Followup to: <[email protected]>
By author: Mike Castle <[email protected]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> If they are so stable, then why does it matter which version of the kernel
> glibc was built against and why aren't those kernel headers good enough to
> accomplish what automounter needs?
>
They usually are just fine. However, if the automount protocol is
updated, we don't want to *have* to sit through a full glibc release
cycle.
-hpa
--
<[email protected]> at work, <[email protected]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt