impact of wasting cycles during enqueue by using the heuristic in
> contrast to always queueing the timer on the local CPU was measured with a
> micro benchmark. Therefore a timer is enqueued and dequeued in a loop with
> 1000 repetitions on a isolated CPU. The time the loop takes is measured. A
> quater of the remaining CPUs was kept busy. This measurement was repeated
> several times. With the patch queue the average duration was reduced by
> approximately 25%.
>
> 145ns plain v6
> 109ns v6 with patch queue
>
>
> Furthermore the impact of residence in deep idle states of an idle system
> was investigated. The patch queue doesn't downgrade this behavior.
>
>
> During testing on a mostly idle machine a ping pong game could be observed:
> a process_timeout timer is expired remotely on a non idle CPU. Then the CPU
> where the schedule_timeout() was executed to enqueue the timer comes out of
> idle and restarts the timer using schedule_timeout() and goes back to idle
> again. This is due to the fair scheduler which tries to keep the task on
> the CPU which it previously executed on.
>
>
> Next Steps
> ~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Simple deferrable timers are no longer required as they can be converted to
> global timers. If a CPU goes idle, a formerly deferrable timer will not
> prevent the CPU to sleep as long as possible. Only the last migrator CPU
> has to take care of them. Deferrable timers with timer pinned flags needs
> to be expired on the specified CPU but must not prevent CPU from going
> idle. They require their own timer base which is never taken into account
> when calculating the next expiry time. This conversation and required
> cleanup will be done in a follow up series.
>

Taking non-pinned deferrable timers case, they are queued on their own base
and its expiry is not taken into account while programming the next timer
event during idle.

Can you elaborate on "Simple deferrable timers are no longer required as they
can be converted to global timers" statement?

Though they can be on global base, we still need to find a way to distinguish
them aginst the normal global timers so that the last migrator can program
the next timer event without taking these deferrable timer expiry into
account? IOW, a deferrable timer should not bring a completely idle system out
of idle to serve the deferrable timer.

When the deferrable timers will be queued on global base, once a CPU comes out
of idle and serve the timers on global base, the deferrable timers also would
be served. This is a welcoming change. We would see a truly deferrable global
timer something we would be interested in. [1] has some background on this.

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/

Thanks,
Pavan

2022-11-08 10:55:46

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> @@ -1859,6 +1863,36 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
> */
> is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
>
> + if (is_idle) {
> + u64 next_tmigr;
> +
> + next_tmigr = tmigr_cpu_deactivate(tevt->global);
> +
> + tevt->global = KTIME_MAX;
> +
> + /*
> + * If CPU is the last going idle in timer migration
> + * hierarchy, make sure CPU will wake up in time to handle
> + * remote timers. next_tmigr == KTIME_MAX if other CPUs are
> + * still active.
> + */
> + if (next_tmigr < tevt->local) {
> + u64 tmp;
> +
> + /* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
> + if (next_tmigr < basem)
> + next_tmigr = basem;
> +
> + tmp = div_u64(next_tmigr - basem, TICK_NSEC);
> +
> + nextevt = basej + (unsigned long)tmp;
> + tevt->local = next_tmigr;
> + is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);

So after that, tevt->global shouldn't matter anymore for tick_nohz_next_event(),
right? If so then probably that line can go away (with a comment specifying why we can
ignore the global part)?:

tevt.local = min_t(u64, tevt.local, tevt.global);

Thanks.

2022-11-08 11:54:50

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> +static bool tmigr_inactive_up(struct tmigr_group *group,
> + struct tmigr_group *child,
> + void *ptr)
> +{
> + union tmigr_state curstate, newstate;
> + struct tmigr_walk *data = ptr;
> + bool walk_done;
> + u32 childmask;
> +
> + childmask = data->childmask;
> + newstate = curstate = data->groupstate;
> +
> +retry:
> + walk_done = true;
> +
> + /* Reset active bit when child is no longer active */
> + if (!data->childstate.active)
> + newstate.active &= ~(u8)childmask;
> +
> + if (newstate.migrator == (u8)childmask) {
> + /*
> + * Find a new migrator for the group, because child group
> + * is idle!
> + */
> + if (!data->childstate.active) {
> + unsigned long new_migr_bit, active = newstate.active;
> +
> + new_migr_bit = find_first_bit(&active, BIT_CNT);
> +
> + /* Changes need to be propagated */
> + walk_done = false;
> + data->childmask = group->childmask;
> +
> + if (new_migr_bit != BIT_CNT)
> + newstate.migrator = BIT(new_migr_bit);
> + else
> + newstate.migrator = TMIGR_NONE;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + newstate.seq++;
> +
> + DBG_BUG_ON((newstate.migrator != TMIGR_NONE) && !(newstate.active));
> +
> + if (atomic_cmpxchg(group->migr_state, curstate.state, newstate.state) != curstate.state) {
> + /*
> + * Something changed in child/parent group in the meantime,
> + * reread the state of child and parent; Update of
> + * data->childstate is required for event handling;
> + */
> + if (child)
> + data->childstate.state = atomic_read(child->migr_state);
> + newstate.state = curstate.state = atomic_read(group->migr_state);
> +
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> + data->groupstate = newstate;
> +
> + /* Event Handling */
> + tmigr_update_events(group, child, data);
> +
> + if (group->parent && (walk_done == false)) {

Nit: it would be slightly clearer if data->childmask were updated here.

> + data->childstate = newstate;
> + data->groupstate.state = atomic_read(group->parent->migr_state);

Thanks.

