2021-04-26 15:27:05

by Kai-Heng Feng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Invoke another _DSM to enable MUX on HP Workstation laptops

On HP Fury G7 Workstations, graphics output is re-routed from Intel GFX
to discrete GFX after S3. This is not desirable, because userspace will
treat connected display as a new one, losing display settings.

The expected behavior is to let discrete GFX drives all external
displays.

The platform in question uses ACPI method \_SB.PCI0.HGME to enable MUX.
The method is inside the another _DSM, so add the _DSM and call it
accordingly.

I also tested some MUX-less and iGPU only laptops with that _DSM, no
regression was found.

v3:
- Remove BXT from names.
- Change the parameter type.
- Fold the function into intel_modeset_init_hw().

v2:
- Forward declare struct pci_dev.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3113
References: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h | 3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
index 833d0c1be4f1..d008d3976261 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
@@ -13,12 +13,17 @@
#include "intel_display_types.h"

#define INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID 1 /* For Calpella anyway... */
+#define INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_ENABLE 0 /* No args */
#define INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_INFO 1 /* No args */

static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid =
GUID_INIT(0x7ed873d3, 0xc2d0, 0x4e4f,
0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c);

+static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 =
+ GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260,
+ 0x9d, 0x15, 0xc7, 0x1f, 0xba, 0xda, 0xe4, 0x14);
+
static char *intel_dsm_port_name(u8 id)
{
switch (id) {
@@ -176,6 +181,19 @@ void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void)
{
}

+void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = i915->drm.pdev;
+ acpi_handle dhandle;
+
+ dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!dhandle)
+ return;
+
+ acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID,
+ INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_ENABLE, NULL);
+}
+
/*
* ACPI Specification, Revision 5.0, Appendix B.3.2 _DOD (Enumerate All Devices
* Attached to the Display Adapter).
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
index e8b068661d22..def013cf6308 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
@@ -11,11 +11,14 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
void intel_register_dsm_handler(void);
void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void);
+void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
void intel_acpi_device_id_update(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
#else
static inline void intel_register_dsm_handler(void) { return; }
static inline void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void) { return; }
static inline
+void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { return; }
+static inline
void intel_acpi_device_id_update(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { return; }
#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index a10e26380ef3..d79dae370b20 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -11472,6 +11472,8 @@ void intel_modeset_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;

+ intel_dsm_enable_mux(i915);
+
if (!HAS_DISPLAY(i915))
return;

--
2.30.2


2021-05-11 03:35:36

by Kai-Heng Feng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Invoke another _DSM to enable MUX on HP Workstation laptops

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:24 PM Kai-Heng Feng
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On HP Fury G7 Workstations, graphics output is re-routed from Intel GFX
> to discrete GFX after S3. This is not desirable, because userspace will
> treat connected display as a new one, losing display settings.
>
> The expected behavior is to let discrete GFX drives all external
> displays.
>
> The platform in question uses ACPI method \_SB.PCI0.HGME to enable MUX.
> The method is inside the another _DSM, so add the _DSM and call it
> accordingly.
>
> I also tested some MUX-less and iGPU only laptops with that _DSM, no
> regression was found.
>
> v3:
> - Remove BXT from names.
> - Change the parameter type.
> - Fold the function into intel_modeset_init_hw().
>
> v2:
> - Forward declare struct pci_dev.
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3113
> References: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/[email protected]/
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <[email protected]>

A gentle ping...

> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> index 833d0c1be4f1..d008d3976261 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> @@ -13,12 +13,17 @@
> #include "intel_display_types.h"
>
> #define INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID 1 /* For Calpella anyway... */
> +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_ENABLE 0 /* No args */
> #define INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_INFO 1 /* No args */
>
> static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid =
> GUID_INIT(0x7ed873d3, 0xc2d0, 0x4e4f,
> 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c);
>
> +static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 =
> + GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260,
> + 0x9d, 0x15, 0xc7, 0x1f, 0xba, 0xda, 0xe4, 0x14);
> +
> static char *intel_dsm_port_name(u8 id)
> {
> switch (id) {
> @@ -176,6 +181,19 @@ void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void)
> {
> }
>
> +void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = i915->drm.pdev;
> + acpi_handle dhandle;
> +
> + dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!dhandle)
> + return;
> +
> + acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID,
> + INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_ENABLE, NULL);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * ACPI Specification, Revision 5.0, Appendix B.3.2 _DOD (Enumerate All Devices
> * Attached to the Display Adapter).
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
> index e8b068661d22..def013cf6308 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
> @@ -11,11 +11,14 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> void intel_register_dsm_handler(void);
> void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void);
> +void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> void intel_acpi_device_id_update(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> #else
> static inline void intel_register_dsm_handler(void) { return; }
> static inline void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void) { return; }
> static inline
> +void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { return; }
> +static inline
> void intel_acpi_device_id_update(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { return; }
> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index a10e26380ef3..d79dae370b20 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -11472,6 +11472,8 @@ void intel_modeset_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;
>
> + intel_dsm_enable_mux(i915);
> +
> if (!HAS_DISPLAY(i915))
> return;
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>

2021-05-11 18:22:50

by Ville Syrjälä

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Invoke another _DSM to enable MUX on HP Workstation laptops

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:24:10PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> On HP Fury G7 Workstations, graphics output is re-routed from Intel GFX
> to discrete GFX after S3. This is not desirable, because userspace will
> treat connected display as a new one, losing display settings.
>
> The expected behavior is to let discrete GFX drives all external
> displays.
>
> The platform in question uses ACPI method \_SB.PCI0.HGME to enable MUX.
> The method is inside the another _DSM, so add the _DSM and call it
> accordingly.
>
> I also tested some MUX-less and iGPU only laptops with that _DSM, no
> regression was found.
>
> v3:
> - Remove BXT from names.
> - Change the parameter type.
> - Fold the function into intel_modeset_init_hw().
>
> v2:
> - Forward declare struct pci_dev.
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3113
> References: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/[email protected]/
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> index 833d0c1be4f1..d008d3976261 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> @@ -13,12 +13,17 @@
> #include "intel_display_types.h"
>
> #define INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID 1 /* For Calpella anyway... */
> +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_ENABLE 0 /* No args */

This block of defines is for the other DSM. We don't want to
mix these up. We also want to name it according to the spec,
so something like GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED. Similarly
for the intel_dsm_enable_mux() wrapper function. + it needs
a comment to document that some BIOSes abuse it to do MUX
initialization and whatnot.

We should perhaps rename all the old DSM stuff to
something a bit less generic as well...

> #define INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_INFO 1 /* No args */
>
> static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid =
> GUID_INIT(0x7ed873d3, 0xc2d0, 0x4e4f,
> 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c);
>
> +static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 =
> + GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260,
> + 0x9d, 0x15, 0xc7, 0x1f, 0xba, 0xda, 0xe4, 0x14);
> +
> static char *intel_dsm_port_name(u8 id)
> {
> switch (id) {
> @@ -176,6 +181,19 @@ void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void)
> {
> }
>
> +void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = i915->drm.pdev;
> + acpi_handle dhandle;
> +
> + dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!dhandle)
> + return;
> +
> + acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID,
> + INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_ENABLE, NULL);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * ACPI Specification, Revision 5.0, Appendix B.3.2 _DOD (Enumerate All Devices
> * Attached to the Display Adapter).
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
> index e8b068661d22..def013cf6308 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
> @@ -11,11 +11,14 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> void intel_register_dsm_handler(void);
> void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void);
> +void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> void intel_acpi_device_id_update(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> #else
> static inline void intel_register_dsm_handler(void) { return; }
> static inline void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void) { return; }
> static inline
> +void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { return; }
> +static inline
> void intel_acpi_device_id_update(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { return; }
> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index a10e26380ef3..d79dae370b20 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -11472,6 +11472,8 @@ void intel_modeset_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;
>
> + intel_dsm_enable_mux(i915);
> +

This should probably be somewhere around where we do all the other
semi ACPI related init (OpRegion/etc.).

> if (!HAS_DISPLAY(i915))
> return;
>
> --
> 2.30.2

--
Ville Syrj?l?
Intel

2021-05-14 15:37:21

by Kai-Heng Feng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Invoke another _DSM to enable MUX on HP Workstation laptops

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 2:19 AM Ville Syrjälä
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:24:10PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> > On HP Fury G7 Workstations, graphics output is re-routed from Intel GFX
> > to discrete GFX after S3. This is not desirable, because userspace will
> > treat connected display as a new one, losing display settings.
> >
> > The expected behavior is to let discrete GFX drives all external
> > displays.
> >
> > The platform in question uses ACPI method \_SB.PCI0.HGME to enable MUX.
> > The method is inside the another _DSM, so add the _DSM and call it
> > accordingly.
> >
> > I also tested some MUX-less and iGPU only laptops with that _DSM, no
> > regression was found.
> >
> > v3:
> > - Remove BXT from names.
> > - Change the parameter type.
> > - Fold the function into intel_modeset_init_hw().
> >
> > v2:
> > - Forward declare struct pci_dev.
> >
> > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3113
> > References: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/[email protected]/
> > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h | 3 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 ++
> > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> > index 833d0c1be4f1..d008d3976261 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> > @@ -13,12 +13,17 @@
> > #include "intel_display_types.h"
> >
> > #define INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID 1 /* For Calpella anyway... */
> > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_ENABLE 0 /* No args */
>
> This block of defines is for the other DSM. We don't want to
> mix these up. We also want to name it according to the spec,
> so something like GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED. Similarly
> for the intel_dsm_enable_mux() wrapper function. + it needs
> a comment to document that some BIOSes abuse it to do MUX
> initialization and whatnot.

Will do.


>
> We should perhaps rename all the old DSM stuff to
> something a bit less generic as well...

I can rename them as well. But what's the naming scheme you prefer?

>
> > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_INFO 1 /* No args */
> >
> > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid =
> > GUID_INIT(0x7ed873d3, 0xc2d0, 0x4e4f,
> > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c);
> >
> > +static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 =
> > + GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260,
> > + 0x9d, 0x15, 0xc7, 0x1f, 0xba, 0xda, 0xe4, 0x14);
> > +
> > static char *intel_dsm_port_name(u8 id)
> > {
> > switch (id) {
> > @@ -176,6 +181,19 @@ void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > +void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = i915->drm.pdev;
> > + acpi_handle dhandle;
> > +
> > + dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev);
> > + if (!dhandle)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID,
> > + INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_ENABLE, NULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * ACPI Specification, Revision 5.0, Appendix B.3.2 _DOD (Enumerate All Devices
> > * Attached to the Display Adapter).
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
> > index e8b068661d22..def013cf6308 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
> > @@ -11,11 +11,14 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > void intel_register_dsm_handler(void);
> > void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void);
> > +void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> > void intel_acpi_device_id_update(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> > #else
> > static inline void intel_register_dsm_handler(void) { return; }
> > static inline void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void) { return; }
> > static inline
> > +void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { return; }
> > +static inline
> > void intel_acpi_device_id_update(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { return; }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > index a10e26380ef3..d79dae370b20 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > @@ -11472,6 +11472,8 @@ void intel_modeset_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > {
> > struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;
> >
> > + intel_dsm_enable_mux(i915);
> > +
>
> This should probably be somewhere around where we do all the other
> semi ACPI related init (OpRegion/etc.).

Hmm, but Jani prefers to put it inside intel_modeset_*() helpers. But
I don't see any opregion related functions are being called by
intel_modeset_*() helpers. Any suggestion?

Kai-Heng

>
> > if (!HAS_DISPLAY(i915))
> > return;
> >
> > --
> > 2.30.2
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

2021-05-17 14:12:52

by Jani Nikula

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Invoke another _DSM to enable MUX on HP Workstation laptops

