2021-03-07 08:54:00

by Jia-Ju Bai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] usb: gadget: legacy: fix error return code of msg_bind()

When usb_otg_descriptor_alloc() returns NULL to usb_desc, no error
return code of msg_bind() is assigned.
To fix this bug, status is assigned with -ENOMEM in this case.

Reported-by: TOTE Robot <[email protected]
Reported-by: TOTE Robot <[email protected]>>
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
---
drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/mass_storage.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/mass_storage.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/mass_storage.c
index 9ed22c5fb7fe..ac1741126619 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/mass_storage.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/mass_storage.c
@@ -175,8 +175,10 @@ static int msg_bind(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev)
struct usb_descriptor_header *usb_desc;

usb_desc = usb_otg_descriptor_alloc(cdev->gadget);
- if (!usb_desc)
+ if (!usb_desc) {
+ status = -ENOMEM;
goto fail_string_ids;
+ }
usb_otg_descriptor_init(cdev->gadget, usb_desc);
otg_desc[0] = usb_desc;
otg_desc[1] = NULL;
--
2.17.1


2021-03-23 11:37:10

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: legacy: fix error return code of msg_bind()

On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 12:49:15AM -0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> When usb_otg_descriptor_alloc() returns NULL to usb_desc, no error
> return code of msg_bind() is assigned.
> To fix this bug, status is assigned with -ENOMEM in this case.
>
> Reported-by: TOTE Robot <[email protected]
> Reported-by: TOTE Robot <[email protected]>>

These lines are not written correctly :(

Please fix up and resend.

thanks,

greg k-h

2021-03-23 12:39:48

by Jia-Ju Bai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: legacy: fix error return code of msg_bind()



On 2021/3/23 19:35, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 12:49:15AM -0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>> When usb_otg_descriptor_alloc() returns NULL to usb_desc, no error
>> return code of msg_bind() is assigned.
>> To fix this bug, status is assigned with -ENOMEM in this case.
>>
>> Reported-by: TOTE Robot <[email protected]
>> Reported-by: TOTE Robot <[email protected]>>
> These lines are not written correctly :(
>
> Please fix up and resend.

Sorry for the mistake.
I will fix it and send a V2 patch.


Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai