2022-11-23 18:29:02

by Michael Walle

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/20] nvmem: core: use nvmem_add_one_cell() in nvmem_add_cells_from_of()

Convert nvmem_add_cells_from_of() to use the new nvmem_add_one_cell().
This will remove duplicate code and it will make it possible to add a
hook to a nvmem layout in between, which can change fields before the
cell is finally added.

Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <[email protected]>
---
changes since v3:
- none

changes since v2:
- none

changes since v1:
- new patch

drivers/nvmem/core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index cb25bf29dea7..26459d582e99 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -688,15 +688,15 @@ static int nvmem_validate_keepouts(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)

static int nvmem_add_cells_from_of(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
{
- struct device_node *parent, *child;
struct device *dev = &nvmem->dev;
struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell;
+ struct device_node *child;
const __be32 *addr;
- int len;
+ int len, ret;

- parent = dev->of_node;
+ for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) {
+ struct nvmem_cell_info info = {0};

- for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) {
addr = of_get_property(child, "reg", &len);
if (!addr)
continue;
@@ -712,34 +712,24 @@ static int nvmem_add_cells_from_of(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
return -ENOMEM;
}

- cell->nvmem = nvmem;
- cell->offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
- cell->bytes = be32_to_cpup(addr);
- cell->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOFn", child);
+ info.offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
+ info.bytes = be32_to_cpup(addr);
+ info.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOFn", child);

addr = of_get_property(child, "bits", &len);
if (addr && len == (2 * sizeof(u32))) {
- cell->bit_offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
- cell->nbits = be32_to_cpup(addr);
+ info.bit_offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
+ info.nbits = be32_to_cpup(addr);
}

- if (cell->nbits)
- cell->bytes = DIV_ROUND_UP(
- cell->nbits + cell->bit_offset,
- BITS_PER_BYTE);
+ info.np = of_node_get(child);

- if (!IS_ALIGNED(cell->offset, nvmem->stride)) {
- dev_err(dev, "cell %s unaligned to nvmem stride %d\n",
- cell->name, nvmem->stride);
- /* Cells already added will be freed later. */
- kfree_const(cell->name);
- kfree(cell);
+ ret = nvmem_add_one_cell(nvmem, &info);
+ kfree(info.name);
+ if (ret) {
of_node_put(child);
- return -EINVAL;
+ return ret;
}
-
- cell->np = of_node_get(child);
- nvmem_cell_entry_add(cell);
}

return 0;
--
2.30.2


2022-12-03 09:06:24

by Dan Carpenter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/20] nvmem: core: use nvmem_add_one_cell() in nvmem_add_cells_from_of()

Hi Michael,

https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Michael-Walle/nvmem-core-introduce-NVMEM-layouts/20221124-020554
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221123180151.2160033-11-michael%40walle.cc
patch subject: [PATCH v4 10/20] nvmem: core: use nvmem_add_one_cell() in nvmem_add_cells_from_of()
config: i386-randconfig-m021
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-8) 11.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
| Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>

New smatch warnings:
drivers/nvmem/core.c:731 nvmem_add_cells_from_of() warn: possible memory leak of 'cell'

Old smatch warnings:
drivers/nvmem/core.c:735 nvmem_add_cells_from_of() warn: possible memory leak of 'cell'

vim +/cell +731 drivers/nvmem/core.c

e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 689 static int nvmem_add_cells_from_of(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 690 {
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 691 struct device *dev = &nvmem->dev;
7ae6478b304bc0 Srinivas Kandagatla 2021-10-13 692 struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell;
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 693 struct device_node *child;
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 694 const __be32 *addr;
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 695 int len, ret;
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 696
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 697 for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) {
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 698 struct nvmem_cell_info info = {0};
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 699
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 700 addr = of_get_property(child, "reg", &len);
0445efacec75b8 Ahmad Fatoum 2021-01-29 701 if (!addr)
0445efacec75b8 Ahmad Fatoum 2021-01-29 702 continue;
0445efacec75b8 Ahmad Fatoum 2021-01-29 703 if (len < 2 * sizeof(u32)) {
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 704 dev_err(dev, "nvmem: invalid reg on %pOF\n", child);
63879e2964bcee Christophe JAILLET 2021-06-11 705 of_node_put(child);
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 706 return -EINVAL;
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 707 }
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 708
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 709 cell = kzalloc(sizeof(*cell), GFP_KERNEL);
63879e2964bcee Christophe JAILLET 2021-06-11 710 if (!cell) {
63879e2964bcee Christophe JAILLET 2021-06-11 711 of_node_put(child);
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 712 return -ENOMEM;
63879e2964bcee Christophe JAILLET 2021-06-11 713 }

Seems like "cell" is not used any more so this just leaks.

e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 714
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 715 info.offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 716 info.bytes = be32_to_cpup(addr);
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 717 info.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOFn", child);
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 718
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 719 addr = of_get_property(child, "bits", &len);
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 720 if (addr && len == (2 * sizeof(u32))) {
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 721 info.bit_offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 722 info.nbits = be32_to_cpup(addr);
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 723 }
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 724
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 725 info.np = of_node_get(child);
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 726
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 727 ret = nvmem_add_one_cell(nvmem, &info);
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 728 kfree(info.name);
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 729 if (ret) {
63879e2964bcee Christophe JAILLET 2021-06-11 730 of_node_put(child);
18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 @731 return ret;
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 732 }
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 733 }
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 734
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 735 return 0;
e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 736 }

--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

2022-12-05 09:53:27

by Michael Walle

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/20] nvmem: core: use nvmem_add_one_cell() in nvmem_add_cells_from_of()

Am 2022-12-03 09:30, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> Hi Michael,
>
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url:
> https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Michael-Walle/nvmem-core-introduce-NVMEM-layouts/20221124-020554
> patch link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221123180151.2160033-11-michael%40walle.cc
> patch subject: [PATCH v4 10/20] nvmem: core: use nvmem_add_one_cell()
> in nvmem_add_cells_from_of()
> config: i386-randconfig-m021
> compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-8) 11.3.0
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
>
> New smatch warnings:
> drivers/nvmem/core.c:731 nvmem_add_cells_from_of() warn: possible
> memory leak of 'cell'
>
> Old smatch warnings:
> drivers/nvmem/core.c:735 nvmem_add_cells_from_of() warn: possible
> memory leak of 'cell'
>
> vim +/cell +731 drivers/nvmem/core.c
>
> e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 689 static int
> nvmem_add_cells_from_of(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
> e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 690 {
> e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 691 struct device
> *dev = &nvmem->dev;
> 7ae6478b304bc0 Srinivas Kandagatla 2021-10-13 692 struct
> nvmem_cell_entry *cell;
> 18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 693 struct device_node
> *child;
> e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 694 const __be32
> *addr;
> 18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 695 int len, ret;
> e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 696
> 18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 697
> for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) {
> 18f50dbcfd3676 Michael Walle 2022-11-23 698 struct
> nvmem_cell_info info = {0};
> e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 699
> e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 700 addr =
> of_get_property(child, "reg", &len);
> 0445efacec75b8 Ahmad Fatoum 2021-01-29 701 if (!addr)
> 0445efacec75b8 Ahmad Fatoum 2021-01-29 702 continue;
> 0445efacec75b8 Ahmad Fatoum 2021-01-29 703 if (len < 2 *
> sizeof(u32)) {
> e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 704 dev_err(dev,
> "nvmem: invalid reg on %pOF\n", child);
> 63879e2964bcee Christophe JAILLET 2021-06-11 705
> of_node_put(child);
> e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 706 return -EINVAL;
> e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 707 }
> e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 708
> e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 709 cell =
> kzalloc(sizeof(*cell), GFP_KERNEL);
> 63879e2964bcee Christophe JAILLET 2021-06-11 710 if (!cell) {
> 63879e2964bcee Christophe JAILLET 2021-06-11 711
> of_node_put(child);
> e888d445ac33a5 Bartosz Golaszewski 2018-09-21 712 return -ENOMEM;
> 63879e2964bcee Christophe JAILLET 2021-06-11 713 }
>
> Seems like "cell" is not used any more so this just leaks.

Damn, what a stupid bug from me. Thanks for catching this.

-michael