Qualcomm SoundWire Master controller is present in most Qualcomm SoCs
either integrated as part of WCD audio codecs via slimbus or
as part of SOC I/O.
This patchset adds support to a very basic controller which has been
tested with WCD934x SoundWire controller connected to WSA881x smart
speaker amplifiers.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <[email protected]>
---
drivers/soundwire/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/soundwire/Makefile | 4 +
drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 983 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 996 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig b/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig
index 53b55b79c4af..f44d4f36dbbb 100644
--- a/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig
@@ -34,4 +34,13 @@ config SOUNDWIRE_INTEL
enable this config option to get the SoundWire support for that
device.
+config SOUNDWIRE_QCOM
+ tristate "Qualcomm SoundWire Master driver"
+ select SOUNDWIRE_BUS
+ depends on SND_SOC
+ help
+ SoundWire Qualcomm Master driver.
+ If you have an Qualcomm platform which has a SoundWire Master then
+ enable this config option to get the SoundWire support for that
+ device
endif
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/Makefile b/drivers/soundwire/Makefile
index 5817beaca0e1..f4ebfde31372 100644
--- a/drivers/soundwire/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/Makefile
@@ -16,3 +16,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOUNDWIRE_INTEL) += soundwire-intel.o
soundwire-intel-init-objs := intel_init.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SOUNDWIRE_INTEL) += soundwire-intel-init.o
+
+#Qualcomm driver
+soundwire-qcom-objs := qcom.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SOUNDWIRE_QCOM) += soundwire-qcom.o
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d1722d44d217
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
@@ -0,0 +1,983 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+// Copyright (c) 2019, Linaro Limited
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/slimbus.h>
+#include <linux/soundwire/sdw.h>
+#include <linux/soundwire/sdw_registers.h>
+#include <sound/pcm_params.h>
+#include <sound/soc.h>
+#include "bus.h"
+
+#define SWRM_COMP_HW_VERSION 0x00
+#define SWRM_COMP_CFG_ADDR 0x04
+#define SWRM_COMP_CFG_IRQ_LEVEL_OR_PULSE_MSK BIT(1)
+#define SWRM_COMP_CFG_ENABLE_MSK BIT(0)
+#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS 0x100
+#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DOUT_PORTS_MASK GENMASK(4, 0)
+#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DIN_PORTS_MASK GENMASK(9, 5)
+#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_WR_FIFO_DEPTH GENMASK(14, 10)
+#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_RD_FIFO_DEPTH GENMASK(19, 15)
+#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_AUTO_ENUM_SLAVES GENMASK(32. 20)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS 0x200
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RMSK GENMASK(16, 0)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SLAVE_PEND_IRQ BIT(0)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED BIT(1)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CHANGE_ENUM_SLAVE_STATUS BIT(2)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_MASTER_CLASH_DET BIT(3)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_OVERFLOW BIT(4)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_UNDERFLOW BIT(5)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_WR_CMD_FIFO_OVERFLOW BIT(6)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR BIT(7)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_DOUT_PORT_COLLISION BIT(8)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_READ_EN_RD_VALID_MISMATCH BIT(9)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED BIT(10)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_AUTO_ENUM_FINISHED BIT(11)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_AUTO_ENUM_FAILED BIT(12)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_AUTO_ENUM_TABLE_IS_FULL BIT(13)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_BUS_RESET_FINISHED BIT(14)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CLK_STOP_FINISHED BIT(15)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_ERROR_PORT_TEST BIT(16)
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_MASK_ADDR 0x204
+#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_CLEAR 0x208
+#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD 0x300
+#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD 0x304
+#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD 0x308
+#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS 0x30C
+#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_ADDR 0x314
+#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_NUM_OF_CMD_RETRY_SHFT 0x0
+#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR 0x318
+#define SWRM_ENUMERATOR_CFG_ADDR 0x500
+#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(m) (0x101C + 0x40 * (m))
+#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_SSP_PERIOD_SHFT 16
+#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT 3
+#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_BMSK GENMASK(2, 0)
+#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT 0
+#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR 0x1048
+#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_BMSK GENMASK(21, 17)
+#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_SHFT 0x11
+#define SWRM_MCP_STATUS 0x104C
+#define SWRM_MCP_STATUS_BANK_NUM_MASK BIT(0)
+#define SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS 0x1090
+#define SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_BANK(n, m) (0x1124 + 0x100 * (n - 1) + 0x40 * m)
+#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL2_BANK(n, m) (0x1126 + 0x100 * (n - 1) + 0x40 * m)
+#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_EN_CHAN_SHFT 0x18
+#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET2_SHFT 0x10
+#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET1_SHFT 0x08
+#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_DATA_0 0xc885
+#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_ADDR_0 0xc889
+#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_ADDR_0 0xc88d
+#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_DATA_0 0xc891
+
+#define SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(data, dev, id, reg) \
+ ((reg) | ((id) << 16) | ((dev) << 20) | ((data) << 24))
+
+#define SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL 0 /* Rows = 48 */
+#define SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS 48
+#define SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL 0 /* Cols = 2 */
+#define SWRM_DEFAULT_COL 16
+#define SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID 0xF
+#define MAX_FREQ_NUM 1
+#define TIMEOUT_MS 1000
+#define QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN 0xf
+#define DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ 9600000
+#define SWRM_MAX_DAIS 0xF
+
+struct qcom_swrm_port_config {
+ u8 si;
+ u8 off1;
+ u8 off2;
+};
+
+struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
+ struct sdw_bus bus;
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct regmap *regmap;
+ struct completion sp_cmd_comp;
+ struct work_struct slave_work;
+ /* read/write lock */
+ struct mutex lock;
+ /* Port alloc/free lock */
+ struct mutex port_lock;
+ struct clk *hclk;
+ int fifo_status;
+ void __iomem *base;
+ u8 wr_cmd_id;
+ u8 rd_cmd_id;
+ int irq;
+ unsigned int version;
+ int num_din_ports;
+ int num_dout_ports;
+ unsigned long dout_port_mask;
+ unsigned long din_port_mask;
+ struct qcom_swrm_port_config pconfig[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
+ struct sdw_stream_runtime *sruntime[SWRM_MAX_DAIS];
+ enum sdw_slave_status status[SDW_MAX_DEVICES];
+ u32 (*reg_read)(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg);
+ int (*reg_write)(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg, int val);
+};
+
+#define to_qcom_sdw(b) container_of(b, struct qcom_swrm_ctrl, bus)
+
+struct usecase {
+ u8 num_port;
+ u8 num_ch;
+ u32 chrate;
+};
+
+static u32 qcom_swrm_slim_reg_read(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg)
+{
+ struct regmap *wcd_regmap = ctrl->regmap;
+ u32 val = 0, ret;
+
+ /* pg register + offset */
+ regmap_bulk_write(wcd_regmap, SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_ADDR_0,
+ (u8 *)®, 4);
+
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(wcd_regmap, SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_DATA_0,
+ (u8 *)&val, 4);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read Failure (%d)\n", ret);
+
+ return val;
+}
+
+static u32 qcom_swrm_mmio_reg_read(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg)
+{
+ return readl_relaxed(ctrl->base + reg);
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_mmio_reg_write(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
+ int reg, int val)
+{
+ writel_relaxed(val, ctrl->base + reg);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_slim_reg_write(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
+ int reg, int val)
+{
+ struct regmap *wcd_regmap = ctrl->regmap;
+
+ /* pg register + offset */
+ regmap_bulk_write(wcd_regmap, SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_DATA_0,
+ (u8 *)&val, 4);
+ /* write address register */
+ regmap_bulk_write(wcd_regmap, SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_ADDR_0,
+ (u8 *)®, 4);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, u8 cmd_data,
+ u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ u8 cmd_id;
+ u32 val;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ctrl->lock);
+ if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
+ cmd_id = SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID;
+ } else {
+ if (++ctrl->wr_cmd_id == SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID)
+ ctrl->wr_cmd_id = 0;
+
+ cmd_id = ctrl->wr_cmd_id;
+ }
+
+ val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(cmd_data, dev_addr, cmd_id, reg_addr);
+ ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD, val);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(ctrl->dev, "%s: reg 0x%x write failed, err:%d\n",
+ __func__, val, ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
+ ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
+ ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
+
+ if (!ret || ctrl->fifo_status) {
+ dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x write failed\n", val);
+ ret = -ENODATA;
+ goto err;
+ }
+ }
+err:
+ mutex_unlock(&ctrl->lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
+ u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr,
+ u32 len, u8 *rval)
+{
+ int i, ret = 0;
+ u8 cmd_id = 0;
+ u32 val;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ctrl->lock);
+ if (dev_addr == SDW_ENUM_DEV_NUM) {
+ cmd_id = SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID;
+ } else {
+ if (++ctrl->rd_cmd_id == SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID)
+ ctrl->rd_cmd_id = 0;
+
+ cmd_id = ctrl->rd_cmd_id;
+ }
+
+ val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(len, dev_addr, cmd_id, reg_addr);
+ ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD, val);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x write failed err:%d\n", val, ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ if (dev_addr == SDW_ENUM_DEV_NUM) {
+ ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
+ ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
+
+ if (!ret || ctrl->fifo_status) {
+ dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x read failed\n", val);
+ ret = -ENODATA;
+ goto err;
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ rval[i] = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR);
+ rval[i] &= 0xFF;
+ }
+
+err:
+ mutex_unlock(&ctrl->lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void qcom_swrm_get_device_status(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
+{
+ u32 val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS);
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 1; i < SDW_MAX_DEVICES; i++) {
+ u32 s;
+
+ s = (val >> (i * 2));
+ s &= SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS_MASK;
+ ctrl->status[i] = s;
+ }
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t qcom_swrm_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_id;
+ u32 sts, value;
+
+ sts = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
+
+ if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED)
+ complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
+
+ if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR) {
+ value = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS);
+ dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev,
+ "CMD error, fifo status 0x%x\n",
+ value);
+ ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD, 0x1);
+ if ((value & 0xF) == 0xF) {
+ ctrl->fifo_status = -ENODATA;
+ complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if ((sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED) ||
+ sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CHANGE_ENUM_SLAVE_STATUS) {
+ if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
+ ctrl->status[0] = SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED;
+
+ schedule_work(&ctrl->slave_work);
+ }
+
+ if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SLAVE_PEND_IRQ)
+ dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "Slave pend irq\n");
+
+ if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
+ dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "New slave attached\n");
+
+ if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_MASTER_CLASH_DET)
+ dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev, "Bus clash detected\n");
+
+ if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_OVERFLOW)
+ dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read FIFO overflow\n");
+
+ if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_UNDERFLOW)
+ dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read FIFO underflow\n");
+
+ if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_WR_CMD_FIFO_OVERFLOW)
+ dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Write FIFO overflow\n");
+
+ if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_DOUT_PORT_COLLISION)
+ dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Port collision detected\n");
+
+ if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_READ_EN_RD_VALID_MISMATCH)
+ dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read enable valid mismatch\n");
+
+ if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED)
+ dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Cmd id finished\n");
+
+ if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_BUS_RESET_FINISHED)
+ dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Bus reset finished\n");
+
+ ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_CLEAR, sts);
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_init(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
+{
+ u32 val;
+ u8 row_ctrl = SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL;
+ u8 col_ctrl = SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL;
+ u8 ssp_period = 1;
+ u8 retry_cmd_num = 3;
+
+ /* Clear Rows and Cols */
+ val = ((row_ctrl << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT) |
+ (col_ctrl << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT) |
+ (ssp_period << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_SSP_PERIOD_SHFT));
+
+ ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(0), val);
+
+ /* Disable Auto enumeration */
+ ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_ENUMERATOR_CFG_ADDR, 0);
+
+ /* Mask soundwire interrupts */
+ ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_MASK_ADDR,
+ SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RMSK);
+
+ /* Configure No pings */
+ val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR);
+
+ val &= ~SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_BMSK;
+ val |= (0x1f << SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_SHFT);
+ ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR, val);
+
+ /* Configure number of retries of a read/write cmd */
+ val = (retry_cmd_num << SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_NUM_OF_CMD_RETRY_SHFT);
+ ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_ADDR, val);
+
+ /* Set IRQ to PULSE */
+ ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_CFG_ADDR,
+ SWRM_COMP_CFG_IRQ_LEVEL_OR_PULSE_MSK |
+ SWRM_COMP_CFG_ENABLE_MSK);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static enum sdw_command_response qcom_swrm_xfer_msg(struct sdw_bus *bus,
+ struct sdw_msg *msg)
+{
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
+ int ret, i, len;
+
+ if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_READ) {
+ for (i = 0; i < msg->len;) {
+ if ((msg->len - i) < QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN)
+ len = msg->len - i;
+ else
+ len = QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN;
+
+ ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(ctrl, msg->dev_num,
+ msg->addr + i, len,
+ &msg->buf[i]);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ if (ret == -ENODATA)
+ return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
+
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ i = i + len;
+ }
+ } else if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_WRITE) {
+ for (i = 0; i < msg->len; i++) {
+ ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(ctrl, msg->buf[i],
+ msg->dev_num,
+ msg->addr + i);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ if (ret == -ENODATA)
+ return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
+
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return SDW_CMD_OK;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_pre_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus)
+{
+ u32 reg = SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(bus->params.next_bank);
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, reg);
+ val |= ((0 << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT) |
+ (7l << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT));
+ ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, reg, val);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_port_params(struct sdw_bus *bus,
+ struct sdw_port_params *p_params,
+ unsigned int bank)
+{
+ /* TBD */
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_transport_params(struct sdw_bus *bus,
+ struct sdw_transport_params *params,
+ enum sdw_reg_bank bank)
+{
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
+ u32 value;
+
+ value = params->offset1 << SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET1_SHFT;
+ value |= params->offset2 << SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET2_SHFT;
+ value |= params->sample_interval - 1;
+
+ ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_BANK((params->port_num), bank),
+ value);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_port_enable(struct sdw_bus *bus,
+ struct sdw_enable_ch *enable_ch,
+ unsigned int bank)
+{
+ u32 reg = SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_BANK(enable_ch->port_num, bank);
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, reg);
+ if (enable_ch->enable)
+ val |= (enable_ch->ch_mask << SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_EN_CHAN_SHFT);
+ else
+ val &= ~(enable_ch->ch_mask << SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_EN_CHAN_SHFT);
+
+ ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, reg, val);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct sdw_master_port_ops qcom_swrm_port_ops = {
+ .dpn_set_port_params = qcom_swrm_port_params,
+ .dpn_set_port_transport_params = qcom_swrm_transport_params,
+ .dpn_port_enable_ch = qcom_swrm_port_enable,
+};
+
+static struct sdw_master_ops qcom_swrm_ops = {
+ .xfer_msg = qcom_swrm_xfer_msg,
+ .pre_bank_switch = qcom_swrm_pre_bank_switch,
+};
+
+static int qcom_swrm_compute_params(struct sdw_bus *bus)
+{
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
+ struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
+ struct sdw_slave_runtime *s_rt;
+ struct sdw_port_runtime *p_rt;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &bus->m_rt_list, bus_node) {
+ list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &m_rt->port_list, port_node) {
+ p_rt->transport_params.port_num = p_rt->num;
+ p_rt->transport_params.sample_interval =
+ ctrl->pconfig[p_rt->num - 1].si + 1;
+ p_rt->transport_params.offset1 =
+ ctrl->pconfig[p_rt->num - 1].off1;
+ p_rt->transport_params.offset2 =
+ ctrl->pconfig[p_rt->num - 1].off2;
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_entry(s_rt, &m_rt->slave_rt_list, m_rt_node) {
+ list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &s_rt->port_list, port_node) {
+ p_rt->transport_params.port_num = p_rt->num;
+ p_rt->transport_params.sample_interval =
+ ctrl->pconfig[i].si + 1;
+ p_rt->transport_params.offset1 =
+ ctrl->pconfig[i].off1;
+ p_rt->transport_params.offset2 =
+ ctrl->pconfig[i].off2;
+ i++;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static u32 qcom_swrm_freq_tbl[MAX_FREQ_NUM] = {
+ DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ,
+};
+
+static void qcom_swrm_slave_wq(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl =
+ container_of(work, struct qcom_swrm_ctrl, slave_work);
+
+ qcom_swrm_get_device_status(ctrl);
+ sdw_handle_slave_status(&ctrl->bus, ctrl->status);
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
+ struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
+{
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
+
+ if (!ctrl->sruntime[dai->id])
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return sdw_enable_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
+}
+
+static void qcom_swrm_stream_free_ports(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
+ struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream)
+{
+ struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
+ struct sdw_port_runtime *p_rt;
+ unsigned long *port_mask;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ctrl->port_lock);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) {
+ if (m_rt->direction == SDW_DATA_DIR_RX)
+ port_mask = &ctrl->dout_port_mask;
+ else
+ port_mask = &ctrl->din_port_mask;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &m_rt->port_list, port_node) {
+ clear_bit(p_rt->num - 1, port_mask);
+ }
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&ctrl->port_lock);
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_stream_alloc_ports(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
+ struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream,
+ struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
+ int direction)
+{
+ struct sdw_port_config pconfig[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
+ struct sdw_stream_config sconfig;
+ struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
+ struct sdw_slave_runtime *s_rt;
+ struct sdw_port_runtime *p_rt;
+ unsigned long *port_mask;
+ int i, maxport, pn, nports = 0, ret = 0;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ctrl->port_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) {
+ if (m_rt->direction == SDW_DATA_DIR_RX) {
+ maxport = ctrl->num_dout_ports;
+ port_mask = &ctrl->dout_port_mask;
+ } else {
+ maxport = ctrl->num_din_ports;
+ port_mask = &ctrl->din_port_mask;
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_entry(s_rt, &m_rt->slave_rt_list, m_rt_node) {
+ list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &s_rt->port_list, port_node) {
+ /* Port numbers start from 1 - 14*/
+ pn = find_first_zero_bit(port_mask, maxport);
+ if (pn > (maxport - 1)) {
+ dev_err(ctrl->dev, "All ports busy\n");
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto err;
+ }
+ set_bit(pn, port_mask);
+ pconfig[nports].num = pn + 1;
+ pconfig[nports].ch_mask = p_rt->ch_mask;
+ nports++;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (direction == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE)
+ sconfig.direction = SDW_DATA_DIR_TX;
+ else
+ sconfig.direction = SDW_DATA_DIR_RX;
+
+ sconfig.ch_count = 1;
+ sconfig.frame_rate = params_rate(params);
+ sconfig.type = stream->type;
+ sconfig.bps = 1;
+ sdw_stream_add_master(&ctrl->bus, &sconfig, pconfig,
+ nports, stream);
+err:
+ if (ret) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nports; i++)
+ clear_bit(pconfig[i].num - 1, port_mask);
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&ctrl->port_lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
+ struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
+ struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
+{
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = qcom_swrm_stream_alloc_ports(ctrl, ctrl->sruntime[dai->id],
+ params, substream->stream);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return sdw_prepare_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
+ struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
+{
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
+
+ qcom_swrm_stream_free_ports(ctrl, ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
+ sdw_stream_remove_master(&ctrl->bus, ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
+ sdw_deprepare_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
+ sdw_disable_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void *qcom_pdm_get_sdw_stream(struct snd_soc_dai *dai,
+ int direction)
+{
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
+
+ return ctrl->sruntime[dai->id];
+}
+
+static int qcom_pdm_set_sdw_stream(struct snd_soc_dai *dai,
+ void *stream, int direction)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *stream,
+ struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
+{
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
+ struct sdw_stream_runtime *sruntime;
+
+ sruntime = sdw_alloc_stream(dai->name);
+ if (!sruntime)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ctrl->sruntime[dai->id] = sruntime;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void qcom_swrm_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *stream,
+ struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
+{
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
+
+ sdw_release_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
+ ctrl->sruntime[dai->id] = NULL;
+}
+
+static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops qcom_swrm_pdm_dai_ops = {
+ .hw_params = qcom_swrm_hw_params,
+ .prepare = qcom_swrm_prepare,
+ .hw_free = qcom_swrm_hw_free,
+ .startup = qcom_swrm_startup,
+ .shutdown = qcom_swrm_shutdown,
+ .set_sdw_stream = qcom_pdm_set_sdw_stream,
+ .get_sdw_stream = qcom_pdm_get_sdw_stream,
+};
+
+static const struct snd_soc_component_driver qcom_swrm_dai_component = {
+ .name = "soundwire",
+};
+
+static int qcom_swrm_register_dais(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
+{
+ int num_dais = ctrl->num_dout_ports + ctrl->num_din_ports;
+ struct snd_soc_dai_driver *dais;
+ int i;
+
+ /* PDM dais are only tested for now */
+ dais = devm_kcalloc(ctrl->dev, num_dais, sizeof(*dais), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dais)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_dais; i++) {
+ dais[i].name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "SDW Pin%d", i);
+ if (i < ctrl->num_dout_ports) {
+ dais[i].playback.stream_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
+ "SDW Tx%d", i);
+ if (!dais[i].playback.stream_name) {
+ kfree(dais[i].name);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ dais[i].playback.channels_min = 1;
+ dais[i].playback.channels_max = 1;
+ dais[i].playback.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000;
+ dais[i].playback.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE;
+ } else {
+ dais[i].capture.stream_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
+ "SDW Rx%d", i);
+ if (!dais[i].capture.stream_name) {
+ kfree(dais[i].name);
+ kfree(dais[i].playback.stream_name);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ dais[i].capture.channels_min = 1;
+ dais[i].capture.channels_max = 1;
+ dais[i].capture.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000;
+ dais[i].capture.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE;
+ }
+ dais[i].ops = &qcom_swrm_pdm_dai_ops;
+ dais[i].id = i;
+ }
+
+ return devm_snd_soc_register_component(ctrl->dev,
+ &qcom_swrm_dai_component,
+ dais, num_dais);
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_get_port_config(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
+{
+ struct device_node *np = ctrl->dev->of_node;
+ u8 off1[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
+ u8 off2[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
+ u8 si[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
+ int i, ret, nports, val;
+
+ val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_PARAMS);
+ ctrl->num_dout_ports = val & SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DOUT_PORTS_MASK;
+ ctrl->num_din_ports = (val & SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DIN_PORTS_MASK) >> 5;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "qcom,din-ports", &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (val > ctrl->num_din_ports)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ctrl->num_din_ports = val;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "qcom,dout-ports", &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (val > ctrl->num_dout_ports)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ctrl->num_dout_ports = val;
+
+ nports = ctrl->num_dout_ports + ctrl->num_din_ports;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u8_array(np, "qcom,ports-offset1",
+ off1, nports);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u8_array(np, "qcom,ports-offset2",
+ off2, nports);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u8_array(np, "qcom,ports-sinterval-low",
+ si, nports);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nports; i++) {
+ ctrl->pconfig[i].si = si[i];
+ ctrl->pconfig[i].off1 = off1[i];
+ ctrl->pconfig[i].off2 = off2[i];
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct sdw_master_prop *prop;
+ struct sdw_bus_params *params;
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl;
+ struct resource *res;
+ int ret;
+
+ ctrl = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ctrl), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ctrl)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ if (dev->parent->bus == &slimbus_bus) {
+ ctrl->reg_read = qcom_swrm_slim_reg_read;
+ ctrl->reg_write = qcom_swrm_slim_reg_write;
+ ctrl->regmap = dev_get_regmap(dev->parent, NULL);
+ if (!ctrl->regmap)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else {
+ ctrl->reg_read = qcom_swrm_mmio_reg_read;
+ ctrl->reg_write = qcom_swrm_mmio_reg_write;
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ ctrl->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(ctrl->base))
+ return PTR_ERR(ctrl->base);
+ }
+
+ ctrl->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (ctrl->irq < 0)
+ return ctrl->irq;
+
+ ctrl->hclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "iface");
+ if (IS_ERR(ctrl->hclk))
+ return PTR_ERR(ctrl->hclk);
+
+ clk_prepare_enable(ctrl->hclk);
+
+ ctrl->dev = dev;
+ dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, ctrl);
+ init_completion(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
+ mutex_init(&ctrl->lock);
+ mutex_init(&ctrl->port_lock);
+ INIT_WORK(&ctrl->slave_work, qcom_swrm_slave_wq);
+
+ ctrl->bus.dev = dev;
+ ctrl->bus.ops = &qcom_swrm_ops;
+ ctrl->bus.port_ops = &qcom_swrm_port_ops;
+ ctrl->bus.compute_params = &qcom_swrm_compute_params;
+
+ ret = qcom_swrm_get_port_config(ctrl);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ params = &ctrl->bus.params;
+ params->max_dr_freq = DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ;
+ params->curr_dr_freq = DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ;
+ params->col = SWRM_DEFAULT_COL;
+ params->row = SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS;
+ params->curr_bank = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_STATUS) &
+ SWRM_MCP_STATUS_BANK_NUM_MASK;
+ params->next_bank = !params->curr_bank;
+
+ prop = &ctrl->bus.prop;
+ prop->max_clk_freq = DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ;
+ prop->num_clk_gears = 0;
+ prop->num_clk_freq = MAX_FREQ_NUM;
+ prop->clk_freq = &qcom_swrm_freq_tbl[0];
+ prop->default_col = SWRM_DEFAULT_COL;
+ prop->default_row = SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS;
+
+ ctrl->version = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_HW_VERSION);
+
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, ctrl->irq, NULL,
+ qcom_swrm_irq_handler,
+ IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
+ "soundwire", ctrl);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to request soundwire irq\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ ret = sdw_add_bus_master(&ctrl->bus);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to register Soundwire controller (%d)\n",
+ ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ qcom_swrm_init(ctrl);
+ ret = qcom_swrm_register_dais(ctrl);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+
+ dev_info(dev, "Qualcomm Soundwire controller v%x.%x.%x Registered\n",
+ (ctrl->version >> 24) & 0xff, (ctrl->version >> 16) & 0xff,
+ ctrl->version & 0xffff);
+
+ return 0;
+err:
+ clk_disable_unprepare(ctrl->hclk);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
+
+ sdw_delete_bus_master(&ctrl->bus);
+ clk_disable_unprepare(ctrl->hclk);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_runtime_suspend(struct device *device)
+{
+ /* TBD */
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_runtime_resume(struct device *device)
+{
+ /* TBD */
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct dev_pm_ops qcom_swrm_dev_pm_ops = {
+ SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(qcom_swrm_runtime_suspend,
+ qcom_swrm_runtime_resume,
+ NULL
+ )
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id qcom_swrm_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.3.0",},
+ { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.5.0",},
+ { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.6.0",},
+ {/* sentinel */},
+};
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_swrm_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver qcom_swrm_driver = {
+ .probe = &qcom_swrm_probe,
+ .remove = &qcom_swrm_remove,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "qcom-soundwire",
+ .of_match_table = qcom_swrm_of_match,
+ .pm = &qcom_swrm_dev_pm_ops,
+ }
+};
+module_platform_driver(qcom_swrm_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm soundwire driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
2.21.0
> +config SOUNDWIRE_QCOM
> + tristate "Qualcomm SoundWire Master driver"
> + select SOUNDWIRE_BUS
> + depends on SND_SOC
depends on SLIMBUS if you need the SlimBus link to talk to your
SoundWire Master?
Also depends on device tree since you use of_ functions?
> +#define SWRM_COMP_HW_VERSION 0x00
Can we please use SDW_ or QCOM_SDW_ as prefix?
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_AUTO_ENUM_FINISHED BIT(11)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_AUTO_ENUM_FAILED BIT(12)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_AUTO_ENUM_TABLE_IS_FULL BIT(13)
This hints at hardware support to assign Device Numbers automagically so
will likely have impacts on the bus driver code, no?
> +#define SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL 0 /* Rows = 48 */
> +#define SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS 48
> +#define SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL 0 /* Cols = 2 */
> +#define SWRM_DEFAULT_COL 16
> +#define SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID 0xF
> +#define MAX_FREQ_NUM 1
> +#define TIMEOUT_MS 1000
> +#define QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN 0xf
> +#define DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ 9600000
The clocks and frame shape don't match usual expectations for PDM.
For a 9.6 MHz support, you would typically use 8 columns and 50 rows to
transport PDM with a 50x oversampling. I've never seen anyone use 48x
for PDM.
> +#define SWRM_MAX_DAIS 0xF
> +
> +struct qcom_swrm_port_config {
> + u8 si;
> + u8 off1;
> + u8 off2;
> +};
> +
> +struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
> + struct sdw_bus bus;
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + struct completion sp_cmd_comp;
> + struct work_struct slave_work;
> + /* read/write lock */
> + struct mutex lock;
> + /* Port alloc/free lock */
> + struct mutex port_lock;
> + struct clk *hclk;
> + int fifo_status;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + u8 wr_cmd_id;
> + u8 rd_cmd_id;
> + int irq;
> + unsigned int version;
> + int num_din_ports;
> + int num_dout_ports;
> + unsigned long dout_port_mask;
> + unsigned long din_port_mask;
> + struct qcom_swrm_port_config pconfig[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
this is not necessarily correct. the initial definitions for
SDW_MAX_PORTS was for Slave devices. There is no definitions for Masters
in the SoundWire spec, so you could use whatever constant you want for
your hardware.
> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *sruntime[SWRM_MAX_DAIS];
> + enum sdw_slave_status status[SDW_MAX_DEVICES];
> + u32 (*reg_read)(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg);
> + int (*reg_write)(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg, int val);
> +};
> +
> +#define to_qcom_sdw(b) container_of(b, struct qcom_swrm_ctrl, bus)
> +
> +struct usecase {
> + u8 num_port;
> + u8 num_ch;
> + u32 chrate;
> +};
this structure doesn't seem to be used?
> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, u8 cmd_data,
> + u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + u8 cmd_id;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->lock);
> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
> + cmd_id = SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID;
> + } else {
> + if (++ctrl->wr_cmd_id == SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID)
> + ctrl->wr_cmd_id = 0;
> +
> + cmd_id = ctrl->wr_cmd_id;
> + }
might be worth having a helper/macro since you are doing the same thing
below.