2022-11-08 15:41:59

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a pull at expiry model

On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Pavan Kondeti wrote:

> Hi Anna-Maria,
>
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:21PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > Next Steps
> > ~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Simple deferrable timers are no longer required as they can be converted to
> > global timers. If a CPU goes idle, a formerly deferrable timer will not
> > prevent the CPU to sleep as long as possible. Only the last migrator CPU
> > has to take care of them. Deferrable timers with timer pinned flags needs
> > to be expired on the specified CPU but must not prevent CPU from going
> > idle. They require their own timer base which is never taken into account
> > when calculating the next expiry time. This conversation and required
> > cleanup will be done in a follow up series.
> >
>
> Taking non-pinned deferrable timers case, they are queued on their own base
> and its expiry is not taken into account while programming the next timer
> event during idle.

If CPU is not the last CPU going idle, then yes.

> Can you elaborate on "Simple deferrable timers are no longer required as they
> can be converted to global timers" statement?

Global timers do not prevent CPU from going idle. Same thing that
deferrable timers does right now. Global timers are queued into the
hierarchy and migrator takes care of expiry when CPU goes idle. The main
change of behavoir with global timers compared to deferrable timers is,
that they will expire in time and not necessarily on the CPU they were
enqueued. Deferrable timers were expired, only when the CPU was awake and
always on the CPU they have been enqueued.

> Though they can be on global base, we still need to find a way to distinguish
> them aginst the normal global timers so that the last migrator can program
> the next timer event without taking these deferrable timer expiry into
> account? IOW, a deferrable timer should not bring a completely idle system out
> of idle to serve the deferrable timer.

This behavior will change a little. If the system is completely idle, the
last migrator CPU has to handle the first global timer even if it is a
formerly deferrable and non pinned timer.

> When the deferrable timers will be queued on global base, once a CPU comes out
> of idle and serve the timers on global base, the deferrable timers also would
> be served. This is a welcoming change. We would see a truly deferrable global
> timer something we would be interested in. [1] has some background on this.

Serving the deferrable timers once a CPU comes out of idle is already the
case even without the timer migration hierarchy. See upstream version of
run_local_timers().

> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/

As far as I understand the problem you are linking to correctly, you want
to have a real "unbound" solution for deferrable or delayed work. This is
what you get with the timer migration hierarchy and when enqueuing
deferrable timers into global timer base. Timers are executed on the
migrator CPU because this CPU is not idle - doesn't matter where they have
been queued before.

It might be possible, that a fomerly deferrable timer enforces the last CPU
going idle to come back out of idle. But the question is, how often does
this occur in contrast to a wakeup cause by a non deferrable timer? If you
have a look at the timers in kernel you have 64 deferrable timers (this
number also contain the deferrable and pinned timers). There are 7 timers
with only TIMER_PINNED flag and some additional using the add_timer_on() to
be enqueued on a dedicated CPU. But in total we have more than 1000
timers. Sure - in the end, numbers hardly depends on the selected kernel
config...

Side note: One big problem of deferrable timers disappear with this
approach. All deferrable timers _WILL_ expire. Even if CPU where they have
been enqueued does not come back out of idle. Only deferrable and pinned
timers will still have this problem.

Thanks,

Anna-Maria

2022-11-08 16:02:33

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/16] timer: Split out "get next timer interrupt" functionality

On Mon, 7 Nov 2022, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > forward_and_idle_timer_bases() includes the functionality for getting the
> > next timer interrupt. To reuse it, it is splitted into an separate function
> > "get_next_timer_interrupt()".
> >
> > This is preparatory work for the conversion of the NOHZ timer
> > placement to a pull at expiry time model. No functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > v4: Fix typo in comment
> > ---
> > kernel/time/timer.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
> > index 680a0760e30d..853089febf83 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/timer.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
> > @@ -1704,6 +1704,46 @@ static unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
> > return base->next_expiry;
> > }
> >
> > +static unsigned long get_next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base_local,
>
> So perhaps forward_and_idle_timer_interrupt() could stay as
> "get_next_timer_interrupt()" and the new get_next_timer_interrupt() above could
> become fetch_next_timer_interrupt().
>
> Just an idea.

Hmm... it's better than mine :) I know, forward_and_idle_timer_bases() is
not the best name.

Maybe, it is total irrelevant: Since local and global timer information is
required, the original get_next_timer_interrupt() does not return directly
the next timer interrupt. This was introduced already in patch "timer:
Retrieve next expiry of pinned/non-pinned timers seperately". So it's no
longer possible to write:

next_timer = get_next_timer_interrupt()

When having a function "get_something()" I would expect the information is
returned directly. Perhaps just a thing that I would expect... the new
get_next_timer_interrupt() returns directly the next timer interrupt.

Thanks,

Anna-Maria



2022-11-08 16:44:24

by Pavan Kondeti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a pull at expiry model

Hi Anna-Maria,

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:06:15PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
>
> > Hi Anna-Maria,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:21PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > > Next Steps
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > > Simple deferrable timers are no longer required as they can be converted to
> > > global timers. If a CPU goes idle, a formerly deferrable timer will not
> > > prevent the CPU to sleep as long as possible. Only the last migrator CPU
> > > has to take care of them. Deferrable timers with timer pinned flags needs
> > > to be expired on the specified CPU but must not prevent CPU from going
> > > idle. They require their own timer base which is never taken into account
> > > when calculating the next expiry time. This conversation and required
> > > cleanup will be done in a follow up series.
> > >
> >
> > Taking non-pinned deferrable timers case, they are queued on their own base
> > and its expiry is not taken into account while programming the next timer
> > event during idle.
>
> If CPU is not the last CPU going idle, then yes.

What is special with last CPU that is going idle? Sorry, it is not clear where
the deferrable timer expiry is taken into account while programming the next
wakeup event?

forward_and_idle_timer_bases()->tmigr_cpu_deactivate() is only taking global
timer expiry (deferrable timers are NOT queued on global base) and comparing
against the local base expiry. This makes me think that we are not taking
deferrable timers expiry into account, which is correct IMO.

