2020-08-18 05:50:25

by Rahul Tanwar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v7 0/2] pwm: intel: Add PWM driver for a new SoC

Patch 1 adds dt binding document in YAML format.
Patch 2 add PWM fan controller driver for LGM SoC.

v7:
- Address code quality related review concerns.
- Rename fan related property to pwm-*.
- Fix one make dt_binding_check reported error.

v6:
- Readjust .apply op as per review feedback.
- Add back pwm-cells property to resolve make dt_binding_check error.
pwm-cells is a required property for PWM driver.
- Add back fan related optional properties.

v5:
- Address below review concerns from Uwe Kleine-K?nig.
* Improve comments about Limitations.
* Use return value of regmap_update_bits if container function returns
error code.
* Modify .apply op to have strict checking for fixed period supported
by PWM HW.
* Use u64 as type when use min_t for duty_cycle.
* Add reset_control_assert() in failure case in probe where it was missing
earlier.
- Remove fan specific optional properties from pwm dt binding document (Rob Herring)

v4:
- Address below review concerns from Uwe Kleine-K?nig.
* Improve notes and limitations comments.
* Add common prefixes for all #defines.
* Modify/Improve logic in .apply & .get_state ops as advised.
* Skip error messages in probe when error is -EPROBE_DEFER.
* Add dependencies in Kconfig (OF & HAS_IOMEM) and add select REGMAP_MMIO.
* Address other code quality related review concerns.
- Fix make dt_binding_check reported error in YAML file.

v3:
- Address below review concerns from Uwe Kleine-K?nig.
* Remove fan rpm calibration task from the driver.
* Modify apply op as per the review feedback.
* Add roundup & round down where necessary.
* Address other misc code quality related review concerns.
* Use devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(). (Philipp Zabel)
* Improve dt binding document.

v2:
- Address below review concerns from Uwe Kleine-K?nig.
* Add notes and limitations about PWM HW.
* Rename all functions and structure to lgm_pwm_*
* Readjust space aligninment in structure fields to single space.
* Switch to using apply instead of config/enable/disable.
* Address other code quality related concerns.
* Rebase to 5.8-rc1.
- Address review concerns in dt binding YAML from Rob Herring.

v1:
- Initial version.


Rahul Tanwar (2):
Add DT bindings YAML schema for PWM fan controller of LGM SoC
Add PWM fan controller driver for LGM SoC

.../devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,lgm-pwm.yaml | 54 +++++
drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pwm/pwm-intel-lgm.c | 267 +++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 333 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,lgm-pwm.yaml
create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-intel-lgm.c

--
2.11.0


2020-08-18 05:51:32

by Rahul Tanwar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/2] Add DT bindings YAML schema for PWM fan controller of LGM SoC

Intel's LGM(Lightning Mountain) SoC contains a PWM fan controller
which is only used to control the fan attached to the system. This
PWM controller does not have any other consumer other than fan.
Add DT bindings documentation for this PWM fan controller.

Signed-off-by: Rahul Tanwar <[email protected]>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,lgm-pwm.yaml | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,lgm-pwm.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,lgm-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,lgm-pwm.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..289b82213e23
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,lgm-pwm.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/intel,lgm-pwm.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: LGM SoC PWM fan controller
+
+maintainers:
+ - Rahul Tanwar <[email protected]>
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ const: intel,lgm-pwm
+
+ reg:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ "#pwm-cells":
+ const: 2
+
+ clocks:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ resets:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ pwm-fanmode:
+ $ref: '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32'
+ description: Specifies PWM fan mode. Default when unspecified is 2.
+
+ pwm-maxrpm:
+ $ref: '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32'
+ description:
+ Specifies maximum RPM of PWM fan attached to the system.
+ Default when unspecified is 4000.
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - clocks
+ - resets
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ pwm: pwm@e0d00000 {
+ compatible = "intel,lgm-pwm";
+ reg = <0xe0d00000 0x30>;
+ #pwm-cells = <2>;
+ clocks = <&cgu0 126>;
+ resets = <&rcu0 0x30 21>;
+ };
--
2.11.0

2020-08-18 05:52:47

by Rahul Tanwar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/2] Add PWM fan controller driver for LGM SoC

Intel Lightning Mountain(LGM) SoC contains a PWM fan controller.
This PWM controller does not have any other consumer, it is a
dedicated PWM controller for fan attached to the system. Add
driver for this PWM fan controller.

Signed-off-by: Rahul Tanwar <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 11 ++
drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pwm/pwm-intel-lgm.c | 267 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 279 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-intel-lgm.c

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
index 7dbcf6973d33..f7a832268c79 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
@@ -232,6 +232,17 @@ config PWM_IMX_TPM
To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
will be called pwm-imx-tpm.

+config PWM_INTEL_LGM
+ tristate "Intel LGM PWM support"
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
+ depends on X86 || COMPILE_TEST
+ select REGMAP_MMIO
+ help
+ Generic PWM fan controller driver for LGM SoC.
+
+ To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
+ will be called pwm-intel-lgm.
+
config PWM_IQS620A
tristate "Azoteq IQS620A PWM support"
depends on MFD_IQS62X || COMPILE_TEST
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
index 2c2ba0a03557..e9431b151694 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_IMG) += pwm-img.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_IMX1) += pwm-imx1.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_IMX27) += pwm-imx27.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_IMX_TPM) += pwm-imx-tpm.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_INTEL_LGM) += pwm-intel-lgm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_IQS620A) += pwm-iqs620a.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_JZ4740) += pwm-jz4740.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_LP3943) += pwm-lp3943.o
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-intel-lgm.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-intel-lgm.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7f26a30c70f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-intel-lgm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation.
+ *
+ * Limitations:
+ * - The hardware supports fixed period which is dependent on 2/3 or 4
+ * wire fan mode.
+ * - Supports normal polarity. Does not support changing polarity.
+ * - When PWM is disabled, output of PWM will become 0(inactive). It doesn't
+ * keep track of running period.
+ * - When duty cycle is changed, PWM output may be a mix of previous setting
+ * and new setting for the first period. From second period, the output is
+ * based on new setting.
+ * - It is a dedicated PWM fan controller. There are no other consumers for
+ * this PWM controller.
+ */
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/pwm.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/reset.h>
+
+#define LGM_PWM_FAN_CON0 0x0
+#define LGM_PWM_FAN_EN_EN BIT(0)
+#define LGM_PWM_FAN_EN_DIS 0x0
+#define LGM_PWM_FAN_EN_MSK BIT(0)
+#define LGM_PWM_FAN_MODE_2WIRE 0x0
+#define LGM_PWM_FAN_MODE_4WIRE 0x1
+#define LGM_PWM_FAN_MODE_MSK BIT(1)
+#define LGM_PWM_FAN_DC_MSK GENMASK(23, 16)
+
+#define LGM_PWM_FAN_CON1 0x4
+#define LGM_PWM_FAN_MAX_RPM_MSK GENMASK(15, 0)
+
+#define LGM_PWM_MAX_RPM (BIT(16) - 1)
+#define LGM_PWM_DEFAULT_RPM 4000
+#define LGM_PWM_MAX_DUTY_CYCLE (BIT(8) - 1)
+
+#define LGM_PWM_DC_BITS 8
+
+#define LGM_PWM_PERIOD_2WIRE_NSECS 40000000
+#define LGM_PWM_PERIOD_4WIRE_NSECS 40000
+
+struct lgm_pwm_chip {
+ struct pwm_chip chip;
+ struct regmap *regmap;
+ struct clk *clk;
+ struct reset_control *rst;
+ u32 period;
+};
+
+static inline struct lgm_pwm_chip *to_lgm_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
+{
+ return container_of(chip, struct lgm_pwm_chip, chip);
+}
+
+static int lgm_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable)
+{
+ struct lgm_pwm_chip *pc = to_lgm_pwm_chip(chip);
+ struct regmap *regmap = pc->regmap;
+
+ return regmap_update_bits(regmap, LGM_PWM_FAN_CON0, LGM_PWM_FAN_EN_MSK,
+ enable ? LGM_PWM_FAN_EN_EN : LGM_PWM_FAN_EN_DIS);
+}
+
+static int lgm_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ const struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+ struct lgm_pwm_chip *pc = to_lgm_pwm_chip(chip);
+ u32 duty_cycle, val;
+ int ret;
+
+ /*
+ * The hardware only supports
+ * normal polarity and fixed period.
+ */
+ if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL ||
+ state->period < pc->period)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (!state->enabled) {
+ ret = lgm_pwm_enable(chip, 0);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ duty_cycle = min_t(u64, state->duty_cycle, pc->period);
+ val = duty_cycle * LGM_PWM_MAX_DUTY_CYCLE / pc->period;
+
+ ret = regmap_update_bits(pc->regmap, LGM_PWM_FAN_CON0, LGM_PWM_FAN_DC_MSK,
+ FIELD_PREP(LGM_PWM_FAN_DC_MSK, val));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = lgm_pwm_enable(chip, 1);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void lgm_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+ struct lgm_pwm_chip *pc = to_lgm_pwm_chip(chip);
+ u32 duty, val;
+
+ state->enabled = regmap_test_bits(pc->regmap, LGM_PWM_FAN_CON0,
+ LGM_PWM_FAN_EN_EN);
+ state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
+ state->period = pc->period; /* fixed period */
+
+ regmap_read(pc->regmap, LGM_PWM_FAN_CON0, &val);
+ duty = FIELD_GET(LGM_PWM_FAN_DC_MSK, val);
+ state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP(duty * pc->period,
+ LGM_PWM_MAX_DUTY_CYCLE);
+}
+
+static const struct pwm_ops lgm_pwm_ops = {
+ .get_state = lgm_pwm_get_state,
+ .apply = lgm_pwm_apply,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static void lgm_pwm_init(struct lgm_pwm_chip *pc)
+{
+ struct device *dev = pc->chip.dev;
+ struct regmap *regmap = pc->regmap;
+ u32 max_rpm, fan_wire, con0_val, con0_mask;
+
+ if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "pwm-fanmode", &fan_wire))
+ fan_wire = 2; /* default is 2 wire mode */
+
+ con0_mask = LGM_PWM_FAN_MODE_MSK;
+
+ switch (fan_wire) {
+ case 4:
+ con0_val = FIELD_PREP(LGM_PWM_FAN_MODE_MSK, LGM_PWM_FAN_MODE_4WIRE);
+ pc->period = LGM_PWM_PERIOD_4WIRE_NSECS;
+ break;
+ default:
+ /* default is 2wire mode */
+ con0_val = FIELD_PREP(LGM_PWM_FAN_MODE_MSK, LGM_PWM_FAN_MODE_2WIRE);
+ pc->period = LGM_PWM_PERIOD_2WIRE_NSECS;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "pwm-maxrpm", &max_rpm))
+ max_rpm = LGM_PWM_DEFAULT_RPM;
+
+ max_rpm = min_t(u32, max_rpm, LGM_PWM_MAX_RPM);
+ if (max_rpm == 0)
+ max_rpm = LGM_PWM_DEFAULT_RPM;
+
+ regmap_update_bits(regmap, LGM_PWM_FAN_CON1, LGM_PWM_FAN_MAX_RPM_MSK, max_rpm);
+ regmap_update_bits(regmap, LGM_PWM_FAN_CON0, con0_mask, con0_val);
+}
+
+static const struct regmap_config lgm_pwm_regmap_config = {
+ .reg_bits = 32,
+ .reg_stride = 4,
+ .val_bits = 32,
+};
+
+static int lgm_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct lgm_pwm_chip *pc;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ void __iomem *io_base;
+ int ret;
+
+ pc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pc), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pc)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ io_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(io_base))
+ return PTR_ERR(io_base);
+
+ pc->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, io_base, &lgm_pwm_regmap_config);
+ if (IS_ERR(pc->regmap)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(pc->regmap);
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to init register map: %pe\n",
+ pc->regmap);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ pc->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(pc->clk)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(pc->clk);
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to get clock: %pe\n", pc->clk);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ pc->rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(pc->rst)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(pc->rst);
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset control: %pe\n",
+ pc->rst);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = reset_control_deassert(pc->rst);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(dev, "cannot deassert reset control: %pe\n",
+ ERR_PTR(ret));
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(pc->clk);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to enable clock\n");
+ reset_control_assert(pc->rst);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ pc->chip.dev = dev;
+ pc->chip.ops = &lgm_pwm_ops;
+ pc->chip.npwm = 1;
+
+ lgm_pwm_init(pc);
+
+ ret = pwmchip_add(&pc->chip);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to add PWM chip: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
+ clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk);
+ reset_control_assert(pc->rst);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pc);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int lgm_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct lgm_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk);
+ reset_control_assert(pc->rst);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id lgm_pwm_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "intel,lgm-pwm" },
+ { }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, lgm_pwm_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver lgm_pwm_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "intel-pwm",
+ .of_match_table = lgm_pwm_of_match,
+ },
+ .probe = lgm_pwm_probe,
+ .remove = lgm_pwm_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(lgm_pwm_driver);
--
2.11.0

2020-08-18 08:40:15

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] pwm: intel: Add PWM driver for a new SoC

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 01:48:59PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
> Patch 1 adds dt binding document in YAML format.
> Patch 2 add PWM fan controller driver for LGM SoC.
>
> v7:
> - Address code quality related review concerns.
> - Rename fan related property to pwm-*.
> - Fix one make dt_binding_check reported error.

I guess it misses the answer why pwm-fan can't be integrated into the soup?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


2020-08-19 04:17:05

by Rahul Tanwar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] pwm: intel: Add PWM driver for a new SoC


Hi Andy,

On 18/8/2020 4:38 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 01:48:59PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
>> Patch 1 adds dt binding document in YAML format.
>> Patch 2 add PWM fan controller driver for LGM SoC.
>>
>> v7:
>> - Address code quality related review concerns.
>> - Rename fan related property to pwm-*.
>> - Fix one make dt_binding_check reported error.
> I guess it misses the answer why pwm-fan can't be integrated into the soup?
>

Can you please elaborate more? I could not understand your point clearly.

Regards,
Rahul

2020-08-19 07:56:00

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] pwm: intel: Add PWM driver for a new SoC

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 7:18 AM Tanwar, Rahul
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> On 18/8/2020 4:38 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 01:48:59PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
> >> Patch 1 adds dt binding document in YAML format.
> >> Patch 2 add PWM fan controller driver for LGM SoC.
> >>
> >> v7:
> >> - Address code quality related review concerns.
> >> - Rename fan related property to pwm-*.
> >> - Fix one make dt_binding_check reported error.
> > I guess it misses the answer why pwm-fan can't be integrated into the soup?
> >
>
> Can you please elaborate more? I could not understand your point clearly.

It's not mine, it's Uwe's. There is an hwmon module called pwm-fan. As
far as *I* understand this, it can be utilized to control fans via PWM
APIs. And Uwe asked you if you considered that and why you don't
integrated (coupled) it here.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

2020-08-19 08:48:37

by Rahul Tanwar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] pwm: intel: Add PWM driver for a new SoC


Hi Andy,

On 19/8/2020 3:54 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 7:18 AM Tanwar, Rahul
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> On 18/8/2020 4:38 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 01:48:59PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
>>>> Patch 1 adds dt binding document in YAML format.
>>>> Patch 2 add PWM fan controller driver for LGM SoC.
>>>>
>>>> v7:
>>>> - Address code quality related review concerns.
>>>> - Rename fan related property to pwm-*.
>>>> - Fix one make dt_binding_check reported error.
>>> I guess it misses the answer why pwm-fan can't be integrated into the soup?
>>>
>> Can you please elaborate more? I could not understand your point clearly.
> It's not mine, it's Uwe's. There is an hwmon module called pwm-fan. As
> far as *I* understand this, it can be utilized to control fans via PWM
> APIs. And Uwe asked you if you considered that and why you don't
> integrated (coupled) it here.

Thanks for clarification. I now understand what Rob, Uwe & you mean by
pwm-fan. I will check in detail about it if we can integrate it with
pwm-fan hwmon driver.

Regards,
Rahul