> +
> + val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(cmd_data, dev_addr, cmd_id, reg_addr);
> + ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD, val);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "%s: reg 0x%x write failed, err:%d\n",
> + __func__, val, ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
This is odd. The SoundWire spec does not handle writes to a single
device or broadcast writes differently. I don't see a clear reason why
you would only timeout for a broadcast write.
> +
> + if (!ret || ctrl->fifo_status) {
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x write failed\n", val);
> + ret = -ENODATA;
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
> +err:
> + mutex_unlock(&ctrl->lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
> + u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr,
> + u32 len, u8 *rval)
> +{
> + int i, ret = 0;
> + u8 cmd_id = 0;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->lock);
> + if (dev_addr == SDW_ENUM_DEV_NUM) {
> + cmd_id = SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID;
> + } else {
> + if (++ctrl->rd_cmd_id == SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID)
> + ctrl->rd_cmd_id = 0;
> +
> + cmd_id = ctrl->rd_cmd_id;
> + }
helper?
> + val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(len, dev_addr, cmd_id, reg_addr);
> + ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD, val);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x write failed err:%d\n", val, ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (dev_addr == SDW_ENUM_DEV_NUM) {
> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>
same comment here, there isn't a clear reason to only timeout for a read
from device0.
> + if (!ret || ctrl->fifo_status) {
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x read failed\n", val);
> + ret = -ENODATA;
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> + rval[i] = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR);
> + rval[i] &= 0xFF;
> + }
> +
> +err:
> + mutex_unlock(&ctrl->lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_swrm_get_device_status(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
> +{
> + u32 val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS);
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 1; i < SDW_MAX_DEVICES; i++) {
> + u32 s;
> +
> + s = (val >> (i * 2));
> + s &= SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS_MASK;
> + ctrl->status[i] = s;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t qcom_swrm_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_id;
> + u32 sts, value;
> +
> + sts = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED)
> + complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR) {
> + value = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS);
> + dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev,
> + "CMD error, fifo status 0x%x\n",
> + value);
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD, 0x1);
> + if ((value & 0xF) == 0xF) {
> + ctrl->fifo_status = -ENODATA;
> + complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if ((sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED) ||
> + sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CHANGE_ENUM_SLAVE_STATUS) {
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
> + ctrl->status[0] = SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED;
> +
> + schedule_work(&ctrl->slave_work);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SLAVE_PEND_IRQ)
> + dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "Slave pend irq\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
> + dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "New slave attached\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_MASTER_CLASH_DET)
> + dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev, "Bus clash detected\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_OVERFLOW)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read FIFO overflow\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_UNDERFLOW)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read FIFO underflow\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_WR_CMD_FIFO_OVERFLOW)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Write FIFO overflow\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_DOUT_PORT_COLLISION)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Port collision detected\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_READ_EN_RD_VALID_MISMATCH)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read enable valid mismatch\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Cmd id finished\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_BUS_RESET_FINISHED)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Bus reset finished\n");
This list is odd as well. It makes sense to only log error cases if you
don't really know how to handle them, but a 'NEW SLAVE ATTACHED' should
lead to an action, no?
> +
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_CLEAR, sts);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_init(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> + u8 row_ctrl = SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL;
> + u8 col_ctrl = SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL;
> + u8 ssp_period = 1;
> + u8 retry_cmd_num = 3;
probably want a define for those magic values, they are quite important.
> +
> + /* Clear Rows and Cols */
> + val = ((row_ctrl << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT) |
> + (col_ctrl << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT) |
> + (ssp_period << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_SSP_PERIOD_SHFT));
> +
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(0), val);
> +
> + /* Disable Auto enumeration */
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_ENUMERATOR_CFG_ADDR, 0);
This goes back to my earlier comment. Do you disable this
auto-enumeration to avoid conflicts with the existing bus management?
That's not necessarily smart, we may want to change that bus layer to
reduce the enumeration time if hardware can do it.
> +
> + /* Mask soundwire interrupts */
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_MASK_ADDR,
> + SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RMSK);
> +
> + /* Configure No pings */
> + val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR);
If there is any sort of PREQ signaling for Slave-initiated interrupts,
disabling PINGs is likely a non-conformant implementation since the
master is required to issue a PING command within 32 frames. That's also
the only way to know if a device is attached, so additional comments are
likely required.
> +
> + val &= ~SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_BMSK;
> + val |= (0x1f << SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_SHFT);
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR, val);
> +
> + /* Configure number of retries of a read/write cmd */
> + val = (retry_cmd_num << SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_NUM_OF_CMD_RETRY_SHFT);
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_ADDR, val);
> +
> + /* Set IRQ to PULSE */
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_CFG_ADDR,
> + SWRM_COMP_CFG_IRQ_LEVEL_OR_PULSE_MSK |
> + SWRM_COMP_CFG_ENABLE_MSK);
indentation seems off in this code?
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static enum sdw_command_response qcom_swrm_xfer_msg(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> + struct sdw_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
> + int ret, i, len;
> +
> + if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_READ) {
> + for (i = 0; i < msg->len;) {
> + if ((msg->len - i) < QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN)
> + len = msg->len - i;
> + else
> + len = QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN;
> +
> + ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(ctrl, msg->dev_num,
> + msg->addr + i, len,
> + &msg->buf[i]);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
> + return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + i = i + len;
> + }
> + } else if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_WRITE) {
> + for (i = 0; i < msg->len; i++) {
> + ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(ctrl, msg->buf[i],
> + msg->dev_num,
> + msg->addr + i);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
> + return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return SDW_CMD_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_pre_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> +{
> + u32 reg = SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(bus->params.next_bank);
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, reg);
> + val |= ((0 << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT) |
> + (7l << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT));
magic values, probably need a macro here?
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, reg, val);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_register_dais(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
> +{
> + int num_dais = ctrl->num_dout_ports + ctrl->num_din_ports;
> + struct snd_soc_dai_driver *dais;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* PDM dais are only tested for now */
> + dais = devm_kcalloc(ctrl->dev, num_dais, sizeof(*dais), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dais)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_dais; i++) {
> + dais[i].name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "SDW Pin%d", i);
if (!dais[i].name)
> + if (i < ctrl->num_dout_ports) {
> + dais[i].playback.stream_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
> + "SDW Tx%d", i);
> + if (!dais[i].playback.stream_name) {
> + kfree(dais[i].name);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
also need to free previously allocated memory in earlier iterations, or
use devm_
> + dais[i].playback.channels_min = 1;
> + dais[i].playback.channels_max = 1;
> + dais[i].playback.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000;
> + dais[i].playback.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE;
> + } else {
> + dais[i].capture.stream_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
> + "SDW Rx%d", i);
> + if (!dais[i].capture.stream_name) {
> + kfree(dais[i].name);
> + kfree(dais[i].playback.stream_name);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + dais[i].capture.channels_min = 1;
> + dais[i].capture.channels_max = 1;
> + dais[i].capture.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000;
> + dais[i].capture.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE;
> + }
> + dais[i].ops = &qcom_swrm_pdm_dai_ops;
> + dais[i].id = i;
> + }
> +
> + return devm_snd_soc_register_component(ctrl->dev,
> + &qcom_swrm_dai_component,
> + dais, num_dais);
> +}
On 2019-06-07 10:56, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Qualcomm SoundWire Master controller is present in most Qualcomm SoCs
> either integrated as part of WCD audio codecs via slimbus or
> as part of SOC I/O.
>
> This patchset adds support to a very basic controller which has been
> tested with WCD934x SoundWire controller connected to WSA881x smart
> speaker amplifiers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/Kconfig | 9 +
> drivers/soundwire/Makefile | 4 +
> drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 983 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 996 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig b/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig
> index 53b55b79c4af..f44d4f36dbbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig
> @@ -34,4 +34,13 @@ config SOUNDWIRE_INTEL
> enable this config option to get the SoundWire support for that
> device.
>
> +config SOUNDWIRE_QCOM
> + tristate "Qualcomm SoundWire Master driver"
> + select SOUNDWIRE_BUS
> + depends on SND_SOC
> + help
> + SoundWire Qualcomm Master driver.
> + If you have an Qualcomm platform which has a SoundWire Master then
> + enable this config option to get the SoundWire support for that
> + device
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/Makefile b/drivers/soundwire/Makefile
> index 5817beaca0e1..f4ebfde31372 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/Makefile
> @@ -16,3 +16,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOUNDWIRE_INTEL) += soundwire-intel.o
>
> soundwire-intel-init-objs := intel_init.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOUNDWIRE_INTEL) += soundwire-intel-init.o
> +
> +#Qualcomm driver
> +soundwire-qcom-objs := qcom.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOUNDWIRE_QCOM) += soundwire-qcom.o
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d1722d44d217
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,983 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// Copyright (c) 2019, Linaro Limited
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/completion.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/slimbus.h>
> +#include <linux/soundwire/sdw.h>
> +#include <linux/soundwire/sdw_registers.h>
> +#include <sound/pcm_params.h>
> +#include <sound/soc.h>
> +#include "bus.h"
> +
Pierre already pointed this out - SWR looks odd. During my time with
Soundwire I've met SDW and SNDW, but it's the first time I see SWR.
> +#define SWRM_COMP_HW_VERSION 0x00
> +#define SWRM_COMP_CFG_ADDR 0x04
> +#define SWRM_COMP_CFG_IRQ_LEVEL_OR_PULSE_MSK BIT(1)
> +#define SWRM_COMP_CFG_ENABLE_MSK BIT(0)
> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS 0x100
> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DOUT_PORTS_MASK GENMASK(4, 0)
> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DIN_PORTS_MASK GENMASK(9, 5)
> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_WR_FIFO_DEPTH GENMASK(14, 10)
> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_RD_FIFO_DEPTH GENMASK(19, 15)
> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_AUTO_ENUM_SLAVES GENMASK(32. 20)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS 0x200
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RMSK GENMASK(16, 0)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SLAVE_PEND_IRQ BIT(0)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED BIT(1)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CHANGE_ENUM_SLAVE_STATUS BIT(2)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_MASTER_CLASH_DET BIT(3)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_OVERFLOW BIT(4)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_UNDERFLOW BIT(5)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_WR_CMD_FIFO_OVERFLOW BIT(6)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR BIT(7)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_DOUT_PORT_COLLISION BIT(8)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_READ_EN_RD_VALID_MISMATCH BIT(9)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED BIT(10)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_AUTO_ENUM_FINISHED BIT(11)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_AUTO_ENUM_FAILED BIT(12)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_AUTO_ENUM_TABLE_IS_FULL BIT(13)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_BUS_RESET_FINISHED BIT(14)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CLK_STOP_FINISHED BIT(15)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_ERROR_PORT_TEST BIT(16)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_MASK_ADDR 0x204
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_CLEAR 0x208
You seem to shortcut every reg here similarly to how it's done in SDW
spec. INTERRUPT is represented by INT there, and by doing so, this
define block would look more like a real family.
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD 0x300
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD 0x304
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD 0x308
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS 0x30C
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_ADDR 0x314
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_NUM_OF_CMD_RETRY_SHFT 0x0
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR 0x318
> +#define SWRM_ENUMERATOR_CFG_ADDR 0x500
> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(m) (0x101C + 0x40 * (m))
> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_SSP_PERIOD_SHFT 16
> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT 3
> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_BMSK GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT 0
> +#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR 0x1048
> +#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_BMSK GENMASK(21, 17)
> +#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_SHFT 0x11
> +#define SWRM_MCP_STATUS 0x104C
> +#define SWRM_MCP_STATUS_BANK_NUM_MASK BIT(0)
> +#define SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS 0x1090
> +#define SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_BANK(n, m) (0x1124 + 0x100 * (n - 1) + 0x40 * m)
Some of these you align, others leave with the equal amount of tabs
despite different widths.
> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL2_BANK(n, m) (0x1126 + 0x100 * (n - 1) + 0x40 * m)
Consider reusing _CTRL_ and simply adding offset for 2_.
> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_EN_CHAN_SHFT 0x18
> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET2_SHFT 0x10
> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET1_SHFT 0x08
> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_DATA_0 0xc885
> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_ADDR_0 0xc889
> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_ADDR_0 0xc88d
> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_DATA_0 0xc891
> +
> +#define SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(data, dev, id, reg) \
> + ((reg) | ((id) << 16) | ((dev) << 20) | ((data) << 24))
> +
> +#define SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL 0 /* Rows = 48 */
> +#define SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS 48
> +#define SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL 0 /* Cols = 2 */
> +#define SWRM_DEFAULT_COL 16
> +#define SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID 0xF
> +#define MAX_FREQ_NUM 1
> +#define TIMEOUT_MS 1000
> +#define QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN 0xf
> +#define DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ 9600000
> +#define SWRM_MAX_DAIS 0xF
Given the scale of this block, it might be good to reiterate all defines
and see if indeed all are QCom specific. Maybe some could be replaced by
equivalents from common code.
> +
> +struct qcom_swrm_port_config {
> + u8 si;
> + u8 off1;
> + u8 off2;
> +};
> +
> +struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
> + struct sdw_bus bus;
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + struct completion sp_cmd_comp;
> + struct work_struct slave_work;
> + /* read/write lock */
> + struct mutex lock;
> + /* Port alloc/free lock */
> + struct mutex port_lock;
> + struct clk *hclk;
> + int fifo_status;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + u8 wr_cmd_id;
> + u8 rd_cmd_id;
> + int irq;
> + unsigned int version;
Given the fact you don't use version field directly and always shift it,
I'd consider making use of union here to listing version bits
explicitly. Overall size won't change.
> + int num_din_ports;
> + int num_dout_ports;
> + unsigned long dout_port_mask;
> + unsigned long din_port_mask;
> + struct qcom_swrm_port_config pconfig[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *sruntime[SWRM_MAX_DAIS];
> + enum sdw_slave_status status[SDW_MAX_DEVICES];
> + u32 (*reg_read)(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg);
> + int (*reg_write)(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg, int val);
> +};
> +
> +#define to_qcom_sdw(b) container_of(b, struct qcom_swrm_ctrl, bus)
> +
> +struct usecase {
> + u8 num_port;
> + u8 num_ch;
> + u32 chrate;
> +};
> +
"usecase" looks ambiguous at best.
> +static u32 qcom_swrm_slim_reg_read(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg)
> +{
> + struct regmap *wcd_regmap = ctrl->regmap;
> + u32 val = 0, ret;
> +
> + /* pg register + offset */
> + regmap_bulk_write(wcd_regmap, SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_ADDR_0,
> + (u8 *)®, 4);
> +
> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(wcd_regmap, SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_DATA_0,
> + (u8 *)&val, 4);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read Failure (%d)\n", ret);
> +
> + return val;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 qcom_swrm_mmio_reg_read(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg)
> +{
> + return readl_relaxed(ctrl->base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_mmio_reg_write(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
> + int reg, int val)
> +{
> + writel_relaxed(val, ctrl->base + reg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_slim_reg_write(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
> + int reg, int val)
> +{
> + struct regmap *wcd_regmap = ctrl->regmap;
> +
> + /* pg register + offset */
> + regmap_bulk_write(wcd_regmap, SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_DATA_0,
> + (u8 *)&val, 4);
> + /* write address register */
> + regmap_bulk_write(wcd_regmap, SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_ADDR_0,
> + (u8 *)®, 4);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Ok, so you choose to declare write op as returning "int" yet either it
cannot do so (void writel_relaxed) or ret is completely ignored
(regmap_bulk_write does return an int value). Either switch to void or
check against returned value whenever possible.
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, u8 cmd_data,
> + u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + u8 cmd_id;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->lock);
> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
> + cmd_id = SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID;
> + } else {
> + if (++ctrl->wr_cmd_id == SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID)
> + ctrl->wr_cmd_id = 0;
> +
> + cmd_id = ctrl->wr_cmd_id;
> + }
> +
> + val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(cmd_data, dev_addr, cmd_id, reg_addr);
> + ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD, val);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "%s: reg 0x%x write failed, err:%d\n",
> + __func__, val, ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
> +
> + if (!ret || ctrl->fifo_status) {
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x write failed\n", val);
Both, this and err msg above are generic enough to be put into goto to
save some space.
> + ret = -ENODATA;
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
> +err:
> + mutex_unlock(&ctrl->lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
> + u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr,
> + u32 len, u8 *rval)
> +{
> + int i, ret = 0;
> + u8 cmd_id = 0;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->lock);
> + if (dev_addr == SDW_ENUM_DEV_NUM) {
> + cmd_id = SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID;
> + } else {
> + if (++ctrl->rd_cmd_id == SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID)
> + ctrl->rd_cmd_id = 0;
> +
> + cmd_id = ctrl->rd_cmd_id;
> + }
> +
> + val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(len, dev_addr, cmd_id, reg_addr);
> + ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD, val);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x write failed err:%d\n", val, ret);
Same for _rt_.
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (dev_addr == SDW_ENUM_DEV_NUM) {
> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
> +
> + if (!ret || ctrl->fifo_status) {
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x read failed\n", val);
Just to be sure. It is really "read" that is failing here?
> + ret = -ENODATA;
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> + rval[i] = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR);
> + rval[i] &= 0xFF;
> + }
> +
> +err:
> + mutex_unlock(&ctrl->lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_swrm_get_device_status(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
> +{
> + u32 val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS);
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 1; i < SDW_MAX_DEVICES; i++) {
> + u32 s;
> +
> + s = (val >> (i * 2));
> + s &= SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS_MASK;
> + ctrl->status[i] = s;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t qcom_swrm_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_id;
> + u32 sts, value;
> +
> + sts = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED)
> + complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR) {
> + value = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS);
> + dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev,
> + "CMD error, fifo status 0x%x\n",
> + value);
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD, 0x1);
> + if ((value & 0xF) == 0xF) {
> + ctrl->fifo_status = -ENODATA;
> + complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if ((sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED) ||
> + sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CHANGE_ENUM_SLAVE_STATUS) {
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
> + ctrl->status[0] = SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED;
> +
> + schedule_work(&ctrl->slave_work);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SLAVE_PEND_IRQ)
> + dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "Slave pend irq\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
> + dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "New slave attached\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_MASTER_CLASH_DET)
> + dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev, "Bus clash detected\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_OVERFLOW)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read FIFO overflow\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_UNDERFLOW)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read FIFO underflow\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_WR_CMD_FIFO_OVERFLOW)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Write FIFO overflow\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_DOUT_PORT_COLLISION)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Port collision detected\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_READ_EN_RD_VALID_MISMATCH)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read enable valid mismatch\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Cmd id finished\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_BUS_RESET_FINISHED)
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Bus reset finished\n");
If you do not handle these errors at all, consider declaring
ERROR-message table. I believe leaving erroneus status as is may lead to
fatal consequences. If there is no intention for handling even the most
critical cases, please add TODO/ comment here.
> +
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_CLEAR, sts);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_init(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> + u8 row_ctrl = SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL;
> + u8 col_ctrl = SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL;
> + u8 ssp_period = 1;
> + u8 retry_cmd_num = 3;
> +
> + /* Clear Rows and Cols */
> + val = ((row_ctrl << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT) |
> + (col_ctrl << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT) |
> + (ssp_period << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_SSP_PERIOD_SHFT));
> +
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(0), val);
> +
> + /* Disable Auto enumeration */
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_ENUMERATOR_CFG_ADDR, 0);
> +
> + /* Mask soundwire interrupts */
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_MASK_ADDR,
> + SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RMSK);
> +
> + /* Configure No pings */
> + val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR);
> +
> + val &= ~SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_BMSK;
> + val |= (0x1f << SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_SHFT);
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR, val);
> +
> + /* Configure number of retries of a read/write cmd */
> + val = (retry_cmd_num << SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_NUM_OF_CMD_RETRY_SHFT);
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_ADDR, val);
> +
> + /* Set IRQ to PULSE */
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_CFG_ADDR,
> + SWRM_COMP_CFG_IRQ_LEVEL_OR_PULSE_MSK |
> + SWRM_COMP_CFG_ENABLE_MSK);
> + return 0;
As in my previous comment, you should check against ret from reg_write
if void approach is not chosen.
> +}
> +
> +static enum sdw_command_response qcom_swrm_xfer_msg(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> + struct sdw_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
> + int ret, i, len;
> +
> + if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_READ) {
> + for (i = 0; i < msg->len;) {
> + if ((msg->len - i) < QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN)
> + len = msg->len - i;
> + else
> + len = QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN;
> +
> + ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(ctrl, msg->dev_num,
> + msg->addr + i, len,
> + &msg->buf[i]);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
> + return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + i = i + len;
Any reason for inlining this incrementation? If _rd_ fails, we leave the
loop anyway.
> + }
> + } else if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_WRITE) {
> + for (i = 0; i < msg->len; i++) {
> + ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(ctrl, msg->buf[i],
> + msg->dev_num,
> + msg->addr + i);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
> + return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return SDW_CMD_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_pre_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> +{
> + u32 reg = SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(bus->params.next_bank);
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, reg);
> + val |= ((0 << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT) |
> + (7l << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT));
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, reg, val);
> +
> + return 0;
s/return 0/return ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, reg, val)/
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_port_params(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> + struct sdw_port_params *p_params,
> + unsigned int bank)
> +{
> + /* TBD */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_transport_params(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> + struct sdw_transport_params *params,
> + enum sdw_reg_bank bank)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
> + u32 value;
> +
> + value = params->offset1 << SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET1_SHFT;
> + value |= params->offset2 << SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET2_SHFT;
> + value |= params->sample_interval - 1;
> +
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_BANK((params->port_num), bank),
> + value);
> +
> + return 0;
Another "return issue" here.
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_port_enable(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> + struct sdw_enable_ch *enable_ch,
> + unsigned int bank)
> +{
> + u32 reg = SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_BANK(enable_ch->port_num, bank);
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, reg);
> + if (enable_ch->enable)
> + val |= (enable_ch->ch_mask << SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_EN_CHAN_SHFT);
> + else
> + val &= ~(enable_ch->ch_mask << SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_EN_CHAN_SHFT);
> +
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, reg, val);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct sdw_master_port_ops qcom_swrm_port_ops = {
> + .dpn_set_port_params = qcom_swrm_port_params,
> + .dpn_set_port_transport_params = qcom_swrm_transport_params,
> + .dpn_port_enable_ch = qcom_swrm_port_enable,
> +};
> +
> +static struct sdw_master_ops qcom_swrm_ops = {
> + .xfer_msg = qcom_swrm_xfer_msg,
> + .pre_bank_switch = qcom_swrm_pre_bank_switch,
> +};
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_compute_params(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
> + struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
> + struct sdw_slave_runtime *s_rt;
> + struct sdw_port_runtime *p_rt;
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &bus->m_rt_list, bus_node) {
> + list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &m_rt->port_list, port_node) {
> + p_rt->transport_params.port_num = p_rt->num;
> + p_rt->transport_params.sample_interval =
> + ctrl->pconfig[p_rt->num - 1].si + 1;
> + p_rt->transport_params.offset1 =
> + ctrl->pconfig[p_rt->num - 1].off1;
> + p_rt->transport_params.offset2 =
> + ctrl->pconfig[p_rt->num - 1].off2;
ctrl->pconfig[ <idx> ] colleagues bellow make use of local index
variable which clearly makes it more readable.
> + }
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(s_rt, &m_rt->slave_rt_list, m_rt_node) {
> + list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &s_rt->port_list, port_node) {
> + p_rt->transport_params.port_num = p_rt->num;
> + p_rt->transport_params.sample_interval =
> + ctrl->pconfig[i].si + 1;
> + p_rt->transport_params.offset1 =
> + ctrl->pconfig[i].off1;
> + p_rt->transport_params.offset2 =
> + ctrl->pconfig[i].off2;
> + i++;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 qcom_swrm_freq_tbl[MAX_FREQ_NUM] = {
> + DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ,
> +};
> +
> +static void qcom_swrm_slave_wq(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl =
> + container_of(work, struct qcom_swrm_ctrl, slave_work);
> +
> + qcom_swrm_get_device_status(ctrl);
> + sdw_handle_slave_status(&ctrl->bus, ctrl->status);
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
> +
> + if (!ctrl->sruntime[dai->id])
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return sdw_enable_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_swrm_stream_free_ports(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream)
> +{
> + struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
> + struct sdw_port_runtime *p_rt;
> + unsigned long *port_mask;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->port_lock);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) {
> + if (m_rt->direction == SDW_DATA_DIR_RX)
> + port_mask = &ctrl->dout_port_mask;
> + else
> + port_mask = &ctrl->din_port_mask;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &m_rt->port_list, port_node) {
> + clear_bit(p_rt->num - 1, port_mask);
> + }
Unnecessary brackets.
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&ctrl->port_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_stream_alloc_ports(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream,
> + struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
> + int direction)
> +{
> + struct sdw_port_config pconfig[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
> + struct sdw_stream_config sconfig;
> + struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
> + struct sdw_slave_runtime *s_rt;
> + struct sdw_port_runtime *p_rt;
> + unsigned long *port_mask;
> + int i, maxport, pn, nports = 0, ret = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->port_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) {
> + if (m_rt->direction == SDW_DATA_DIR_RX) {
> + maxport = ctrl->num_dout_ports;
> + port_mask = &ctrl->dout_port_mask;
> + } else {
> + maxport = ctrl->num_din_ports;
> + port_mask = &ctrl->din_port_mask;
> + }
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(s_rt, &m_rt->slave_rt_list, m_rt_node) {
> + list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &s_rt->port_list, port_node) {
> + /* Port numbers start from 1 - 14*/
> + pn = find_first_zero_bit(port_mask, maxport);
> + if (pn > (maxport - 1)) {
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "All ports busy\n");
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + goto err;
> + }
> + set_bit(pn, port_mask);
> + pconfig[nports].num = pn + 1;
> + pconfig[nports].ch_mask = p_rt->ch_mask;
> + nports++;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (direction == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE)
> + sconfig.direction = SDW_DATA_DIR_TX;
> + else
> + sconfig.direction = SDW_DATA_DIR_RX;
> +
> + sconfig.ch_count = 1;
> + sconfig.frame_rate = params_rate(params);
> + sconfig.type = stream->type;
> + sconfig.bps = 1;
Hmm. frame_rate and type gets assigned based on "input" data yet the
rest is hardcoded. Is this intended?
> + sdw_stream_add_master(&ctrl->bus, &sconfig, pconfig,
> + nports, stream);
> +err:
> + if (ret) {
> + for (i = 0; i < nports; i++)
> + clear_bit(pconfig[i].num - 1, port_mask);
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&ctrl->port_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> + struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = qcom_swrm_stream_alloc_ports(ctrl, ctrl->sruntime[dai->id],
> + params, substream->stream);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return sdw_prepare_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
> +
> + qcom_swrm_stream_free_ports(ctrl, ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
> + sdw_stream_remove_master(&ctrl->bus, ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
> + sdw_deprepare_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
> + sdw_disable_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
Declaring local variable initialized with ctrl->sruntime[dai->id] should
prove more readable.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void *qcom_pdm_get_sdw_stream(struct snd_soc_dai *dai,
> + int direction)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
> +
> + return ctrl->sruntime[dai->id];
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_pdm_set_sdw_stream(struct snd_soc_dai *dai,
> + void *stream, int direction)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *stream,
> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *sruntime;
> +
> + sruntime = sdw_alloc_stream(dai->name);
> + if (!sruntime)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ctrl->sruntime[dai->id] = sruntime;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_swrm_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *stream,
> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
> +
> + sdw_release_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
> + ctrl->sruntime[dai->id] = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops qcom_swrm_pdm_dai_ops = {
> + .hw_params = qcom_swrm_hw_params,
> + .prepare = qcom_swrm_prepare,
> + .hw_free = qcom_swrm_hw_free,
> + .startup = qcom_swrm_startup,
> + .shutdown = qcom_swrm_shutdown,
> + .set_sdw_stream = qcom_pdm_set_sdw_stream,
> + .get_sdw_stream = qcom_pdm_get_sdw_stream,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct snd_soc_component_driver qcom_swrm_dai_component = {
> + .name = "soundwire",
> +};
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_register_dais(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
> +{
> + int num_dais = ctrl->num_dout_ports + ctrl->num_din_ports;
> + struct snd_soc_dai_driver *dais;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* PDM dais are only tested for now */
> + dais = devm_kcalloc(ctrl->dev, num_dais, sizeof(*dais), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dais)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_dais; i++) {
> + dais[i].name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "SDW Pin%d", i);
> + if (i < ctrl->num_dout_ports) {
> + dais[i].playback.stream_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
> + "SDW Tx%d", i);
> + if (!dais[i].playback.stream_name) {
> + kfree(dais[i].name);
> + return -ENOMEM;
Now this got me worried. What about memory allocated in iterations
before the failure? It must be freed in error handling path. goto should
be of help here.
> + }
> + dais[i].playback.channels_min = 1;
> + dais[i].playback.channels_max = 1;
> + dais[i].playback.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000;
> + dais[i].playback.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE;
All of these formats are hardcoded. Consider declaring a "template"
format above and simply initialize each dai with it.
> + } else {
> + dais[i].capture.stream_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
> + "SDW Rx%d", i);
> + if (!dais[i].capture.stream_name) {
> + kfree(dais[i].name);
> + kfree(dais[i].playback.stream_name);
> + return -ENOMEM;
Same memory deallocation issue here.
> + }
> +
> + dais[i].capture.channels_min = 1;
> + dais[i].capture.channels_max = 1;
> + dais[i].capture.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000;
> + dais[i].capture.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE;
Comment regarding playback dai initialization applies here too.
> + }
> + dais[i].ops = &qcom_swrm_pdm_dai_ops;
> + dais[i].id = i;
> + }
> +
> + return devm_snd_soc_register_component(ctrl->dev,
> + &qcom_swrm_dai_component,
> + dais, num_dais);
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_get_port_config(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = ctrl->dev->of_node;
> + u8 off1[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
> + u8 off2[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
> + u8 si[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
Array of struct qcom_swrm_port_config instead of this trio?
