* From: "Frederic Weisbecker" <[email protected]>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:06:16AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> What is the meaning of M_EXECus? Mean execution time in microseconds,
>> I assume? I wonder if that is sufficiently high resolution nowadays.
>
>
> It's the maximum execution time encountered for a given worklet.
> I also have a small patch, about ready, to get the average.
>
>
>> You'll note that all the functions are reported as "foo+0x0/0xN".
>> There is a way of suppressing the unneeded and unuseful "+0x0/0xN",
>> but I forget what it is and the comments over lib/vsprintf.c:pointer()
>> didn't help. I think it's %pS.
>
>
> I don't know any way to perform this.
> %pF and %pS will act pretty much the same, except:
>
> Extract from lib/vsprintf.c:
>
> * Note: The difference between 'S' and 'F' is that on ia64 and ppc64
> * function pointers are really function descriptors, which contain a
> * pointer to the real address.
>
> But the output formatting is the same: address, offset, size, modname.
>
> I found it a bit annoying, so I proposed the following patch recently:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/15/310
>
> And someone came with a better idea, IMO:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/17/105
>
>
>>
>> The patchset adds no user documentation for the feature and should not
>> (IMO) be merged in such a state. Please.
>>
>
>
> Ok, I will try something today about the documentation.
>
> Thanks!
Hello,
To Frederic
Thanks for reply this mail for me.
Your saying is better than me.
To Andrew:
Sorry for replay late, I was rest yesterday.
Frederic's answer is all I wish to say.
Thanks
Zhaolei
>
>
>????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay? ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?