Hi ALL,
We met the below WARNING during system suspend on an iMX6Q SDB board
with the latest linus/master branch (v5.9-rc1+) and next-20200820.
v5.8 kernel is ok. So i did bisect and finally found it's caused by
the patch below.
Reverting it can get rid of the warning, but I wonder if there may be
other potential issues.
Any ideas?
Defconfig used is: imx_v6_v7_defconfig
commit 843e600b8a2b01463c4d873a90b2c2ea8033f1f6
Author: Saravana Kannan <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Jul 16 14:45:23 2020 -0700
driver core: Fix sleeping in invalid context during device link deletion
Marek and Guenter reported that commit 287905e68dd2 ("driver core:
Expose device link details in sysfs") caused sleeping/scheduling while
atomic warnings.
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/locking/mutex.c:935
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 12, name: kworker/0:1
2 locks held by kworker/0:1/12:
#0: ee8074a8 ((wq_completion)rcu_gp){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
process_one_work+0x174/0x7dc
#1: ee921f20 ((work_completion)(&sdp->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
process_one_work+0x174/0x7dc
Preemption disabled at:
[<c01b10f0>] srcu_invoke_callbacks+0xc0/0x154
----- 8< ----- SNIP
[<c064590c>] (device_del) from [<c0645c9c>] (device_unregister+0x24/0x64)
[<c0645c9c>] (device_unregister) from [<c01b10fc>]
(srcu_invoke_callbacks+0xcc/0x154)
[<c01b10fc>] (srcu_invoke_callbacks) from [<c01493c4>]
(process_one_work+0x234/0x7dc)
[<c01493c4>] (process_one_work) from [<c01499b0>] (worker_thread+0x44/0x51c)
[<c01499b0>] (worker_thread) from [<c0150bf4>] (kthread+0x158/0x1a0)
[<c0150bf4>] (kthread) from [<c0100114>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
Exception stack(0xee921fb0 to 0xee921ff8)
This was caused by the device link device being released in the context
of srcu_invoke_callbacks(). There is no need to wait till the RCU
callback to release the device link device. So release the device
earlier and move the call_srcu() into the device release code. That way,
the memory will get freed only after the device is released AND the RCU
callback is called.
Fixes: 287905e68dd2 ("driver core: Expose device link details in sysfs")
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Error log:
# echo mem > /sys/power/state
[ 39.111865] PM: suspend entry (deep)
[ 39.148650] Filesystems sync: 0.032 seconds
[ 39.154034]
[ 39.155537] ======================================================
[ 39.161723] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 39.167911] 5.9.0-rc1-00103-g7eac66d0456f #37 Not tainted
[ 39.173315] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 39.179500] sh/647 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 39.183862] c15a310c (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c
[ 39.191200]
[ 39.191200] but task is already holding lock:
[ 39.197036] c15a37e4 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fw_pm_notify+0x90/0xd4
[ 39.203582]
[ 39.203582] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 39.203582]
[ 39.211763]
[ 39.211763] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 39.219249]
[ 39.219249] -> #2 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 39.224673] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
[ 39.229126] firmware_uevent+0x18/0xa0
[ 39.233411] dev_uevent+0xc4/0x1f8
[ 39.237343] uevent_show+0x98/0x114
[ 39.241362] dev_attr_show+0x18/0x48
[ 39.245472] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x84/0xec
[ 39.249927] seq_read+0x138/0x550
[ 39.253774] vfs_read+0x94/0x164
[ 39.257529] ksys_read+0x60/0xe8
[ 39.261288] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
[ 39.265564] 0xbed7c808
[ 39.268538]
[ 39.268538] -> #1 (kn->active#3){++++}-{0:0}:
[ 39.274391] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x94
[ 39.279450] device_del+0x144/0x3fc
[ 39.283467] __device_link_del+0x4c/0x70
[ 39.287919] device_link_remove+0x5c/0x8c
[ 39.292464] _regulator_put.part.0+0x104/0x1dc
[ 39.297436] regulator_put+0x2c/0x3c
[ 39.299731] regulator regulator.5: Failed to increase supply voltage: -110
[ 39.301544] release_nodes+0x1b4/0x204
[ 39.301553] really_probe+0x104/0x3b4
[ 39.316881] driver_probe_device+0x58/0xb4
[ 39.321506] device_driver_attach+0x58/0x60
[ 39.326217] __driver_attach+0x58/0xd0
[ 39.330499] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xbc
[ 39.334863] bus_add_driver+0x150/0x1dc
[ 39.339227] driver_register+0x74/0x108
[ 39.343599] i2c_register_driver+0x38/0x8c
[ 39.348227] do_one_initcall+0x84/0x3b4
[ 39.352598] kernel_init_freeable+0x154/0x1e4
[ 39.357485] kernel_init+0x8/0x118
[ 39.361415] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20
[ 39.365518] 0x0
[ 39.367883]
[ 39.367883] -> #0 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 39.373740] lock_acquire+0xe0/0x4ec
[ 39.377848] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x9d0
[ 39.381952] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
[ 39.386405] dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c
[ 39.390769] fw_pm_notify+0xa4/0xd4
[ 39.394795] notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x80
[ 39.399420] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x64
[ 39.405003] __pm_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x3c
[ 39.410063] pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x438
[ 39.414080] state_store+0x68/0xc8
[ 39.418013] kernfs_fop_write+0x10c/0x22c
