2022-11-09 04:43:36

by Siddharth Vadapalli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 3/3] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Add support for SERDES configuration

Use PHY framework APIs to initialize the SERDES PHY connected to CPSW MAC.

Define the functions am65_cpsw_disable_phy(), am65_cpsw_enable_phy(),
am65_cpsw_disable_serdes_phy() and am65_cpsw_enable_serdes_phy().

Power on and initialize the SerDes PHY in am65_cpsw_nuss_init_slave_ports()
by invoking am65_cpsw_enable_serdes_phy().

Power off the SerDes PHY in am65_cpsw_nuss_remove() by invoking
am65_cpsw_disable_serdes_phy().

Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
index bc9f29d10c22..83349d24a0e6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
@@ -1444,6 +1444,65 @@ static const struct net_device_ops am65_cpsw_nuss_netdev_ops = {
.ndo_setup_tc = am65_cpsw_qos_ndo_setup_tc,
};

+static void am65_cpsw_disable_phy(struct phy *phy)
+{
+ phy_power_off(phy);
+ phy_exit(phy);
+}
+
+static int am65_cpsw_enable_phy(struct phy *phy)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = phy_init(phy);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = phy_power_on(phy);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ phy_exit(phy);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void am65_cpsw_disable_serdes_phy(struct am65_cpsw_common *common)
+{
+ struct device_node *node, *port_np;
+ struct device *dev = common->dev;
+ const char *name = "serdes-phy";
+ struct phy *phy;
+
+ node = of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node, "ethernet-ports");
+
+ for_each_child_of_node(node, port_np) {
+ phy = devm_of_phy_get(dev, port_np, name);
+ am65_cpsw_disable_phy(phy);
+ }
+}
+
+static int am65_cpsw_init_serdes_phy(struct device *dev, struct device_node *port_np)
+{
+ const char *name = "serdes-phy";
+ struct phy *phy;
+ int ret;
+
+ phy = devm_of_phy_get(dev, port_np, name);
+ if (PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = am65_cpsw_enable_phy(phy);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto err_phy;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_phy:
+ devm_phy_put(dev, phy);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static void am65_cpsw_nuss_mac_config(struct phylink_config *config, unsigned int mode,
const struct phylink_link_state *state)
{
@@ -1941,6 +2000,11 @@ static int am65_cpsw_nuss_init_slave_ports(struct am65_cpsw_common *common)
goto of_node_put;
}

+ /* Initialize the phy for the port */
+ ret = am65_cpsw_init_serdes_phy(dev, port_np);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
port->slave.mac_only =
of_property_read_bool(port_np, "ti,mac-only");

@@ -2868,6 +2932,7 @@ static int am65_cpsw_nuss_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)

am65_cpsw_nuss_phylink_cleanup(common);
am65_cpsw_unregister_devlink(common);
+ am65_cpsw_disable_serdes_phy(common);
am65_cpsw_unregister_notifiers(common);

/* must unregister ndevs here because DD release_driver routine calls
--
2.25.1



2022-11-10 14:35:08

by Paolo Abeni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/3] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Add support for SERDES configuration

hello,

On Wed, 2022-11-09 at 09:52 +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
[...]

> +static void am65_cpsw_disable_serdes_phy(struct am65_cpsw_common *common)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node, *port_np;
> + struct device *dev = common->dev;
> + const char *name = "serdes-phy";
> + struct phy *phy;
> +
> + node = of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node, "ethernet-ports");
> +
> + for_each_child_of_node(node, port_np) {
> + phy = devm_of_phy_get(dev, port_np, name);

The above will try to allocate some memory and can fail. Even if the
the following code will handle a NULL ptr, the phy will not be
disabled.

I think it's better if you cache the serdes phy ptr in
am65_cpsw_init_serdes_phy() and you use such reference here, without
resorting to devm_of_phy_get().

Cheers,

Paolo


2022-11-17 10:39:22

by Siddharth Vadapalli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/3] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Add support for SERDES configuration

Hello Paolo,

On 10/11/22 18:36, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> hello,
>
> On Wed, 2022-11-09 at 09:52 +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> [...]
>
>> +static void am65_cpsw_disable_serdes_phy(struct am65_cpsw_common *common)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *node, *port_np;
>> + struct device *dev = common->dev;
>> + const char *name = "serdes-phy";
>> + struct phy *phy;
>> +
>> + node = of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node, "ethernet-ports");
>> +
>> + for_each_child_of_node(node, port_np) {
>> + phy = devm_of_phy_get(dev, port_np, name);
>
> The above will try to allocate some memory and can fail. Even if the
> the following code will handle a NULL ptr, the phy will not be
> disabled.
>
> I think it's better if you cache the serdes phy ptr in
> am65_cpsw_init_serdes_phy() and you use such reference here, without
> resorting to devm_of_phy_get().

Thank you for reviewing the patch. I plan on creating a new "struct
phy*" member named "serdes_phy" in the struct "am65_cpsw_slave_data"
defined in the file "am65-cpsw-nuss.h", and store the SerDes phy in this
member, during the execution of the am65_cpsw_init_serdes_phy()
function. Please let me know if I can proceed with this implementation.

Regards,
Siddharth.