> + int i, ret, nports, val;
> +
> + val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_PARAMS);
> + ctrl->num_dout_ports = val & SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DOUT_PORTS_MASK;
> + ctrl->num_din_ports = (val & SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DIN_PORTS_MASK) >> 5;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "qcom,din-ports", &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (val > ctrl->num_din_ports)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ctrl->num_din_ports = val;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "qcom,dout-ports", &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (val > ctrl->num_dout_ports)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ctrl->num_dout_ports = val;
> +
> + nports = ctrl->num_dout_ports + ctrl->num_din_ports;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u8_array(np, "qcom,ports-offset1",
> + off1, nports);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u8_array(np, "qcom,ports-offset2",
> + off2, nports);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u8_array(np, "qcom,ports-sinterval-low",
> + si, nports);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nports; i++) {
> + ctrl->pconfig[i].si = si[i];
> + ctrl->pconfig[i].off1 = off1[i];
> + ctrl->pconfig[i].off2 = off2[i];
> + }
Using array I spoke of earlier leads to brackets being redundant here.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct sdw_master_prop *prop;
> + struct sdw_bus_params *params;
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl;
> + struct resource *res;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ctrl = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ctrl), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ctrl)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + if (dev->parent->bus == &slimbus_bus) {
> + ctrl->reg_read = qcom_swrm_slim_reg_read;
> + ctrl->reg_write = qcom_swrm_slim_reg_write;
> + ctrl->regmap = dev_get_regmap(dev->parent, NULL);
> + if (!ctrl->regmap)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + ctrl->reg_read = qcom_swrm_mmio_reg_read;
> + ctrl->reg_write = qcom_swrm_mmio_reg_write;
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + ctrl->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctrl->base))
> + return PTR_ERR(ctrl->base);
> + }
> +
> + ctrl->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (ctrl->irq < 0)
> + return ctrl->irq;
> +
> + ctrl->hclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "iface");
> + if (IS_ERR(ctrl->hclk))
> + return PTR_ERR(ctrl->hclk);
> +
> + clk_prepare_enable(ctrl->hclk);
> +
> + ctrl->dev = dev;
> + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, ctrl);
> + init_completion(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
> + mutex_init(&ctrl->lock);
> + mutex_init(&ctrl->port_lock);
> + INIT_WORK(&ctrl->slave_work, qcom_swrm_slave_wq);
> +
> + ctrl->bus.dev = dev;
> + ctrl->bus.ops = &qcom_swrm_ops;
> + ctrl->bus.port_ops = &qcom_swrm_port_ops;
> + ctrl->bus.compute_params = &qcom_swrm_compute_params;
> +
> + ret = qcom_swrm_get_port_config(ctrl);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + params = &ctrl->bus.params;
> + params->max_dr_freq = DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ;
> + params->curr_dr_freq = DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ;
> + params->col = SWRM_DEFAULT_COL;
> + params->row = SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS;
> + params->curr_bank = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_STATUS) &
> + SWRM_MCP_STATUS_BANK_NUM_MASK;
> + params->next_bank = !params->curr_bank;
> +
> + prop = &ctrl->bus.prop;
> + prop->max_clk_freq = DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ;
> + prop->num_clk_gears = 0;
> + prop->num_clk_freq = MAX_FREQ_NUM;
> + prop->clk_freq = &qcom_swrm_freq_tbl[0];
> + prop->default_col = SWRM_DEFAULT_COL;
> + prop->default_row = SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS;
> +
> + ctrl->version = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_HW_VERSION);
> +
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, ctrl->irq, NULL,
> + qcom_swrm_irq_handler,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
> + "soundwire", ctrl);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to request soundwire irq\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + ret = sdw_add_bus_master(&ctrl->bus);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register Soundwire controller (%d)\n",
> + ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + qcom_swrm_init(ctrl);
> + ret = qcom_swrm_register_dais(ctrl);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "Qualcomm Soundwire controller v%x.%x.%x Registered\n",
> + (ctrl->version >> 24) & 0xff, (ctrl->version >> 16) & 0xff,
> + ctrl->version & 0xffff);
> +
> + return 0;
> +err:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(ctrl->hclk);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + sdw_delete_bus_master(&ctrl->bus);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(ctrl->hclk);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_runtime_suspend(struct device *device)
> +{
> + /* TBD */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_runtime_resume(struct device *device)
> +{
> + /* TBD */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops qcom_swrm_dev_pm_ops = {
> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(qcom_swrm_runtime_suspend,
> + qcom_swrm_runtime_resume,
> + NULL
> + )
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id qcom_swrm_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.3.0",},
> + { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.5.0",},
> + { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.6.0",},
> + {/* sentinel */},
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_swrm_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver qcom_swrm_driver = {
> + .probe = &qcom_swrm_probe,
> + .remove = &qcom_swrm_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "qcom-soundwire",
> + .of_match_table = qcom_swrm_of_match,
> + .pm = &qcom_swrm_dev_pm_ops,
> + }
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(qcom_swrm_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm soundwire driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
Thanks for taking time to review,
On 07/06/2019 14:36, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>> +config SOUNDWIRE_QCOM
>> + tristate "Qualcomm SoundWire Master driver"
>> + select SOUNDWIRE_BUS
>> + depends on SND_SOC
>
> depends on SLIMBUS if you need the SlimBus link to talk to your
> SoundWire Master?
>
> Also depends on device tree since you use of_ functions?
>
Thats true, will fix this in next version.
>> +#define SWRM_COMP_HW_VERSION 0x00
>
> Can we please use SDW_ or QCOM_SDW_ as prefix?
>
SWRM prefix is as per the data sheet register names, If it help am happy
to add QCOM_ prefix it.
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_AUTO_ENUM_FINISHED BIT(11)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_AUTO_ENUM_FAILED BIT(12)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_AUTO_ENUM_TABLE_IS_FULL BIT(13)
>
> This hints at hardware support to assign Device Numbers automagically so
> will likely have impacts on the bus driver code, no?
yes, this controller has autoenumeration support, however I had disabled
this code due to the fact that we need some more support in bus driver
to accommodate this feature.
I will explore this side once again, may be before sending next version.
>
>
>> +#define SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL 0 /* Rows = 48 */
>> +#define SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS 48
>> +#define SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL 0 /* Cols = 2 */
>> +#define SWRM_DEFAULT_COL 16
>> +#define SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID 0xF
>> +#define MAX_FREQ_NUM 1
>> +#define TIMEOUT_MS 1000
>> +#define QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN 0xf
>> +#define DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ 9600000
>
> The clocks and frame shape don't match usual expectations for PDM.
> For a 9.6 MHz support, you would typically use 8 columns and 50 rows to
> transport PDM with a 50x oversampling. I've never seen anyone use 48x
> for PDM.
>
>> +#define SWRM_MAX_DAIS 0xF
>> +
>> +struct qcom_swrm_port_config {
>> + u8 si;
>> + u8 off1;
>> + u8 off2;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
>> + struct sdw_bus bus;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct regmap *regmap;
>> + struct completion sp_cmd_comp;
>> + struct work_struct slave_work;
>> + /* read/write lock */
>> + struct mutex lock;
>> + /* Port alloc/free lock */
>> + struct mutex port_lock;
>> + struct clk *hclk;
>> + int fifo_status;
>> + void __iomem *base;
>> + u8 wr_cmd_id;
>> + u8 rd_cmd_id;
>> + int irq;
>> + unsigned int version;
>> + int num_din_ports;
>> + int num_dout_ports;
>> + unsigned long dout_port_mask;
>> + unsigned long din_port_mask;
>> + struct qcom_swrm_port_config pconfig[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
>
> this is not necessarily correct. the initial definitions for
> SDW_MAX_PORTS was for Slave devices. There is no definitions for Masters
> in the SoundWire spec, so you could use whatever constant you want for
> your hardware.
Yes, I can move this define to this driver specific.
>
>> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *sruntime[SWRM_MAX_DAIS];
>> + enum sdw_slave_status status[SDW_MAX_DEVICES];
>> + u32 (*reg_read)(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg);
>> + int (*reg_write)(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg, int val);
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define to_qcom_sdw(b) container_of(b, struct qcom_swrm_ctrl, bus)
>> +
>> +struct usecase {
>> + u8 num_port;
>> + u8 num_ch;
>> + u32 chrate;
>> +};
>
> this structure doesn't seem to be used?
>
looks like left over, I will remove this.
>> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, u8
>> cmd_data,
>> + u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + u8 cmd_id;
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->lock);
>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
>> + cmd_id = SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID;
>> + } else {
>> + if (++ctrl->wr_cmd_id == SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID)
>> + ctrl->wr_cmd_id = 0;
>> +
>> + cmd_id = ctrl->wr_cmd_id;
>> + }
>
> might be worth having a helper/macro since you are doing the same thing
> below.
>
I will do that!
>> +
>> + val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(cmd_data, dev_addr, cmd_id, reg_addr);
>> + ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD, val);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "%s: reg 0x%x write failed, err:%d\n",
>> + __func__, val, ret);
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
>> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
>> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>
> This is odd. The SoundWire spec does not handle writes to a single
> device or broadcast writes differently. I don't see a clear reason why
> you would only timeout for a broadcast write.
>
There is danger of blocking here without timeout.
>> +
>> + if (!ret || ctrl->fifo_status) {
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x write failed\n", val);
>> + ret = -ENODATA;
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +err:
>> + mutex_unlock(&ctrl->lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
>> + u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr,
>> + u32 len, u8 *rval)
>> +{
>> + int i, ret = 0;
>> + u8 cmd_id = 0;
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->lock);
>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_ENUM_DEV_NUM) {
>> + cmd_id = SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID;
>> + } else {
>> + if (++ctrl->rd_cmd_id == SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID)
>> + ctrl->rd_cmd_id = 0;
>> +
>> + cmd_id = ctrl->rd_cmd_id;
>> + }
>
> helper?
yes will add that.
>
>> + val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(len, dev_addr, cmd_id, reg_addr);
>> + ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD, val);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x write failed err:%d\n", val, ret);
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_ENUM_DEV_NUM) {
>> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
>> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>>
> same comment here, there isn't a clear reason to only timeout for a read
> from device0.
>
>> + if (!ret || ctrl->fifo_status) {
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x read failed\n", val);
>> + ret = -ENODATA;
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>> + rval[i] = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR);
>> + rval[i] &= 0xFF;
>> + }
>> +
>> +err:
>> + mutex_unlock(&ctrl->lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void qcom_swrm_get_device_status(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
>> +{
>> + u32 val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS);
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 1; i < SDW_MAX_DEVICES; i++) {
>> + u32 s;
>> +
>> + s = (val >> (i * 2));
>> + s &= SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS_MASK;
>> + ctrl->status[i] = s;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t qcom_swrm_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_id;
>> + u32 sts, value;
>> +
>> + sts = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED)
>> + complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR) {
>> + value = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS);
>> + dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev,
>> + "CMD error, fifo status 0x%x\n",
>> + value);
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD, 0x1);
>> + if ((value & 0xF) == 0xF) {
>> + ctrl->fifo_status = -ENODATA;
>> + complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ((sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED) ||
>> + sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CHANGE_ENUM_SLAVE_STATUS) {
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
>> + ctrl->status[0] = SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED;
>> +
>> + schedule_work(&ctrl->slave_work);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SLAVE_PEND_IRQ)
>> + dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "Slave pend irq\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
>> + dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "New slave attached\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_MASTER_CLASH_DET)
>> + dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev, "Bus clash detected\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_OVERFLOW)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read FIFO overflow\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_UNDERFLOW)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read FIFO underflow\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_WR_CMD_FIFO_OVERFLOW)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Write FIFO overflow\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_DOUT_PORT_COLLISION)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Port collision detected\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_READ_EN_RD_VALID_MISMATCH)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read enable valid mismatch\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Cmd id finished\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_BUS_RESET_FINISHED)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Bus reset finished\n");
>
> This list is odd as well. It makes sense to only log error cases if you
> don't really know how to handle them, but a 'NEW SLAVE ATTACHED' should
> lead to an action, no?
NEW SLAVE ATTACHED interrupt already schedules action by reporting this
to soudwire bus layer.
Some of them are leftover as part of debug, i will try to clean them up
and see if some of them can be handled properly.
>
>> +
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_CLEAR, sts);
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_init(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
>> +{
>> + u32 val;
>> + u8 row_ctrl = SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL;
>> + u8 col_ctrl = SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL;
>> + u8 ssp_period = 1;
>> + u8 retry_cmd_num = 3;
>
> probably want a define for those magic values, they are quite important.
Yep, will do that!
>
>> +
>> + /* Clear Rows and Cols */
>> + val = ((row_ctrl << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT) |
>> + (col_ctrl << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT) |
>> + (ssp_period << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_SSP_PERIOD_SHFT));
>> +
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(0), val);
>> +
>> + /* Disable Auto enumeration */
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_ENUMERATOR_CFG_ADDR, 0);
>
> This goes back to my earlier comment. Do you disable this
> auto-enumeration to avoid conflicts with the existing bus management?
> That's not necessarily smart, we may want to change that bus layer to
> reduce the enumeration time if hardware can do it.
I will explore add this support in bus befor next version.
>
>> +
>> + /* Mask soundwire interrupts */
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_MASK_ADDR,
>> + SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RMSK);
>> +
>> + /* Configure No pings */
>> + val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR);
>
> If there is any sort of PREQ signaling for Slave-initiated interrupts,
> disabling PINGs is likely a non-conformant implementation since the
> master is required to issue a PING command within 32 frames. That's also
> the only way to know if a device is attached, so additional comments are
> likely required.
This is the value of Maximum number of consiecutive read/write commands
without ping command in between. I will try to collect more details and
add some comments here.
>
>> +
>> + val &= ~SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_BMSK;
>> + val |= (0x1f << SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_SHFT);
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR, val);
>> +
>> + /* Configure number of retries of a read/write cmd */
>> + val = (retry_cmd_num << SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_NUM_OF_CMD_RETRY_SHFT);
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_ADDR, val);
>> +
>> + /* Set IRQ to PULSE */
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_CFG_ADDR,
>> + SWRM_COMP_CFG_IRQ_LEVEL_OR_PULSE_MSK |
>> + SWRM_COMP_CFG_ENABLE_MSK);
>
> indentation seems off in this code?
>
Yes! I will fix this.
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static enum sdw_command_response qcom_swrm_xfer_msg(struct sdw_bus *bus,
>> + struct sdw_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
>> + int ret, i, len;
>> +
>> + if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_READ) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < msg->len;) {
>> + if ((msg->len - i) < QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN)
>> + len = msg->len - i;
>> + else
>> + len = QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN;
>> +
>> + ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(ctrl, msg->dev_num,
>> + msg->addr + i, len,
>> + &msg->buf[i]);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
>> + return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + i = i + len;
>> + }
>> + } else if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_WRITE) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < msg->len; i++) {
>> + ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(ctrl, msg->buf[i],
>> + msg->dev_num,
>> + msg->addr + i);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
>> + return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return SDW_CMD_OK;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_pre_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus)
>> +{
>> + u32 reg = SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(bus->params.next_bank);
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, reg);
>> + val |= ((0 << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT) |
>> + (7l << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT));
>
> magic values, probably need a macro here?
