Hey! Watch where you point that flame-thrower!
At the risk of stoking those old fires:
Has anyone looked into getting kgdb working on 2.5? On any
architecture? (I'm mostly interested in XScale, but I thought I'd start
here in the hope that another arch has done the heavy lifting. ;) )
(Hmm, more Googling yields mention of 2.5.49-mm1, so I'll look into that
some more. Agh, it looks like there have been 2 versions of kgdb in the
-mm series. More study needed.)
Failing that, I'd grasp at straws such as general advice or other
pointers. :)
Thanks,
Eli
--------------------. "If it ain't broke now,
Eli Carter \ it will be soon." -- crypto-gram
eli.carter(a)inet.com `-------------------------------------------------
> Hey! Watch where you point that flame-thrower!
>
> At the risk of stoking those old fires:
> Has anyone looked into getting kgdb working on 2.5? On any architecture? (I'm mostly interested in XScale, but I thought I'd start here in the hope that another arch has done the heavy lifting. ;) )
It does already, it's in both current -mm and -mjb trees. There was a
fancy new version floating around at one point, not sure what happened
to that, but the old one works fine.
M.
Hi Martin
> > Has anyone looked into getting kgdb working on 2.5? On any
> architecture? (I'm mostly interested in XScale, but I thought I'd start
> here in the hope that another arch has done the heavy lifting. ;) )
>
> It does already, it's in both current -mm and -mjb trees. There was a
> fancy new version floating around at one point, not sure what happened
> to that, but the old one works fine.
Is there a way to get a separate patch w/o the whole -mm? (I guess I can do
the required manual surgical separation, but asking is free :)
I?aky P?rez-Gonz?lez -- Not speaking for Intel -- all opinions are my own
(and my fault)
>> > Has anyone looked into getting kgdb working on 2.5? On any
>> architecture? (I'm mostly interested in XScale, but I thought I'd start
>> here in the hope that another arch has done the heavy lifting. ;) )
>>
>> It does already, it's in both current -mm and -mjb trees. There was a
>> fancy new version floating around at one point, not sure what happened
>> to that, but the old one works fine.
>
> Is there a way to get a separate patch w/o the whole -mm? (I guess I can do
> the required manual surgical separation, but asking is free :)
yeah, look in Andrew's broken-out directory. "kgdb.patch" or something.
M.