>
> > Can you elaborate on "Simple deferrable timers are no longer required as they
> > can be converted to global timers" statement?
>
> Global timers do not prevent CPU from going idle. Same thing that
> deferrable timers does right now. Global timers are queued into the
> hierarchy and migrator takes care of expiry when CPU goes idle. The main
> change of behavoir with global timers compared to deferrable timers is,
> that they will expire in time and not necessarily on the CPU they were
> enqueued. Deferrable timers were expired, only when the CPU was awake and
> always on the CPU they have been enqueued.

Thanks. This is very clear. A deferrable timer (upstream or your patches)
only expire on busy and local CPU. A CPU will not come out of idle, just to
serve a deferrable timer.

>
> > Though they can be on global base, we still need to find a way to distinguish
> > them aginst the normal global timers so that the last migrator can program
> > the next timer event without taking these deferrable timer expiry into
> > account? IOW, a deferrable timer should not bring a completely idle system out
> > of idle to serve the deferrable timer.
>
> This behavior will change a little. If the system is completely idle, the
> last migrator CPU has to handle the first global timer even if it is a
> formerly deferrable and non pinned timer.
>
> > When the deferrable timers will be queued on global base, once a CPU comes out
> > of idle and serve the timers on global base, the deferrable timers also would
> > be served. This is a welcoming change. We would see a truly deferrable global
> > timer something we would be interested in. [1] has some background on this.
>
> Serving the deferrable timers once a CPU comes out of idle is already the
> case even without the timer migration hierarchy. See upstream version of
> run_local_timers().

However upstream version does not wake a CPU just to serve a deferrable timer.
But it seems if we consider a deferrable timer just as another global timer,
sure it will not prevent the local CPU going idle but there would be one CPU
(thus, the system) that pays the penalty.

>
> > [1]
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>
> As far as I understand the problem you are linking to correctly, you want
> to have a real "unbound" solution for deferrable or delayed work. This is
> what you get with the timer migration hierarchy and when enqueuing
> deferrable timers into global timer base. Timers are executed on the
> migrator CPU because this CPU is not idle - doesn't matter where they have
> been queued before.
>
> It might be possible, that a fomerly deferrable timer enforces the last CPU
> going idle to come back out of idle. But the question is, how often does
> this occur in contrast to a wakeup cause by a non deferrable timer? If you
> have a look at the timers in kernel you have 64 deferrable timers (this
> number also contain the deferrable and pinned timers). There are 7 timers
> with only TIMER_PINNED flag and some additional using the add_timer_on() to
> be enqueued on a dedicated CPU. But in total we have more than 1000
> timers. Sure - in the end, numbers hardly depends on the selected kernel
> config...

I will give an example here. Lets say we have 4 CPUs in a system. There is a
devfreq governor driver that configures a delayed work for every 20 msec.

#1 When the system is busy, this *deferrable* timer expires at the 20 msec
boundary. However, when the system is idle (i.e no use case is running but
system does not enter global suspend because of other reasons like display
ON etc), we don't expect this deferrable timer to expire at every 20 msec.

With your proposal, we endup seeing the system (last CPU that enters idle)
coming out of idle for every 20 msec which is not desirable.

#2 Today, deferrable is local to CPU. Irrespective of the activity on the
other CPUs, this deferrable timer does not expire as long as the local CPU
is idle for whatever reason. That is definitly not the devfreq governor
expectation. The intention is to save power when system is idle but serving
the purpose when it is relatively busy.

>
> Side note: One big problem of deferrable timers disappear with this
> approach. All deferrable timers _WILL_ expire. Even if CPU where they have
> been enqueued does not come back out of idle. Only deferrable and pinned
> timers will still have this problem.
>
Yes, this is a welcoming change. Solves the #2 problem as mentioned above.

Thanks,
Pavan

2022-11-08 17:17:10

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > @@ -1859,6 +1863,36 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
> > */
> > is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
> >
> > + if (is_idle) {
> > + u64 next_tmigr;
> > +
> > + next_tmigr = tmigr_cpu_deactivate(tevt->global);
> > +
> > + tevt->global = KTIME_MAX;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If CPU is the last going idle in timer migration
> > + * hierarchy, make sure CPU will wake up in time to handle
> > + * remote timers. next_tmigr == KTIME_MAX if other CPUs are
> > + * still active.
> > + */
> > + if (next_tmigr < tevt->local) {
> > + u64 tmp;
> > +
> > + /* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
> > + if (next_tmigr < basem)
> > + next_tmigr = basem;
> > +
> > + tmp = div_u64(next_tmigr - basem, TICK_NSEC);
> > +
> > + nextevt = basej + (unsigned long)tmp;
> > + tevt->local = next_tmigr;
> > + is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
>
> So after that, tevt->global shouldn't matter anymore for tick_nohz_next_event(),
> right? If so then probably that line can go away (with a comment specifying why we can
> ignore the global part)?:
>
> tevt.local = min_t(u64, tevt.local, tevt.global);
>

tevt->global is set to KTIME_MAX anyway. So the whole tevt information is
also no longer required in tick_nohz_next_event(). I need to rework the
patch where this was introduced. Then the forward_and_idle_timer_bases()
could still simply return the next timer and then there is no longer a
point against using your idea with naming of the functions.

2022-11-08 17:18:15

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Mon, 7 Nov 2022, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > @@ -1859,6 +1863,36 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
> > */
> > is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
> >
> > + if (is_idle) {
> > + u64 next_tmigr;
> > +
> > + next_tmigr = tmigr_cpu_deactivate(tevt->global);
> > +
> > + tevt->global = KTIME_MAX;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If CPU is the last going idle in timer migration
> > + * hierarchy, make sure CPU will wake up in time to handle
> > + * remote timers. next_tmigr == KTIME_MAX if other CPUs are
> > + * still active.
> > + */
> > + if (next_tmigr < tevt->local) {
> > + u64 tmp;
> > +
> > + /* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
> > + if (next_tmigr < basem)
> > + next_tmigr = basem;
> > +
> > + tmp = div_u64(next_tmigr - basem, TICK_NSEC);
> > +
> > + nextevt = basej + (unsigned long)tmp;
> > + tevt->local = next_tmigr;
> > + is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
> > + } else {
> > + nextevt = nextevt_local;
>
> That else part look unecessary.

Yes, you are right. I will add a comment instead. Maybe someone wants to
improve it and then requires the proper nextevt...

> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > /* We need to mark both bases in sync */
> > base_local->is_idle = base_global->is_idle = is_idle;
>
> Do we still need to maintain base_global->is_idle ?

is_idle information is required in trigger_dyntick_cpu(). I made a mistake
with the hunk in trigger_dyntick_cpu() introduced in this patch. Because
after this patch, global timers are still enqueued on any CPU because
crystallball still exists. trigger_dyntick_cpu() is also required for non
pinned timers. I need to move the hunk of trigger_dyntick_cpu() into the
last patch of the queue where crystallball is removed during enqueue and
there update also this line. Then I will drop the update of
base_global->is_idle in timer_clear_idle() as well.

Sorry. This went wrong during splitting and folding the queue back and
forwards...

> (I'm going to do daily reviews on this patch because it's quite dense :)

Thanks! I try to answer your questions fast. Let me know when you are done
or when you need an updated version for further review :)

Thanks,

Anna-Maria


2022-11-08 17:58:45

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a pull at expiry model

On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Pavan Kondeti wrote:

> Hi Anna-Maria,
>
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:06:15PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Anna-Maria,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:21PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > > > Next Steps
> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >
> > > > Simple deferrable timers are no longer required as they can be converted to
> > > > global timers. If a CPU goes idle, a formerly deferrable timer will not
> > > > prevent the CPU to sleep as long as possible. Only the last migrator CPU
> > > > has to take care of them. Deferrable timers with timer pinned flags needs
> > > > to be expired on the specified CPU but must not prevent CPU from going
> > > > idle. They require their own timer base which is never taken into account
> > > > when calculating the next expiry time. This conversation and required
> > > > cleanup will be done in a follow up series.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Taking non-pinned deferrable timers case, they are queued on their own base
> > > and its expiry is not taken into account while programming the next timer
> > > event during idle.
> >
> > If CPU is not the last CPU going idle, then yes.
>
> What is special with last CPU that is going idle? Sorry, it is not clear where
> the deferrable timer expiry is taken into account while programming the next
> wakeup event?

The last CPU has to make sure the global timers are handled. At the moment
the deferrable timer expiry is not taken into account for next wakeup.

> forward_and_idle_timer_bases()->tmigr_cpu_deactivate() is only taking global
> timer expiry (deferrable timers are NOT queued on global base) and comparing
> against the local base expiry. This makes me think that we are not taking
> deferrable timers expiry into account, which is correct IMO.

The information "deferrable timers [...] can be converted to global timers"
is below the heading "Next Steps". It is _NOT_ part of this series, it will
be part of a follow up patch series.

The posted series only introduces the timer migration hierarchy and then
removes the heuristic on which CPU a timer will be enqueued. The only
change for deferrable timers after this series is: They are always enqueued
on the local CPU. The rest stays the same.

[...]

> > > When the deferrable timers will be queued on global base, once a CPU comes out
> > > of idle and serve the timers on global base, the deferrable timers also would
> > > be served. This is a welcoming change. We would see a truly deferrable global
> > > timer something we would be interested in. [1] has some background on this.
> >
> > Serving the deferrable timers once a CPU comes out of idle is already the
> > case even without the timer migration hierarchy. See upstream version of
> > run_local_timers().
>
> However upstream version does not wake a CPU just to serve a deferrable timer.
> But it seems if we consider a deferrable timer just as another global timer,
> sure it will not prevent the local CPU going idle but there would be one CPU
> (thus, the system) that pays the penalty.
>

Right.

> > > [1]
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> >
> > As far as I understand the problem you are linking to correctly, you want
> > to have a real "unbound" solution for deferrable or delayed work. This is
> > what you get with the timer migration hierarchy and when enqueuing
> > deferrable timers into global timer base. Timers are executed on the
> > migrator CPU because this CPU is not idle - doesn't matter where they have
> > been queued before.
> >
> > It might be possible, that a fomerly deferrable timer enforces the last CPU
> > going idle to come back out of idle. But the question is, how often does
> > this occur in contrast to a wakeup cause by a non deferrable timer? If you
> > have a look at the timers in kernel you have 64 deferrable timers (this
> > number also contain the deferrable and pinned timers). There are 7 timers
> > with only TIMER_PINNED flag and some additional using the add_timer_on() to
> > be enqueued on a dedicated CPU. But in total we have more than 1000
> > timers. Sure - in the end, numbers hardly depends on the selected kernel
> > config...
>
> I will give an example here. Lets say we have 4 CPUs in a system. There is a
> devfreq governor driver that configures a delayed work for every 20 msec.

s/delayed work/deferrable work ?

> #1 When the system is busy, this *deferrable* timer expires at the 20 msec
> boundary. However, when the system is idle (i.e no use case is running but
> system does not enter global suspend because of other reasons like display
> ON etc), we don't expect this deferrable timer to expire at every 20 msec.
>
> With your proposal, we endup seeing the system (last CPU that enters idle)
> coming out of idle for every 20 msec which is not desirable.

With my proposal for next steps only timers with pinned and deferrable flag
set would keep the old behavior.

