2021-03-05 01:04:06

by James Bottomley

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: rebase of the scsi-mkp tree

On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 11:04 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I notice that you have rebased the scsi-mkp tree. Unfotunately James
> has already merged part of the old version of the scsi-mkp tree int
> the scsi tree so that commits f69d02e37a85..39ae3edda325 in the scsi-
> mkp tree are the same patches as commits fe07bfda2fb9..100d21c4ff29
> in the scsi tree.

It's just the flux from Linus announcing he's screwed up -rc1 and we
shouldn't base on it ... it should all be fixed soon.

James

Attachments:
signature.asc (235.00 B)
This is a digitally signed message part

2021-03-05 01:05:23

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: rebase of the scsi-mkp tree

Hi James,

On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:21:20 -0800 James Bottomley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 11:04 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > I notice that you have rebased the scsi-mkp tree. Unfotunately James
> > has already merged part of the old version of the scsi-mkp tree int
> > the scsi tree so that commits f69d02e37a85..39ae3edda325 in the scsi-
> > mkp tree are the same patches as commits fe07bfda2fb9..100d21c4ff29
> > in the scsi tree.
>
> It's just the flux from Linus announcing he's screwed up -rc1 and we
> shouldn't base on it ... it should all be fixed soon.

Thanks.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature