2023-04-04 18:25:45

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V4 15/23] irqchip/riscv-intc: Add ACPI support

Add support for initializing the RISC-V INTC driver on ACPI
platforms.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
index f229e3e66387..6b476fa356c0 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
*/

#define pr_fmt(fmt) "riscv-intc: " fmt
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <linux/bits.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
@@ -112,6 +113,30 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *riscv_intc_hwnode(void)
return intc_domain->fwnode;
}

+static int __init riscv_intc_init_common(struct fwnode_handle *fn)
+{
+ int rc;
+
+ intc_domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fn, BITS_PER_LONG,
+ &riscv_intc_domain_ops, NULL);
+ if (!intc_domain) {
+ pr_err("unable to add IRQ domain\n");
+ return -ENXIO;
+ }
+
+ rc = set_handle_irq(&riscv_intc_irq);
+ if (rc) {
+ pr_err("failed to set irq handler\n");
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ riscv_set_intc_hwnode_fn(riscv_intc_hwnode);
+
+ pr_info("%d local interrupts mapped\n", BITS_PER_LONG);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int __init riscv_intc_init(struct device_node *node,
struct device_node *parent)
{
@@ -133,24 +158,47 @@ static int __init riscv_intc_init(struct device_node *node,
if (riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(hartid) != smp_processor_id())
return 0;

- intc_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, BITS_PER_LONG,
- &riscv_intc_domain_ops, NULL);
- if (!intc_domain) {
- pr_err("unable to add IRQ domain\n");
- return -ENXIO;
- }
-
- rc = set_handle_irq(&riscv_intc_irq);
+ rc = riscv_intc_init_common(of_node_to_fwnode(node));
if (rc) {
- pr_err("failed to set irq handler\n");
+ pr_err("failed to initialize INTC\n");
return rc;
}

- riscv_set_intc_hwnode_fn(riscv_intc_hwnode);
-
- pr_info("%d local interrupts mapped\n", BITS_PER_LONG);
-
return 0;
}

IRQCHIP_DECLARE(riscv, "riscv,cpu-intc", riscv_intc_init);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+
+static int __init riscv_intc_acpi_init(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
+ const unsigned long end)
+{
+ int rc;
+ struct fwnode_handle *fn;
+ struct acpi_madt_rintc *rintc;
+
+ rintc = (struct acpi_madt_rintc *)header;
+
+ /*
+ * The ACPI MADT will have one INTC for each CPU (or HART)
+ * so riscv_intc_acpi_init() function will be called once
+ * for each INTC. We only do INTC initialization
+ * for the INTC belonging to the boot CPU (or boot HART).
+ */
+ if (riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(rintc->hart_id) != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
+ fn = irq_domain_alloc_named_fwnode("RISCV-INTC");
+ if (!fn) {
+ pr_err("unable to allocate INTC FW node\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ rc = riscv_intc_init_common(fn);
+ return rc;
+}
+
+IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE(riscv_intc, ACPI_MADT_TYPE_RINTC, NULL,
+ ACPI_MADT_RINTC_VERSION_V1, riscv_intc_acpi_init);
+#endif
--
2.34.1


2023-04-05 15:50:42

by Andrew Jones

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 15/23] irqchip/riscv-intc: Add ACPI support

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 11:50:29PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> Add support for initializing the RISC-V INTC driver on ACPI
> platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
> index f229e3e66387..6b476fa356c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> */
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "riscv-intc: " fmt
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/atomic.h>
> #include <linux/bits.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> @@ -112,6 +113,30 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *riscv_intc_hwnode(void)
> return intc_domain->fwnode;
> }
>
> +static int __init riscv_intc_init_common(struct fwnode_handle *fn)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + intc_domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fn, BITS_PER_LONG,
> + &riscv_intc_domain_ops, NULL);
> + if (!intc_domain) {
> + pr_err("unable to add IRQ domain\n");
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> +
> + rc = set_handle_irq(&riscv_intc_irq);
> + if (rc) {
> + pr_err("failed to set irq handler\n");
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + riscv_set_intc_hwnode_fn(riscv_intc_hwnode);
> +
> + pr_info("%d local interrupts mapped\n", BITS_PER_LONG);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int __init riscv_intc_init(struct device_node *node,
> struct device_node *parent)
> {
> @@ -133,24 +158,47 @@ static int __init riscv_intc_init(struct device_node *node,
> if (riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(hartid) != smp_processor_id())
> return 0;
>
> - intc_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, BITS_PER_LONG,
> - &riscv_intc_domain_ops, NULL);
> - if (!intc_domain) {
> - pr_err("unable to add IRQ domain\n");
> - return -ENXIO;
> - }
> -
> - rc = set_handle_irq(&riscv_intc_irq);
> + rc = riscv_intc_init_common(of_node_to_fwnode(node));
> if (rc) {
> - pr_err("failed to set irq handler\n");
> + pr_err("failed to initialize INTC\n");

The ACPI version doesn't output this error when riscv_intc_init_common()
fails. It should probably be consistent. Either removing it here, if the
errors output within riscv_intc_init_common() are sufficient, or adding
it to the ACPI version.