>
Okay, will add a proper define for this values.
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, reg, val);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
>> +static int qcom_swrm_register_dais(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
>> +{
>> + int num_dais = ctrl->num_dout_ports + ctrl->num_din_ports;
>> + struct snd_soc_dai_driver *dais;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + /* PDM dais are only tested for now */
>> + dais = devm_kcalloc(ctrl->dev, num_dais, sizeof(*dais), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!dais)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_dais; i++) {
>> + dais[i].name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "SDW Pin%d", i);
>
> if (!dais[i].name)
>
>> + if (i < ctrl->num_dout_ports) {
>> + dais[i].playback.stream_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
>> + "SDW Tx%d", i);
>> + if (!dais[i].playback.stream_name) {
>> + kfree(dais[i].name);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>
> also need to free previously allocated memory in earlier iterations, or
> use devm_
>
Yes, thats true, I will fix this in next version.
Thanks,
srini
Thanks for taking time to review,
I agre with most of the comments specially handling returns and making
code more readable.
Will fix them in next version.
On 08/06/2019 22:53, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
> On 2019-06-07 10:56, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> Qualcomm SoundWire Master controller is present in most Qualcomm SoCs
>> either integrated as part of WCD audio codecs via slimbus or
>> as part of SOC I/O.
>>
>> This patchset adds support to a very basic controller which has been
>> tested with WCD934x SoundWire controller connected to WSA881x smart
>> speaker amplifiers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/soundwire/Kconfig | 9 +
>> drivers/soundwire/Makefile | 4 +
>> drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 983 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 996 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig b/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig
>> index 53b55b79c4af..f44d4f36dbbb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig
>> @@ -34,4 +34,13 @@ config SOUNDWIRE_INTEL
>> enable this config option to get the SoundWire support for that
>> device.
>> +config SOUNDWIRE_QCOM
>> + tristate "Qualcomm SoundWire Master driver"
>> + select SOUNDWIRE_BUS
>> + depends on SND_SOC
>> + help
>> + SoundWire Qualcomm Master driver.
>> + If you have an Qualcomm platform which has a SoundWire Master then
>> + enable this config option to get the SoundWire support for that
>> + device
>> endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/Makefile b/drivers/soundwire/Makefile
>> index 5817beaca0e1..f4ebfde31372 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soundwire/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/Makefile
>> @@ -16,3 +16,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOUNDWIRE_INTEL) += soundwire-intel.o
>> soundwire-intel-init-objs := intel_init.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SOUNDWIRE_INTEL) += soundwire-intel-init.o
>> +
>> +#Qualcomm driver
>> +soundwire-qcom-objs := qcom.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOUNDWIRE_QCOM) += soundwire-qcom.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..d1722d44d217
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,983 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +// Copyright (c) 2019, Linaro Limited
>> +
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/completion.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/slimbus.h>
>> +#include <linux/soundwire/sdw.h>
>> +#include <linux/soundwire/sdw_registers.h>
>> +#include <sound/pcm_params.h>
>> +#include <sound/soc.h>
>> +#include "bus.h"
>> +
>
> Pierre already pointed this out - SWR looks odd. During my time with
> Soundwire I've met SDW and SNDW, but it's the first time I see SWR.
These names are derived from register names from hw datasheet.
So I have not much choice here other than using them as it. May be
adding QCOM_ prefix make it bit more non-confusing.
>
> You seem to shortcut every reg here similarly to how it's done in SDW
> spec. INTERRUPT is represented by INT there, and by doing so, this
> define block would look more like a real family.
>
Will do that in next version.!
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD 0x300
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD 0x304
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD 0x308
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS 0x30C
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_ADDR 0x314
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_NUM_OF_CMD_RETRY_SHFT 0x0
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR 0x318
>> +#define SWRM_ENUMERATOR_CFG_ADDR 0x500
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(m) (0x101C + 0x40 * (m))
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_SSP_PERIOD_SHFT 16
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT 3
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_BMSK GENMASK(2, 0)
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT 0
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR 0x1048
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_BMSK GENMASK(21, 17)
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_SHFT 0x11
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_STATUS 0x104C
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_STATUS_BANK_NUM_MASK BIT(0)
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS 0x1090
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
>> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_BANK(n, m) (0x1124 + 0x100 * (n - 1) +
>> 0x40 * m)
>
> Some of these you align, others leave with the equal amount of tabs
> despite different widths.
>
I will take a closer look at such instance before sending next version.
>> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL2_BANK(n, m) (0x1126 + 0x100 * (n - 1) +
>> 0x40 * m)
>
> Consider reusing _CTRL_ and simply adding offset for 2_.
Okay.
>
>> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_EN_CHAN_SHFT 0x18
>> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET2_SHFT 0x10
>> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET1_SHFT 0x08
>> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_DATA_0 0xc885
>> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_ADDR_0 0xc889
>> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_ADDR_0 0xc88d
>> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_DATA_0 0xc891
>> +
>> +#define SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(data, dev, id, reg) \
>> + ((reg) | ((id) << 16) | ((dev) << 20) | ((data) << 24))
>> +
>> +#define SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL 0 /* Rows = 48 */
>> +#define SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS 48
>> +#define SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL 0 /* Cols = 2 */
>> +#define SWRM_DEFAULT_COL 16
>> +#define SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID 0xF
>> +#define MAX_FREQ_NUM 1
>> +#define TIMEOUT_MS 1000
>> +#define QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN 0xf
>> +#define DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ 9600000
>> +#define SWRM_MAX_DAIS 0xF
>
> Given the scale of this block, it might be good to reiterate all defines
> and see if indeed all are QCom specific. Maybe some could be replaced by
> equivalents from common code.
>
I did take a look at common defines, however these values are pretty
much specific to this controller configuration.>> +
>> +struct qcom_swrm_port_config {
>> + u8 si;
>> + u8 off1;
>> + u8 off2;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
>> + struct sdw_bus bus;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct regmap *regmap;
>> + struct completion sp_cmd_comp;
>> + struct work_struct slave_work;
>> + /* read/write lock */
>> + struct mutex lock;
>> + /* Port alloc/free lock */
>> + struct mutex port_lock;
>> + struct clk *hclk;
>> + int fifo_status;
>> + void __iomem *base;
>> + u8 wr_cmd_id;
>> + u8 rd_cmd_id;
>> + int irq;
>> + unsigned int version;
>
> Given the fact you don't use version field directly and always shift it,
> I'd consider making use of union here to listing version bits
> explicitly. Overall size won't change.
Okay, I tried to keep most of the driver simple as I could as this is
the first version, I will explore adding union as you suggested.
>
>> + int num_din_ports;
>> + int num_dout_ports;
>> + unsigned long dout_port_mask;
>> + unsigned long din_port_mask;
>> + struct qcom_swrm_port_config pconfig[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
>> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *sruntime[SWRM_MAX_DAIS];
>> + enum sdw_slave_status status[SDW_MAX_DEVICES];
>> + u32 (*reg_read)(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg);
>> + int (*reg_write)(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg, int val);
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define to_qcom_sdw(b) container_of(b, struct qcom_swrm_ctrl, bus)
>> +
>> +struct usecase {
>> + u8 num_port;
>> + u8 num_ch;
>> + u32 chrate;
>> +};
>> +
>
> "usecase" looks ambiguous at best.
Its leftover
>
>> +static u32 qcom_swrm_slim_reg_read(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg)
>> +{
>> + struct regmap *wcd_regmap = ctrl->regmap;
>> + u32 val = 0, ret;
>> +
>> + /* pg register + offset */
>> + regmap_bulk_write(wcd_regmap, SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_ADDR_0,
>> + (u8 *)®, 4);
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(wcd_regmap, SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_DATA_0,
>> + (u8 *)&val, 4);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read Failure (%d)\n", ret);
>> +
>> + return val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 qcom_swrm_mmio_reg_read(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg)
>> +{
>> + return readl_relaxed(ctrl->base + reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_mmio_reg_write(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
>> + int reg, int val)
>> +{
>> + writel_relaxed(val, ctrl->base + reg);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_slim_reg_write(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
>> + int reg, int val)
>> +{
>> + struct regmap *wcd_regmap = ctrl->regmap;
>> +
>> + /* pg register + offset */
>> + regmap_bulk_write(wcd_regmap, SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_DATA_0,
>> + (u8 *)&val, 4);
>> + /* write address register */
>> + regmap_bulk_write(wcd_regmap, SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_ADDR_0,
>> + (u8 *)®, 4);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> Ok, so you choose to declare write op as returning "int" yet either it
> cannot do so (void writel_relaxed) or ret is completely ignored
> (regmap_bulk_write does return an int value). Either switch to void or
> check against returned value whenever possible.
>
Its right to check the return values, I will change it this accordingly
and fix all such occurances.
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, u8
>> cmd_data,
>> + u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + u8 cmd_id;
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->lock);
>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
>> + cmd_id = SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID;
>> + } else {
>> + if (++ctrl->wr_cmd_id == SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID)
>> + ctrl->wr_cmd_id = 0;
>> +
>> + cmd_id = ctrl->wr_cmd_id;
>> + }
>> +
>> + val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(cmd_data, dev_addr, cmd_id, reg_addr);
>> + ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD, val);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "%s: reg 0x%x write failed, err:%d\n",
>> + __func__, val, ret);
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
>> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
>> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>> +
>> + if (!ret || ctrl->fifo_status) {
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x write failed\n", val);
>
> Both, this and err msg above are generic enough to be put into goto to
> save some space.
I agree!
>
>> + ret = -ENODATA;
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +err:
>> + mutex_unlock(&ctrl->lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
>> + u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr,
>> + u32 len, u8 *rval)
>> +{
>> + int i, ret = 0;
>> + u8 cmd_id = 0;
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->lock);
>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_ENUM_DEV_NUM) {
>> + cmd_id = SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID;
>> + } else {
>> + if (++ctrl->rd_cmd_id == SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID)
>> + ctrl->rd_cmd_id = 0;
>> +
>> + cmd_id = ctrl->rd_cmd_id;
>> + }
>> +
>> + val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(len, dev_addr, cmd_id, reg_addr);
>> + ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD, val);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x write failed err:%d\n", val, ret);
>
> Same for _rt_.
>
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_ENUM_DEV_NUM) {
>> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
>> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>> +
>> + if (!ret || ctrl->fifo_status) {
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "reg 0x%x read failed\n", val);
>
> Just to be sure. It is really "read" that is failing here?
>
The final result is that read has not been sucessfull with a complete
interrupt. So yes read is failing here.
>> + ret = -ENODATA;
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>> + rval[i] = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR);
>> + rval[i] &= 0xFF;
>> + }
>> +
>> +err:
>> + mutex_unlock(&ctrl->lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void qcom_swrm_get_device_status(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
>> +{
>> + u32 val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS);
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 1; i < SDW_MAX_DEVICES; i++) {
>> + u32 s;
>> +
>> + s = (val >> (i * 2));
>> + s &= SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS_MASK;
>> + ctrl->status[i] = s;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t qcom_swrm_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_id;
>> + u32 sts, value;
>> +
>> + sts = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED)
>> + complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR) {
>> + value = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS);
>> + dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev,
>> + "CMD error, fifo status 0x%x\n",
>> + value);
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD, 0x1);
>> + if ((value & 0xF) == 0xF) {
>> + ctrl->fifo_status = -ENODATA;
>> + complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ((sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED) ||
>> + sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CHANGE_ENUM_SLAVE_STATUS) {
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
>> + ctrl->status[0] = SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED;
>> +
>> + schedule_work(&ctrl->slave_work);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SLAVE_PEND_IRQ)
>> + dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "Slave pend irq\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
>> + dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "New slave attached\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_MASTER_CLASH_DET)
>> + dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev, "Bus clash detected\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_OVERFLOW)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read FIFO overflow\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_UNDERFLOW)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read FIFO underflow\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_WR_CMD_FIFO_OVERFLOW)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Write FIFO overflow\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_DOUT_PORT_COLLISION)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Port collision detected\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_READ_EN_RD_VALID_MISMATCH)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Read enable valid mismatch\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Cmd id finished\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_BUS_RESET_FINISHED)
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Bus reset finished\n");
>
> If you do not handle these errors at all, consider declaring
> ERROR-message table. I believe leaving erroneus status as is may lead to
> fatal consequences. If there is no intention for handling even the most
> critical cases, please add TODO/ comment here.
Yep, I agree will clean this up!
>
>> +
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_CLEAR, sts);
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_init(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
>> +{
>> + u32 val;
>> + u8 row_ctrl = SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL;
>> + u8 col_ctrl = SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL;
>> + u8 ssp_period = 1;
>> + u8 retry_cmd_num = 3;
>> +
>> + /* Clear Rows and Cols */
>> + val = ((row_ctrl << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT) |
>> + (col_ctrl << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT) |
>> + (ssp_period << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_SSP_PERIOD_SHFT));
>> +
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(0), val);
>> +
>> + /* Disable Auto enumeration */
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_ENUMERATOR_CFG_ADDR, 0);
>> +
>> + /* Mask soundwire interrupts */
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_MASK_ADDR,
>> + SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RMSK);
>> +
>> + /* Configure No pings */
>> + val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR);
>> +
>> + val &= ~SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_BMSK;
>> + val |= (0x1f << SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_SHFT);
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR, val);
>> +
>> + /* Configure number of retries of a read/write cmd */
>> + val = (retry_cmd_num << SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_NUM_OF_CMD_RETRY_SHFT);
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_ADDR, val);
>> +
>> + /* Set IRQ to PULSE */
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_CFG_ADDR,
>> + SWRM_COMP_CFG_IRQ_LEVEL_OR_PULSE_MSK |
>> + SWRM_COMP_CFG_ENABLE_MSK);
>> + return 0;
>
> As in my previous comment, you should check against ret from reg_write
> if void approach is not chosen.
I agree!
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static enum sdw_command_response qcom_swrm_xfer_msg(struct sdw_bus *bus,
>> + struct sdw_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
>> + int ret, i, len;
>> +
>> + if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_READ) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < msg->len;) {
>> + if ((msg->len - i) < QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN)
>> + len = msg->len - i;
>> + else
>> + len = QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN;
>> +
>> + ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(ctrl, msg->dev_num,
>> + msg->addr + i, len,
>> + &msg->buf[i]);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
>> + return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + i = i + len;
>
> Any reason for inlining this incrementation? If _rd_ fails, we leave the
> loop anyway.
