2012-08-09 10:16:44

by Amit Shah

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] virtio-trace: Support virtio-trace

Hi,

On (Tue) 24 Jul 2012 [11:36:57], Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The following patch set provides a low-overhead system for collecting kernel
> tracing data of guests by a host in a virtualization environment.

So I just have one minor comment, please post a non-RFC version of the
patch.

Since you have an ACK from Steven for the ftrace patch, I guess Rusty
can push this in via his virtio tree?

I'll ack the virtio-console bits in the next series you send.

Thanks,

Amit


2012-08-21 05:00:43

by Rusty Russell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] virtio-trace: Support virtio-trace

On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:46:20 +0530, Amit Shah <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On (Tue) 24 Jul 2012 [11:36:57], Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The following patch set provides a low-overhead system for collecting kernel
> > tracing data of guests by a host in a virtualization environment.
>
> So I just have one minor comment, please post a non-RFC version of the
> patch.
>
> Since you have an ACK from Steven for the ftrace patch, I guess Rusty
> can push this in via his virtio tree?
>
> I'll ack the virtio-console bits in the next series you send.

You didn't Ack, BTW. At least, AFAICT.

Cheers,
Rusty.

2012-08-21 05:09:45

by Amit Shah

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] virtio-trace: Support virtio-trace

On (Tue) 21 Aug 2012 [11:47:16], Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:46:20 +0530, Amit Shah <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On (Tue) 24 Jul 2012 [11:36:57], Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > The following patch set provides a low-overhead system for collecting kernel
> > > tracing data of guests by a host in a virtualization environment.
> >
> > So I just have one minor comment, please post a non-RFC version of the
> > patch.
> >
> > Since you have an ACK from Steven for the ftrace patch, I guess Rusty
> > can push this in via his virtio tree?
> >
> > I'll ack the virtio-console bits in the next series you send.
>
> You didn't Ack, BTW. At least, AFAICT.

Ah, sorry. Will do that now.

Amit