> #2 Today, deferrable is local to CPU. Irrespective of the activity on the
> other CPUs, this deferrable timer does not expire as long as the local CPU
> is idle for whatever reason. That is definitly not the devfreq governor
> expectation. The intention is to save power when system is idle but serving
> the purpose when it is relatively busy.
>
> >
> > Side note: One big problem of deferrable timers disappear with this
> > approach. All deferrable timers _WILL_ expire. Even if CPU where they have
> > been enqueued does not come back out of idle. Only deferrable and pinned
> > timers will still have this problem.
> >
> Yes, this is a welcoming change. Solves the #2 problem as mentioned above.

But this welcoming change is only accessible when enqueuing deferrable
timers into global base. But be aware, the problem sill exists for pinned
deferrable timers.

Thanks,

Anna-Maria


2022-11-08 19:19:17

by Pavan Kondeti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a pull at expiry model

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 06:39:22PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
>
> > Hi Anna-Maria,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:06:15PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Anna-Maria,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:21PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > > > > Next Steps
> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > >
> > > > > Simple deferrable timers are no longer required as they can be converted to
> > > > > global timers. If a CPU goes idle, a formerly deferrable timer will not
> > > > > prevent the CPU to sleep as long as possible. Only the last migrator CPU
> > > > > has to take care of them. Deferrable timers with timer pinned flags needs
> > > > > to be expired on the specified CPU but must not prevent CPU from going
> > > > > idle. They require their own timer base which is never taken into account
> > > > > when calculating the next expiry time. This conversation and required
> > > > > cleanup will be done in a follow up series.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Taking non-pinned deferrable timers case, they are queued on their own base
> > > > and its expiry is not taken into account while programming the next timer
> > > > event during idle.
> > >
> > > If CPU is not the last CPU going idle, then yes.
> >
> > What is special with last CPU that is going idle? Sorry, it is not clear where
> > the deferrable timer expiry is taken into account while programming the next
> > wakeup event?
>
> The last CPU has to make sure the global timers are handled. At the moment
> the deferrable timer expiry is not taken into account for next wakeup.
>

Right. Nothing changes wrt deferrable timers with this series.

> > forward_and_idle_timer_bases()->tmigr_cpu_deactivate() is only taking global
> > timer expiry (deferrable timers are NOT queued on global base) and comparing
> > against the local base expiry. This makes me think that we are not taking
> > deferrable timers expiry into account, which is correct IMO.
>
> The information "deferrable timers [...] can be converted to global timers"
> is below the heading "Next Steps". It is _NOT_ part of this series, it will
> be part of a follow up patch series.
>
> The posted series only introduces the timer migration hierarchy and then
> removes the heuristic on which CPU a timer will be enqueued. The only
> change for deferrable timers after this series is: They are always enqueued
> on the local CPU. The rest stays the same.
>

Understood.

>
> > > > When the deferrable timers will be queued on global base, once a CPU comes out
> > > > of idle and serve the timers on global base, the deferrable timers also would
> > > > be served. This is a welcoming change. We would see a truly deferrable global
> > > > timer something we would be interested in. [1] has some background on this.
> > >
> > > Serving the deferrable timers once a CPU comes out of idle is already the
> > > case even without the timer migration hierarchy. See upstream version of
> > > run_local_timers().
> >
> > However upstream version does not wake a CPU just to serve a deferrable timer.
> > But it seems if we consider a deferrable timer just as another global timer,
> > sure it will not prevent the local CPU going idle but there would be one CPU
> > (thus, the system) that pays the penalty.
> >
>
> Right.
>
> > > > [1]
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> > >
> > > As far as I understand the problem you are linking to correctly, you want
> > > to have a real "unbound" solution for deferrable or delayed work. This is
> > > what you get with the timer migration hierarchy and when enqueuing
> > > deferrable timers into global timer base. Timers are executed on the
> > > migrator CPU because this CPU is not idle - doesn't matter where they have
> > > been queued before.
> > >
> > > It might be possible, that a fomerly deferrable timer enforces the last CPU
> > > going idle to come back out of idle. But the question is, how often does
> > > this occur in contrast to a wakeup cause by a non deferrable timer? If you
> > > have a look at the timers in kernel you have 64 deferrable timers (this
> > > number also contain the deferrable and pinned timers). There are 7 timers
> > > with only TIMER_PINNED flag and some additional using the add_timer_on() to
> > > be enqueued on a dedicated CPU. But in total we have more than 1000
> > > timers. Sure - in the end, numbers hardly depends on the selected kernel
> > > config...
> >
> > I will give an example here. Lets say we have 4 CPUs in a system. There is a
> > devfreq governor driver that configures a delayed work for every 20 msec.
>
> s/delayed work/deferrable work ?

yeah, deferrable work.

>
> > #1 When the system is busy, this *deferrable* timer expires at the 20 msec
> > boundary. However, when the system is idle (i.e no use case is running but
> > system does not enter global suspend because of other reasons like display
> > ON etc), we don't expect this deferrable timer to expire at every 20 msec.
> >
> > With your proposal, we endup seeing the system (last CPU that enters idle)
> > coming out of idle for every 20 msec which is not desirable.
>
> With my proposal for next steps only timers with pinned and deferrable flag
> set would keep the old behavior.

pinned timers/work are meant for collecting/doing per-CPU things. Those who
don't care about these like devfreq would generally want the scheduler to select
the best CPU for their work and probably don't use pinned timers.

>
> > #2 Today, deferrable is local to CPU. Irrespective of the activity on the
> > other CPUs, this deferrable timer does not expire as long as the local CPU
> > is idle for whatever reason. That is definitly not the devfreq governor
> > expectation. The intention is to save power when system is idle but serving
> > the purpose when it is relatively busy.
> >
> > >
> > > Side note: One big problem of deferrable timers disappear with this
> > > approach. All deferrable timers _WILL_ expire. Even if CPU where they have
> > > been enqueued does not come back out of idle. Only deferrable and pinned
> > > timers will still have this problem.
> > >
> > Yes, this is a welcoming change. Solves the #2 problem as mentioned above.
>
> But this welcoming change is only accessible when enqueuing deferrable
> timers into global base. But be aware, the problem sill exists for pinned
> deferrable timers.
>
Yes. I will look forward to your series that implements Next steps and we can
discuss more about this. Please do keep the usecase/example, I have mentioned
above. We really don't want folks to use pinned deferrable timers as a
workaround because now deferrable timers do wake up CPUs otherwise.

Thanks,
Pavan

2022-11-09 16:45:25

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
> index f8b2065df79b..214397d84747 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> #include <asm/io.h>
>
> #include "tick-internal.h"
> +#include "timer_migration.h"
>
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/events/timer.h>
> @@ -592,10 +593,13 @@ trigger_dyntick_cpu(struct timer_base *base, struct timer_list *timer)
>
> /*
> * We might have to IPI the remote CPU if the base is idle and the
> - * timer is not deferrable. If the other CPU is on the way to idle
> - * then it can't set base->is_idle as we hold the base lock:
> + * timer is pinned. If it is a non pinned timer, it is only queued
> + * on the remote CPU, when timer was running during queueing. Then
> + * everything is handled by remote CPU anyway.
> + * on the way to idle then it can't set base->is_idle as we hold
> + * the base lock:
> */
> - if (base->is_idle)
> + if (base->is_idle && timer->flags & TIMER_PINNED)
> wake_up_nohz_cpu(base->cpu);

I'm probably missing something but, shouldn't there be a call to
tmigr_new_timer() on the target to handle the new non-pinned timer?

Thanks.

2022-11-09 17:34:09

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 05:16:11PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2022, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > /* We need to mark both bases in sync */
> > > base_local->is_idle = base_global->is_idle = is_idle;
> >
> > Do we still need to maintain base_global->is_idle ?
>
> is_idle information is required in trigger_dyntick_cpu(). I made a mistake
> with the hunk in trigger_dyntick_cpu() introduced in this patch. Because
> after this patch, global timers are still enqueued on any CPU because
> crystallball still exists. trigger_dyntick_cpu() is also required for non
> pinned timers. I need to move the hunk of trigger_dyntick_cpu() into the
> last patch of the queue where crystallball is removed during enqueue and
> there update also this line. Then I will drop the update of
> base_global->is_idle in timer_clear_idle() as well.
>
> Sorry. This went wrong during splitting and folding the queue back and
> forwards...

Sure, no problem, just asked because I wanted to be sure I wasn't missing
something. I suggest waiting for broader testing after the current batch
lands upstream before removing the crystalball :-)

>
> > (I'm going to do daily reviews on this patch because it's quite dense :)
>
> Thanks! I try to answer your questions fast. Let me know when you are done
> or when you need an updated version for further review :)

You have at least one week ahead of you, the time for me to recollect my brain
throughout that patch. Indeed no need to repost now, I'll have some more questions
for sure.

I like the design, so I'm merely just chasing correctness issues and things that
might be made clearer.

I'm more afraid of what testing will tell wrt. performance and powersaving but,
fortunately, the world will scale much better than me to do this :)

Thanks!

>
> Thanks,
>
> Anna-Maria
>

2022-11-09 17:50:18

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 06:02:11PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > > @@ -1859,6 +1863,36 @@ void forward_and_idle_timer_bases(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
> > > */
> > > is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
> > >
> > > + if (is_idle) {
> > > + u64 next_tmigr;
> > > +
> > > + next_tmigr = tmigr_cpu_deactivate(tevt->global);
> > > +
> > > + tevt->global = KTIME_MAX;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * If CPU is the last going idle in timer migration
> > > + * hierarchy, make sure CPU will wake up in time to handle
> > > + * remote timers. next_tmigr == KTIME_MAX if other CPUs are
> > > + * still active.
> > > + */
> > > + if (next_tmigr < tevt->local) {
> > > + u64 tmp;
> > > +
> > > + /* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
> > > + if (next_tmigr < basem)
> > > + next_tmigr = basem;
> > > +
> > > + tmp = div_u64(next_tmigr - basem, TICK_NSEC);
> > > +
> > > + nextevt = basej + (unsigned long)tmp;
> > > + tevt->local = next_tmigr;
> > > + is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1);
> >
> > So after that, tevt->global shouldn't matter anymore for tick_nohz_next_event(),
> > right? If so then probably that line can go away (with a comment specifying why we can
> > ignore the global part)?:
> >
> > tevt.local = min_t(u64, tevt.local, tevt.global);
> >
>
> tevt->global is set to KTIME_MAX anyway. So the whole tevt information is
> also no longer required in tick_nohz_next_event(). I need to rework the
> patch where this was introduced. Then the forward_and_idle_timer_bases()
> could still simply return the next timer and then there is no longer a
> point against using your idea with naming of the functions.

You got it! ;-)

2022-11-10 06:52:25

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
> > index f8b2065df79b..214397d84747 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/timer.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
> > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> > #include <asm/io.h>
> >
> > #include "tick-internal.h"
> > +#include "timer_migration.h"
> >
> > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > #include <trace/events/timer.h>
> > @@ -592,10 +593,13 @@ trigger_dyntick_cpu(struct timer_base *base, struct timer_list *timer)
> >
> > /*
> > * We might have to IPI the remote CPU if the base is idle and the
> > - * timer is not deferrable. If the other CPU is on the way to idle
> > - * then it can't set base->is_idle as we hold the base lock:
> > + * timer is pinned. If it is a non pinned timer, it is only queued
> > + * on the remote CPU, when timer was running during queueing. Then
> > + * everything is handled by remote CPU anyway.
> > + * on the way to idle then it can't set base->is_idle as we hold
> > + * the base lock:
> > */
> > - if (base->is_idle)
> > + if (base->is_idle && timer->flags & TIMER_PINNED)
> > wake_up_nohz_cpu(base->cpu);
>
> I'm probably missing something but, shouldn't there be a call to
> tmigr_new_timer() on the target to handle the new non-pinned timer?
>

We need to keep the original way right now. This TIMER_PINNED condition is
valid only when enqueue on local CPU is in place.

2022-11-14 13:52:31

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> +/*
> + * Returns true, if there is nothing to be propagated to the next level
> + *
> + * @data->nextexp is reset to KTIME_MAX; it is reused for first global
> + * event which needs to be handled by migrator (in toplevel group)
> + *
> + * This is the only place where group event expiry value is set.
> + */
> +static bool tmigr_update_events(struct tmigr_group *group,
> + struct tmigr_group *child,
> + struct tmigr_walk *data)
> +{
> + struct tmigr_event *evt, *first_childevt;
> + bool walk_done;
> + u64 nextexp;
> +
> + if (child) {
> + if (data->childstate.active)
> + return true;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock(&child->lock);
> + raw_spin_lock_nested(&group->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> +
> + first_childevt = tmigr_next_groupevt(child);
> + nextexp = child->next_expiry;
> + evt = &child->groupevt;
> + } else {
> + nextexp = data->nextexp;
> +
> + /*
> + * Set @data->nextexp to KTIME_MAX; it is reused for first
> + * global event which needs to be handled by migrator (in
> + * toplevel group)
> + */
> + data->nextexp = KTIME_MAX;
> +
> + first_childevt = evt = data->evt;
> + if (test_bit(0, &evt->ignore))

The bit 0 set/clear/test on that ignore field looks a bit confusing.
Is there any reason why it can't be some plain int/boolean?

Thanks.

2022-11-15 11:38:29

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> +static bool tmigr_update_events(struct tmigr_group *group,
> + struct tmigr_group *child,
> + struct tmigr_walk *data)
> +{
> + struct tmigr_event *evt, *first_childevt;
> + bool walk_done;
> + u64 nextexp;
> +
> + if (child) {
> + if (data->childstate.active)
> + return true;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock(&child->lock);
> + raw_spin_lock_nested(&group->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> +
> + first_childevt = tmigr_next_groupevt(child);
> + nextexp = child->next_expiry;
> + evt = &child->groupevt;
> + } else {
> + nextexp = data->nextexp;
> +
> + /*
> + * Set @data->nextexp to KTIME_MAX; it is reused for first
> + * global event which needs to be handled by migrator (in
> + * toplevel group)
> + */
> + data->nextexp = KTIME_MAX;
> +
> + first_childevt = evt = data->evt;
> + if (test_bit(0, &evt->ignore))
> + return true;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock(&group->lock);
> + }
> +
> + if (nextexp == KTIME_MAX) {
> + set_bit(0, &evt->ignore);
> + walk_done = true;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> +
> + walk_done = !group->parent;
> +
> + /*
> + * Update of event cpu and ignore bit is required only when @child
> + * is set (child is equal or higher than lvl0), but it doesn't
> + * matter if it is written once more to per cpu event; make the
> + * update unconditional.
> + */
> + evt->cpu = first_childevt->cpu;
> + clear_bit(0, &evt->ignore);
> +
> + /*
> + * If child event is already queued in group, remove it from queue
> + * when expiry time changed only
> + */
> + if (timerqueue_node_queued(&evt->nextevt)) {
> + if (evt->nextevt.expires == nextexp)
> + goto check_toplvl;
> +
> + if (evt->nextevt.expires != nextexp &&

At this point evt->nextevt.expires != nextexp has to be true.

> + !timerqueue_del(&group->events, &evt->nextevt))
> + group->next_expiry = KTIME_MAX;
> + }
> +
> + evt->nextevt.expires = nextexp;
> +
> + if (timerqueue_add(&group->events, &evt->nextevt))
> + group->next_expiry = nextexp;
> +
> +check_toplvl:
> + if (walk_done && (data->groupstate.migrator == TMIGR_NONE)) {
> + /*
> + * Toplevel group is idle and it has to be ensured global
> + * timers are handled in time. (This could be optimized by
> + * keeping track of the last global scheduled event and
> + * only arming it on CPU if the new event is earlier. Not
> + * sure if its worth the complexity.)
> + */
> + data->nextexp = tmigr_next_groupevt_expires(group);
> + }
> +
> +unlock:
> + raw_spin_unlock(&group->lock);
> +
> + if (child)
> + raw_spin_unlock(&child->lock);
> +
> + return walk_done;
> +}
[...]
> +static int tmigr_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + struct tmigr_cpu *tmc = this_cpu_ptr(&tmigr_cpu);
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irq(&tmc->lock);
> + tmc->online = 0;
> + __tmigr_cpu_deactivate(tmc, KTIME_MAX);

This means that if the CPU is going idle for some time during
the hotplug process (ie: at some point between CPUHP_AP_TMIGR_ONLINE
and CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU), then a global timer may be delayed for that long.

I guess it shouldn't be too bad but worth mentioning...

Although if it happens to be a problem it could be solved with simply allowing
tmigr_cpu_deactivate() when !tmc->online.

Thanks.

2022-11-16 13:48:30

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> +static bool tmigr_handle_remote_up(struct tmigr_group *group,
> + struct tmigr_group *child,
> + void *ptr)
> +{
> + struct tmigr_remote_data *data = ptr;
> + u64 now, next = KTIME_MAX;
> + unsigned long flags, jif;
> + struct tmigr_event *evt;
> + u32 childmask;
> +
> + jif = data->basej;
> + now = data->now;
> +
> + childmask = data->childmask;
> +
> +again:
> + /*
> + * Handle the group only if @childmask is the migrator or if the
> + * group has no migrator. Otherwise the group is active and is
> + * handled by its own migrator.
> + */
> + if (!tmigr_check_migrator(group, childmask))
> + return true;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&group->lock, flags);
> +
> + evt = tmigr_next_expired_groupevt(group, now);
> +
> + if (evt) {
> + unsigned int remote_cpu;
> +
> + remote_cpu = READ_ONCE(evt->cpu);

Is that READ_ONCE() really necessary?

