Hello Linus,
Let's try requesting pull via the signed tag thing...
- - - -
The following changes since commit 62aa2b537c6f5957afd98e29f96897419ed5ebab:
Linux 3.3-rc2 (2012-01-31 13:31:54 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.infradead.org/users/cbou/battery-urgent.git battery-fixes-for-v3.3-rc2
for you to fetch changes up to 455a0e2cd80f7a2849b2e6d3be85c053ee44446b:
lp8727_charger: Add terminating entry for i2c_device_id table (2012-02-01 21:34:26 +0400)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Just a few small fixes for a bunch of drivers. Nothing noteworthy.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Anton Vorontsov (1):
Revert "bq27x00_battery: Fix reporting status value for bq27500 battery"
Axel Lin (2):
power_supply: Fix modalias for charger-manager
lp8727_charger: Add terminating entry for i2c_device_id table
Grazvydas Ignotas (1):
bq27x00_battery: Fix flag register read
Kim, Milo (1):
lp8727_chager: Fix permissions on a header file
drivers/power/bq27x00_battery.c | 15 +++++----------
drivers/power/charger-manager.c | 4 ++--
drivers/power/lp8727_charger.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
mode change 100755 => 100644 include/linux/lp8727.h
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Anton Vorontsov
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Let's try requesting pull via the signed tag thing...
Well, it works, but your key currently isn't signed by *anybody*, so
right now it is a bit pointless.
That said, if you get it signed by more people in the future, the
signature that stays around in the kernel will become more meaningful
than it is today.
Qnd even in the absence of that, any future pushes using the same key
will obviously show that the git tree is controlled by somebody who
has access to that same key. So a gpg signature has *some* meaning
even when there is no external sign of trust, but it really is not
nearly as meaningful as it could be.
I don't know where you are physically, but we've got a fairly
geographically wide set of keys these days, so I think it should be
possible to get that key signed by some relevant people.. Hmm?
Linus
On 02/13/2012 02:29 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Anton Vorontsov
>
> I don't know where you are physically, but we've got a fairly
> geographically wide set of keys these days, so I think it should be
> possible to get that key signed by some relevant people.. Hmm?
Here's the kernel key signing map URL:
http://tinyurl.com/89x89ka
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***