[ 39.419741] cpu cpu0: failed to scale vddpu up: -110
[ 39.422551] vfs_write+0xbc/0x1d8
[ 39.422559] ksys_write+0x60/0xe8
[ 39.427529] cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -110
[ 39.431362] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
[ 39.431368] 0xbeec8958
[ 39.431372]
[ 39.431372] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 39.431372]
[ 39.431375] Chain exists of:
[ 39.431375] dpm_list_mtx --> kn->active#3 --> fw_lock
[ 39.431375]
[ 39.431390] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 39.431390]
[ 39.431394] CPU0 CPU1
[ 39.431398] ---- ----
[ 39.431401] lock(fw_lock);
[ 39.431412] lock(kn->active#3);
[ 39.490528] lock(fw_lock);
[ 39.495934] lock(dpm_list_mtx);
[ 39.499255]
[ 39.499255] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 39.499255]
[ 39.505181] 6 locks held by sh/647:
[ 39.508675] #0: ecf48a84 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at:
vfs_write+0x14c/0x1d8
[ 39.516007] #1: ed2ced48 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
kernfs_fop_write+0xd0/0x22c
[ 39.523684] #2: ec1ff960 (kn->active#90){.+.+}-{0:0}, at:
kernfs_fop_write+0xd8/0x22c
[ 39.531620] #3: c151c4e8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: pm_suspend+0x11c/0x438
[ 39.539991] #4: c151e3f4 ((pm_chain_head).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at:
__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x2c/0x64
[ 39.549753] usb_otg_vbus: disabling
[ 39.549755] #5: c15a37e4 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fw_pm_notify+0x90/0xd4
[ 39.553264] wm8962-supply: disabling
[ 39.560214]
[ 39.560214] stack backtrace:
[ 39.560225] CPU: 0 PID: 647 Comm: sh Not tainted
5.9.0-rc1-00103-g7eac66d0456f #37
[ 39.560230] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree)
[ 39.560260] [<c0112270>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010bfd4>]
(show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[ 39.560287] [<c010bfd4>] (show_stack) from [<c05af3a0>]
(dump_stack+0xe4/0x118)
[ 39.597365] [<c05af3a0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0185390>]
(check_noncircular+0x130/0x1e4)
[ 39.605386] [<c0185390>] (check_noncircular) from [<c018880c>]
(__lock_acquire+0x161c/0x31b0)
[ 39.613923] [<c018880c>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c018ad00>]
(lock_acquire+0xe0/0x4ec)
[ 39.621772] [<c018ad00>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0db0bfc>]
(__mutex_lock+0x94/0x9d0)
[ 39.629445] [<c0db0bfc>] (__mutex_lock) from [<c0db1554>]
(mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24)
[ 39.637463] [<c0db1554>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c07892dc>]
(dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c)
[ 39.645828] [<c07892dc>] (dpm_for_each_dev) from [<c0794a60>]
(fw_pm_notify+0xa4/0xd4)
[ 39.653762] [<c0794a60>] (fw_pm_notify) from [<c0152c7c>]
(notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x80)
[ 39.661954] [<c0152c7c>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c01532a8>]
(__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x64)
[ 39.671709] [<c01532a8>] (__blocking_notifier_call_chain) from
[<c0192498>] (__pm_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x3c)
[ 39.679740] cpu cpu0: failed to scale vddpu up: -110
[ 39.681897] [<c0192498>] (__pm_notifier_call_chain) from
[<c0194424>] (pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x438)
[ 39.686859] cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -110
[ 39.695473] [<c0194424>] (pm_suspend) from [<c019235c>]
(state_store+0x68/0xc8)
[ 39.695490] [<c019235c>] (state_store) from [<c035af80>]
(kernfs_fop_write+0x10c/0x22c)
[ 39.695506] [<c035af80>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c02b0e38>]
(vfs_write+0xbc/0x1d8)
[ 39.695524] [<c02b0e38>] (vfs_write) from [<c02b10a0>] (ksys_write+0x60/0xe8)
[ 39.704844] VGEN1: disabling
[ 39.709627] [<c02b10a0>] (ksys_write) from [<c0100080>]
(ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28)
[ 39.743035] Exception stack(0xed573fa8 to 0xed573ff0)
[ 39.748098] 3fa0: 00000004 01d3caf8 00000001
01d3caf8 00000004 00000000
[ 39.756286] 3fc0: 00000004 01d3caf8 b6f40340 00000004 b6ed6c8c
00000000 00000000 00000000
[ 39.764470] 3fe0: 00000004 beec8958 b6e75d4f b6e01d16
[ 39.770874] VGEN2: disabling
[ 39.776106] VGEN3: disabling
[ 69.590256] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db
[ 69.590312] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.008 seconds) done.
[ 69.606341] OOM killer disabled.
[ 69.609599] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001
seconds) done.
[ 69.619021] printk: Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:50 PM Dong Aisheng <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi ALL,
>
> We met the below WARNING during system suspend on an iMX6Q SDB board
> with the latest linus/master branch (v5.9-rc1+) and next-20200820.
> v5.8 kernel is ok. So i did bisect and finally found it's caused by
> the patch below.
> Reverting it can get rid of the warning, but I wonder if there may be
> other potential issues.
> Any ideas?
Thanks for the report. I'll look into this more closely after Linux
Plumbers (next week). We can't just revert the patch you pointed out
because it's fixing another locking issue.
I'm not familiar with the code path of the firmware_uevent stuff. But
if I were to make a guess, the fix will probably be one of:
1. Not having to go through one of these code paths for the "device
link" device.
