2021-05-29 12:07:53

by Yue Haibing

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH -next] USB: gadget: f_fs: Remove unneed cast in ffs_prepare_buffer()

A coccicheck run provided information like the following.

./drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c:3832:9-16:
WARNING: ERR_CAST can be used with data

ffs_prepare_buffer() should return an ERR_PTR() encoded error
code on failure.

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <[email protected]>
---
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
index bf109191659a..cb419bbd089c 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
@@ -3829,7 +3829,7 @@ static char *ffs_prepare_buffer(const char __user *buf, size_t len)

data = memdup_user(buf, len);
if (IS_ERR(data))
- return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(data));
+ return data;

pr_vdebug("Buffer from user space:\n");
ffs_dump_mem("", data, len);
--
2.17.1


2021-05-29 12:13:41

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] USB: gadget: f_fs: Remove unneed cast in ffs_prepare_buffer()

On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 08:04:08PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> A coccicheck run provided information like the following.
>
> ./drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c:3832:9-16:
> WARNING: ERR_CAST can be used with data
>
> ffs_prepare_buffer() should return an ERR_PTR() encoded error
> code on failure.

It does return such a pointer today, so this statement does not make
much sense :(

And is this a v2 patch? What changed from the previous version?

thanks,

greg k-h

2021-05-29 12:58:46

by Yue Haibing

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] USB: gadget: f_fs: Remove unneed cast in ffs_prepare_buffer()

On 2021/5/29 20:11, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 08:04:08PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
>> A coccicheck run provided information like the following.
>>
>> ./drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c:3832:9-16:
>> WARNING: ERR_CAST can be used with data
>>
>> ffs_prepare_buffer() should return an ERR_PTR() encoded error
>> code on failure.
>
> It does return such a pointer today, so this statement does not make
> much sense :(

Yes, it does. This is just to remove explicit casts.

>
> And is this a v2 patch? What changed from the previous version?

Sorry, I forget to add version info.

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
> .
>