2024-05-17 07:58:15

by Artem Savkov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] powerpc64/bpf: jit support for unconditional byte swap

Add jit support for unconditional byte swap. Tested using BSWAP tests
from test_bpf module.

Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 3071205782b15..97191cf091bbf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -699,11 +699,12 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
*/
case BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_FROM_LE:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_FROM_BE:
+ case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_END | BPF_FROM_LE:
#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__
if (BPF_SRC(code) == BPF_FROM_BE)
goto emit_clear;
#else /* !__BIG_ENDIAN__ */
- if (BPF_SRC(code) == BPF_FROM_LE)
+ if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ALU && BPF_SRC(code) == BPF_FROM_LE)
goto emit_clear;
#endif
switch (imm) {
--
2.45.0



2024-05-22 11:38:15

by Hari Bathini

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] powerpc64/bpf: jit support for unconditional byte swap



On 17/05/24 1:26 pm, Artem Savkov wrote:
> Add jit support for unconditional byte swap. Tested using BSWAP tests
> from test_bpf module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> index 3071205782b15..97191cf091bbf 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> @@ -699,11 +699,12 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
> */
> case BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_FROM_LE:
> case BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_FROM_BE:

> + case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_END | BPF_FROM_LE:

A comment here indicating this case does unconditional swap
could improve readability.

Other than this minor nit, the patchset looks good to me.
Also, tested the changes with test_bpf module and selftests.
For the series..

Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <[email protected]>

> #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__
> if (BPF_SRC(code) == BPF_FROM_BE)
> goto emit_clear;
> #else /* !__BIG_ENDIAN__ */
> - if (BPF_SRC(code) == BPF_FROM_LE)
> + if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ALU && BPF_SRC(code) == BPF_FROM_LE)
> goto emit_clear;
> #endif
> switch (imm) {