2. Rewriting the device_del() code in device_link_remove() code path.
If anyone has a fix, I'd be happy to review.
-Saravana
> Defconfig used is: imx_v6_v7_defconfig
>
> commit 843e600b8a2b01463c4d873a90b2c2ea8033f1f6
> Author: Saravana Kannan <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu Jul 16 14:45:23 2020 -0700
>
> driver core: Fix sleeping in invalid context during device link deletion
>
> Marek and Guenter reported that commit 287905e68dd2 ("driver core:
> Expose device link details in sysfs") caused sleeping/scheduling while
> atomic warnings.
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> kernel/locking/mutex.c:935
> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 12, name: kworker/0:1
> 2 locks held by kworker/0:1/12:
> #0: ee8074a8 ((wq_completion)rcu_gp){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
> process_one_work+0x174/0x7dc
> #1: ee921f20 ((work_completion)(&sdp->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
> process_one_work+0x174/0x7dc
> Preemption disabled at:
> [<c01b10f0>] srcu_invoke_callbacks+0xc0/0x154
> ----- 8< ----- SNIP
> [<c064590c>] (device_del) from [<c0645c9c>] (device_unregister+0x24/0x64)
> [<c0645c9c>] (device_unregister) from [<c01b10fc>]
> (srcu_invoke_callbacks+0xcc/0x154)
> [<c01b10fc>] (srcu_invoke_callbacks) from [<c01493c4>]
> (process_one_work+0x234/0x7dc)
> [<c01493c4>] (process_one_work) from [<c01499b0>] (worker_thread+0x44/0x51c)
> [<c01499b0>] (worker_thread) from [<c0150bf4>] (kthread+0x158/0x1a0)
> [<c0150bf4>] (kthread) from [<c0100114>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
> Exception stack(0xee921fb0 to 0xee921ff8)
>
> This was caused by the device link device being released in the context
> of srcu_invoke_callbacks(). There is no need to wait till the RCU
> callback to release the device link device. So release the device
> earlier and move the call_srcu() into the device release code. That way,
> the memory will get freed only after the device is released AND the RCU
> callback is called.
>
> Fixes: 287905e68dd2 ("driver core: Expose device link details in sysfs")
> Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
>
> Error log:
> # echo mem > /sys/power/state
> [ 39.111865] PM: suspend entry (deep)
> [ 39.148650] Filesystems sync: 0.032 seconds
> [ 39.154034]
> [ 39.155537] ======================================================
> [ 39.161723] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> [ 39.167911] 5.9.0-rc1-00103-g7eac66d0456f #37 Not tainted
> [ 39.173315] ------------------------------------------------------
> [ 39.179500] sh/647 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 39.183862] c15a310c (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c
> [ 39.191200]
> [ 39.191200] but task is already holding lock:
> [ 39.197036] c15a37e4 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fw_pm_notify+0x90/0xd4
> [ 39.203582]
> [ 39.203582] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> [ 39.203582]
> [ 39.211763]
> [ 39.211763] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> [ 39.219249]
> [ 39.219249] -> #2 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> [ 39.224673] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
> [ 39.229126] firmware_uevent+0x18/0xa0
> [ 39.233411] dev_uevent+0xc4/0x1f8
> [ 39.237343] uevent_show+0x98/0x114
> [ 39.241362] dev_attr_show+0x18/0x48
> [ 39.245472] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x84/0xec
> [ 39.249927] seq_read+0x138/0x550
> [ 39.253774] vfs_read+0x94/0x164
> [ 39.257529] ksys_read+0x60/0xe8
> [ 39.261288] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
> [ 39.265564] 0xbed7c808
> [ 39.268538]
> [ 39.268538] -> #1 (kn->active#3){++++}-{0:0}:
> [ 39.274391] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x94
> [ 39.279450] device_del+0x144/0x3fc
> [ 39.283467] __device_link_del+0x4c/0x70
> [ 39.287919] device_link_remove+0x5c/0x8c
> [ 39.292464] _regulator_put.part.0+0x104/0x1dc
> [ 39.297436] regulator_put+0x2c/0x3c
> [ 39.299731] regulator regulator.5: Failed to increase supply voltage: -110
> [ 39.301544] release_nodes+0x1b4/0x204
> [ 39.301553] really_probe+0x104/0x3b4
> [ 39.316881] driver_probe_device+0x58/0xb4
> [ 39.321506] device_driver_attach+0x58/0x60
> [ 39.326217] __driver_attach+0x58/0xd0
> [ 39.330499] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xbc
> [ 39.334863] bus_add_driver+0x150/0x1dc
> [ 39.339227] driver_register+0x74/0x108
> [ 39.343599] i2c_register_driver+0x38/0x8c
> [ 39.348227] do_one_initcall+0x84/0x3b4
> [ 39.352598] kernel_init_freeable+0x154/0x1e4
> [ 39.357485] kernel_init+0x8/0x118
> [ 39.361415] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20
> [ 39.365518] 0x0
> [ 39.367883]
> [ 39.367883] -> #0 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> [ 39.373740] lock_acquire+0xe0/0x4ec
> [ 39.377848] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x9d0
> [ 39.381952] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
> [ 39.386405] dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c
> [ 39.390769] fw_pm_notify+0xa4/0xd4
> [ 39.394795] notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x80
> [ 39.399420] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x64
> [ 39.405003] __pm_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x3c
> [ 39.410063] pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x438
> [ 39.414080] state_store+0x68/0xc8
> [ 39.418013] kernfs_fop_write+0x10c/0x22c
> [ 39.419741] cpu cpu0: failed to scale vddpu up: -110
> [ 39.422551] vfs_write+0xbc/0x1d8
> [ 39.422559] ksys_write+0x60/0xe8
> [ 39.427529] cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -110
> [ 39.431362] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
> [ 39.431368] 0xbeec8958
> [ 39.431372]
> [ 39.431372] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 39.431372]
> [ 39.431375] Chain exists of:
> [ 39.431375] dpm_list_mtx --> kn->active#3 --> fw_lock
> [ 39.431375]
> [ 39.431390] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> [ 39.431390]
> [ 39.431394] CPU0 CPU1
> [ 39.431398] ---- ----
> [ 39.431401] lock(fw_lock);
> [ 39.431412] lock(kn->active#3);
> [ 39.490528] lock(fw_lock);
> [ 39.495934] lock(dpm_list_mtx);
> [ 39.499255]
> [ 39.499255] *** DEADLOCK ***
> [ 39.499255]
> [ 39.505181] 6 locks held by sh/647:
> [ 39.508675] #0: ecf48a84 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at:
> vfs_write+0x14c/0x1d8
> [ 39.516007] #1: ed2ced48 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> kernfs_fop_write+0xd0/0x22c
> [ 39.523684] #2: ec1ff960 (kn->active#90){.+.+}-{0:0}, at:
> kernfs_fop_write+0xd8/0x22c
> [ 39.531620] #3: c151c4e8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3},
> at: pm_suspend+0x11c/0x438
> [ 39.539991] #4: c151e3f4 ((pm_chain_head).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at:
> __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x2c/0x64
> [ 39.549753] usb_otg_vbus: disabling
> [ 39.549755] #5: c15a37e4 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fw_pm_notify+0x90/0xd4
> [ 39.553264] wm8962-supply: disabling
> [ 39.560214]
> [ 39.560214] stack backtrace:
> [ 39.560225] CPU: 0 PID: 647 Comm: sh Not tainted
> 5.9.0-rc1-00103-g7eac66d0456f #37
> [ 39.560230] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree)
> [ 39.560260] [<c0112270>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010bfd4>]
> (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [ 39.560287] [<c010bfd4>] (show_stack) from [<c05af3a0>]
> (dump_stack+0xe4/0x118)
> [ 39.597365] [<c05af3a0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0185390>]
> (check_noncircular+0x130/0x1e4)
> [ 39.605386] [<c0185390>] (check_noncircular) from [<c018880c>]
> (__lock_acquire+0x161c/0x31b0)
> [ 39.613923] [<c018880c>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c018ad00>]
> (lock_acquire+0xe0/0x4ec)
> [ 39.621772] [<c018ad00>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0db0bfc>]
> (__mutex_lock+0x94/0x9d0)
> [ 39.629445] [<c0db0bfc>] (__mutex_lock) from [<c0db1554>]
> (mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24)
> [ 39.637463] [<c0db1554>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c07892dc>]
> (dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c)
> [ 39.645828] [<c07892dc>] (dpm_for_each_dev) from [<c0794a60>]
> (fw_pm_notify+0xa4/0xd4)
> [ 39.653762] [<c0794a60>] (fw_pm_notify) from [<c0152c7c>]
> (notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x80)
> [ 39.661954] [<c0152c7c>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c01532a8>]
> (__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x64)
> [ 39.671709] [<c01532a8>] (__blocking_notifier_call_chain) from
> [<c0192498>] (__pm_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x3c)
> [ 39.679740] cpu cpu0: failed to scale vddpu up: -110
> [ 39.681897] [<c0192498>] (__pm_notifier_call_chain) from
> [<c0194424>] (pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x438)
> [ 39.686859] cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -110
> [ 39.695473] [<c0194424>] (pm_suspend) from [<c019235c>]
> (state_store+0x68/0xc8)
> [ 39.695490] [<c019235c>] (state_store) from [<c035af80>]
> (kernfs_fop_write+0x10c/0x22c)
> [ 39.695506] [<c035af80>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c02b0e38>]
> (vfs_write+0xbc/0x1d8)
> [ 39.695524] [<c02b0e38>] (vfs_write) from [<c02b10a0>] (ksys_write+0x60/0xe8)
> [ 39.704844] VGEN1: disabling
> [ 39.709627] [<c02b10a0>] (ksys_write) from [<c0100080>]
> (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28)
> [ 39.743035] Exception stack(0xed573fa8 to 0xed573ff0)
> [ 39.748098] 3fa0: 00000004 01d3caf8 00000001
> 01d3caf8 00000004 00000000
> [ 39.756286] 3fc0: 00000004 01d3caf8 b6f40340 00000004 b6ed6c8c
> 00000000 00000000 00000000
> [ 39.764470] 3fe0: 00000004 beec8958 b6e75d4f b6e01d16
> [ 39.770874] VGEN2: disabling
> [ 39.776106] VGEN3: disabling
>
> [ 69.590256] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db
> [ 69.590312] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.008 seconds) done.
> [ 69.606341] OOM killer disabled.
> [ 69.609599] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001
> seconds) done.
> [ 69.619021] printk: Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
> From: Saravana Kannan <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2020 2:28 AM
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:50 PM Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi ALL,
> >
> > We met the below WARNING during system suspend on an iMX6Q SDB board
> > with the latest linus/master branch (v5.9-rc1+) and next-20200820.
