2013-04-10 07:17:52

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pm tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig between commit 785f40040874 ("cpufreq:
s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq") from the pm tree and
commits fb278af74b28 ("ARM: S3C24XX: Removed unneeded dependency on
CPU_S3C2410") and a4e4d22c6f53 ("ARM: S3C24XX: Removed unneeded
dependency on CPU_S3C2412") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up by removing the sections from arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig
and can carry thefix as necessary (no action is required).

P.S. those arm-soc tree commits have a bad Author email address ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]


Attachments:
(No filename) (667.00 B)
(No filename) (836.00 B)
Download all attachments

2013-04-10 08:37:11

by Kukjin Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pm tree

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
Hi,

> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig between commit 785f40040874 ("cpufreq:
> s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq") from the pm tree and

As I know, Rafael will drop it in his tree.
http://lists-archives.com/linux-kernel/27815851-cpufreq-s3c24xx-move-cpufreq
-driver-to-drivers-cpufreq.html

> commits fb278af74b28 ("ARM: S3C24XX: Removed unneeded dependency on
> CPU_S3C2410") and a4e4d22c6f53 ("ARM: S3C24XX: Removed unneeded
> dependency on CPU_S3C2412") from the arm-soc tree.
>
> I fixed it up by removing the sections from arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig
> and can carry thefix as necessary (no action is required).
>
Thanks.

> P.S. those arm-soc tree commits have a bad Author email address ...

Oops :-( it's my fault due to e-mail client problem...

Arnd, it happened in next/dt-exynos, next/mct-exynos and
next/cleanup-samsung branches in my tree.

And I sorted out in my local just now. Could you please re-pull them into
arm-soc? Then, I will push forced. Sorry about that.

- Kukjin

2013-04-11 08:37:11

by Olof Johansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pm tree

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 05:36:49PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> Hi,
>
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig between commit 785f40040874 ("cpufreq:
> > s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq") from the pm tree and
>
> As I know, Rafael will drop it in his tree.
> http://lists-archives.com/linux-kernel/27815851-cpufreq-s3c24xx-move-cpufreq
> -driver-to-drivers-cpufreq.html
>
> > commits fb278af74b28 ("ARM: S3C24XX: Removed unneeded dependency on
> > CPU_S3C2410") and a4e4d22c6f53 ("ARM: S3C24XX: Removed unneeded
> > dependency on CPU_S3C2412") from the arm-soc tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up by removing the sections from arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig
> > and can carry thefix as necessary (no action is required).
> >
> Thanks.
>
> > P.S. those arm-soc tree commits have a bad Author email address ...
>
> Oops :-( it's my fault due to e-mail client problem...
>
> Arnd, it happened in next/dt-exynos, next/mct-exynos and
> next/cleanup-samsung branches in my tree.
>
> And I sorted out in my local just now. Could you please re-pull them into
> arm-soc? Then, I will push forced. Sorry about that.

Given that it's "just" formatting errors, I would prefer not repulling and
rebuilding just because of it. For someone reading the information it's pretty
obvious what the valid email address would be. Please try to be mindful of it
in the future though (and we'll try to double-check these things too).


-Olof

2013-04-19 11:00:01

by Kukjin Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pm tree

Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 05:36:49PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig between commit 785f40040874 ("cpufreq:
> > > s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq") from the pm tree and
> >
> > As I know, Rafael will drop it in his tree.
> > http://lists-archives.com/linux-kernel/27815851-cpufreq-s3c24xx-move-
> cpufreq
> > -driver-to-drivers-cpufreq.html
> >
> > > commits fb278af74b28 ("ARM: S3C24XX: Removed unneeded dependency on
> > > CPU_S3C2410") and a4e4d22c6f53 ("ARM: S3C24XX: Removed unneeded
> > > dependency on CPU_S3C2412") from the arm-soc tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up by removing the sections from arch/arm/mach-
> s3c24xx/Kconfig
> > > and can carry thefix as necessary (no action is required).
> > >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > > P.S. those arm-soc tree commits have a bad Author email address ...
> >
> > Oops :-( it's my fault due to e-mail client problem...
> >
> > Arnd, it happened in next/dt-exynos, next/mct-exynos and
> > next/cleanup-samsung branches in my tree.
> >
> > And I sorted out in my local just now. Could you please re-pull them
> into
> > arm-soc? Then, I will push forced. Sorry about that.
>
> Given that it's "just" formatting errors, I would prefer not repulling and
> rebuilding just because of it. For someone reading the information it's

Hmm...if possible, I'm still hoping, you could replace previous branches
which including 'wrong format' for author e-mail :-) But up to you.

> pretty
> obvious what the valid email address would be. Please try to be mindful of
> it

OK.

> in the future though (and we'll try to double-check these things too).
>
BTW, if you don't want to pull, I need to re-send for '[GIT PULL 4/4]
dt-exynos 2 for v3.10'...

But I'm not sure it's possible...

Anyway, sorry for noise.

- Kukjin