2021-11-04 14:20:17

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.14 00/16] 5.14.17-rc1 review

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.14.17 release.
There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 06 Nov 2021 14:11:51 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.14.17-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.14.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.14.17-rc1

Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
ALSA: usb-audio: Add Audient iD14 to mixer map quirk table

Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
ALSA: usb-audio: Add Schiit Hel device to mixer map quirk table

Matthew Brost <[email protected]>
Revert "drm/i915/gt: Propagate change in error status to children on unhold"

Anson Jacob <[email protected]>
drm/amd/display: Revert "Directly retrain link from debugfs"

Christian König <[email protected]>
drm/amdgpu: revert "Add autodump debugfs node for gpu reset v8"

Bryan O'Donoghue <[email protected]>
Revert "wcn36xx: Disable bmps when encryption is disabled"

Wang Kefeng <[email protected]>
ARM: 9120/1: Revert "amba: make use of -1 IRQs warn"

Lucas Stach <[email protected]>
Revert "soc: imx: gpcv2: move reset assert after requesting domain power up"

José Roberto de Souza <[email protected]>
drm/i915: Remove memory frequency calculation

Yifan Zhang <[email protected]>
drm/amdkfd: fix boot failure when iommu is disabled in Picasso.

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "usb: core: hcd: Add support for deferring roothub registration"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "xhci: Set HCD flag to defer primary roothub registration"

Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
media: firewire: firedtv-avc: fix a buffer overflow in avc_ca_pmt()

Eugene Crosser <[email protected]>
vrf: Revert "Reset skb conntrack connection..."

Erik Ekman <[email protected]>
sfc: Fix reading non-legacy supported link modes

Ming Lei <[email protected]>
scsi: core: Put LLD module refcnt after SCSI device is released


-------------

Diffstat:

Makefile | 4 +-
drivers/amba/bus.c | 3 -
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 2 -
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c | 80 ----------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.h | 5 --
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 8 ---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c | 3 +
.../drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_debugfs.c | 3 +-
.../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 4 --
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 8 ---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 30 +-------
drivers/media/firewire/firedtv-avc.c | 14 +++-
drivers/media/firewire/firedtv-ci.c | 2 +
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ethtool_common.c | 10 +--
drivers/net/vrf.c | 4 --
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/main.c | 10 ---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/pmc.c | 5 +-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/wcn36xx.h | 1 -
drivers/scsi/scsi.c | 4 +-
drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c | 9 +++
drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c | 4 +-
drivers/usb/core/hcd.c | 29 ++------
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 1 -
include/linux/usb/hcd.h | 2 -
sound/usb/mixer_maps.c | 8 +++
25 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 200 deletions(-)



2021-11-04 19:57:29

by Shuah Khan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.14 00/16] 5.14.17-rc1 review

On 11/4/21 8:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.14.17 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 06 Nov 2021 14:11:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.14.17-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.14.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>

thanks,
-- Shuah

2021-11-04 22:53:52

by Florian Fainelli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.14 00/16] 5.14.17-rc1 review

On 11/4/21 7:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.14.17 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 06 Nov 2021 14:11:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.14.17-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.14.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian

2021-11-05 03:36:32

by Ken Moffat

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.14 00/16] 5.14.17-rc1 review

On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 03:12:31PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.14.17 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 06 Nov 2021 14:11:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.14.17-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.14.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Tested on my AMD Picasso, I confirm this fixes the Xorg problem in
recent 5.14 kernels.

Tested-by: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>

ĸen
--
Vetinari smiled. "Can you keep a secret, Mister Lipwig?"
"Oh, yes, sir. I've kept lots."
"Capital. And the point is, so can I. You do not need to know.”

2021-11-05 05:38:29

by Daniel Díaz

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.14 00/16] 5.14.17-rc1 review

Hello!

On 11/4/21 8:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.14.17 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 06 Nov 2021 14:11:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.14.17-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.14.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

## Build
* kernel: 5.14.17-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.14.y
* git commit: 05ed8d6b833a25cb7b38026ed8f584dbdce21ec2
* git describe: v5.14.16-17-g05ed8d6b833a
* test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.14.y/build/v5.14.16-17-g05ed8d6b833a

## No regressions (compared to v5.14.16)

## No fixes (compared to v5.14.16)

## Test result summary
total: 95590, pass: 80826, fail: 1113, skip: 12783, xfail: 868

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 290 total, 268 passed, 22 failed
* arm64: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
[email protected]

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

2021-11-05 16:43:34

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.14 00/16] 5.14.17-rc1 review

On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 03:12:31PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.14.17 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 06 Nov 2021 14:11:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

Build results:
total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 482 pass: 482 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

Guenter

2021-11-06 19:58:03

by Fox Chen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5.14 00/16] 5.14.17-rc1 review

On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 15:12:31 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.14.17 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 06 Nov 2021 14:11:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.14.17-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.14.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

5.14.17-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)

Tested-by: Fox Chen <[email protected]>