Include "linux/of_address.h" to fix the compile error for
mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe() when compiling fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c.
CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c: In function ‘mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe’:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c:90:11: error: implicit declaration of function ‘of_iomap’; did you mean ‘pci_iomap’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
l2ctlr = of_iomap(dev->dev.of_node, 0);
^~~~~~~~
pci_iomap
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c:90:9: error: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
l2ctlr = of_iomap(dev->dev.of_node, 0);
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
scripts/Makefile.build:267: recipe for target 'arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o' failed
make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o] Error 1
Fixes: commit 6db92cc9d07d ("powerpc/85xx: add cache-sram support")
Signed-off-by: WANG Wenhu <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c
index 2d0af0c517bb..7533572492f0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include "fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h"
--
2.17.1
Le 13/03/2020 à 18:19, WANG Wenhu a écrit :
> Include "linux/of_address.h" to fix the compile error for
> mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe() when compiling fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c.
>
> CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c: In function ‘mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe’:
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c:90:11: error: implicit declaration of function ‘of_iomap’; did you mean ‘pci_iomap’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> l2ctlr = of_iomap(dev->dev.of_node, 0);
> ^~~~~~~~
> pci_iomap
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c:90:9: error: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
> l2ctlr = of_iomap(dev->dev.of_node, 0);
> ^
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> scripts/Makefile.build:267: recipe for target 'arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o' failed
> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o] Error 1
>
> Fixes: commit 6db92cc9d07d ("powerpc/85xx: add cache-sram support")
Shouldn't you Cc stable as well ?
> Signed-off-by: WANG Wenhu <[email protected]>
> ---
What's the difference between v1 and v2 ?
Christophe
发件人：Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
发送日期：2020-03-14 01:45:11
收件人：WANG Wenhu <[email protected]>,Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>,Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>,Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>,Richard Fontana <[email protected]>,Kate Stewart <[email protected]>,Allison Randal <[email protected]>,Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>,[email protected],[email protected]
抄送人：[email protected],[email protected]
主题：Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/fsl-85xx: fix compile error>
>
>Le 13/03/2020 à 18:19, WANG Wenhu a écrit :
>> Include "linux/of_address.h" to fix the compile error for
>> mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe() when compiling fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c.
>>
>> CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o
>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c: In function ‘mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe’:
>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c:90:11: error: implicit declaration of function ‘of_iomap’; did you mean ‘pci_iomap’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> l2ctlr = of_iomap(dev->dev.of_node, 0);
>> ^~~~~~~~
>> pci_iomap
>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c:90:9: error: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
>> l2ctlr = of_iomap(dev->dev.of_node, 0);
>> ^
>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>> scripts/Makefile.build:267: recipe for target 'arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o' failed
>> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o] Error 1
>>
>> Fixes: commit 6db92cc9d07d ("powerpc/85xx: add cache-sram support")
>
>Shouldn't you Cc stable as well ?
Pretty sure if it makes a difference(that I did not recognize).
Does the inconsistency of Cc lead to a failure on classification
or something else which may confuse you?
>
>> Signed-off-by: WANG Wenhu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>
>What's the difference between v1 and v2 ?
The label field modification: "Fixed" -> "Fixes", which now is
identified successfully. Really sorry for the fault on v1.
>
>Christophe
Le 13/03/2020 à 19:17, 王文虎 a écrit :
> 发件人：Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
> 发送日期：2020-03-14 01:45:11
> 收件人：WANG Wenhu <[email protected]>,Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>,Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>,Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>,Richard Fontana <[email protected]>,Kate Stewart <[email protected]>,Allison Randal <[email protected]>,Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>,[email protected],[email protected]
> 抄送人：[email protected],[email protected]
> 主题：Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/fsl-85xx: fix compile error>
>>
>> Le 13/03/2020 à 18:19, WANG Wenhu a écrit :
>>> Include "linux/of_address.h" to fix the compile error for
>>> mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe() when compiling fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c.
>>>
>>> CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o
>>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c: In function ‘mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe’:
>>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c:90:11: error: implicit declaration of function ‘of_iomap’; did you mean ‘pci_iomap’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>> l2ctlr = of_iomap(dev->dev.of_node, 0);
>>> ^~~~~~~~
>>> pci_iomap
>>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c:90:9: error: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
>>> l2ctlr = of_iomap(dev->dev.of_node, 0);
>>> ^
>>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>>> scripts/Makefile.build:267: recipe for target 'arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o' failed
>>> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o] Error 1
>>>
>>> Fixes: commit 6db92cc9d07d ("powerpc/85xx: add cache-sram support")
>>
>> Shouldn't you Cc stable as well ?
> Pretty sure if it makes a difference(that I did not recognize).
> Does the inconsistency of Cc lead to a failure on classification
> or something else which may confuse you?
See
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v5.1.9#n299
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: WANG Wenhu <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>
>> What's the difference between v1 and v2 ?
> The label field modification: "Fixed" -> "Fixes", which now is
> identified successfully. Really sorry for the fault on v1.
Ok. Usually people tell here (just below the ---) what is the difference
between the different versions. It helps people understand what the
changes are.
Christophe