Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to
fix dtb validation.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <[email protected]>
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
index d35dcc4f0242..92582cccbb1b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ patternProperties:
'#gpio-cells':
const: 2
+ interrupt-controller: true
+ '#interrupt-cells':
+ const: 2
+
reg:
maxItems: 1
clocks:
@@ -80,6 +84,8 @@ patternProperties:
minimum: 1
maximum: 16
+ gpio-line-names: true
+
st,bank-name:
description:
Should be a name string for this bank as specified in the datasheet.
--
2.17.1
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:46:39 +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to
> fix dtb validation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <[email protected]>
>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
On 13/09/2022 09:46, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to
> fix dtb validation.
Rebase your patch on recent Linux kernel and use get_maintainers.pl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <[email protected]>
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
> index d35dcc4f0242..92582cccbb1b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ patternProperties:
> '#gpio-cells':
> const: 2
>
> + interrupt-controller: true
> + '#interrupt-cells':
> + const: 2
> +
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
> clocks:
> @@ -80,6 +84,8 @@ patternProperties:
> minimum: 1
> maximum: 16
>
> + gpio-line-names: true
maxItems?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof
On 9/19/22 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/09/2022 09:46, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>> Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to
>> fix dtb validation.
>
> Rebase your patch on recent Linux kernel and use get_maintainers.pl.
I did it on 6.0-rc5 but yes I used your kernel.org address instead of
linaro ones. Sorry.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <[email protected]>
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>> index d35dcc4f0242..92582cccbb1b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ patternProperties:
>> '#gpio-cells':
>> const: 2
>>
>> + interrupt-controller: true
>> + '#interrupt-cells':
>> + const: 2
>> +
>> reg:
>> maxItems: 1
>> clocks:
>> @@ -80,6 +84,8 @@ patternProperties:
>> minimum: 1
>> maximum: 16
>>
>> + gpio-line-names: true
>
> maxItems?
Generic question, Is it mandatory to add maxItems information for all
entries ?
For sure I'll send a v2 with it.
Alex
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
On 23/09/2022 10:29, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof
>
> On 9/19/22 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 13/09/2022 09:46, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>>> Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to
>>> fix dtb validation.
>>
>> Rebase your patch on recent Linux kernel and use get_maintainers.pl.
>
> I did it on 6.0-rc5 but yes I used your kernel.org address instead of
> linaro ones. Sorry.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>>> index d35dcc4f0242..92582cccbb1b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>>> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ patternProperties:
>>> '#gpio-cells':
>>> const: 2
>>>
>>> + interrupt-controller: true
>>> + '#interrupt-cells':
>>> + const: 2
>>> +
>>> reg:
>>> maxItems: 1
>>> clocks:
>>> @@ -80,6 +84,8 @@ patternProperties:
>>> minimum: 1
>>> maximum: 16
>>>
>>> + gpio-line-names: true
>>
>> maxItems?
>
> Generic question, Is it mandatory to add maxItems information for all
> entries ?
It's not mandatory for all. For some it is recommended, for some it does
not make sense. Here it's quite easy to add and it will validate the
entry. Any reason not to add it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On 9/23/22 11:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/09/2022 10:29, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof
>>
>> On 9/19/22 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 13/09/2022 09:46, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>>>> Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to
>>>> fix dtb validation.
>>>
>>> Rebase your patch on recent Linux kernel and use get_maintainers.pl.
>>
>> I did it on 6.0-rc5 but yes I used your kernel.org address instead of
>> linaro ones. Sorry.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>>>> index d35dcc4f0242..92582cccbb1b 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>>>> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ patternProperties:
>>>> '#gpio-cells':
>>>> const: 2
>>>>
>>>> + interrupt-controller: true
>>>> + '#interrupt-cells':
>>>> + const: 2
>>>> +
>>>> reg:
>>>> maxItems: 1
>>>> clocks:
>>>> @@ -80,6 +84,8 @@ patternProperties:
>>>> minimum: 1
>>>> maximum: 16
>>>>
>>>> + gpio-line-names: true
>>>
>>> maxItems?
>>
>> Generic question, Is it mandatory to add maxItems information for all
>> entries ?
>
> It's not mandatory for all. For some it is recommended, for some it does
> not make sense. Here it's quite easy to add and it will validate the
> entry. Any reason not to add it?
Ok understood. To be honest, no reasons to not add it.
cheers
alex
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>