platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, ..) relies on static
allocation of IRQ resources in DT core code, this causes an issue
when using hierarchical interrupt domains using "interrupts" property
in the node as this bypasses the hierarchical setup and messes up the
irq chaining.
In preparation for removal of static setup of IRQ resource from DT core
code use platform_get_irq_optional().
This patch break's the for loop if there are no more interrupts instead
of continuing as done in previous code.
Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
---
v1->v2
* Simplified checking error code
* Break loop earlier if no interrupts are seen
---
drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
index b49f04daaf47..ff9c55999ddf 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct rcar_thermal_common *common;
struct rcar_thermal_priv *priv;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
- struct resource *res, *irq;
+ struct resource *res;
const struct rcar_thermal_chip *chip = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
int mres = 0;
int i;
@@ -467,9 +467,16 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
for (i = 0; i < chip->nirqs; i++) {
- irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, i);
- if (!irq)
- continue;
+ int irq;
+
+ irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, i);
+ if (irq == -ENXIO)
+ break;
+ if (irq < 0) {
+ ret = irq;
+ goto error_unregister;
+ }
+
if (!common->base) {
/*
* platform has IRQ support.
@@ -487,7 +494,7 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
idle = 0; /* polling delay is not needed */
}
- ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq->start, rcar_thermal_irq,
+ ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, rcar_thermal_irq,
IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), common);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "irq request failed\n ");
--
2.17.1
Hi Andy,
Thank you for the review.
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 11:41 AM Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, December 24, 2021, Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, ..) relies on static
>> allocation of IRQ resources in DT core code, this causes an issue
>> when using hierarchical interrupt domains using "interrupts" property
>> in the node as this bypasses the hierarchical setup and messes up the
>> irq chaining.
>>
>> In preparation for removal of static setup of IRQ resource from DT core
>> code use platform_get_irq_optional().
>>
>> This patch break's the for loop if there are no more interrupts instead
>> of continuing as done in previous code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> v1->v2
>> * Simplified checking error code
>> * Break loop earlier if no interrupts are seen
>> ---
>> drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
>> index b49f04daaf47..ff9c55999ddf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
>> @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> struct rcar_thermal_common *common;
>> struct rcar_thermal_priv *priv;
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> - struct resource *res, *irq;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> const struct rcar_thermal_chip *chip = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>> int mres = 0;
>> int i;
>> @@ -467,9 +467,16 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < chip->nirqs; i++) {
>> - irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, i);
>> - if (!irq)
>> - continue;
>> + int irq;
>> +
>> + irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, i);
>> + if (irq == -ENXIO)
>> + break;
>> + if (irq < 0) {
>> + ret = irq;
>> + goto error_unregister;
>> + }
>
>
> In all your patches which introduce optional IRQ please change the logic to the opposite:
>
> if (irq > 0)
> ...we got one...
> if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> ...return it, if it is ever possible...
>
> With this you adding me a work.
>
The maintainer has requested me to do so [0].
[0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/[email protected]/#24669399
Cheers,
Prabhakar
>
>>
>> +
>> if (!common->base) {
>> /*
>> * platform has IRQ support.
>> @@ -487,7 +494,7 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> idle = 0; /* polling delay is not needed */
>> }
>>
>> - ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq->start, rcar_thermal_irq,
>> + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, rcar_thermal_irq,
>> IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), common);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dev, "irq request failed\n ");
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 1:41 PM Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday, December 24, 2021, Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]> wrote:
...
>> + int irq;
>> +
>> + irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, i);
>> + if (irq == -ENXIO)
>> + break;
>> + if (irq < 0) {
>> + ret = irq;
>> + goto error_unregister;
>> + }
>
>
> In all your patches which introduce optional IRQ please change the logic to the opposite:
>
> if (irq > 0)
> ...we got one...
> if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> ...return it, if it is ever possible...
>
> With this you adding me a work.
I noticed that in some patches you actually do the right things, so,
please do it in the same way where you use _optiomal() variant, i.e.
if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENXIO)
return ret;
if (ret > 0)
...we got it...
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko