Static analyzer tool found that the ret variable is not initialized but
code expects ret value >=0 when pinconf is skipped in the first pinmux
loop. The same expectation is for pinmux in a pinconf loop.
That's why initialize ret to 0 to avoid uninitialized ret value in first
loop or reusing ret value from first loop in second.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized variables")
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
CC: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
CC: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
index f5c32d2a3c91..136c323d855e 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
@@ -1266,6 +1266,7 @@ static int pinctrl_commit_state(struct pinctrl *p, struct pinctrl_state *state)
break;
case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN:
case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP:
+ ret = 0;
break;
default:
ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -1284,6 +1285,7 @@ static int pinctrl_commit_state(struct pinctrl *p, struct pinctrl_state *state)
list_for_each_entry(setting, &state->settings, node) {
switch (setting->type) {
case PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP:
+ ret = 0;
break;
case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN:
case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP:
--
2.30.1
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:31 AM Michal Simek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Static analyzer tool found that the ret variable is not initialized but
> code expects ret value >=0 when pinconf is skipped in the first pinmux
> loop. The same expectation is for pinmux in a pinconf loop.
> That's why initialize ret to 0 to avoid uninitialized ret value in first
> loop or reusing ret value from first loop in second.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized variables")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
> CC: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
> CC: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Patch applied!
Yours,
Linus Walleij