gpiochip_add_pin_range() can fail, so better return its error code than
a hard coded '0'.
Fixes: d2b67744fd99 ("pinctrl: bcm2835: implement hook for missing gpio-ranges")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
---
This patch is speculative and compile tested only.
If it is wrong, maybe a comment explaining why 0 should be returned would
be welcomed.
---
drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
index 8e2551a08c37..cb298fad354a 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
@@ -366,10 +366,8 @@ static int bcm2835_add_pin_ranges_fallback(struct gpio_chip *gc)
if (!pctldev)
return 0;
- gpiochip_add_pin_range(gc, pinctrl_dev_get_devname(pctldev), 0, 0,
- gc->ngpio);
-
- return 0;
+ return gpiochip_add_pin_range(gc, pinctrl_dev_get_devname(pctldev), 0, 0,
+ gc->ngpio);
}
static const struct gpio_chip bcm2835_gpio_chip = {
--
2.34.1
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 11:43 PM Christophe JAILLET
<[email protected]> wrote:
> gpiochip_add_pin_range() can fail, so better return its error code than
> a hard coded '0'.
>
> Fixes: d2b67744fd99 ("pinctrl: bcm2835: implement hook for missing gpio-ranges")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
Patch applied for the next kernel cycle (becoming v6.5)
Yours,
Linus Walleij