This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.131 release.
There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.131-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.4.131-rc1
Juergen Gross <[email protected]>
xen/events: reset active flag for lateeoi events later
Alper Gun <[email protected]>
KVM: SVM: Call SEV Guest Decommission if ASID binding fails
Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
s390/stack: fix possible register corruption with stack switch helper
David Rientjes <[email protected]>
KVM: SVM: Periodically schedule when unregistering regions on destroy
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++--
arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 18 +++++++++++-------
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
commit 67147e96a332b56c7206238162771d82467f86c0 upstream.
The CALL_ON_STACK macro is used to call a C function from inline
assembly, and therefore must consider the C ABI, which says that only
registers 6-13, and 15 are non-volatile (restored by the called
function).
The inline assembly incorrectly marks all registers used to pass
parameters to the called function as read-only input operands, instead
of operands that are read and written to. This might result in
register corruption depending on usage, compiler, and compile options.
Fix this by marking all operands used to pass parameters as read/write
operands. To keep the code simple even register 6, if used, is marked
as read-write operand.
Fixes: ff340d2472ec ("s390: add stack switch helper")
Cc: <[email protected]> # 4.20
Reviewed-by: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -79,12 +79,16 @@ struct stack_frame {
CALL_ARGS_4(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4); \
register unsigned long r4 asm("6") = (unsigned long)(arg5)
-#define CALL_FMT_0 "=&d" (r2) :
-#define CALL_FMT_1 "+&d" (r2) :
-#define CALL_FMT_2 CALL_FMT_1 "d" (r3),
-#define CALL_FMT_3 CALL_FMT_2 "d" (r4),
-#define CALL_FMT_4 CALL_FMT_3 "d" (r5),
-#define CALL_FMT_5 CALL_FMT_4 "d" (r6),
+/*
+ * To keep this simple mark register 2-6 as being changed (volatile)
+ * by the called function, even though register 6 is saved/nonvolatile.
+ */
+#define CALL_FMT_0 "=&d" (r2)
+#define CALL_FMT_1 "+&d" (r2)
+#define CALL_FMT_2 CALL_FMT_1, "+&d" (r3)
+#define CALL_FMT_3 CALL_FMT_2, "+&d" (r4)
+#define CALL_FMT_4 CALL_FMT_3, "+&d" (r5)
+#define CALL_FMT_5 CALL_FMT_4, "+&d" (r6)
#define CALL_CLOBBER_5 "0", "1", "14", "cc", "memory"
#define CALL_CLOBBER_4 CALL_CLOBBER_5
@@ -105,7 +109,7 @@ struct stack_frame {
" brasl 14,%[_fn]\n" \
" la 15,0(%[_prev])\n" \
: [_prev] "=&a" (prev), CALL_FMT_##nr \
- [_stack] "a" (stack), \
+ : [_stack] "a" (stack), \
[_bc] "i" (offsetof(struct stack_frame, back_chain)), \
[_fn] "X" (fn) : CALL_CLOBBER_##nr); \
r2; \
On 7/9/21 7:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.131 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.131-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
thanks,
-- Shuah
On 2021/7/9 21:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.131 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.131-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.4.131-rc1,
Kernel repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.4.y
Version: 5.4.131-rc1
Commit: 901498b2630533698a5037666f2d140b120ac995
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 8905
passed: 8905
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 8905
passed: 8905
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 03:20:14PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.131 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210702): 65 configs -> no failure
arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210702): 107 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210702): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression.
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
--
Regards
Sudip
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 at 18:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.131 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.131-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
## Build
* kernel: 5.4.131-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: 901498b2630533698a5037666f2d140b120ac995
* git describe: v5.4.130-5-g901498b26305
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.130-5-g901498b26305
## No regressions (compared to v5.4.130)
## No fixes (compared to v5.4.130)
## Test result summary
total: 73646, pass: 59708, fail: 787, skip: 11904, xfail: 1247,
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 192 total, 191 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 15 total, 14 passed, 1 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 03:20:14PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.131 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 428 pass: 428 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Guenter
On 7/9/2021 6:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.131 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.131-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian