2002-09-30 17:26:40

by Steven Cole

Subject: 2.5.37-bk2 maybe new traceback for $BLAH at slab.c:1374

I got the other init_irq() stuff just like many other people, but here's
one which I haven't seen reported yet. Kernel is 2.5.39bk2. I just got
this once on boot up. This system is UP, IDE.

Debug: sleeping function called from illegal context at slab.c:1374
cc57bf74 cc57bf94 c013204b c02a89e1 0000055e cc57a000 cd0103e0 00000000
cc57bfbc c010bb13 c12832e8 000001d0 c012b317 bffffb88 00000000 cc57a000
00000000 00000004 bffffb28 c010781b 00000000 00000400 00000001 00000000
Call Trace:
[<c013204b>]__kmem_cache_alloc+0x10b/0x110
[<c010bb13>]sys_ioperm+0x83/0x150
[<c012b317>]sys_munmap+0x57/0x80
[<c010781b>]syscall_call+0x7/0xb


Steven

2002-09-30 17:53:13

by Andrew Morton

Subject: Re: 2.5.37-bk2 maybe new traceback for $BLAH at slab.c:1374

Steven Cole wrote:
>
> I got the other init_irq() stuff just like many other people, but here's
> one which I haven't seen reported yet. Kernel is 2.5.39bk2. I just got
> this once on boot up. This system is UP, IDE.
>
> Debug: sleeping function called from illegal context at slab.c:1374
> cc57bf74 cc57bf94 c013204b c02a89e1 0000055e cc57a000 cd0103e0 00000000
> cc57bfbc c010bb13 c12832e8 000001d0 c012b317 bffffb88 00000000 cc57a000
> 00000000 00000004 bffffb28 c010781b 00000000 00000400 00000001 00000000
> Call Trace:
> [<c013204b>]__kmem_cache_alloc+0x10b/0x110
> [<c010bb13>]sys_ioperm+0x83/0x150
> [<c012b317>]sys_munmap+0x57/0x80
> [<c010781b>]syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>

Yup, thanks. The sys_ioperm() one is known. I'll fix it up.