I have proposed "Distros and Syzkaller - Why bother?" for the LPC 2019
distros microconference.
I am curious as to how other distros are using Syzkaller and if there
are ways for us to collaborate.
I am curious how Syzkaller fits into the distro's development cycle,
release cycle and if it is part
of the distro's Continuous Integration (CI) process?
Any insights would be appreciated.
Thank you,
George Kennedy
+ <[email protected]>
On 7/26/2019 10:48 AM, George Kennedy wrote:
> I have proposed "Distros and Syzkaller - Why bother?" for the LPC 2019
> distros microconference.
>
> I am curious as to how other distros are using Syzkaller and if there
> are ways for us to collaborate.
>
> I am curious how Syzkaller fits into the distro's development cycle,
> release cycle and if it is part
> of the distro's Continuous Integration (CI) process?
>
> Any insights would be appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
> George Kennedy
>
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 5:21 PM Dhaval Giani <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Adding a bunch of people.
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019, 8:06 AM George Kennedy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> + <[email protected]>
>>
>> On 7/26/2019 10:48 AM, George Kennedy wrote:
>> > I have proposed "Distros and Syzkaller - Why bother?" for the LPC 2019
>> > distros microconference.
>> >
>> > I am curious as to how other distros are using Syzkaller and if there
>> > are ways for us to collaborate.
>> >
>> > I am curious how Syzkaller fits into the distro's development cycle,
>> > release cycle and if it is part
>> > of the distro's Continuous Integration (CI) process?
>> >
>> > Any insights would be appreciated.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > George Kennedy
Cool! Will try to be there.
Note syzbot also tests LTS releases now:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/linux-4.14
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/linux-4.19
Though, results are only delivered to
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/syzkaller-lts-bugs
We could test some distro trees as well with the relevant configs.
Details are discussable.