On Sun, 26 Sept 2021 at 20:33, Andreas Kemnade <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Ahmad,
>
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 08:54:35 +0200
> Ahmad Fatoum <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello Andreas,
> >
> > On 24.09.21 11:14, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > > Binding specification only allows one compatible here.
> >
> > This same change was NACKed by Lucas here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/[email protected]/
> >
> > I also think the schema should be fixed instead.
> >
> well, that argumentation makes sense. Feel free to drop this patch. I
> will not repost the series if it is just about dropping patches.
The argument of using a new DTB with an old kernel, therefore
prohibiting changes in new DTB, does not make that much sense, except
when caring about other systems which would like to directly reuse the
DTB... anyway it's not that important to fight over it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:34:57 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sept 2021 at 20:33, Andreas Kemnade <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ahmad,
> >
> > On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 08:54:35 +0200
> > Ahmad Fatoum <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Andreas,
> > >
> > > On 24.09.21 11:14, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > > > Binding specification only allows one compatible here.
> > >
> > > This same change was NACKed by Lucas here:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/[email protected]/
> > >
> > > I also think the schema should be fixed instead.
> > >
> > well, that argumentation makes sense. Feel free to drop this patch. I
> > will not repost the series if it is just about dropping patches.
>
> The argument of using a new DTB with an old kernel, therefore
> prohibiting changes in new DTB, does not make that much sense, except
> when caring about other systems which would like to directly reuse the
> DTB... anyway it's not that important to fight over it.
>
hmm, imx6sl_data specifies
ESDHC_FLAG_ERR004536
imx6sq_data does not specify it.
Than there is ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING vs. ESDHC_FLAG_MAN_TUNING.
So it the fsl,imx6q-usdhc really a technically valid fallback compatible?
Regards,
Andreas