> > v5.8 kernel is ok. So i did bisect and finally found it's caused by
> > the patch below.
> > Reverting it can get rid of the warning, but I wonder if there may be
> > other potential issues.
> > Any ideas?
>
> Thanks for the report. I'll look into this more closely after Linux Plumbers (next
> week). We can't just revert the patch you pointed out because it's fixing another
> locking issue.
>
Thanks. Pls have me CCed when you send out patches.
I'd love to test it.
Regards
Aisheng
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:50 PM Dong Aisheng <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi ALL,
>
> We met the below WARNING during system suspend on an iMX6Q SDB board
> with the latest linus/master branch (v5.9-rc1+) and next-20200820.
> v5.8 kernel is ok. So i did bisect and finally found it's caused by
> the patch below.
> Reverting it can get rid of the warning, but I wonder if there may be
> other potential issues.
> Any ideas?
>
> Defconfig used is: imx_v6_v7_defconfig
>
----- 8< ----- Snipped text that was a bit misleading
>
> Error log:
> # echo mem > /sys/power/state
> [ 39.111865] PM: suspend entry (deep)
> [ 39.148650] Filesystems sync: 0.032 seconds
> [ 39.154034]
> [ 39.155537] ======================================================
> [ 39.161723] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> [ 39.167911] 5.9.0-rc1-00103-g7eac66d0456f #37 Not tainted
> [ 39.173315] ------------------------------------------------------
> [ 39.179500] sh/647 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 39.183862] c15a310c (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c
> [ 39.191200]
> [ 39.191200] but task is already holding lock:
> [ 39.197036] c15a37e4 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fw_pm_notify+0x90/0xd4
> [ 39.203582]
> [ 39.203582] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> [ 39.203582]
> [ 39.211763]
> [ 39.211763] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> [ 39.219249]
> [ 39.219249] -> #2 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> [ 39.224673] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
> [ 39.229126] firmware_uevent+0x18/0xa0
> [ 39.233411] dev_uevent+0xc4/0x1f8
> [ 39.237343] uevent_show+0x98/0x114
> [ 39.241362] dev_attr_show+0x18/0x48
> [ 39.245472] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x84/0xec
> [ 39.249927] seq_read+0x138/0x550
> [ 39.253774] vfs_read+0x94/0x164
> [ 39.257529] ksys_read+0x60/0xe8
> [ 39.261288] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
> [ 39.265564] 0xbed7c808
> [ 39.268538]
> [ 39.268538] -> #1 (kn->active#3){++++}-{0:0}:
> [ 39.274391] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x94
> [ 39.279450] device_del+0x144/0x3fc
Rafael/Greg,
I'm not very familiar with the #0 and #2 calls stacks. But poking
around a bit, they are NOT due to the device-link-device. But the new
stuff is the above two lines that are deleting the device-link-device
(that's used to expose device link details in sysfs) when the device
link is deleted.
Kicking off a workqueue to break this cycle is easy, but the problem
is that if I queue a work to delete the device, then the sysfs folder
won't get removed immediately. And if the same link is created again
before the work is completed, then there'll be a sysfs name collision
and warning.
So, I'm kinda stuck here. Open to suggestions. Hoping you'll have
better ideas for breaking the cycle. Or point out how I'm
misunderstanding the cycle here.
-Saravana
> [ 39.283467] __device_link_del+0x4c/0x70
> [ 39.287919] device_link_remove+0x5c/0x8c
> [ 39.292464] _regulator_put.part.0+0x104/0x1dc
> [ 39.297436] regulator_put+0x2c/0x3c
> [ 39.299731] regulator regulator.5: Failed to increase supply voltage: -110
> [ 39.301544] release_nodes+0x1b4/0x204
> [ 39.301553] really_probe+0x104/0x3b4
> [ 39.316881] driver_probe_device+0x58/0xb4
> [ 39.321506] device_driver_attach+0x58/0x60
> [ 39.326217] __driver_attach+0x58/0xd0
> [ 39.330499] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xbc
> [ 39.334863] bus_add_driver+0x150/0x1dc
> [ 39.339227] driver_register+0x74/0x108
> [ 39.343599] i2c_register_driver+0x38/0x8c
> [ 39.348227] do_one_initcall+0x84/0x3b4
> [ 39.352598] kernel_init_freeable+0x154/0x1e4
> [ 39.357485] kernel_init+0x8/0x118
> [ 39.361415] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20
> [ 39.365518] 0x0
> [ 39.367883]
> [ 39.367883] -> #0 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> [ 39.373740] lock_acquire+0xe0/0x4ec
> [ 39.377848] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x9d0
> [ 39.381952] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
> [ 39.386405] dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c
> [ 39.390769] fw_pm_notify+0xa4/0xd4
> [ 39.394795] notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x80
> [ 39.399420] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x64
> [ 39.405003] __pm_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x3c
> [ 39.410063] pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x438
> [ 39.414080] state_store+0x68/0xc8
> [ 39.418013] kernfs_fop_write+0x10c/0x22c
> [ 39.419741] cpu cpu0: failed to scale vddpu up: -110
> [ 39.422551] vfs_write+0xbc/0x1d8
> [ 39.422559] ksys_write+0x60/0xe8
> [ 39.427529] cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -110
> [ 39.431362] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
> [ 39.431368] 0xbeec8958
> [ 39.431372]
> [ 39.431372] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 39.431372]
> [ 39.431375] Chain exists of:
> [ 39.431375] dpm_list_mtx --> kn->active#3 --> fw_lock
> [ 39.431375]
> [ 39.431390] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> [ 39.431390]
> [ 39.431394] CPU0 CPU1
> [ 39.431398] ---- ----
> [ 39.431401] lock(fw_lock);
> [ 39.431412] lock(kn->active#3);
> [ 39.490528] lock(fw_lock);
> [ 39.495934] lock(dpm_list_mtx);
> [ 39.499255]
> [ 39.499255] *** DEADLOCK ***
> [ 39.499255]
> [ 39.505181] 6 locks held by sh/647:
> [ 39.508675] #0: ecf48a84 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at:
> vfs_write+0x14c/0x1d8
> [ 39.516007] #1: ed2ced48 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> kernfs_fop_write+0xd0/0x22c
> [ 39.523684] #2: ec1ff960 (kn->active#90){.+.+}-{0:0}, at:
> kernfs_fop_write+0xd8/0x22c
> [ 39.531620] #3: c151c4e8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3},
> at: pm_suspend+0x11c/0x438
> [ 39.539991] #4: c151e3f4 ((pm_chain_head).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at:
> __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x2c/0x64
> [ 39.549753] usb_otg_vbus: disabling
> [ 39.549755] #5: c15a37e4 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fw_pm_notify+0x90/0xd4
> [ 39.553264] wm8962-supply: disabling
> [ 39.560214]
> [ 39.560214] stack backtrace:
> [ 39.560225] CPU: 0 PID: 647 Comm: sh Not tainted
> 5.9.0-rc1-00103-g7eac66d0456f #37
> [ 39.560230] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree)
> [ 39.560260] [<c0112270>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010bfd4>]
> (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [ 39.560287] [<c010bfd4>] (show_stack) from [<c05af3a0>]
> (dump_stack+0xe4/0x118)
> [ 39.597365] [<c05af3a0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0185390>]
> (check_noncircular+0x130/0x1e4)
> [ 39.605386] [<c0185390>] (check_noncircular) from [<c018880c>]
> (__lock_acquire+0x161c/0x31b0)
> [ 39.613923] [<c018880c>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c018ad00>]
> (lock_acquire+0xe0/0x4ec)
> [ 39.621772] [<c018ad00>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0db0bfc>]
> (__mutex_lock+0x94/0x9d0)
> [ 39.629445] [<c0db0bfc>] (__mutex_lock) from [<c0db1554>]
> (mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24)
> [ 39.637463] [<c0db1554>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c07892dc>]
> (dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c)
> [ 39.645828] [<c07892dc>] (dpm_for_each_dev) from [<c0794a60>]
> (fw_pm_notify+0xa4/0xd4)
> [ 39.653762] [<c0794a60>] (fw_pm_notify) from [<c0152c7c>]
> (notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x80)
> [ 39.661954] [<c0152c7c>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c01532a8>]
> (__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x64)
> [ 39.671709] [<c01532a8>] (__blocking_notifier_call_chain) from
> [<c0192498>] (__pm_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x3c)
> [ 39.679740] cpu cpu0: failed to scale vddpu up: -110
> [ 39.681897] [<c0192498>] (__pm_notifier_call_chain) from
> [<c0194424>] (pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x438)
> [ 39.686859] cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -110
> [ 39.695473] [<c0194424>] (pm_suspend) from [<c019235c>]
> (state_store+0x68/0xc8)
> [ 39.695490] [<c019235c>] (state_store) from [<c035af80>]
> (kernfs_fop_write+0x10c/0x22c)
> [ 39.695506] [<c035af80>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c02b0e38>]
> (vfs_write+0xbc/0x1d8)
> [ 39.695524] [<c02b0e38>] (vfs_write) from [<c02b10a0>] (ksys_write+0x60/0xe8)
> [ 39.704844] VGEN1: disabling
> [ 39.709627] [<c02b10a0>] (ksys_write) from [<c0100080>]
> (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28)
> [ 39.743035] Exception stack(0xed573fa8 to 0xed573ff0)
> [ 39.748098] 3fa0: 00000004 01d3caf8 00000001
> 01d3caf8 00000004 00000000
> [ 39.756286] 3fc0: 00000004 01d3caf8 b6f40340 00000004 b6ed6c8c
> 00000000 00000000 00000000
> [ 39.764470] 3fe0: 00000004 beec8958 b6e75d4f b6e01d16
> [ 39.770874] VGEN2: disabling
> [ 39.776106] VGEN3: disabling
>
> [ 69.590256] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db
> [ 69.590312] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.008 seconds) done.
> [ 69.606341] OOM killer disabled.
> [ 69.609599] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001
> seconds) done.
> [ 69.619021] printk: Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:17 PM Saravana Kannan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:50 PM Dong Aisheng <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi ALL,
> >
> > We met the below WARNING during system suspend on an iMX6Q SDB board
> > with the latest linus/master branch (v5.9-rc1+) and next-20200820.
> > v5.8 kernel is ok. So i did bisect and finally found it's caused by
> > the patch below.
> > Reverting it can get rid of the warning, but I wonder if there may be
> > other potential issues.
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Defconfig used is: imx_v6_v7_defconfig
> >
>
> ----- 8< ----- Snipped text that was a bit misleading
>
> >
> > Error log:
> > # echo mem > /sys/power/state
> > [ 39.111865] PM: suspend entry (deep)
> > [ 39.148650] Filesystems sync: 0.032 seconds
> > [ 39.154034]
> > [ 39.155537] ======================================================
> > [ 39.161723] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> > [ 39.167911] 5.9.0-rc1-00103-g7eac66d0456f #37 Not tainted
> > [ 39.173315] ------------------------------------------------------
> > [ 39.179500] sh/647 is trying to acquire lock:
> > [ 39.183862] c15a310c (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> > dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c
> > [ 39.191200]
> > [ 39.191200] but task is already holding lock:
> > [ 39.197036] c15a37e4 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fw_pm_notify+0x90/0xd4
> > [ 39.203582]
> > [ 39.203582] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> > [ 39.203582]
> > [ 39.211763]
> > [ 39.211763] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> > [ 39.219249]
> > [ 39.219249] -> #2 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> > [ 39.224673] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
> > [ 39.229126] firmware_uevent+0x18/0xa0
> > [ 39.233411] dev_uevent+0xc4/0x1f8
> > [ 39.237343] uevent_show+0x98/0x114
> > [ 39.241362] dev_attr_show+0x18/0x48
> > [ 39.245472] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x84/0xec
> > [ 39.249927] seq_read+0x138/0x550
> > [ 39.253774] vfs_read+0x94/0x164
> > [ 39.257529] ksys_read+0x60/0xe8
> > [ 39.261288] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
> > [ 39.265564] 0xbed7c808
> > [ 39.268538]
> > [ 39.268538] -> #1 (kn->active#3){++++}-{0:0}:
> > [ 39.274391] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x94
> > [ 39.279450] device_del+0x144/0x3fc
>
> Rafael/Greg,
>
> I'm not very familiar with the #0 and #2 calls stacks. But poking
> around a bit, they are NOT due to the device-link-device. But the new
> stuff is the above two lines that are deleting the device-link-device
> (that's used to expose device link details in sysfs) when the device
> link is deleted.
>
> Kicking off a workqueue to break this cycle is easy, but the problem
> is that if I queue a work to delete the device, then the sysfs folder
> won't get removed immediately. And if the same link is created again
> before the work is completed, then there'll be a sysfs name collision
> and warning.
>
> So, I'm kinda stuck here. Open to suggestions. Hoping you'll have
> better ideas for breaking the cycle. Or point out how I'm
> misunderstanding the cycle here.
>
Aisheng,
Sent out a fix that I think should work.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#u
I wasn't able to reproduce it in my hardware. So, if you can test that
patch (and respond to that thread), that'd be great.
-Saravana
> Subject: Re: Lockdep warning caused by "driver core: Fix sleeping in invalid
> context during device link deletion"
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:17 PM Saravana Kannan
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:50 PM Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi ALL,
> > >
> > > We met the below WARNING during system suspend on an iMX6Q SDB
> board
> > > with the latest linus/master branch (v5.9-rc1+) and next-20200820.
> > > v5.8 kernel is ok. So i did bisect and finally found it's caused by
> > > the patch below.
> > > Reverting it can get rid of the warning, but I wonder if there may
> > > be other potential issues.
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Defconfig used is: imx_v6_v7_defconfig
> > >
> >
> > ----- 8< ----- Snipped text that was a bit misleading
> >
> > >
> > > Error log:
> > > # echo mem > /sys/power/state
> > > [ 39.111865] PM: suspend entry (deep)
> > > [ 39.148650] Filesystems sync: 0.032 seconds
> > > [ 39.154034]
> > > [ 39.155537]
> ======================================================
> > > [ 39.161723] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> > > [ 39.167911] 5.9.0-rc1-00103-g7eac66d0456f #37 Not tainted
> > > [ 39.173315] ------------------------------------------------------
> > > [ 39.179500] sh/647 is trying to acquire lock:
> > > [ 39.183862] c15a310c (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> > > dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c
> > > [ 39.191200]
> > > [ 39.191200] but task is already holding lock:
> > > [ 39.197036] c15a37e4 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> fw_pm_notify+0x90/0xd4
> > > [ 39.203582]
> > > [ 39.203582] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> > > [ 39.203582]
> > > [ 39.211763]
> > > [ 39.211763] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> > > [ 39.219249]
> > > [ 39.219249] -> #2 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> > > [ 39.224673] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
> > > [ 39.229126] firmware_uevent+0x18/0xa0
> > > [ 39.233411] dev_uevent+0xc4/0x1f8
> > > [ 39.237343] uevent_show+0x98/0x114
> > > [ 39.241362] dev_attr_show+0x18/0x48
> > > [ 39.245472] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x84/0xec
> > > [ 39.249927] seq_read+0x138/0x550
> > > [ 39.253774] vfs_read+0x94/0x164
> > > [ 39.257529] ksys_read+0x60/0xe8
> > > [ 39.261288] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
> > > [ 39.265564] 0xbed7c808
> > > [ 39.268538]
> > > [ 39.268538] -> #1 (kn->active#3){++++}-{0:0}:
> > > [ 39.274391] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x94
> > > [ 39.279450] device_del+0x144/0x3fc
> >
> > Rafael/Greg,
> >
> > I'm not very familiar with the #0 and #2 calls stacks. But poking
> > around a bit, they are NOT due to the device-link-device. But the new
> > stuff is the above two lines that are deleting the device-link-device
> > (that's used to expose device link details in sysfs) when the device
> > link is deleted.