> return rc;
> }
>
> - riscv_set_intc_hwnode_fn(riscv_intc_hwnode);
> -
> - pr_info("%d local interrupts mapped\n", BITS_PER_LONG);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> IRQCHIP_DECLARE(riscv, "riscv,cpu-intc", riscv_intc_init);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +
> +static int __init riscv_intc_acpi_init(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> + const unsigned long end)
> +{
> + int rc;
> + struct fwnode_handle *fn;
> + struct acpi_madt_rintc *rintc;
> +
> + rintc = (struct acpi_madt_rintc *)header;
> +
> + /*
> + * The ACPI MADT will have one INTC for each CPU (or HART)
> + * so riscv_intc_acpi_init() function will be called once
> + * for each INTC. We only do INTC initialization
> + * for the INTC belonging to the boot CPU (or boot HART).
> + */
> + if (riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(rintc->hart_id) != smp_processor_id())
> + return 0;
> +
> + fn = irq_domain_alloc_named_fwnode("RISCV-INTC");
> + if (!fn) {
> + pr_err("unable to allocate INTC FW node\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + rc = riscv_intc_init_common(fn);
> + return rc;

nit: If we don't add the error message here, then rc can be removed and we
can just do

return riscv_intc_init_common(fn);

And, if we remove the error above, then we reduce the return there too.

> +}
> +
> +IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE(riscv_intc, ACPI_MADT_TYPE_RINTC, NULL,
> + ACPI_MADT_RINTC_VERSION_V1, riscv_intc_acpi_init);
> +#endif
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Thanks,
drew

2023-04-06 03:55:18

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 15/23] irqchip/riscv-intc: Add ACPI support

On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 05:48:47PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 11:50:29PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > Add support for initializing the RISC-V INTC driver on ACPI
> > platforms.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
> > index f229e3e66387..6b476fa356c0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > */
> >
> > #define pr_fmt(fmt) "riscv-intc: " fmt
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > #include <linux/atomic.h>
> > #include <linux/bits.h>
> > #include <linux/cpu.h>
> > @@ -112,6 +113,30 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *riscv_intc_hwnode(void)
> > return intc_domain->fwnode;
> > }
> >
> > +static int __init riscv_intc_init_common(struct fwnode_handle *fn)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + intc_domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fn, BITS_PER_LONG,
> > + &riscv_intc_domain_ops, NULL);
> > + if (!intc_domain) {
> > + pr_err("unable to add IRQ domain\n");
> > + return -ENXIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rc = set_handle_irq(&riscv_intc_irq);
> > + if (rc) {
> > + pr_err("failed to set irq handler\n");
> > + return rc;
> > + }
> > +
> > + riscv_set_intc_hwnode_fn(riscv_intc_hwnode);
> > +
> > + pr_info("%d local interrupts mapped\n", BITS_PER_LONG);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int __init riscv_intc_init(struct device_node *node,
> > struct device_node *parent)
> > {
> > @@ -133,24 +158,47 @@ static int __init riscv_intc_init(struct device_node *node,
> > if (riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(hartid) != smp_processor_id())
> > return 0;
> >
> > - intc_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, BITS_PER_LONG,
> > - &riscv_intc_domain_ops, NULL);
> > - if (!intc_domain) {
> > - pr_err("unable to add IRQ domain\n");
> > - return -ENXIO;
> > - }
> > -
> > - rc = set_handle_irq(&riscv_intc_irq);
> > + rc = riscv_intc_init_common(of_node_to_fwnode(node));
> > if (rc) {
> > - pr_err("failed to set irq handler\n");
> > + pr_err("failed to initialize INTC\n");
>
> The ACPI version doesn't output this error when riscv_intc_init_common()
> fails. It should probably be consistent. Either removing it here, if the
> errors output within riscv_intc_init_common() are sufficient, or adding
> it to the ACPI version.
>
> > return rc;
> > }
> >
> > - riscv_set_intc_hwnode_fn(riscv_intc_hwnode);
> > -
> > - pr_info("%d local interrupts mapped\n", BITS_PER_LONG);
> > -
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > IRQCHIP_DECLARE(riscv, "riscv,cpu-intc", riscv_intc_init);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > +
> > +static int __init riscv_intc_acpi_init(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> > + const unsigned long end)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > + struct fwnode_handle *fn;
> > + struct acpi_madt_rintc *rintc;
> > +
> > + rintc = (struct acpi_madt_rintc *)header;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The ACPI MADT will have one INTC for each CPU (or HART)
> > + * so riscv_intc_acpi_init() function will be called once
> > + * for each INTC. We only do INTC initialization
> > + * for the INTC belonging to the boot CPU (or boot HART).
> > + */
> > + if (riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(rintc->hart_id) != smp_processor_id())
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + fn = irq_domain_alloc_named_fwnode("RISCV-INTC");
> > + if (!fn) {
> > + pr_err("unable to allocate INTC FW node\n");
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rc = riscv_intc_init_common(fn);
> > + return rc;
>
> nit: If we don't add the error message here, then rc can be removed and we
> can just do
>
> return riscv_intc_init_common(fn);
>
> And, if we remove the error above, then we reduce the return there too.
>
Make sense. Thanks!. Will update in next revision.

Thanks,
Sunil