Re-implement the log buffer as a list of buffer fragments that can
be extended as the size of the log info grows.
When using parameterization the test case can run many times and create
a large amount of log. It's not really practical to keep increasing the
size of the fixed buffer every time a test needs more space. And a big
fixed buffer wastes memory.
The original char *log pointer is replaced by a pointer to a list of
struct kunit_log_frag, each containing a fixed-size buffer.
kunit_log_append() now attempts to append to that last kunit_log_frag in
the list. If there isn't enough space it will append a new kunit_log_frag
to the list. This simple implementation does not attempt to completely
fill the buffer in every kunit_log_frag.
The 'log' member of kunit_suite, kunit_test_case and kunit_suite must be a
pointer because the API of kunit_log() requires that is the same type in
all three structs. As kunit.log is a pointer to the 'log' of the current
kunit_case, it must be a pointer in the other two structs.
The existing kunit-test.c log tests have been updated for the new log
buffer and a new kunit_log_extend_test() case to test extending the buffer.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <[email protected]>
---
include/kunit/test.h | 25 +++++++++----
lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
lib/kunit/kunit-test.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
lib/kunit/test.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++----------
4 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index 011e0d6bb506..907b30401669 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kunit_running);
struct kunit;
-/* Size of log associated with test. */
-#define KUNIT_LOG_SIZE 2048
+/* Initial size of log associated with test. */
+#define KUNIT_DEFAULT_LOG_SIZE 500
/* Maximum size of parameter description string. */
#define KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE 128
@@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ struct kunit_attributes {
enum kunit_speed speed;
};
+struct kunit_log_frag {
+ struct list_head list;
+ char buf[KUNIT_DEFAULT_LOG_SIZE];
+};
+
/**
* struct kunit_case - represents an individual test case.
*
@@ -132,7 +137,7 @@ struct kunit_case {
/* private: internal use only. */
enum kunit_status status;
char *module_name;
- char *log;
+ struct list_head *log;
};
static inline char *kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(enum kunit_status status)
@@ -252,7 +257,7 @@ struct kunit_suite {
/* private: internal use only */
char status_comment[KUNIT_STATUS_COMMENT_SIZE];
struct dentry *debugfs;
- char *log;
+ struct list_head *log;
int suite_init_err;
};
@@ -272,7 +277,7 @@ struct kunit {
/* private: internal use only. */
const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */
- char *log; /* Points at case log after initialization */
+ struct list_head *log; /* Points at case log after initialization */
struct kunit_try_catch try_catch;
/* param_value is the current parameter value for a test case. */
const void *param_value;
@@ -304,7 +309,7 @@ static inline void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test)
bool kunit_enabled(void);
-void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log);
+void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, struct list_head *log);
int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite);
@@ -317,6 +322,12 @@ int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_
void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites, int num_suites);
+static inline void kunit_init_log_frag(struct kunit_log_frag *frag)
+{
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&frag->list);
+ frag->buf[0] = '\0';
+}
+
#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
int kunit_run_all_tests(void);
#else
@@ -451,7 +462,7 @@ static inline void *kunit_kcalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp
void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test);
-void __printf(2, 3) kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...);
+void __printf(2, 3) kunit_log_append(struct list_head *log, const char *fmt, ...);
/**
* kunit_mark_skipped() - Marks @test_or_suite as skipped
diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
index 22c5c496a68f..a26b6d31bd2f 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <kunit/test.h>
@@ -37,14 +38,15 @@ void kunit_debugfs_init(void)
debugfs_rootdir = debugfs_create_dir(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_ROOT, NULL);
}
-static void debugfs_print_result(struct seq_file *seq,
- struct kunit_suite *suite,
- struct kunit_case *test_case)
+static void debugfs_print_log(struct seq_file *seq, const struct list_head *log)
{
- if (!test_case || !test_case->log)
+ struct kunit_log_frag *frag;
+
+ if (!log)
return;
- seq_printf(seq, "%s", test_case->log);
+ list_for_each_entry(frag, log, list)
+ seq_puts(seq, frag->buf);
}
/*
@@ -69,10 +71,9 @@ static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
seq_printf(seq, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "1..%zd\n", kunit_suite_num_test_cases(suite));
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)
- debugfs_print_result(seq, suite, test_case);
+ debugfs_print_log(seq, test_case->log);
- if (suite->log)
- seq_printf(seq, "%s", suite->log);
+ debugfs_print_log(seq, suite->log);
seq_printf(seq, "%s %d %s\n",
kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(success), 1, suite->name);
@@ -100,14 +101,53 @@ static const struct file_operations debugfs_results_fops = {
.release = debugfs_release,
};
+static struct list_head *kunit_debugfs_alloc_log(void)
+{
+ struct list_head *log;
+ struct kunit_log_frag *frag;
+
+ log = kzalloc(sizeof(*log), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!log)
+ return NULL;
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(log);
+
+ frag = kmalloc(sizeof(*frag), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!frag) {
+ kfree(log);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ kunit_init_log_frag(frag);
+ list_add_tail(&frag->list, log);
+
+ return log;
+}
+
+static void kunit_debugfs_free_log(struct list_head *log)
+{
+ struct kunit_log_frag *frag, *n;
+
+ if (!log)
+ return;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, log, list) {
+ list_del(&frag->list);
+ kfree(frag);
+ }
+
+ kfree(log);
+}
+
void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
{
struct kunit_case *test_case;
/* Allocate logs before creating debugfs representation. */
- suite->log = kzalloc(KUNIT_LOG_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ suite->log = kunit_debugfs_alloc_log();
+
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)
- test_case->log = kzalloc(KUNIT_LOG_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ test_case->log = kunit_debugfs_alloc_log();
suite->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(suite->name, debugfs_rootdir);
@@ -121,7 +161,8 @@ void kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
struct kunit_case *test_case;
debugfs_remove_recursive(suite->debugfs);
- kfree(suite->log);
+ kunit_debugfs_free_log(suite->log);
+
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)
- kfree(test_case->log);
+ kunit_debugfs_free_log(test_case->log);
}
diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
index 83d8e90ca7a2..abf659c6ded4 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
@@ -533,9 +533,16 @@ static struct kunit_suite kunit_resource_test_suite = {
static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_suite suite;
+ struct kunit_log_frag *frag;
- suite.log = kunit_kzalloc(test, KUNIT_LOG_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ suite.log = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*suite.log), GFP_KERNEL);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, suite.log);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(suite.log);
+ frag = kunit_kmalloc(test, sizeof(*frag), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, frag);
+ kunit_init_log_frag(frag);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, frag->buf[0], '\0');
+ list_add_tail(&frag->list, suite.log);
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, "put this in log.");
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, "this too.");
@@ -543,14 +550,17 @@ static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test)
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &suite, "along with this.");
#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS
+ frag = list_first_entry(test->log, struct kunit_log_frag, list);
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
- strstr(test->log, "put this in log."));
+ strstr(frag->buf, "put this in log."));
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
- strstr(test->log, "this too."));
+ strstr(frag->buf, "this too."));
+
+ frag = list_first_entry(suite.log, struct kunit_log_frag, list);
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
- strstr(suite.log, "add to suite log."));
+ strstr(frag->buf, "add to suite log."));
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
- strstr(suite.log, "along with this."));
+ strstr(frag->buf, "along with this."));
#else
KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, test->log);
#endif
@@ -558,19 +568,75 @@ static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test)
static void kunit_log_newline_test(struct kunit *test)
{
+ struct kunit_log_frag *frag;
+
kunit_info(test, "Add newline\n");
if (test->log) {
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL_MSG(test, strstr(test->log, "Add newline\n"),
- "Missing log line, full log:\n%s", test->log);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, strstr(test->log, "Add newline\n\n"));
+ frag = list_first_entry(test->log, struct kunit_log_frag, list);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL_MSG(test, strstr(frag->buf, "Add newline\n"),
+ "Missing log line, full log:\n%s", frag->buf);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, strstr(frag->buf, "Add newline\n\n"));
} else {
kunit_skip(test, "only useful when debugfs is enabled");
}
}
+static void kunit_log_extend_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS
+ struct kunit_suite suite;
+ struct kunit_log_frag *frag;
+ char *p, *pn;
+ size_t len;
+ int i, q;
+
+ suite.log = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*suite.log), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, suite.log);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(suite.log);
+ frag = kunit_kmalloc(test, sizeof(*frag), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, frag);
+ kunit_init_log_frag(frag);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, frag->buf[0], '\0');
+ list_add_tail(&frag->list, suite.log);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < KUNIT_DEFAULT_LOG_SIZE; ++i) {
+ kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &suite,
+ "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy penguin %d\n", i);
+ }
+
+ /* There must be more than one buffer fragment now */
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, list_is_singular(suite.log));
+
+ /* Copy all the data into a contiguous string for easier parsing */
+ len = 0;
+ list_for_each_entry(frag, suite.log, list)
+ len += strlen(frag->buf);
+
+ p = kunit_kmalloc(test, len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, p);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(frag, suite.log, list)
+ strlcat(p, frag->buf, len);
+
+ i = 0;
+ while ((pn = strchr(p, '\n')) != NULL) {
+ *pn = '\0';
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, sscanf(p,
+ "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy penguin %d\n",
+ &q), 1);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, q, i);
+ p = pn + 1;
+ ++i;
+ }
+#else
+ kunit_skip(test, "only useful when debugfs is enabled");
+#endif
+}
+
static struct kunit_case kunit_log_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_log_test),
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_log_newline_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_log_extend_test),
{}
};
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index cb9797fa6303..f90e395b3656 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <kunit/test-bug.h>
#include <kunit/attributes.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
#include <linux/panic.h>
@@ -114,46 +115,54 @@ static void kunit_print_test_stats(struct kunit *test,
* already present.
* @log: The log to add the newline to.
*/
-static void kunit_log_newline(char *log)
+static void kunit_log_newline(struct kunit_log_frag *frag)
{
int log_len, len_left;
- log_len = strlen(log);
- len_left = KUNIT_LOG_SIZE - log_len - 1;
+ log_len = strlen(frag->buf);
+ len_left = sizeof(frag->buf) - log_len - 1;
- if (log_len > 0 && log[log_len - 1] != '\n')
- strncat(log, "\n", len_left);
+ if (log_len > 0 && frag->buf[log_len - 1] != '\n')
+ strncat(frag->buf, "\n", len_left);
}
-/*
- * Append formatted message to log, size of which is limited to
- * KUNIT_LOG_SIZE bytes (including null terminating byte).
- */
-void kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...)
+/* Append formatted message to log, extending the log buffer if necessary. */
+void kunit_log_append(struct list_head *log, const char *fmt, ...)
{
va_list args;
+ struct kunit_log_frag *frag;
int len, log_len, len_left;
if (!log)
return;
- log_len = strlen(log);
- len_left = KUNIT_LOG_SIZE - log_len - 1;
- if (len_left <= 0)
- return;
+ frag = list_last_entry(log, struct kunit_log_frag, list);
+ log_len = strlen(frag->buf);
+ len_left = sizeof(frag->buf) - log_len - 1;
/* Evaluate length of line to add to log */
va_start(args, fmt);
len = vsnprintf(NULL, 0, fmt, args) + 1;
va_end(args);
+ if (len > len_left) {
+ frag = kmalloc(sizeof(*frag), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!frag)
+ return;
+
+ kunit_init_log_frag(frag);
+ list_add_tail(&frag->list, log);
+ len_left = sizeof(frag->buf) - 1;
+ log_len = 0;
+ }
+
/* Print formatted line to the log */
va_start(args, fmt);
- vsnprintf(log + log_len, min(len, len_left), fmt, args);
+ vsnprintf(frag->buf + log_len, min(len, len_left), fmt, args);
va_end(args);
/* Add newline to end of log if not already present. */
- kunit_log_newline(log);
+ kunit_log_newline(frag);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_log_append);
@@ -359,14 +368,18 @@ void __kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_do_failed_assertion);
-void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log)
+void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, struct list_head *log)
{
spin_lock_init(&test->lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&test->resources);
test->name = name;
test->log = log;
- if (test->log)
- test->log[0] = '\0';
+ if (test->log) {
+ struct kunit_log_frag *frag = list_first_entry(test->log,
+ struct kunit_log_frag,
+ list);
+ frag->buf[0] = '\0';
+ }
test->status = KUNIT_SUCCESS;
test->status_comment[0] = '\0';
}
--
2.30.2
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 22:14, Richard Fitzgerald
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Re-implement the log buffer as a list of buffer fragments that can
> be extended as the size of the log info grows.
>
> When using parameterization the test case can run many times and create
> a large amount of log. It's not really practical to keep increasing the
> size of the fixed buffer every time a test needs more space. And a big
> fixed buffer wastes memory.
>
> The original char *log pointer is replaced by a pointer to a list of
> struct kunit_log_frag, each containing a fixed-size buffer.
>
> kunit_log_append() now attempts to append to that last kunit_log_frag in
> the list. If there isn't enough space it will append a new kunit_log_frag
> to the list. This simple implementation does not attempt to completely
> fill the buffer in every kunit_log_frag.
>
> The 'log' member of kunit_suite, kunit_test_case and kunit_suite must be a
> pointer because the API of kunit_log() requires that is the same type in
> all three structs. As kunit.log is a pointer to the 'log' of the current
> kunit_case, it must be a pointer in the other two structs.
>
> The existing kunit-test.c log tests have been updated for the new log
> buffer and a new kunit_log_extend_test() case to test extending the buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <[email protected]>
> ---
+Rae, since she's the last person to touch the log code.
Thanks a bunch. Some way of handling longer logs has been on the to-do
list for a while, and this is probably better than the other options
of allowing per-test log sizes or using krealloc().
This mostly works okay here, but the test fails when running:
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --alltests
[17:05:12] # kunit_log_extend_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at
lib/kunit/kunit-test.c:624
[17:05:12] Expected sscanf(p, "The quick brown fox jumps over the
lazy penguin %d", &q) == 1, but
[17:05:12] sscanf(p, "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy
penguin %d", &q) == 0 (0x0)
I haven't found the cause of it, yet, but it happens both on UML and
QEMU x86_64.
> include/kunit/test.h | 25 +++++++++----
> lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> lib/kunit/kunit-test.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> lib/kunit/test.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++----------
> 4 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> index 011e0d6bb506..907b30401669 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kunit_running);
>
> struct kunit;
>
> -/* Size of log associated with test. */
> -#define KUNIT_LOG_SIZE 2048
> +/* Initial size of log associated with test. */
> +#define KUNIT_DEFAULT_LOG_SIZE 500
Would it make more sense to call this KUNIT_LOG_FRAGMENT_SIZE or
similar, as not only is this the default size, but also the amount by
which the size is incremented.
Also, there's plenty of scope for bikeshedding the exact value of
this, two considerations being:
- Most tests have very small logs: we possibly should look into what
the average log size is.
- It may make sense to tweak the log size to fit nicely within common
allocation/page sizes. e.g., PAGE_SIZE-sizeof(struct list_head) or
something. Though that is probably too big by default.
>
> /* Maximum size of parameter description string. */
> #define KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE 128
> @@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ struct kunit_attributes {
> enum kunit_speed speed;
> };
>
> +struct kunit_log_frag {
> + struct list_head list;
> + char buf[KUNIT_DEFAULT_LOG_SIZE];
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct kunit_case - represents an individual test case.
> *
> @@ -132,7 +137,7 @@ struct kunit_case {
> /* private: internal use only. */
> enum kunit_status status;
> char *module_name;
> - char *log;
> + struct list_head *log;
> };
>
> static inline char *kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(enum kunit_status status)
> @@ -252,7 +257,7 @@ struct kunit_suite {
> /* private: internal use only */
> char status_comment[KUNIT_STATUS_COMMENT_SIZE];
> struct dentry *debugfs;
> - char *log;
> + struct list_head *log;
> int suite_init_err;
> };
>
> @@ -272,7 +277,7 @@ struct kunit {
>
> /* private: internal use only. */
> const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */
> - char *log; /* Points at case log after initialization */
> + struct list_head *log; /* Points at case log after initialization */
> struct kunit_try_catch try_catch;
> /* param_value is the current parameter value for a test case. */
> const void *param_value;
> @@ -304,7 +309,7 @@ static inline void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test)
>
> bool kunit_enabled(void);
>
> -void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log);
> +void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, struct list_head *log);
>
> int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite);
>
> @@ -317,6 +322,12 @@ int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_
>
> void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites, int num_suites);
>
> +static inline void kunit_init_log_frag(struct kunit_log_frag *frag)
> +{
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&frag->list);
> + frag->buf[0] = '\0';
> +}
> +
> #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
> int kunit_run_all_tests(void);
> #else
> @@ -451,7 +462,7 @@ static inline void *kunit_kcalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp
>
> void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test);
>
> -void __printf(2, 3) kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...);
> +void __printf(2, 3) kunit_log_append(struct list_head *log, const char *fmt, ...);
>
> /**
> * kunit_mark_skipped() - Marks @test_or_suite as skipped
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> index 22c5c496a68f..a26b6d31bd2f 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
>
> #include <kunit/test.h>
> @@ -37,14 +38,15 @@ void kunit_debugfs_init(void)
> debugfs_rootdir = debugfs_create_dir(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_ROOT, NULL);
> }
>
> -static void debugfs_print_result(struct seq_file *seq,
> - struct kunit_suite *suite,
> - struct kunit_case *test_case)
> +static void debugfs_print_log(struct seq_file *seq, const struct list_head *log)
> {
> - if (!test_case || !test_case->log)
> + struct kunit_log_frag *frag;
> +
> + if (!log)
> return;
>
> - seq_printf(seq, "%s", test_case->log);
> + list_for_each_entry(frag, log, list)
> + seq_puts(seq, frag->buf);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -69,10 +71,9 @@ static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> seq_printf(seq, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "1..%zd\n", kunit_suite_num_test_cases(suite));
>
> kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)
> - debugfs_print_result(seq, suite, test_case);
> + debugfs_print_log(seq, test_case->log);
>
> - if (suite->log)
> - seq_printf(seq, "%s", suite->log);
> + debugfs_print_log(seq, suite->log);
>
> seq_printf(seq, "%s %d %s\n",
> kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(success), 1, suite->name);
> @@ -100,14 +101,53 @@ static const struct file_operations debugfs_results_fops = {
> .release = debugfs_release,
> };
>
> +static struct list_head *kunit_debugfs_alloc_log(void)
> +{
> + struct list_head *log;
> + struct kunit_log_frag *frag;
> +
> + log = kzalloc(sizeof(*log), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!log)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(log);
> +
> + frag = kmalloc(sizeof(*frag), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!frag) {
> + kfree(log);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + kunit_init_log_frag(frag);
> + list_add_tail(&frag->list, log);
> +
> + return log;
> +}
> +
> +static void kunit_debugfs_free_log(struct list_head *log)
> +{
> + struct kunit_log_frag *frag, *n;
> +
> + if (!log)
> + return;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, log, list) {
> + list_del(&frag->list);
> + kfree(frag);
> + }
> +
> + kfree(log);
> +}
> +
> void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> {
> struct kunit_case *test_case;
>
> /* Allocate logs before creating debugfs representation. */
> - suite->log = kzalloc(KUNIT_LOG_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + suite->log = kunit_debugfs_alloc_log();
> +
> kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)
> - test_case->log = kzalloc(KUNIT_LOG_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + test_case->log = kunit_debugfs_alloc_log();
>
> suite->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(suite->name, debugfs_rootdir);
>
> @@ -121,7 +161,8 @@ void kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> struct kunit_case *test_case;
>
> debugfs_remove_recursive(suite->debugfs);
> - kfree(suite->log);
> + kunit_debugfs_free_log(suite->log);
> +
> kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)
> - kfree(test_case->log);
> + kunit_debugfs_free_log(test_case->log);
> }
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
> index 83d8e90ca7a2..abf659c6ded4 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
> @@ -533,9 +533,16 @@ static struct kunit_suite kunit_resource_test_suite = {
> static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct kunit_suite suite;
> + struct kunit_log_frag *frag;
>
> - suite.log = kunit_kzalloc(test, KUNIT_LOG_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + suite.log = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*suite.log), GFP_KERNEL);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, suite.log);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(suite.log);
> + frag = kunit_kmalloc(test, sizeof(*frag), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, frag);
> + kunit_init_log_frag(frag);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, frag->buf[0], '\0');
> + list_add_tail(&frag->list, suite.log);
>
> kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, "put this in log.");
> kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, "this too.");
> @@ -543,14 +550,17 @@ static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test)
> kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &suite, "along with this.");
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS
> + frag = list_first_entry(test->log, struct kunit_log_frag, list);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
> - strstr(test->log, "put this in log."));
> + strstr(frag->buf, "put this in log."));
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
> - strstr(test->log, "this too."));
> + strstr(frag->buf, "this too."));
> +
> + frag = list_first_entry(suite.log, struct kunit_log_frag, list);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
> - strstr(suite.log, "add to suite log."));
> + strstr(frag->buf, "add to suite log."));
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
> - strstr(suite.log, "along with this."));
> + strstr(frag->buf, "along with this."));
> #else
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, test->log);
> #endif
> @@ -558,19 +568,75 @@ static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test)
>
> static void kunit_log_newline_test(struct kunit *test)
> {
> + struct kunit_log_frag *frag;
> +
> kunit_info(test, "Add newline\n");
> if (test->log) {
> - KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL_MSG(test, strstr(test->log, "Add newline\n"),
> - "Missing log line, full log:\n%s", test->log);
> - KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, strstr(test->log, "Add newline\n\n"));
> + frag = list_first_entry(test->log, struct kunit_log_frag, list);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL_MSG(test, strstr(frag->buf, "Add newline\n"),
> + "Missing log line, full log:\n%s", frag->buf);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, strstr(frag->buf, "Add newline\n\n"));
> } else {
> kunit_skip(test, "only useful when debugfs is enabled");
> }
> }
>
> +static void kunit_log_extend_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS
> + struct kunit_suite suite;
> + struct kunit_log_frag *frag;
> + char *p, *pn;
> + size_t len;
> + int i, q;
> +
> + suite.log = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*suite.log), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, suite.log);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(suite.log);
> + frag = kunit_kmalloc(test, sizeof(*frag), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, frag);
> + kunit_init_log_frag(frag);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, frag->buf[0], '\0');
> + list_add_tail(&frag->list, suite.log);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < KUNIT_DEFAULT_LOG_SIZE; ++i) {
> + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &suite,
> + "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy penguin %d\n", i);
> + }
> +
> + /* There must be more than one buffer fragment now */
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, list_is_singular(suite.log));
> +
> + /* Copy all the data into a contiguous string for easier parsing */
> + len = 0;
> + list_for_each_entry(frag, suite.log, list)
> + len += strlen(frag->buf);
> +
> + p = kunit_kmalloc(test, len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, p);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(frag, suite.log, list)
> + strlcat(p, frag->buf, len);
> +
> + i = 0;
> + while ((pn = strchr(p, '\n')) != NULL) {
> + *pn = '\0';
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, sscanf(p,
> + "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy penguin %d\n",
Do we want the '\n' at the end of this if we're overwriting it above?
> + &q), 1);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, q, i);
Could we make these KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ? I'd rather not have this kill the
test thread.
> + p = pn + 1;
> + ++i;
> + }
> +#else
> + kunit_skip(test, "only useful when debugfs is enabled");
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> static struct kunit_case kunit_log_test_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(kunit_log_test),
> KUNIT_CASE(kunit_log_newline_test),
> + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_log_extend_test),
> {}
> };
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
> index cb9797fa6303..f90e395b3656 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <kunit/test-bug.h>
> #include <kunit/attributes.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> #include <linux/panic.h>
> @@ -114,46 +115,54 @@ static void kunit_print_test_stats(struct kunit *test,
> * already present.
> * @log: The log to add the newline to.
> */
> -static void kunit_log_newline(char *log)
> +static void kunit_log_newline(struct kunit_log_frag *frag)
> {
> int log_len, len_left;
>
> - log_len = strlen(log);
> - len_left = KUNIT_LOG_SIZE - log_len - 1;
> + log_len = strlen(frag->buf);
> + len_left = sizeof(frag->buf) - log_len - 1;
>
> - if (log_len > 0 && log[log_len - 1] != '\n')
> - strncat(log, "\n", len_left);
> + if (log_len > 0 && frag->buf[log_len - 1] != '\n')
> + strncat(frag->buf, "\n", len_left);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Append formatted message to log, size of which is limited to
> - * KUNIT_LOG_SIZE bytes (including null terminating byte).
> - */
> -void kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...)
> +/* Append formatted message to log, extending the log buffer if necessary. */
> +void kunit_log_append(struct list_head *log, const char *fmt, ...)
> {
> va_list args;
> + struct kunit_log_frag *frag;
> int len, log_len, len_left;
>
> if (!log)
> return;
>
> - log_len = strlen(log);
> - len_left = KUNIT_LOG_SIZE - log_len - 1;
> - if (len_left <= 0)
> - return;
> + frag = list_last_entry(log, struct kunit_log_frag, list);
> + log_len = strlen(frag->buf);
> + len_left = sizeof(frag->buf) - log_len - 1;
>
> /* Evaluate length of line to add to log */
> va_start(args, fmt);
> len = vsnprintf(NULL, 0, fmt, args) + 1;
> va_end(args);
>
> + if (len > len_left) {
> + frag = kmalloc(sizeof(*frag), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!frag)
> + return;
> +
> + kunit_init_log_frag(frag);
> + list_add_tail(&frag->list, log);
> + len_left = sizeof(frag->buf) - 1;
> + log_len = 0;
> + }
> +
> /* Print formatted line to the log */
> va_start(args, fmt);
> - vsnprintf(log + log_len, min(len, len_left), fmt, args);
> + vsnprintf(frag->buf + log_len, min(len, len_left), fmt, args);
> va_end(args);
>
> /* Add newline to end of log if not already present. */
> - kunit_log_newline(log);
> + kunit_log_newline(frag);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_log_append);
>
> @@ -359,14 +368,18 @@ void __kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_do_failed_assertion);
>
> -void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log)
> +void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, struct list_head *log)
> {
> spin_lock_init(&test->lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&test->resources);
> test->name = name;
> test->log = log;
> - if (test->log)
> - test->log[0] = '\0';
> + if (test->log) {
> + struct kunit_log_frag *frag = list_first_entry(test->log,
> + struct kunit_log_frag,
> + list);
> + frag->buf[0] = '\0';
> + }
> test->status = KUNIT_SUCCESS;
> test->status_comment[0] = '\0';
> }
> --
> 2.30.2
>
On 5/8/23 10:17, David Gow wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 22:14, Richard Fitzgerald
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Re-implement the log buffer as a list of buffer fragments that can
>> be extended as the size of the log info grows.
>>
>> When using parameterization the test case can run many times and create
>> a large amount of log. It's not really practical to keep increasing the
>> size of the fixed buffer every time a test needs more space. And a big
>> fixed buffer wastes memory.
>>
>> The original char *log pointer is replaced by a pointer to a list of
>> struct kunit_log_frag, each containing a fixed-size buffer.
>>
>> kunit_log_append() now attempts to append to that last kunit_log_frag in
>> the list. If there isn't enough space it will append a new kunit_log_frag
>> to the list. This simple implementation does not attempt to completely
>> fill the buffer in every kunit_log_frag.
>>
>> The 'log' member of kunit_suite, kunit_test_case and kunit_suite must be a
>> pointer because the API of kunit_log() requires that is the same type in
>> all three structs. As kunit.log is a pointer to the 'log' of the current
>> kunit_case, it must be a pointer in the other two structs.
>>
>> The existing kunit-test.c log tests have been updated for the new log
>> buffer and a new kunit_log_extend_test() case to test extending the buffer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <[email protected]>
>> ---
>
> +Rae, since she's the last person to touch the log code.
>
> Thanks a bunch. Some way of handling longer logs has been on the to-do
> list for a while, and this is probably better than the other options
> of allowing per-test log sizes or using krealloc().
>
> This mostly works okay here, but the test fails when running:
> ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --alltests
> [17:05:12] # kunit_log_extend_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at
> lib/kunit/kunit-test.c:624
> [17:05:12] Expected sscanf(p, "The quick brown fox jumps over the
> lazy penguin %d", &q) == 1, but
> [17:05:12] sscanf(p, "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy
> penguin %d", &q) == 0 (0x0)
>
> I haven't found the cause of it, yet, but it happens both on UML and
> QEMU x86_64.
>
Strange, I haven't been able to reproduce this. But sscanf() isn't the
best function to use here because of how it treats whitespace.
'\n' doesn't match a newline, it mtaches any whitespace.
I'm working on a V2 chain, and one change I've made is to replace the
sscanf() with an exact match of what the string should be. I've also
added some test cases.
>> include/kunit/test.h | 25 +++++++++----
>> lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> lib/kunit/kunit-test.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> lib/kunit/test.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++----------
>> 4 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
>> index 011e0d6bb506..907b30401669 100644
>> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
>> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
>> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kunit_running);
>>
>> struct kunit;
>>
>> -/* Size of log associated with test. */
>> -#define KUNIT_LOG_SIZE 2048
>> +/* Initial size of log associated with test. */
>> +#define KUNIT_DEFAULT_LOG_SIZE 500
>
> Would it make more sense to call this KUNIT_LOG_FRAGMENT_SIZE or
> similar, as not only is this the default size, but also the amount by
> which the size is incremented.
>
> Also, there's plenty of scope for bikeshedding the exact value of
> this, two considerations being:
> - Most tests have very small logs: we possibly should look into what
> the average log size is.
> - It may make sense to tweak the log size to fit nicely within common
> allocation/page sizes. e.g., PAGE_SIZE-sizeof(struct list_head) or
> something. Though that is probably too big by default.
>
This initial implementation doesn't support splitting the log line over
multiple fragments (I like to avoid rewirting the whole world in one
patch.) So the fragment size also limits the maximum log line.
I've done some work in supporting long lines and will include it in
my V2 chain.
...
>> + i = 0;
>> + while ((pn = strchr(p, '\n')) != NULL) {
>> + *pn = '\0';
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, sscanf(p,
>> + "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy penguin %d\n",
>
> Do we want the '\n' at the end of this if we're overwriting it above?
>
Oh, that's an embarrassing error. But see my comment above about
sscanf().
>> + &q), 1);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, q, i);
>
> Could we make these KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ? I'd rather not have this kill the
> test thread.
>
Yes, that's a typo.
Personally, I find the choice of ASSERT/EXPECT confusing. Since people
are so used to _asserting_ the condition to be checked, the brain tends
to go for ASSERT out of habit. IMO it would have been better to use
ASSERT for the thing the test is checking (for consistency with normal
usage) and maybe KUNIT_NEEDS_xxx() for things that are prerequisites of
the test code itself.