On 11/02/2017 10:53 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 11/02/2017 10:19 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 11/02/2017 10:15 AM, Pintu Kumar wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Shuah Khan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Pintu,
>>>>
>>>> On 11/01/2017 11:00 AM, Pintu Agarwal wrote:
>>>>> This is a test utility to verify ION buffer sharing in user space
>>>>> between 2 independent processes.
>>>>> It uses unix domain socket (with SCM_RIGHTS) as IPC to transfer an FD to
>>>>> another process to share the same buffer.
>>>>> This utility demonstrates how ION buffer sharing can be implemented between
>>>>> two user space processes, using various heap types.
>>>>>
>>>>> This utility is made to be run as part of kselftest framework in kernel.
>>>>> The utility is verified on Ubuntu-32 bit system with Linux Kernel 4.14,
>>>>> using ION system heap.
>>>>>
>>>>> For more information about the utility please check the README file.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pintu Agarwal <[email protected]>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 3 +-
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/android/Makefile | 46 ++++
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/.gitignore | 2 +
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/Makefile | 16 ++
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/README | 101 ++++++++
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/config | 4 +
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ion.h | 143 ++++++++++++
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ion_test.sh | 55 +++++
>>>>> .../testing/selftests/android/ion/ionapp_export.c | 135 +++++++++++
>>>>> .../testing/selftests/android/ion/ionapp_import.c | 88 +++++++
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ionutils.c | 259 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ionutils.h | 55 +++++
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ipcsocket.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ipcsocket.h | 35 +++
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/android/run.sh | 3 +
>>>>> 15 files changed, 1171 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/android/Makefile
>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/.gitignore
>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/Makefile
>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/README
>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/config
>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ion.h
>>>>> create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ion_test.sh
>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ionapp_export.c
>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ionapp_import.c
>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ionutils.c
>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ionutils.h
>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ipcsocket.c
>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ipcsocket.h
>>>>> create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/android/run.sh
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
>>>>> index ff80564..61bc77b 100644
>>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
>>>>> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>>>>> -TARGETS = bpf
>>>>> +TARGETS = android
>>>>
>>>> Based on our discussion on dependency on staging headers, let's not add
>>>> this test to kselftest run. Remove it from here and users can run it
>>>> as needed.
>>>>
>>>>> +TARGETS += bpf
>>>>> TARGETS += breakpoints
>>>>> TARGETS += capabilities
>>>>> TARGETS += cpufreq
>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/android/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/android/Makefil> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 0000000..1a74922
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/android/Makefile
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
>>>>> +SUBDIRS := ion
>>>>> +
>>>>> +TEST_PROGS := run.sh
>>>>> +
>>>>> +.PHONY: all clean
>>>>> +
>>>>> +include ../lib.mk
>>>>> +
>>>>> +all:
>>>>> + @for DIR in $(SUBDIRS); do \
>>>>> + BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR; \
>>>>> + mkdir $$BUILD_TARGET -p; \
>>>>> + make OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;\
>>>>> + #SUBDIR test prog name should be in the form: SUBDIR_test.sh
>>>>> + TEST=$$DIR"_test.sh"; \
>>>>> + if [ -e $$DIR/$$TEST ]; then
>>>>> + rsync -a $$DIR/$$TEST $$BUILD_TARGET/;
>>>>> + fi
>>>>> + done
>>>>> +
>>>>> +override define RUN_TESTS
>>>>> + @cd $(OUTPUT); ./run.sh
>>>>> +endef
>>>>> +
>>>>> +override define INSTALL_RULE
>>>>> + mkdir -p $(INSTALL_PATH)
>>>>> + install -t $(INSTALL_PATH) $(TEST_PROGS) $(TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED) $(TEST_FILES)
>>>>> +
>>>>> + @for SUBDIR in $(SUBDIRS); do \
>>>>> + BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$SUBDIR; \
>>>>> + mkdir $$BUILD_TARGET -p; \
>>>>> + $(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$SUBDIR INSTALL_PATH=$(INSTALL_PATH)/$$SUBDIR install; \
>>>>> + done;
>>>>> +endef
>>>>> +
>>>>> +override define EMIT_TESTS
>>>>> + echo "./run.sh"
>>>>> +endef
>>>>> +
>>>>> +override define CLEAN
>>>>> + @for DIR in $(SUBDIRS); do \
>>>>> + BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR; \
>>>>> + mkdir $$BUILD_TARGET -p; \
>>>>> + make OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;\
>>>>> + done
>>>>> +endef
>>>>
>>>> This Makefile is fine, you still want to leverage common run_tests target
>>>> in lib.mk Install and emit tests should be fine, because these are built
>>>> in the source tree. I am looking to avoid attempts to build this test
>>>> outside kernel tree.
>>>
>>> Ok, I understood what you mean.
>>> You want to remove ion test from kselftest build, but still maintain
>>> the test code inside selftest.
>>> Yes, I agree with this, kselftest will succeed (outside of kernel
>>> source tree), and still somebody can build and run it locally.
>>
>> Right.
>>
>>>
>>> But, my concern is, whole this recent patches were made to include it
>>> into kselftest framework.
>>> Otherwise in my previous patch, I included it under:
>>> tools/testing/android (outside of selftest).
>>
>> I do want this test under kselftest framework. It doesn't make sense to
>> add this under tools/testing/adroid. At some point we could add it to
>> the selftest/Makefile TARGETS list for it to be run very easily if it
>> resides under selftests.
>>
>>>
>>> If, removing the android/ion from kselftest is fine (as of now), I can
>>> push the new changes by tomorrow.
>>> Just waiting for Greg and Laura to confirm...
>>>
>
> I did some sanity tests on this patch on a system with staging and android
> enabled. Most users will see
>
> ion_test.sh: No /dev/ion device found
> ion_test.sh: May be CONFIG_ION is not set
>
> Leaving this in kselftest run might be useful on adroid veification
> tests.
>
> With ion.h local file, outside builds work. We will just have to remember
> to clean this up if and when ion moves from staging.
>
> I am planning to take this patch as is for 4.15-rc1.
>
> Laura! Are you good with the heap size changes in this patch?
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>
Yes, I think this is okay.
Thanks,
Laura
From 1582977806601132275@xxx Thu Nov 02 17:54:37 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1579656416160844925
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread