This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release.
There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 02 May 2021 14:19:04 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.34-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.10.34-rc1
Tomas Winkler <[email protected]>
mei: me: add Alder Lake P device id.
Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq disabling in iwl_pcie_gen2_enqueue_hcmd()
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++--
drivers/misc/mei/hw-me-regs.h | 1 +
drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx-gen2.c | 7 ++++---
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
From: Tomas Winkler <[email protected]>
commit 0df74278faedf20f9696bf2755cf0ce34afa4c3a upstream.
Add Alder Lake P device ID.
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/misc/mei/hw-me-regs.h | 1 +
drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/misc/mei/hw-me-regs.h
+++ b/drivers/misc/mei/hw-me-regs.h
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@
#define MEI_DEV_ID_ADP_S 0x7AE8 /* Alder Lake Point S */
#define MEI_DEV_ID_ADP_LP 0x7A60 /* Alder Lake Point LP */
+#define MEI_DEV_ID_ADP_P 0x51E0 /* Alder Lake Point P */
/*
* MEI HW Section
--- a/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id mei_me
{MEI_PCI_DEVICE(MEI_DEV_ID_ADP_S, MEI_ME_PCH15_CFG)},
{MEI_PCI_DEVICE(MEI_DEV_ID_ADP_LP, MEI_ME_PCH15_CFG)},
+ {MEI_PCI_DEVICE(MEI_DEV_ID_ADP_P, MEI_ME_PCH15_CFG)},
/* required last entry */
{0, }
From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
commit e7020bb068d8be50a92f48e36b236a1a1ef9282e upstream.
Analogically to what we did in 2800aadc18a6 ("iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq
disabling in iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd()"), we must apply the same fix to
iwl_pcie_gen2_enqueue_hcmd(), as it's being called from exactly the same
contexts.
Reported-by: Heiner Kallweit <[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx-gen2.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx-gen2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx-gen2.c
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ static int iwl_pcie_gen2_enqueue_hcmd(st
const u8 *cmddata[IWL_MAX_CMD_TBS_PER_TFD];
u16 cmdlen[IWL_MAX_CMD_TBS_PER_TFD];
struct iwl_tfh_tfd *tfd;
+ unsigned long flags;
copy_size = sizeof(struct iwl_cmd_header_wide);
cmd_size = sizeof(struct iwl_cmd_header_wide);
@@ -155,14 +156,14 @@ static int iwl_pcie_gen2_enqueue_hcmd(st
goto free_dup_buf;
}
- spin_lock_bh(&txq->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&txq->lock, flags);
idx = iwl_txq_get_cmd_index(txq, txq->write_ptr);
tfd = iwl_txq_get_tfd(trans, txq, txq->write_ptr);
memset(tfd, 0, sizeof(*tfd));
if (iwl_txq_space(trans, txq) < ((cmd->flags & CMD_ASYNC) ? 2 : 1)) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&txq->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&txq->lock, flags);
IWL_ERR(trans, "No space in command queue\n");
iwl_op_mode_cmd_queue_full(trans->op_mode);
@@ -297,7 +298,7 @@ static int iwl_pcie_gen2_enqueue_hcmd(st
spin_unlock(&trans_pcie->reg_lock);
out:
- spin_unlock_bh(&txq->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&txq->lock, flags);
free_dup_buf:
if (idx < 0)
kfree(dup_buf);
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:20:41 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 May 2021 14:19:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.34-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
5.10.34-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen <[email protected]>
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 04:20:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 May 2021 14:19:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210430): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210430): 105 configs -> no new failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression.
arm: Booted on rpi3b. No regression.
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
--
Regards
Sudip
On 4/30/2021 7:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 May 2021 14:19:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.34-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 19:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 May 2021 14:19:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.34-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.34-rc1
* git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 9fe3189f108d04763059a2dc87e213f4e2064ec6
* git describe: v5.10.33-3-g9fe3189f108d
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.33-3-g9fe3189f108d
## No regressions (compared to v5.10.33)
## No Fixes (compared to v5.10.33)
## Test result summary
total: 78188, pass: 63866, fail: 3046, skip: 11021, xfail: 255,
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 193 total, 193 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 27 total, 26 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest-
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native-
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none-
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 04:20:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 02 May 2021 14:19:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 455 pass: 455 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Guenter