Allow charger manager can be built as a module like other charger
drivers.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
---
Changes from v1:
- Use IS_ENABLED() instead.
---
drivers/power/supply/Kconfig | 2 +-
include/linux/power/charger-manager.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/Kconfig b/drivers/power/supply/Kconfig
index 9a5591a..195bc04 100644
--- a/drivers/power/supply/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/Kconfig
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ config CHARGER_GPIO
called gpio-charger.
config CHARGER_MANAGER
- bool "Battery charger manager for multiple chargers"
+ tristate "Battery charger manager for multiple chargers"
depends on REGULATOR
select EXTCON
help
diff --git a/include/linux/power/charger-manager.h b/include/linux/power/charger-manager.h
index ad19e68..ae94dce 100644
--- a/include/linux/power/charger-manager.h
+++ b/include/linux/power/charger-manager.h
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ struct charger_manager {
u64 charging_end_time;
};
-#ifdef CONFIG_CHARGER_MANAGER
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CHARGER_MANAGER)
extern void cm_notify_event(struct power_supply *psy,
enum cm_event_types type, char *msg);
#else
--
1.9.1
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:34:10AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Allow charger manager can be built as a module like other charger
> drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
Thanks, queued. I do not like this driver, but its the best we have
at the moment.
-- Sebastian
> Changes from v1:
> - Use IS_ENABLED() instead.
> ---
> drivers/power/supply/Kconfig | 2 +-
> include/linux/power/charger-manager.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/Kconfig b/drivers/power/supply/Kconfig
> index 9a5591a..195bc04 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/Kconfig
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ config CHARGER_GPIO
> called gpio-charger.
>
> config CHARGER_MANAGER
> - bool "Battery charger manager for multiple chargers"
> + tristate "Battery charger manager for multiple chargers"
> depends on REGULATOR
> select EXTCON
> help
> diff --git a/include/linux/power/charger-manager.h b/include/linux/power/charger-manager.h
> index ad19e68..ae94dce 100644
> --- a/include/linux/power/charger-manager.h
> +++ b/include/linux/power/charger-manager.h
> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ struct charger_manager {
> u64 charging_end_time;
> };
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CHARGER_MANAGER
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CHARGER_MANAGER)
> extern void cm_notify_event(struct power_supply *psy,
> enum cm_event_types type, char *msg);
> #else
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Hi Sebastian,
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 4:47 AM Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:34:10AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > Allow charger manager can be built as a module like other charger
> > drivers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
> > ---
>
> Thanks, queued. I do not like this driver, but its the best we have
> at the moment.
Thanks. I understood your concern, do you have any plan to re-design
the charger manager driver in kernel? Or do you have some thoughts
about re-designing it? Now we have some out of tree code to use the
old charger manger, and we'd like to change to the new charger manger
driver and upstream them.
--
Baolin Wang
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:20:41AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 4:47 AM Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:34:10AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > > Allow charger manager can be built as a module like other charger
> > > drivers.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> >
> > Thanks, queued. I do not like this driver, but its the best we have
> > at the moment.
>
> Thanks. I understood your concern, do you have any plan to re-design
> the charger manager driver in kernel? Or do you have some thoughts
> about re-designing it? Now we have some out of tree code to use the
> old charger manger, and we'd like to change to the new charger manger
> driver and upstream them.
I don't have anything ready yet and not enough time unfortunately.
The proper way would be to have something equivialent to charger-manager
in the power-supply core. The core should be able to monitor batteries
and handle connected chargers automatically. Also there shouldn't be
any DT entry for the software managing the charger, since DT is about
hardware.
-- Sebastian
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 6:18 AM Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:20:41AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 4:47 AM Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:34:10AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > > > Allow charger manager can be built as a module like other charger
> > > > drivers.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Thanks, queued. I do not like this driver, but its the best we have
> > > at the moment.
> >
> > Thanks. I understood your concern, do you have any plan to re-design
> > the charger manager driver in kernel? Or do you have some thoughts
> > about re-designing it? Now we have some out of tree code to use the
> > old charger manger, and we'd like to change to the new charger manger
> > driver and upstream them.
>
> I don't have anything ready yet and not enough time unfortunately.
> The proper way would be to have something equivialent to charger-manager
> in the power-supply core. The core should be able to monitor batteries
> and handle connected chargers automatically. Also there shouldn't be
> any DT entry for the software managing the charger, since DT is about
> hardware.
OK. We'll think about it according to your suggestion. Thanks.
--
Baolin Wang