Thanks.

> +
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&group->lock, flags);
> +
> + next = tmigr_handle_remote_cpu(remote_cpu, now, jif);
> +
> + /* check if there is another event, that needs to be handled */
> + goto again;
> + } else {
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&group->lock, flags);
> + }
> +
> + /* Update of childmask for next level */
> + data->childmask = group->childmask;
> + data->wakeup = next;
> +
> + return false;
> +}

2022-11-24 08:08:16

by Anna-Maria Behnsen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Tue, 15 Nov 2022, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > +static int tmigr_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + struct tmigr_cpu *tmc = this_cpu_ptr(&tmigr_cpu);
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock_irq(&tmc->lock);
> > + tmc->online = 0;
> > + __tmigr_cpu_deactivate(tmc, KTIME_MAX);
>
> This means that if the CPU is going idle for some time during
> the hotplug process (ie: at some point between CPUHP_AP_TMIGR_ONLINE
> and CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU), then a global timer may be delayed for that long.
>
> I guess it shouldn't be too bad but worth mentioning...
>
> Although if it happens to be a problem it could be solved with simply allowing
> tmigr_cpu_deactivate() when !tmc->online.

The plan was (and I broke it) to let the CPU handle global timers by itself
as long as timer migration hierarchy is not completely initialized and as
long as CPU is marked offline in timer migration hierarchy. Otherwise
global timers might be delayed during this period. The proper way would be
that tmigr_cpu_deactivate(nextexp) directly returns nextexp if !tmc->online
and tmigr hierarchy is not in place yet. I will have a deeper look if there
was a reason why I changed the return to KTIME_MAX...

Thanks,

Anna-Maria

2022-11-28 16:29:34

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 08:47:56AM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2022, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > > +static int tmigr_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> > > +{
> > > + struct tmigr_cpu *tmc = this_cpu_ptr(&tmigr_cpu);
> > > +
> > > + raw_spin_lock_irq(&tmc->lock);
> > > + tmc->online = 0;
> > > + __tmigr_cpu_deactivate(tmc, KTIME_MAX);
> >
> > This means that if the CPU is going idle for some time during
> > the hotplug process (ie: at some point between CPUHP_AP_TMIGR_ONLINE
> > and CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU), then a global timer may be delayed for that long.
> >
> > I guess it shouldn't be too bad but worth mentioning...
> >
> > Although if it happens to be a problem it could be solved with simply allowing
> > tmigr_cpu_deactivate() when !tmc->online.
>
> The plan was (and I broke it) to let the CPU handle global timers by itself
> as long as timer migration hierarchy is not completely initialized and as
> long as CPU is marked offline in timer migration hierarchy. Otherwise
> global timers might be delayed during this period. The proper way would be
> that tmigr_cpu_deactivate(nextexp) directly returns nextexp if !tmc->online
> and tmigr hierarchy is not in place yet. I will have a deeper look if there
> was a reason why I changed the return to KTIME_MAX...

Well, do you need tmc->online at all?

I guess tmigr_cpu_offline() could be simply removed because when the CPU goes
finally down in do_idle() it does:

tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
cpuhp_report_idle_dead();

So the tick is expected to be stopped (better check it is) and thus the tmc
should be deactivated.

I guess you just need to call tmigr_cpu_activate() from timers_prepare_cpu().

Or am I missing something along the way?

2022-11-29 10:44:01

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 05:20:10PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 08:47:56AM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Nov 2022, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > > > +static int tmigr_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct tmigr_cpu *tmc = this_cpu_ptr(&tmigr_cpu);
> > > > +
> > > > + raw_spin_lock_irq(&tmc->lock);
> > > > + tmc->online = 0;
> > > > + __tmigr_cpu_deactivate(tmc, KTIME_MAX);
> > >
> > > This means that if the CPU is going idle for some time during
> > > the hotplug process (ie: at some point between CPUHP_AP_TMIGR_ONLINE
> > > and CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU), then a global timer may be delayed for that long.
> > >
> > > I guess it shouldn't be too bad but worth mentioning...
> > >
> > > Although if it happens to be a problem it could be solved with simply allowing
> > > tmigr_cpu_deactivate() when !tmc->online.
> >
> > The plan was (and I broke it) to let the CPU handle global timers by itself
> > as long as timer migration hierarchy is not completely initialized and as
> > long as CPU is marked offline in timer migration hierarchy. Otherwise
> > global timers might be delayed during this period. The proper way would be
> > that tmigr_cpu_deactivate(nextexp) directly returns nextexp if !tmc->online
> > and tmigr hierarchy is not in place yet. I will have a deeper look if there
> > was a reason why I changed the return to KTIME_MAX...
>
> Well, do you need tmc->online at all?
>
> I guess tmigr_cpu_offline() could be simply removed because when the CPU goes
> finally down in do_idle() it does:
>
> tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
> cpuhp_report_idle_dead();
>
> So the tick is expected to be stopped (better check it is) and thus the tmc
> should be deactivated.
>
> I guess you just need to call tmigr_cpu_activate() from timers_prepare_cpu().

Now of course the issue is that between CPUHP_TIMERS_PREPARE and
CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE the tglobal timers may not be served.

One way to deal with that is to call tmigr_cpu_activate() from
cpu_startup_entry().

Otherwise then back to tmc->online I guess.