>
>> + }
>> + } else if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_WRITE) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < msg->len; i++) {
>> + ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(ctrl, msg->buf[i],
>> + msg->dev_num,
>> + msg->addr + i);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
>> + return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return SDW_CMD_OK;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_pre_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus)
>> +{
>> + u32 reg = SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(bus->params.next_bank);
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, reg);
>> + val |= ((0 << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT) |
>> + (7l << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT));
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, reg, val);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>
> s/return 0/return ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, reg, val)/
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_port_params(struct sdw_bus *bus,
>> + struct sdw_port_params *p_params,
>> + unsigned int bank)
>> +{
>> + /* TBD */
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_transport_params(struct sdw_bus *bus,
>> + struct sdw_transport_params *params,
>> + enum sdw_reg_bank bank)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
>> + u32 value;
>> +
>> + value = params->offset1 << SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET1_SHFT;
>> + value |= params->offset2 << SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET2_SHFT;
>> + value |= params->sample_interval - 1;
>> +
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_BANK((params->port_num),
>> bank),
>> + value);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>
> Another "return issue" here.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_port_enable(struct sdw_bus *bus,
>> + struct sdw_enable_ch *enable_ch,
>> + unsigned int bank)
>> +{
>> + u32 reg = SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_BANK(enable_ch->port_num, bank);
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, reg);
>> + if (enable_ch->enable)
>> + val |= (enable_ch->ch_mask << SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_EN_CHAN_SHFT);
>> + else
>> + val &= ~(enable_ch->ch_mask << SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_EN_CHAN_SHFT);
>> +
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, reg, val);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct sdw_master_port_ops qcom_swrm_port_ops = {
>> + .dpn_set_port_params = qcom_swrm_port_params,
>> + .dpn_set_port_transport_params = qcom_swrm_transport_params,
>> + .dpn_port_enable_ch = qcom_swrm_port_enable,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct sdw_master_ops qcom_swrm_ops = {
>> + .xfer_msg = qcom_swrm_xfer_msg,
>> + .pre_bank_switch = qcom_swrm_pre_bank_switch,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_compute_params(struct sdw_bus *bus)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
>> + struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
>> + struct sdw_slave_runtime *s_rt;
>> + struct sdw_port_runtime *p_rt;
>> + int i = 0;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &bus->m_rt_list, bus_node) {
>> + list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &m_rt->port_list, port_node) {
>> + p_rt->transport_params.port_num = p_rt->num;
>> + p_rt->transport_params.sample_interval =
>> + ctrl->pconfig[p_rt->num - 1].si + 1;
>> + p_rt->transport_params.offset1 =
>> + ctrl->pconfig[p_rt->num - 1].off1;
>> + p_rt->transport_params.offset2 =
>> + ctrl->pconfig[p_rt->num - 1].off2;
>
> ctrl->pconfig[ <idx> ] colleagues bellow make use of local index
> variable which clearly makes it more readable.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(s_rt, &m_rt->slave_rt_list, m_rt_node) {
>> + list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &s_rt->port_list, port_node) {
>> + p_rt->transport_params.port_num = p_rt->num;
>> + p_rt->transport_params.sample_interval =
>> + ctrl->pconfig[i].si + 1;
>> + p_rt->transport_params.offset1 =
>> + ctrl->pconfig[i].off1;
>> + p_rt->transport_params.offset2 =
>> + ctrl->pconfig[i].off2;
>> + i++;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 qcom_swrm_freq_tbl[MAX_FREQ_NUM] = {
>> + DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void qcom_swrm_slave_wq(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl =
>> + container_of(work, struct qcom_swrm_ctrl, slave_work);
>> +
>> + qcom_swrm_get_device_status(ctrl);
>> + sdw_handle_slave_status(&ctrl->bus, ctrl->status);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
>> +
>> + if (!ctrl->sruntime[dai->id])
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + return sdw_enable_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void qcom_swrm_stream_free_ports(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
>> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream)
>> +{
>> + struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
>> + struct sdw_port_runtime *p_rt;
>> + unsigned long *port_mask;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->port_lock);
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) {
>> + if (m_rt->direction == SDW_DATA_DIR_RX)
>> + port_mask = &ctrl->dout_port_mask;
>> + else
>> + port_mask = &ctrl->din_port_mask;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &m_rt->port_list, port_node) {
>> + clear_bit(p_rt->num - 1, port_mask);
>> + }
>
> Unnecessary brackets.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&ctrl->port_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_stream_alloc_ports(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
>> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream,
>> + struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
>> + int direction)
>> +{
>> + struct sdw_port_config pconfig[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
>> + struct sdw_stream_config sconfig;
>> + struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
>> + struct sdw_slave_runtime *s_rt;
>> + struct sdw_port_runtime *p_rt;
>> + unsigned long *port_mask;
>> + int i, maxport, pn, nports = 0, ret = 0;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->port_lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) {
>> + if (m_rt->direction == SDW_DATA_DIR_RX) {
>> + maxport = ctrl->num_dout_ports;
>> + port_mask = &ctrl->dout_port_mask;
>> + } else {
>> + maxport = ctrl->num_din_ports;
>> + port_mask = &ctrl->din_port_mask;
>> + }
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(s_rt, &m_rt->slave_rt_list, m_rt_node) {
>> + list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &s_rt->port_list, port_node) {
>> + /* Port numbers start from 1 - 14*/
>> + pn = find_first_zero_bit(port_mask, maxport);
>> + if (pn > (maxport - 1)) {
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "All ports busy\n");
>> + ret = -EBUSY;
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + set_bit(pn, port_mask);
>> + pconfig[nports].num = pn + 1;
>> + pconfig[nports].ch_mask = p_rt->ch_mask;
>> + nports++;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (direction == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE)
>> + sconfig.direction = SDW_DATA_DIR_TX;
>> + else
>> + sconfig.direction = SDW_DATA_DIR_RX;
>> +
>> + sconfig.ch_count = 1;
>> + sconfig.frame_rate = params_rate(params);
>> + sconfig.type = stream->type;
>> + sconfig.bps = 1;
>
> Hmm. frame_rate and type gets assigned based on "input" data yet the
> rest is hardcoded. Is this intended?
For now I only managed to test PDM on this controller, and I agree these
need to be more generic..
>> + sdw_stream_add_master(&ctrl->bus, &sconfig, pconfig,
>> + nports, stream);
>> +err:
>> + if (ret) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < nports; i++)
>> + clear_bit(pconfig[i].num - 1, port_mask);
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&ctrl->port_lock);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>> + struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
>> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = qcom_swrm_stream_alloc_ports(ctrl, ctrl->sruntime[dai->id],
>> + params, substream->stream);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return sdw_prepare_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
>> +
>> + qcom_swrm_stream_free_ports(ctrl, ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
>> + sdw_stream_remove_master(&ctrl->bus, ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
>> + sdw_deprepare_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
>> + sdw_disable_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
>
> Declaring local variable initialized with ctrl->sruntime[dai->id] should
> prove more readable.
>
I agree!
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_register_dais(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
>> +{
>> + int num_dais = ctrl->num_dout_ports + ctrl->num_din_ports;
>> + struct snd_soc_dai_driver *dais;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + /* PDM dais are only tested for now */
>> + dais = devm_kcalloc(ctrl->dev, num_dais, sizeof(*dais), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!dais)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_dais; i++) {
>> + dais[i].name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "SDW Pin%d", i);
>> + if (i < ctrl->num_dout_ports) {
>> + dais[i].playback.stream_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
>> + "SDW Tx%d", i);
>> + if (!dais[i].playback.stream_name) {
>> + kfree(dais[i].name);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> Now this got me worried. What about memory allocated in iterations
> before the failure? It must be freed in error handling path. goto should
> be of help here.
>
I agree.
>> + }
>> + dais[i].playback.channels_min = 1;
>> + dais[i].playback.channels_max = 1;
>> + dais[i].playback.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000;
>> + dais[i].playback.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE;
>
> All of these formats are hardcoded. Consider declaring a "template"
> format above and simply initialize each dai with it.
Okay!
>
>> + } else {
>> + dais[i].capture.stream_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
>> + "SDW Rx%d", i);
>> + if (!dais[i].capture.stream_name) {
>> + kfree(dais[i].name);
>> + kfree(dais[i].playback.stream_name);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> Same memory deallocation issue here.
I see that, I will take care of this in next version.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + dais[i].capture.channels_min = 1;
>> + dais[i].capture.channels_max = 1;
>> + dais[i].capture.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000;
>> + dais[i].capture.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE;
>
> Comment regarding playback dai initialization applies here too.
>
>> + }
>> + dais[i].ops = &qcom_swrm_pdm_dai_ops;
>> + dais[i].id = i;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return devm_snd_soc_register_component(ctrl->dev,
>> + &qcom_swrm_dai_component,
>> + dais, num_dais);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_get_port_config(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np = ctrl->dev->of_node;
>> + u8 off1[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
>> + u8 off2[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
>> + u8 si[SDW_MAX_PORTS];
>
> Array of struct qcom_swrm_port_config instead of this trio?
>
Makes sense! Will do that in next version.
>> + int i, ret, nports, val;
>> +
>> + val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_PARAMS);
>> + ctrl->num_dout_ports = val & SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DOUT_PORTS_MASK;
>> + ctrl->num_din_ports = (val & SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DIN_PORTS_MASK) >> 5;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "qcom,din-ports", &val);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (val > ctrl->num_din_ports)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + ctrl->num_din_ports = val;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "qcom,dout-ports", &val);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (val > ctrl->num_dout_ports)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + ctrl->num_dout_ports = val;
>> +
>> + nports = ctrl->num_dout_ports + ctrl->num_din_ports;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u8_array(np, "qcom,ports-offset1",
>> + off1, nports);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u8_array(np, "qcom,ports-offset2",
>> + off2, nports);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u8_array(np, "qcom,ports-sinterval-low",
>> + si, nports);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < nports; i++) {
>> + ctrl->pconfig[i].si = si[i];
>> + ctrl->pconfig[i].off1 = off1[i];
>> + ctrl->pconfig[i].off2 = off2[i];
>> + }
>
> Using array I spoke of earlier leads to brackets being redundant here.
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
On 07-06-19, 09:56, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Qualcomm SoundWire Master controller is present in most Qualcomm SoCs
> either integrated as part of WCD audio codecs via slimbus or
> as part of SOC I/O.
>
> This patchset adds support to a very basic controller which has been
> tested with WCD934x SoundWire controller connected to WSA881x smart
> speaker amplifiers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/Kconfig | 9 +
> drivers/soundwire/Makefile | 4 +
> drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 983 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Can you split this to two patches (at least), master driver followed by
DAI driver
> +
> +#define SWRM_COMP_HW_VERSION 0x00
What does COMP stand for?
> +#define SWRM_COMP_CFG_ADDR 0x04
> +#define SWRM_COMP_CFG_IRQ_LEVEL_OR_PULSE_MSK BIT(1)
> +#define SWRM_COMP_CFG_ENABLE_MSK BIT(0)
> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS 0x100
> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DOUT_PORTS_MASK GENMASK(4, 0)
> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DIN_PORTS_MASK GENMASK(9, 5)
> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_WR_FIFO_DEPTH GENMASK(14, 10)
> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_RD_FIFO_DEPTH GENMASK(19, 15)
> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_AUTO_ENUM_SLAVES GENMASK(32. 20)
Thats a lot of text, So as others have said we need to rethink the
naming conventions, perhaps QC_SDW_PARAM_AUTO_ENUM (feel free to drop
SDW as well from here as it QC specific!
Also move common ones to core..
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS 0x200
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RMSK GENMASK(16, 0)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SLAVE_PEND_IRQ BIT(0)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED BIT(1)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CHANGE_ENUM_SLAVE_STATUS BIT(2)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_MASTER_CLASH_DET BIT(3)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_OVERFLOW BIT(4)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_UNDERFLOW BIT(5)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_WR_CMD_FIFO_OVERFLOW BIT(6)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR BIT(7)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_DOUT_PORT_COLLISION BIT(8)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_READ_EN_RD_VALID_MISMATCH BIT(9)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED BIT(10)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_AUTO_ENUM_FINISHED BIT(11)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_AUTO_ENUM_FAILED BIT(12)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_AUTO_ENUM_TABLE_IS_FULL BIT(13)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_BUS_RESET_FINISHED BIT(14)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CLK_STOP_FINISHED BIT(15)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_ERROR_PORT_TEST BIT(16)
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_MASK_ADDR 0x204
> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_CLEAR 0x208
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD 0x300
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD 0x304
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD 0x308
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS 0x30C
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_ADDR 0x314
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_NUM_OF_CMD_RETRY_SHFT 0x0
> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR 0x318
> +#define SWRM_ENUMERATOR_CFG_ADDR 0x500
> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(m) (0x101C + 0x40 * (m))
> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_SSP_PERIOD_SHFT 16
> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT 3
> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_BMSK GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT 0
> +#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR 0x1048
> +#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_BMSK GENMASK(21, 17)
> +#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_SHFT 0x11
> +#define SWRM_MCP_STATUS 0x104C
> +#define SWRM_MCP_STATUS_BANK_NUM_MASK BIT(0)
> +#define SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS 0x1090
> +#define SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_BANK(n, m) (0x1124 + 0x100 * (n - 1) + 0x40 * m)
> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL2_BANK(n, m) (0x1126 + 0x100 * (n - 1) + 0x40 * m)
> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_EN_CHAN_SHFT 0x18
> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET2_SHFT 0x10
> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET1_SHFT 0x08
> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_DATA_0 0xc885
> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_ADDR_0 0xc889
> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_ADDR_0 0xc88d
> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_DATA_0 0xc891
> +
> +#define SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(data, dev, id, reg) \
> + ((reg) | ((id) << 16) | ((dev) << 20) | ((data) << 24))
> +
> +#define SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL 0 /* Rows = 48 */
> +#define SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS 48
> +#define SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL 0 /* Cols = 2 */
> +#define SWRM_DEFAULT_COL 16
> +#define SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID 0xF
> +#define MAX_FREQ_NUM 1
> +#define TIMEOUT_MS 1000
> +#define QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN 0xf
> +#define DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ 9600000
> +#define SWRM_MAX_DAIS 0xF
I was thinking it would make sense to move this to DT, DAI is after all
a hw property!
> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, u8 cmd_data,
> + u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + u8 cmd_id;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->lock);
> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
> + cmd_id = SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID;
> + } else {
> + if (++ctrl->wr_cmd_id == SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID)
> + ctrl->wr_cmd_id = 0;
> +
> + cmd_id = ctrl->wr_cmd_id;
> + }
> +
> + val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(cmd_data, dev_addr, cmd_id, reg_addr);
> + ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD, val);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "%s: reg 0x%x write failed, err:%d\n",
> + __func__, val, ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
why not wait for completion on non broadcast?
> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
> + u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr,
> + u32 len, u8 *rval)
> +{
> + int i, ret = 0;
Superfluous initialization of ret
> +static irqreturn_t qcom_swrm_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_id;
> + u32 sts, value;
> +
> + sts = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED)
> + complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR) {
> + value = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS);
> + dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev,
> + "CMD error, fifo status 0x%x\n",
> + value);
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD, 0x1);
> + if ((value & 0xF) == 0xF) {
> + ctrl->fifo_status = -ENODATA;
> + complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if ((sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED) ||
> + sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CHANGE_ENUM_SLAVE_STATUS) {
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
> + ctrl->status[0] = SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED;
> +
> + schedule_work(&ctrl->slave_work);
So why are we scheduling work, you are the thread handler so I think it
should be okay and better to invoke bus for status update.