On Fri, 14 May 2021, Kai-Heng Feng <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 2:19 AM Ville Syrjälä
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:24:10PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>> > On HP Fury G7 Workstations, graphics output is re-routed from Intel GFX
>> > to discrete GFX after S3. This is not desirable, because userspace will
>> > treat connected display as a new one, losing display settings.
>> >
>> > The expected behavior is to let discrete GFX drives all external
>> > displays.
>> >
>> > The platform in question uses ACPI method \_SB.PCI0.HGME to enable MUX.
>> > The method is inside the another _DSM, so add the _DSM and call it
>> > accordingly.
>> >
>> > I also tested some MUX-less and iGPU only laptops with that _DSM, no
>> > regression was found.
>> >
>> > v3:
>> > - Remove BXT from names.
>> > - Change the parameter type.
>> > - Fold the function into intel_modeset_init_hw().
>> >
>> > v2:
>> > - Forward declare struct pci_dev.
>> >
>> > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3113
>> > References: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/[email protected]/
>> > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <[email protected]>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h | 3 +++
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 ++
>> > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
>> > index 833d0c1be4f1..d008d3976261 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
>> > @@ -13,12 +13,17 @@
>> > #include "intel_display_types.h"
>> >
>> > #define INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID 1 /* For Calpella anyway... */
>> > +#define INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_ENABLE 0 /* No args */
>>
>> This block of defines is for the other DSM. We don't want to
>> mix these up. We also want to name it according to the spec,
>> so something like GET_BIOS_DATA_FUNCS_SUPPORTED. Similarly
>> for the intel_dsm_enable_mux() wrapper function. + it needs
>> a comment to document that some BIOSes abuse it to do MUX
>> initialization and whatnot.
>
> Will do.
>
>
>>
>> We should perhaps rename all the old DSM stuff to
>> something a bit less generic as well...
>
> I can rename them as well. But what's the naming scheme you prefer?
>
>>
>> > #define INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_INFO 1 /* No args */
>> >
>> > static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid =
>> > GUID_INIT(0x7ed873d3, 0xc2d0, 0x4e4f,
>> > 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c);
>> >
>> > +static const guid_t intel_dsm_guid2 =
>> > + GUID_INIT(0x3e5b41c6, 0xeb1d, 0x4260,
>> > + 0x9d, 0x15, 0xc7, 0x1f, 0xba, 0xda, 0xe4, 0x14);
>> > +
>> > static char *intel_dsm_port_name(u8 id)
>> > {
>> > switch (id) {
>> > @@ -176,6 +181,19 @@ void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void)
>> > {
>> > }
>> >
>> > +void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> > +{
>> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = i915->drm.pdev;
>> > + acpi_handle dhandle;
>> > +
>> > + dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev);
>> > + if (!dhandle)
>> > + return;
>> > +
>> > + acpi_evaluate_dsm(dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid2, INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID,
>> > + INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_ENABLE, NULL);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > /*
>> > * ACPI Specification, Revision 5.0, Appendix B.3.2 _DOD (Enumerate All Devices
>> > * Attached to the Display Adapter).
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
>> > index e8b068661d22..def013cf6308 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.h
>> > @@ -11,11 +11,14 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
>> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> > void intel_register_dsm_handler(void);
>> > void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void);
>> > +void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>> > void intel_acpi_device_id_update(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>> > #else
>> > static inline void intel_register_dsm_handler(void) { return; }
>> > static inline void intel_unregister_dsm_handler(void) { return; }
>> > static inline
>> > +void intel_dsm_enable_mux(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { return; }
>> > +static inline
>> > void intel_acpi_device_id_update(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { return; }
>> > #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > index a10e26380ef3..d79dae370b20 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > @@ -11472,6 +11472,8 @@ void intel_modeset_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> > {
>> > struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;
>> >
>> > + intel_dsm_enable_mux(i915);
>> > +
>>
>> This should probably be somewhere around where we do all the other
>> semi ACPI related init (OpRegion/etc.).
>
> Hmm, but Jani prefers to put it inside intel_modeset_*() helpers. But
> I don't see any opregion related functions are being called by
> intel_modeset_*() helpers. Any suggestion?

I think I mainly wanted it in intel_display.c instead of at the driver
top level.

BR,
Jani.


>
> Kai-Heng
>
>>
>> > if (!HAS_DISPLAY(i915))
>> > return;
>> >
>> > --
>> > 2.30.2
>>
>> --
>> Ville Syrjälä
>> Intel

--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center