2021-06-17 04:50:46

by Alex Bee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add ES8316 codec for Rock Pi4

Rock Pi4 boards have the codec connected to i2s0 and it is accessible
via i2c1 address 0x11.
Add an audio-graph-card it.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <[email protected]>
---
.../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi
index 7d0a7c697703..e5c1083174ff 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi
@@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ sdio_pwrseq: sdio-pwrseq {
reset-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};

+ sound {
+ compatible = "audio-graph-card";
+ label = "rockchip,rk3399";
+ dais = <&i2s0_p0>;
+ };
+
vcc12v_dcin: dc-12v {
compatible = "regulator-fixed";
regulator-name = "vcc12v_dcin";
@@ -422,6 +428,20 @@ &i2c1 {
i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <300>;
i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <15>;
status = "okay";
+
+ es8316: codec@11 {
+ compatible = "everest,es8316";
+ reg = <0x11>;
+ clocks = <&cru SCLK_I2S_8CH_OUT>;
+ clock-names = "mclk";
+ #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
+
+ port {
+ es8316_p0_0: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&i2s0_p0_0>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
};

&i2c3 {
@@ -441,6 +461,14 @@ &i2s0 {
rockchip,capture-channels = <2>;
rockchip,playback-channels = <2>;
status = "okay";
+
+ i2s0_p0: port {
+ i2s0_p0_0: endpoint {
+ dai-format = "i2s";
+ mclk-fs = <256>;
+ remote-endpoint = <&es8316_p0_0>;
+ };
+ };
};

&i2s1 {
--
2.27.0


2021-06-17 04:51:02

by Alex Bee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RK3399 Rock Pi 4a plus board

Rock Pi 4a plus board is the successor of Rock Pi 4a board.

Differences to the original version are
- has RK3399 OP1 SoC revision
- has eMMC (16 or 32 GB) soldered on board (no changes required,
since it is enabled in rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi)
- dev boards have SPI flash soldered, but as per manufacturer response,
this won't be the case for mass production boards

I didn't add yet another compatible, since the small set of differences
are captured by the device tree.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
.../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
index c3e00c0e2db7..dbd7d37950f1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-puma-haikou.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a.dtb
+dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4b.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4c.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock960.dtb
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2deaab7f9307
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 Akash Gajjar <[email protected]>
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 Pragnesh Patel <[email protected]>
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+#include "rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi"
+#include "rk3399-op1-opp.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+ model = "Radxa ROCK Pi 4A plus";
+ compatible = "radxa,rockpi4a", "radxa,rockpi4", "rockchip,rk3399";
+};
--
2.27.0

2021-06-17 04:51:07

by Alex Bee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RK3399 Rock Pi 4b plus board

Rock Pi 4b plus board is the successor of Rock Pi 4b board.

Differences to the original version are
- has RK3399 OP1 SoC revision
- has eMMC (16 or 32 GB) soldered on board (no changes required,
since it is enabled in rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi)
- dev boards have SPI flash soldered, but as per manufacturer response,
this won't be the case for mass production boards

I didn't add yet another compatible, since the small set of differences
are captured by the device tree.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
.../dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4b-plus.dts | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4b-plus.dts

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
index dbd7d37950f1..e867e5889d44 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4b.dtb
+dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4b-plus.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4c.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock960.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rockpro64-v2.dtb
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4b-plus.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4b-plus.dts
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ea68b8c9d9ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4b-plus.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 Akash Gajjar <[email protected]>
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 Pragnesh Patel <[email protected]>
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+#include "rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi"
+#include "rk3399-op1-opp.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+ model = "Radxa ROCK Pi 4B plus";
+ compatible = "radxa,rockpi4b", "radxa,rockpi4", "rockchip,rk3399";
+
+ aliases {
+ mmc2 = &sdio0;
+ };
+};
+
+&sdio0 {
+ status = "okay";
+
+ brcmf: wifi@1 {
+ compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
+ reg = <1>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
+ interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ interrupt-names = "host-wake";
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&wifi_host_wake_l>;
+ };
+};
+
+&uart0 {
+ status = "okay";
+
+ bluetooth {
+ compatible = "brcm,bcm43438-bt";
+ clocks = <&rk808 1>;
+ clock-names = "ext_clock";
+ device-wakeup-gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ host-wakeup-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ shutdown-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&bt_host_wake_l &bt_wake_l &bt_enable_h>;
+ };
+};
--
2.27.0