> >
> > Kicking off a workqueue to break this cycle is easy, but the problem
> > is that if I queue a work to delete the device, then the sysfs folder
> > won't get removed immediately. And if the same link is created again
> > before the work is completed, then there'll be a sysfs name collision
> > and warning.
> >
> > So, I'm kinda stuck here. Open to suggestions. Hoping you'll have
> > better ideas for breaking the cycle. Or point out how I'm
> > misunderstanding the cycle here.
> >
>
> Aisheng,
>
> Sent out a fix that I think should work.
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.ke
> rnel.org%2Flkml%2F20200831221007.1506441-1-saravanak%40google.com%
> 2FT%2F%23u&data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C3254604d7
> 41b4d1ce73b08d84dfb65af%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0
> %7C0%7C637345089428077609&sdata=5lh8WO%2BYMh4C1sBn58Fsm
> XsjqjPj%2B%2FB71%2FENfMGDtTk%3D&reserved=0
>
> I wasn't able to reproduce it in my hardware. So, if you can test that patch
> (and respond to that thread), that'd be great.
I not found your patch in my mailbox, but anyway I tested it.
Tested-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]> (i.MX7ULP EVK)
Regards,
Peng.
>
> -Saravana
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:07 PM Peng Fan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: Lockdep warning caused by "driver core: Fix sleeping in invalid
> > context during device link deletion"
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:17 PM Saravana Kannan
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:50 PM Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi ALL,
> > > >
> > > > We met the below WARNING during system suspend on an iMX6Q SDB
> > board
> > > > with the latest linus/master branch (v5.9-rc1+) and next-20200820.
> > > > v5.8 kernel is ok. So i did bisect and finally found it's caused by
> > > > the patch below.
> > > > Reverting it can get rid of the warning, but I wonder if there may
> > > > be other potential issues.
> > > > Any ideas?
> > > >
> > > > Defconfig used is: imx_v6_v7_defconfig
> > > >
> > >
> > > ----- 8< ----- Snipped text that was a bit misleading
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Error log:
> > > > # echo mem > /sys/power/state
> > > > [ 39.111865] PM: suspend entry (deep)
> > > > [ 39.148650] Filesystems sync: 0.032 seconds
> > > > [ 39.154034]
> > > > [ 39.155537]
> > ======================================================
> > > > [ 39.161723] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> > > > [ 39.167911] 5.9.0-rc1-00103-g7eac66d0456f #37 Not tainted
> > > > [ 39.173315] ------------------------------------------------------
> > > > [ 39.179500] sh/647 is trying to acquire lock:
> > > > [ 39.183862] c15a310c (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> > > > dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c
> > > > [ 39.191200]
> > > > [ 39.191200] but task is already holding lock:
> > > > [ 39.197036] c15a37e4 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> > fw_pm_notify+0x90/0xd4
> > > > [ 39.203582]
> > > > [ 39.203582] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> > > > [ 39.203582]
> > > > [ 39.211763]
> > > > [ 39.211763] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> > > > [ 39.219249]
> > > > [ 39.219249] -> #2 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> > > > [ 39.224673] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
> > > > [ 39.229126] firmware_uevent+0x18/0xa0
> > > > [ 39.233411] dev_uevent+0xc4/0x1f8
> > > > [ 39.237343] uevent_show+0x98/0x114
> > > > [ 39.241362] dev_attr_show+0x18/0x48
> > > > [ 39.245472] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x84/0xec
> > > > [ 39.249927] seq_read+0x138/0x550
> > > > [ 39.253774] vfs_read+0x94/0x164
> > > > [ 39.257529] ksys_read+0x60/0xe8
> > > > [ 39.261288] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
> > > > [ 39.265564] 0xbed7c808
> > > > [ 39.268538]
> > > > [ 39.268538] -> #1 (kn->active#3){++++}-{0:0}:
> > > > [ 39.274391] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x94
> > > > [ 39.279450] device_del+0x144/0x3fc
> > >
> > > Rafael/Greg,
> > >
> > > I'm not very familiar with the #0 and #2 calls stacks. But poking
> > > around a bit, they are NOT due to the device-link-device. But the new
> > > stuff is the above two lines that are deleting the device-link-device
> > > (that's used to expose device link details in sysfs) when the device
> > > link is deleted.
> > >
> > > Kicking off a workqueue to break this cycle is easy, but the problem
> > > is that if I queue a work to delete the device, then the sysfs folder
> > > won't get removed immediately. And if the same link is created again
> > > before the work is completed, then there'll be a sysfs name collision
> > > and warning.
> > >
> > > So, I'm kinda stuck here. Open to suggestions. Hoping you'll have
> > > better ideas for breaking the cycle. Or point out how I'm
> > > misunderstanding the cycle here.
> > >
> >
> > Aisheng,
> >
> > Sent out a fix that I think should work.
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.ke
> > rnel.org%2Flkml%2F20200831221007.1506441-1-saravanak%40google.com%
> > 2FT%2F%23u&data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C3254604d7
> > 41b4d1ce73b08d84dfb65af%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0
> > %7C0%7C637345089428077609&sdata=5lh8WO%2BYMh4C1sBn58Fsm
> > XsjqjPj%2B%2FB71%2FENfMGDtTk%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > I wasn't able to reproduce it in my hardware. So, if you can test that patch
> > (and respond to that thread), that'd be great.
>
> I not found your patch in my mailbox, but anyway I tested it.
Sorry I forgot to CC everyone from the original email!
>
> Tested-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]> (i.MX7ULP EVK)
Thanks for testing!
-Saravana