2021-01-26 10:41:30

by Stefan Berger

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] tpm: ibmvtpm: fix error return code in tpm_ibmvtpm_probe()

From: Stefan Berger <[email protected]>

Return error code -ETIMEDOUT rather than '0' when waiting for the
rtce_buf to be set has timed out.

Fixes: d8d74ea3c002 ("tpm: ibmvtpm: Wait for buffer to be set before proceeding")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <[email protected]>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index 994385bf37c0..813eb2cac0ce 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -687,6 +687,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev,
ibmvtpm->rtce_buf != NULL,
HZ)) {
dev_err(dev, "CRQ response timed out\n");
+ rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
goto init_irq_cleanup;
}

--
2.25.4


2021-01-29 17:44:05

by Jarkko Sakkinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: ibmvtpm: fix error return code in tpm_ibmvtpm_probe()

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 08:47:53PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> From: Stefan Berger <[email protected]>
>
> Return error code -ETIMEDOUT rather than '0' when waiting for the
> rtce_buf to be set has timed out.
>
> Fixes: d8d74ea3c002 ("tpm: ibmvtpm: Wait for buffer to be set before proceeding")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <[email protected]>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>

Thanks! Should I add

Cc: [email protected] to this?

/Jarkko


> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> index 994385bf37c0..813eb2cac0ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> @@ -687,6 +687,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev,
> ibmvtpm->rtce_buf != NULL,
> HZ)) {
> dev_err(dev, "CRQ response timed out\n");
> + rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
> goto init_irq_cleanup;
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.4
>
>

2021-01-29 19:04:02

by Stefan Berger

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: ibmvtpm: fix error return code in tpm_ibmvtpm_probe()

On 1/29/21 12:35 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 08:47:53PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> From: Stefan Berger <[email protected]>
>>
>> Return error code -ETIMEDOUT rather than '0' when waiting for the
>> rtce_buf to be set has timed out.
>>
>> Fixes: d8d74ea3c002 ("tpm: ibmvtpm: Wait for buffer to be set before proceeding")
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <[email protected]>
>> ---
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks! Should I add
>
> Cc: [email protected] to this?

Yes, that would be good! Thank you!


   Stefan


>
> /Jarkko
>
>
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
>> index 994385bf37c0..813eb2cac0ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
>> @@ -687,6 +687,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev,
>> ibmvtpm->rtce_buf != NULL,
>> HZ)) {
>> dev_err(dev, "CRQ response timed out\n");
>> + rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
>> goto init_irq_cleanup;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.4
>>
>>

2021-01-30 21:21:45

by Jarkko Sakkinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: ibmvtpm: fix error return code in tpm_ibmvtpm_probe()

On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 13:57 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 1/29/21 12:35 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 08:47:53PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > From: Stefan Berger <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Return error code -ETIMEDOUT rather than '0' when waiting for the
> > > rtce_buf to be set has timed out.
> > >
> > > Fixes: d8d74ea3c002 ("tpm: ibmvtpm: Wait for buffer to be set before proceeding")
> > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
> >
> > Thanks! Should I add
> >
> > Cc: [email protected] to this?
>
> Yes, that would be good! Thank you!


OK, it's applied.


>     Stefan

/Jarkko