2023-03-10 14:47:37

by Rob Herring (Arm)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: mxs: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence

It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
for presence of a property and nothing more.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c
index 0129b7c514d7..51e47053c816 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void __init update_fec_mac_prop(enum mac_oui oui)

from = np;

- if (of_get_property(np, "local-mac-address", NULL))
+ if (of_property_present(np, "local-mac-address"))
continue;

newmac = kzalloc(sizeof(*newmac) + 6, GFP_KERNEL);
--
2.39.2



2023-03-14 07:06:21

by Shawn Guo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mxs: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:46:54AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>

Applied, thanks!