2021-06-18 12:30:25

by Johan Jonker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add ES8316 codec for Rock Pi4

Hi Alex,

On 6/17/21 6:49 AM, Alex Bee wrote:
> Rock Pi4 boards have the codec connected to i2s0 and it is accessible
> via i2c1 address 0x11.
> Add an audio-graph-card it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi
> index 7d0a7c697703..e5c1083174ff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi
> @@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ sdio_pwrseq: sdio-pwrseq {
> reset-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> };
>
> + sound {
> + compatible = "audio-graph-card";

> + label = "rockchip,rk3399";

See previous discussion:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/[email protected]/

It seems that aplay/linux? adds "-1" to it and removes the comma and
"-", so we get:

hdmisound
rockchiprk3399
rockchiprk339_1

Shouldn't we label it with something that reflect the function/output.
Shouldn't we standardize to SPDIF, HDMI and Analog similar to rk3318/rk3328?
Make a shorter label without spaces or special chars, so that chars
don't get removed?

Proposal:

Analog
HDMI
ES8316 <---
SPDIF


Possible example solutions:

[PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: more user friendly name of sound nodes
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/

===

Johan

> + dais = <&i2s0_p0>;
> + };
> +
> vcc12v_dcin: dc-12v {
> compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> regulator-name = "vcc12v_dcin";
> @@ -422,6 +428,20 @@ &i2c1 {
> i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <300>;
> i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <15>;
> status = "okay";
> +
> + es8316: codec@11 {
> + compatible = "everest,es8316";
> + reg = <0x11>;
> + clocks = <&cru SCLK_I2S_8CH_OUT>;
> + clock-names = "mclk";
> + #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
> +
> + port {
> + es8316_p0_0: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&i2s0_p0_0>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> };
>
> &i2c3 {
> @@ -441,6 +461,14 @@ &i2s0 {
> rockchip,capture-channels = <2>;
> rockchip,playback-channels = <2>;
> status = "okay";
> +
> + i2s0_p0: port {
> + i2s0_p0_0: endpoint {
> + dai-format = "i2s";
> + mclk-fs = <256>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&es8316_p0_0>;
> + };
> + };
> };
>
> &i2s1 {
>

2021-06-18 16:08:12

by Heiko Stuebner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RK3399 Rock Pi 4a plus board

Am Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2021, 06:49:54 CEST schrieb Alex Bee:
> Rock Pi 4a plus board is the successor of Rock Pi 4a board.
>
> Differences to the original version are
> - has RK3399 OP1 SoC revision
> - has eMMC (16 or 32 GB) soldered on board (no changes required,
> since it is enabled in rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi)
> - dev boards have SPI flash soldered, but as per manufacturer response,
> this won't be the case for mass production boards
>
> I didn't add yet another compatible, since the small set of differences
> are captured by the device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> index c3e00c0e2db7..dbd7d37950f1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-puma-haikou.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4b.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4c.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock960.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2deaab7f9307
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2019 Akash Gajjar <[email protected]>
> + * Copyright (c) 2019 Pragnesh Patel <[email protected]>
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +#include "rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi"
> +#include "rk3399-op1-opp.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Radxa ROCK Pi 4A plus";
> + compatible = "radxa,rockpi4a", "radxa,rockpi4", "rockchip,rk3399";

hmm, I don't really follow why you're re-using the radxa,rockpi4a
compatible. I'd assume this should be radxa,rockpi4a+ or something?

I.e. if a bootloader needs to select the matching devicetree from a list
of available devicetrees, this could end up running a regular rockpi4a
(without +) using the OP1 operating points and thus at way too high
frequencies.


Heiko


> +};
>




2021-06-18 19:01:22

by Alex Bee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add ES8316 codec for Rock Pi4

Hi Johan,

Am 18.06.21 um 11:54 schrieb Johan Jonker:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 6/17/21 6:49 AM, Alex Bee wrote:
>> Rock Pi4 boards have the codec connected to i2s0 and it is accessible
>> via i2c1 address 0x11.
>> Add an audio-graph-card it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi
>> index 7d0a7c697703..e5c1083174ff 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi
>> @@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ sdio_pwrseq: sdio-pwrseq {
>> reset-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> };
>>
>> + sound {
>> + compatible = "audio-graph-card";
>> + label = "rockchip,rk3399";
> See previous discussion:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/[email protected]/
>
> It seems that aplay/linux? adds "-1" to it and removes the comma and
> "-", so we get:
>
> hdmisound
> rockchiprk3399
> rockchiprk339_1
>
> Shouldn't we label it with something that reflect the function/output.
> Shouldn't we standardize to SPDIF, HDMI and Analog similar to rk3318/rk3328?
> Make a shorter label without spaces or special chars, so that chars
> don't get removed?
>
> Proposal:
>
> Analog
> HDMI
> ES8316 <---
> SPDIF

OK - thanks for that, I wasn't aware.

I'll go for "Analog", since that seems to be the accepted solution for
RockPro64 board and I think we should keep it the same across boards (on
distro side it can get annoying if you need a couple of alsa configs
with the same contents, just because audio card names are different).

Alex.

>
>
> Possible example solutions:
>
> [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: more user friendly name of sound nodes
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>
> ===
>
> Johan
>
>> + dais = <&i2s0_p0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> vcc12v_dcin: dc-12v {
>> compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> regulator-name = "vcc12v_dcin";
>> @@ -422,6 +428,20 @@ &i2c1 {
>> i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <300>;
>> i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <15>;
>> status = "okay";
>> +
>> + es8316: codec@11 {
>> + compatible = "everest,es8316";
>> + reg = <0x11>;
>> + clocks = <&cru SCLK_I2S_8CH_OUT>;
>> + clock-names = "mclk";
>> + #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + port {
>> + es8316_p0_0: endpoint {
>> + remote-endpoint = <&i2s0_p0_0>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> &i2c3 {
>> @@ -441,6 +461,14 @@ &i2s0 {
>> rockchip,capture-channels = <2>;
>> rockchip,playback-channels = <2>;
>> status = "okay";
>> +
>> + i2s0_p0: port {
>> + i2s0_p0_0: endpoint {
>> + dai-format = "i2s";
>> + mclk-fs = <256>;
>> + remote-endpoint = <&es8316_p0_0>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> &i2s1 {
>>

2021-06-18 19:11:33

by Alex Bee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RK3399 Rock Pi 4a plus board

Hi Heiko,

Am 18.06.21 um 15:08 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> Am Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2021, 06:49:54 CEST schrieb Alex Bee:
>> Rock Pi 4a plus board is the successor of Rock Pi 4a board.
>>
>> Differences to the original version are
>> - has RK3399 OP1 SoC revision
>> - has eMMC (16 or 32 GB) soldered on board (no changes required,
>> since it is enabled in rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi)
>> - dev boards have SPI flash soldered, but as per manufacturer response,
>> this won't be the case for mass production boards
>>
>> I didn't add yet another compatible, since the small set of differences
>> are captured by the device tree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
>> index c3e00c0e2db7..dbd7d37950f1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-puma-haikou.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a.dtb
>> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4b.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4c.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock960.dtb
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..2deaab7f9307
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dts
>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2019 Akash Gajjar <[email protected]>
>> + * Copyright (c) 2019 Pragnesh Patel <[email protected]>
>> + */
>> +
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +#include "rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsi"
>> +#include "rk3399-op1-opp.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + model = "Radxa ROCK Pi 4A plus";
>> + compatible = "radxa,rockpi4a", "radxa,rockpi4", "rockchip,rk3399";
> hmm, I don't really follow why you're re-using the radxa,rockpi4a
> compatible. I'd assume this should be radxa,rockpi4a+ or something?

Ah, yes this was part of my cover letter, which obviously got lost
somewhere.

Anyways: Reason I thought of was: For example broadcom nvram file names
must match the compatible string and they have to be copied/symlinked
over and over if we add new compatibles for every minor changed revision
of a board. I guess there are more examples for that in userland.

>
> I.e. if a bootloader needs to select the matching devicetree from a list
> of available devicetrees, this could end up running a regular rockpi4a
> (without +) using the OP1 operating points and thus at way too high
> frequencies.

Besides I wasn't aware, that "a bootloader" can do that already I
understand your concerns and will change it.

Alex.

>
> Heiko
>
>
>> +};
>>
>
>
>