On 11.04.2016 03:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
A regression was bisected to this commit:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115321
So it's probably better to hold off on backporting this commit (and
possibly the corresponding amdgpu commit as well).
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:26:00AM +0900, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On 11.04.2016 03:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> A regression was bisected to this commit:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115321
Why not just provide stable with the bugfix as well? Being
bug-compatible is a big plus :)
> So it's probably better to hold off on backporting this commit (and
> possibly the corresponding amdgpu commit as well).
What specific commit are you referring to here?
thanks,
greg k-h
On 12.04.2016 23:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:26:00AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 11.04.2016 03:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>> A regression was bisected to this commit:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115321
>
> Why not just provide stable with the bugfix as well?
What bugfix are you referring to? I'm not aware of any fix for this
regression.
>> So it's probably better to hold off on backporting this commit (and
>> possibly the corresponding amdgpu commit as well).
>
> What specific commit are you referring to here?
bedf2a65c1aa8fb29ba8527fd00c0f68ec1f55f1 ("drm/amdgpu: disable runtime
pm on PX laptops without dGPU power control")
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
On 12.04.2016 23:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:26:00AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 11.04.2016 03:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>> A regression was bisected to this commit:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115321
FYI, the backport to 4.5 triggered another bug report:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116251
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:44:09AM +0900, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On 12.04.2016 23:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:26:00AM +0900, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >> On 11.04.2016 03:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >>
> >> A regression was bisected to this commit:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115321
>
> FYI, the backport to 4.5 triggered another bug report:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116251
Is it fixed in Linus's tree yet? If so, great, let me know the git
commit id.
thanks,
greg k-h