Here comes another one. Unless I receive some more patches, the next
patch will be the first release-candidate for v2.0.40
2.0.40pre3
o Fix typo in sched.c (Tim Sutherland)
| this time for real; I applied this
| patch to the wrong kernel-tree last
| time, hence the reject
o IDE probe patch for some ATAPI drives (Geert Van der Plas)
2.0.40pre2
o Make pci2000 compile (Joseph Martin)
o Use KERNELRELEASE in module (me)
installpath as well
o Removed unused variable in (me)
ext2/super.c
o Fixed warning in ext2/dir.c (me)
o Fix a blunder of my own in (me)
arch/kernel/i386/traps.c
o Fix typo in sched.c (Tim Sutherland)
o Fix bug in mkdep.c (Tim Sutherland)
o Fix bug in autoirq.c (Michael Deutschmann)
o Add allocation debugging code (Michael Deutschmann)
o Fix bugs in the math-emu code (Bill Metzenthen,
Michael Deutschmann)
2.0.40pre1
o Fixed the ordering of (Philipp Rumpf)
watchdog initialising, to make sure
hardware watchdogs takes precedence
over the softdog driver
o Fix the CREDITS-entry for (Kai Petzke)
Kai Petzke
o Updated the MAINTAINERS-file a little (me)
o Fix "dumpable"-race (Solar Designer)
o Fix theoretical exploit in printk (Solar Designer)
o Backported checkconfig.pl, (me)
checkhelp.pl and checkincludes.pl
from v2.4
o Backported support for tags and (me)
TAGS
o Added an extra-version entry to (me)
the version#, to keep track of
the prepatches etc.
o Fix all occurences of (me)
#endif BLABLA type; don't forget
that it should be /* BLABLA */ !!!
/David
_ _
// David Weinehall <[email protected]> /> Northern lights wander \\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
Hi David.
> Here comes another one. Unless I receive some more patches, the next
> patch will be the first release-candidate for v2.0.40
>
>
> 2.0.40pre3
Didn't you just say that you do -preN _with_ a leading "-" ?
Mail subject and mail contents is different.
// Stefan
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:30:12PM +0100, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> Hi David.
>
> > Here comes another one. Unless I receive some more patches, the next
> > patch will be the first release-candidate for v2.0.40
> >
> >
> > 2.0.40pre3
>
> Didn't you just say that you do -preN _with_ a leading "-" ?
>
> Mail subject and mail contents is different.
I mean that I use it in the Makefile EXTRAVERSION
Regards: David
_ _
// David Weinehall <[email protected]> /> Northern lights wander \\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:36:35PM +0100, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> >>>Here comes another one. Unless I receive some more patches, the next
> >>>patch will be the first release-candidate for v2.0.40
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>2.0.40pre3
> >>>
> >>Didn't you just say that you do -preN _with_ a leading "-" ?
> >>
> >>Mail subject and mail contents is different.
> >>
> >
> > I mean that I use it in the Makefile EXTRAVERSION
>
> Why not use it everywhere ? Or do you consider there to be a valid
> difference?
No, more of a thinko :-)
/David
_ _
// David Weinehall <[email protected]> /> Northern lights wander \\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
Hi.
>>>Here comes another one. Unless I receive some more patches, the next
>>>patch will be the first release-candidate for v2.0.40
>>>
>>>
>>>2.0.40pre3
>>>
>>Didn't you just say that you do -preN _with_ a leading "-" ?
>>
>>Mail subject and mail contents is different.
>>
>
> I mean that I use it in the Makefile EXTRAVERSION
Why not use it everywhere ? Or do you consider there to be a valid
difference?
// Stefan