Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]> writes:
> s/buidler/builder/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/sphinx/rstFlatTable.py | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/rstFlatTable.py b/Documentation/sphinx/rstFlatTable.py
> index a3eea0bbe6ba..1d2b9be6b6c5 100755
> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/rstFlatTable.py
> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/rstFlatTable.py
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ class ListTableBuilder(object):
> for colwidth in colwidths:
> colspec = nodes.colspec(colwidth=colwidth)
> # FIXME: It seems, that the stub method only works well in the
> - # absence of rowspan (observed by the html buidler, the docutils-xml
> + # absence of rowspan (observed by the html builder, the docutils-xml
> # build seems OK). This is not extraordinary, because there exists
> # no table directive (except *this* flat-table) which allows to
> # define coexistent of rowspan and stubs (there was no use-case
> --
This was fixed in your previous patch from March 2. Bhaskar, please
slow down a bit and try not to create needless work for the recipients
of your patches, OK?
Thanks,
jon
On 11:57 Thu 25 Mar 2021, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> s/buidler/builder/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Documentation/sphinx/rstFlatTable.py | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/rstFlatTable.py b/Documentation/sphinx/rstFlatTable.py
>> index a3eea0bbe6ba..1d2b9be6b6c5 100755
>> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/rstFlatTable.py
>> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/rstFlatTable.py
>> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ class ListTableBuilder(object):
>> for colwidth in colwidths:
>> colspec = nodes.colspec(colwidth=colwidth)
>> # FIXME: It seems, that the stub method only works well in the
>> - # absence of rowspan (observed by the html buidler, the docutils-xml
>> + # absence of rowspan (observed by the html builder, the docutils-xml
>> # build seems OK). This is not extraordinary, because there exists
>> # no table directive (except *this* flat-table) which allows to
>> # define coexistent of rowspan and stubs (there was no use-case
>> --
>
>This was fixed in your previous patch from March 2. Bhaskar, please
>slow down a bit and try not to create needless work for the recipients
>of your patches, OK?
>
Apologies. I am sorry to cause pain to others, this was not true intension of
the trivial work I am trying to do.
I shall be prudent in the future. My sincere apology to gobbles up peoples
time.
>Thanks,
>
>jon