On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 14:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.11 release.
> There are 254 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:55:56 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.11-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.11.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
The stable rc 5.10 and 5.11 builds failed for arm64 architecture
due to below warnings / errors,
> Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]>
> arm64/mm: define arch_get_mappable_range()
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c: In function 'arch_add_memory':
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:1483:13: error: implicit declaration of function
'mhp_range_allowed'; did you mean 'cpu_map_prog_allowed'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true));
^
include/linux/build_bug.h:30:63: note: in definition of macro
'BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID'
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e))))
^
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:1483:2: note: in expansion of macro 'VM_BUG_ON'
VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true));
^~~~~~~~~
Build link,
https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.11/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=juno,label=docker-buster-lkft/41/consoleText
https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.10/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=dragonboard-410c,label=docker-buster-lkft/120/consoleFull
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org