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SLAVE_PEND_IRQ)
> + dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "Slave pend irq\n");
> +
> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
> + dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "New slave attached\n");
No updating bus on the status?
> +static enum sdw_command_response qcom_swrm_xfer_msg(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> + struct sdw_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
> + int ret, i, len;
> +
> + if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_READ) {
> + for (i = 0; i < msg->len;) {
> + if ((msg->len - i) < QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN)
> + len = msg->len - i;
> + else
> + len = QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN;
> +
> + ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(ctrl, msg->dev_num,
> + msg->addr + i, len,
> + &msg->buf[i]);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
> + return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + i = i + len;
> + }
> + } else if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_WRITE) {
> + for (i = 0; i < msg->len; i++) {
> + ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(ctrl, msg->buf[i],
> + msg->dev_num,
> + msg->addr + i);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
> + return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
> +
> + return ret;
So we need to convert this to sdw_command_response before returning.
> +static int qcom_swrm_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
> +
> + if (!ctrl->sruntime[dai->id])
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return sdw_enable_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
Hmm you need to handle dai prepare being called for multiple times.
> +static int qcom_pdm_set_sdw_stream(struct snd_soc_dai *dai,
> + void *stream, int direction)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
lets remove if we dont intend to do anything!
> +static int qcom_swrm_runtime_suspend(struct device *device)
> +{
> + /* TBD */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_swrm_runtime_resume(struct device *device)
> +{
> + /* TBD */
> + return 0;
> +}
Again, lets remove these, add when we have the functionality
--
~Vinod
Thanks for taking time to review!
On 10/06/2019 07:40, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 07-06-19, 09:56, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> Qualcomm SoundWire Master controller is present in most Qualcomm SoCs
>> either integrated as part of WCD audio codecs via slimbus or
>> as part of SOC I/O.
>>
>> This patchset adds support to a very basic controller which has been
>> tested with WCD934x SoundWire controller connected to WSA881x smart
>> speaker amplifiers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/soundwire/Kconfig | 9 +
>> drivers/soundwire/Makefile | 4 +
>> drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 983 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Can you split this to two patches (at least), master driver followed by
> DAI driver
Sure.
>
>> +
>> +#define SWRM_COMP_HW_VERSION 0x00
>
> What does COMP stand for?
Controller splits registers into "Component(core configuration
registers)", "Interrupt" "Command Fifo" and so on...
>
>> +#define SWRM_COMP_CFG_ADDR 0x04
>> +#define SWRM_COMP_CFG_IRQ_LEVEL_OR_PULSE_MSK BIT(1)
>> +#define SWRM_COMP_CFG_ENABLE_MSK BIT(0)
>> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS 0x100
>> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DOUT_PORTS_MASK GENMASK(4, 0)
>> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DIN_PORTS_MASK GENMASK(9, 5)
>> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_WR_FIFO_DEPTH GENMASK(14, 10)
>> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_RD_FIFO_DEPTH GENMASK(19, 15)
>> +#define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_AUTO_ENUM_SLAVES GENMASK(32. 20)
>
> Thats a lot of text, So as others have said we need to rethink the
> naming conventions, perhaps QC_SDW_PARAM_AUTO_ENUM (feel free to drop
> SDW as well from here as it QC specific!
>
> Also move common ones to core..
>
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS 0x200
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RMSK GENMASK(16, 0)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SLAVE_PEND_IRQ BIT(0)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED BIT(1)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CHANGE_ENUM_SLAVE_STATUS BIT(2)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_MASTER_CLASH_DET BIT(3)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_OVERFLOW BIT(4)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_UNDERFLOW BIT(5)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_WR_CMD_FIFO_OVERFLOW BIT(6)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR BIT(7)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_DOUT_PORT_COLLISION BIT(8)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_READ_EN_RD_VALID_MISMATCH BIT(9)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED BIT(10)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_AUTO_ENUM_FINISHED BIT(11)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_AUTO_ENUM_FAILED BIT(12)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_AUTO_ENUM_TABLE_IS_FULL BIT(13)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_BUS_RESET_FINISHED BIT(14)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CLK_STOP_FINISHED BIT(15)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_ERROR_PORT_TEST BIT(16)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_MASK_ADDR 0x204
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_CLEAR 0x208
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD 0x300
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD 0x304
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD 0x308
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS 0x30C
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_ADDR 0x314
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CFG_NUM_OF_CMD_RETRY_SHFT 0x0
>> +#define SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR 0x318
>> +#define SWRM_ENUMERATOR_CFG_ADDR 0x500
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(m) (0x101C + 0x40 * (m))
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_SSP_PERIOD_SHFT 16
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT 3
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_BMSK GENMASK(2, 0)
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT 0
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR 0x1048
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_BMSK GENMASK(21, 17)
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_CFG_MAX_NUM_OF_CMD_NO_PINGS_SHFT 0x11
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_STATUS 0x104C
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_STATUS_BANK_NUM_MASK BIT(0)
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS 0x1090
>> +#define SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
>> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_BANK(n, m) (0x1124 + 0x100 * (n - 1) + 0x40 * m)
>> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL2_BANK(n, m) (0x1126 + 0x100 * (n - 1) + 0x40 * m)
>> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_EN_CHAN_SHFT 0x18
>> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET2_SHFT 0x10
>> +#define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET1_SHFT 0x08
>> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_DATA_0 0xc885
>> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_WR_ADDR_0 0xc889
>> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_ADDR_0 0xc88d
>> +#define SWRM_AHB_BRIDGE_RD_DATA_0 0xc891
>> +
>> +#define SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(data, dev, id, reg) \
>> + ((reg) | ((id) << 16) | ((dev) << 20) | ((data) << 24))
>> +
>> +#define SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL 0 /* Rows = 48 */
>> +#define SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS 48
>> +#define SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL 0 /* Cols = 2 */
>> +#define SWRM_DEFAULT_COL 16
>> +#define SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID 0xF
>> +#define MAX_FREQ_NUM 1
>> +#define TIMEOUT_MS 1000
>> +#define QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN 0xf
>> +#define DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ 9600000
>> +#define SWRM_MAX_DAIS 0xF
>
> I was thinking it would make sense to move this to DT, DAI is after all
> a hw property!
I will give that a try before sending out next version.
>
>> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, u8 cmd_data,
>> + u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + u8 cmd_id;
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&ctrl->lock);
>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
>> + cmd_id = SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID;
>> + } else {
>> + if (++ctrl->wr_cmd_id == SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID)
>> + ctrl->wr_cmd_id = 0;
>> +
>> + cmd_id = ctrl->wr_cmd_id;
>> + }
>> +
>> + val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(cmd_data, dev_addr, cmd_id, reg_addr);
>> + ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD, val);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "%s: reg 0x%x write failed, err:%d\n",
>> + __func__, val, ret);
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
>> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
>> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>
> why not wait for completion on non broadcast?
>
This could lead to dead-lock if we endup reading registers from
interrupt handler.
>> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
>> + u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr,
>> + u32 len, u8 *rval)
>> +{
>> + int i, ret = 0;
>
> Superfluous initialization of ret
>
I agree.
>> +static irqreturn_t qcom_swrm_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_id;
>> + u32 sts, value;
>> +
>> + sts = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED)
>> + complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR) {
>> + value = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS);
>> + dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev,
>> + "CMD error, fifo status 0x%x\n",
>> + value);
>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD, 0x1);
>> + if ((value & 0xF) == 0xF) {
>> + ctrl->fifo_status = -ENODATA;
>> + complete(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ((sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED) ||
>> + sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CHANGE_ENUM_SLAVE_STATUS) {
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
>> + ctrl->status[0] = SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED;
>> +
>> + schedule_work(&ctrl->slave_work);
>
> So why are we scheduling work, you are the thread handler so I think it
> should be okay and better to invoke bus for status update.
I had seen lockup issues as this would trigger broadcast messages which
would wait on completion interrupt!
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SLAVE_PEND_IRQ)
>> + dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "Slave pend irq\n");
>> +
>> + if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED)
>> + dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "New slave attached\n");
>
> No updating bus on the status?
>
Its done down below this function! These are debug messages only!
looks redundant, will remove it.
>> +static enum sdw_command_response qcom_swrm_xfer_msg(struct sdw_bus *bus,
>> + struct sdw_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
>> + int ret, i, len;
>> +
>> + if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_READ) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < msg->len;) {
>> + if ((msg->len - i) < QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN)
>> + len = msg->len - i;
>> + else
>> + len = QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN;
>> +
>> + ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(ctrl, msg->dev_num,
>> + msg->addr + i, len,
>> + &msg->buf[i]);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
>> + return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + i = i + len;
>> + }
>> + } else if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_WRITE) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < msg->len; i++) {
>> + ret = qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(ctrl, msg->buf[i],
>> + msg->dev_num,
>> + msg->addr + i);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
>> + return SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
>> +
>> + return ret;
>
> So we need to convert this to sdw_command_response before returning.
>
Sure!
>> +static int qcom_swrm_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dai->dev);
>> +
>> + if (!ctrl->sruntime[dai->id])
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + return sdw_enable_stream(ctrl->sruntime[dai->id]);
>
> Hmm you need to handle dai prepare being called for multiple times.
> Thanks for pointing this out, Will fix this.
>> +static int qcom_pdm_set_sdw_stream(struct snd_soc_dai *dai,
>> + void *stream, int direction)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> lets remove if we dont intend to do anything!
>
Hm, not sure how I missed this one!
>> +static int qcom_swrm_runtime_suspend(struct device *device)
>> +{
>> + /* TBD */
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_runtime_resume(struct device *device)
>> +{
>> + /* TBD */
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> Again, lets remove these, add when we have the functionality
We have issues without this, as soundwire bus would return error on
runtime pm get/set. For RFC, I had to make this dummy, I will be able to
add and test some code in next 1/2 spins.
Thanks,
srini
>
>>> +#define SWRM_COMP_HW_VERSION 0x00
>>
>> Can we please use SDW_ or QCOM_SDW_ as prefix?
>>
>
> SWRM prefix is as per the data sheet register names, If it help am happy
> to add QCOM_ prefix it.
That'd be fine. As long as there is no duplication and two
terms/prefixes used for the same thing I am happy.
>>> +
>>> + val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(cmd_data, dev_addr, cmd_id, reg_addr);
>>> + ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD, val);
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "%s: reg 0x%x write failed, err:%d\n",
>>> + __func__, val, ret);
>>> + goto err;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
>>> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
>>> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
>>> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>>
>> This is odd. The SoundWire spec does not handle writes to a single
>> device or broadcast writes differently. I don't see a clear reason why
>> you would only timeout for a broadcast write.
>>
>
> There is danger of blocking here without timeout.
Right, and it's fine to add a timeout. The question is why add a timeout
*only* for a broadcast operation? It should be added for every
transaction IMO, unless you have a reason not to do so.
>>
>>> +
>>> + /* Mask soundwire interrupts */
>>> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_MASK_ADDR,
>>> + SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RMSK);
>>> +
>>> + /* Configure No pings */
>>> + val = ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR);
>>
>> If there is any sort of PREQ signaling for Slave-initiated interrupts,
>> disabling PINGs is likely a non-conformant implementation since the
>> master is required to issue a PING command within 32 frames. That's
>> also the only way to know if a device is attached, so additional
>> comments are likely required.
> This is the value of Maximum number of consiecutive read/write commands
> without ping command in between. I will try to collect more details and
> add some comments here.
Right, so it's probably the comment that's too strict. It's not no pings
it's no pings during a sequence of up to N read/writes.
On 10/06/2019 15:12, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
>>>> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
>>>> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
>>>> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>>>
>>> This is odd. The SoundWire spec does not handle writes to a single
>>> device or broadcast writes differently. I don't see a clear reason
>>> why you would only timeout for a broadcast write.
>>>
>>
>> There is danger of blocking here without timeout.
>
> Right, and it's fine to add a timeout. The question is why add a timeout
> *only* for a broadcast operation? It should be added for every
> transaction IMO, unless you have a reason not to do so.
>
I did try this before, the issue is when we read/write registers from
interrupt handler, these can be deadlocked as we will be interrupt
handler waiting for another completion interrupt, which will never
happen unless we return from the first interrupt.
thanks,
srini
>>>
On 6/11/19 5:29 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>
> On 10/06/2019 15:12, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
>>>>> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
>>>>> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
>>>>> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>>>>
>>>> This is odd. The SoundWire spec does not handle writes to a single
>>>> device or broadcast writes differently. I don't see a clear reason
>>>> why you would only timeout for a broadcast write.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There is danger of blocking here without timeout.
>>
>> Right, and it's fine to add a timeout. The question is why add a
>> timeout *only* for a broadcast operation? It should be added for every
>> transaction IMO, unless you have a reason not to do so.
>>
>
> I did try this before, the issue is when we read/write registers from
> interrupt handler, these can be deadlocked as we will be interrupt
> handler waiting for another completion interrupt, which will never
> happen unless we return from the first interrupt.
I don't quite get the issue. With the Intel hardware we only deal with
Master registers (some of which mirror the bus state) in the handler and
will only modify Slave registers in the thread. All changes to Slave
registers will be subject to a timeout as well as a check for no
response or NAK. Not sure what is specific about your solution that
requires a different handling of commands depending on which device
number is used. It could very well be that you've uncovered a flaw in
the bus design but I still don't see how it would be Qualcomm-specific?
On 11/06/2019 13:21, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
> On 6/11/19 5:29 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/06/2019 15:12, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
>>>>>> + ctrl->fifo_status = 0;
>>>>>> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->sp_cmd_comp,
>>>>>> + msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>>>>>
>>>>> This is odd. The SoundWire spec does not handle writes to a single
>>>>> device or broadcast writes differently. I don't see a clear reason
>>>>> why you would only timeout for a broadcast write.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is danger of blocking here without timeout.
>>>
>>> Right, and it's fine to add a timeout. The question is why add a
>>> timeout *only* for a broadcast operation? It should be added for
>>> every transaction IMO, unless you have a reason not to do so.
>>>
>>
>> I did try this before, the issue is when we read/write registers from
>> interrupt handler, these can be deadlocked as we will be interrupt
>> handler waiting for another completion interrupt, which will never
>> happen unless we return from the first interrupt.
>
> I don't quite get the issue. With the Intel hardware we only deal with
> Master registers (some of which mirror the bus state) in the handler and
> will only modify Slave registers in the thread. All changes to Slave
> registers will be subject to a timeout as well as a check for no
> response or NAK. Not sure what is specific about your solution that
> requires a different handling of commands depending on which device
> number is used. It could very well be that you've uncovered a flaw in
> the bus design but I still don't see how it would be Qualcomm-specific?
Sorry It took bit more time for digging up the issue which I faced
previously to answer this query. This is now fixed and v2 patchset has
same handling for all the slave registers read/writes with no special
casing.
Thanks,
srini