Two stages are required to setup up main link to be ready to transmit
video stream.
Stage 1: dp_hpd_plug_handle() perform link training to set up main link
stage 2: user space framework (msm_dp_display_enable()) to enable pixel
clock and transfer main link to video ready state.
At current implementation, when dongle unplugged dp_hdp_unplug_handle()
has to wait until stage 2 completed before it can send link down uevent
to user space framework to disable pixel clock followed by tearing down
main link. This introduce unnecessary latency if dongle unplugged happen
after stage 1 and before stage 2. It also has possibility leave main link
stay at ready state after dongle unplugged if framework does not response
to link down uevent notification. This will prevent next dongle plug in
from working. This scenario could possibly happen when dongle unplug while
system in the middle of suspending.
This patch allow unplug handle to tear down main link and notify
framework link down immediately if dongle unplugged happen after
stage 1 and before stage 2. With this approach, dp driver is much
more resilient to any different scenarios. Also redundant both
dp_connect_pending_timeout() and dp_disconnect_pending_timeout()
are removed to reduce logic complexity.
Fixes: 8ede2ecc3e5e ("drm/msm/dp: Add DP compliance tests on Snapdragon Chipsets")
Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c | 29 +++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 101 +++++++++++-------------------------
3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
index 1a13e50..c2d060d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
@@ -1891,6 +1891,35 @@ int dp_ctrl_off_link_stream(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
return ret;
}
+int dp_ctrl_off_link(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
+{
+ struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl;
+ struct dp_io *dp_io;
+ struct phy *phy;
+ int ret;
+
+ ctrl = container_of(dp_ctrl, struct dp_ctrl_private, dp_ctrl);
+ dp_io = &ctrl->parser->io;
+ phy = dp_io->phy;
+
+ dp_catalog_ctrl_mainlink_ctrl(ctrl->catalog, false);
+
+ ret = dp_power_clk_enable(ctrl->power, DP_CTRL_PM, false);
+ if (ret) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Failed to disable link clocks. ret=%d\n", ret);
+ }
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_DP("Before, phy=%p init_count=%d power_on=%d\n",
+ phy, phy->init_count, phy->power_count);
+
+ phy_power_off(phy);
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_DP("After, phy=%p init_count=%d power_on=%d\n",
+ phy, phy->init_count, phy->power_count);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
int dp_ctrl_off(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
{
struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h
index 2433edb..ffafe17 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct dp_ctrl {
int dp_ctrl_on_link(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl);
int dp_ctrl_on_stream(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl);
int dp_ctrl_off_link_stream(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl);
+int dp_ctrl_off_link(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl);
int dp_ctrl_off(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl);
void dp_ctrl_push_idle(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl);
void dp_ctrl_isr(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
index 01453db..f5bd8f5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
@@ -57,14 +57,11 @@ enum {
EV_IRQ_HPD_INT,
EV_HPD_UNPLUG_INT,
EV_USER_NOTIFICATION,
- EV_CONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT,
- EV_DISCONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT,
};
#define EVENT_TIMEOUT (HZ/10) /* 100ms */
#define DP_EVENT_Q_MAX 8
-#define DP_TIMEOUT_5_SECOND (5000/EVENT_TIMEOUT)
#define DP_TIMEOUT_NONE 0
#define WAIT_FOR_RESUME_TIMEOUT_JIFFIES (HZ / 2)
@@ -430,6 +427,11 @@ static int dp_display_usbpd_configure_cb(struct device *dev)
static int dp_display_usbpd_disconnect_cb(struct device *dev)
{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int dp_display_notify_disconnect(struct device *dev)
+{
struct dp_display_private *dp = dev_get_dp_display_private(dev);
dp_add_event(dp, EV_USER_NOTIFICATION, false, 0);
@@ -512,7 +514,6 @@ static int dp_hpd_plug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
{
struct dp_usbpd *hpd = dp->usbpd;
u32 state;
- u32 tout = DP_TIMEOUT_5_SECOND;
int ret;
if (!hpd)
@@ -539,14 +540,11 @@ static int dp_hpd_plug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
return 0;
}
- dp->hpd_state = ST_CONNECT_PENDING;
-
ret = dp_display_usbpd_configure_cb(&dp->pdev->dev);
if (ret) { /* link train failed */
dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECTED;
} else {
- /* start sentinel checking in case of missing uevent */
- dp_add_event(dp, EV_CONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT, 0, tout);
+ dp->hpd_state = ST_CONNECT_PENDING;
}
/* enable HDP irq_hpd/replug interrupt */
@@ -562,21 +560,6 @@ static int dp_hpd_plug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
static int dp_display_enable(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data);
static int dp_display_disable(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data);
-static int dp_connect_pending_timeout(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
-{
- u32 state;
-
- mutex_lock(&dp->event_mutex);
-
- state = dp->hpd_state;
- if (state == ST_CONNECT_PENDING)
- dp->hpd_state = ST_CONNECTED;
-
- mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static void dp_display_handle_plugged_change(struct msm_dp *dp_display,
bool plugged)
{
@@ -615,24 +598,21 @@ static int dp_hpd_unplug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
if (dp->link->sink_count == 0) {
dp_display_host_phy_exit(dp);
}
+ dp_display_notify_disconnect(&dp->pdev->dev);
mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
return 0;
- }
-
- if (state == ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING) {
+ } else if (state == ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING) {
mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
return 0;
- }
-
- if (state == ST_CONNECT_PENDING) {
- /* wait until CONNECTED */
- dp_add_event(dp, EV_HPD_UNPLUG_INT, 0, 1); /* delay = 1 */
+ } else if (state == ST_CONNECT_PENDING) {
+ dp_ctrl_off_link(dp->ctrl);
+ dp_display_host_phy_exit(dp);
+ dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECTED;
+ dp_display_notify_disconnect(&dp->pdev->dev);
mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
return 0;
}
- dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING;
-
/* disable HPD plug interrupts */
dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(dp->catalog, DP_DP_HPD_PLUG_INT_MASK, false);
@@ -640,10 +620,13 @@ static int dp_hpd_unplug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
* We don't need separate work for disconnect as
* connect/attention interrupts are disabled
*/
- dp_display_usbpd_disconnect_cb(&dp->pdev->dev);
+ dp_display_notify_disconnect(&dp->pdev->dev);
- /* start sentinel checking in case of missing uevent */
- dp_add_event(dp, EV_DISCONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT, 0, DP_TIMEOUT_5_SECOND);
+ if (state == ST_DISPLAY_OFF) {
+ dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECTED;
+ } else {
+ dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING;
+ }
DRM_DEBUG_DP("hpd_state=%d\n", state);
/* signal the disconnect event early to ensure proper teardown */
@@ -657,21 +640,6 @@ static int dp_hpd_unplug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
return 0;
}
-static int dp_disconnect_pending_timeout(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
-{
- u32 state;
-
- mutex_lock(&dp->event_mutex);
-
- state = dp->hpd_state;
- if (state == ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING)
- dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECTED;
-
- mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static int dp_irq_hpd_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
{
u32 state;
@@ -685,13 +653,6 @@ static int dp_irq_hpd_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
return 0;
}
- if (state == ST_CONNECT_PENDING) {
- /* wait until ST_CONNECTED */
- dp_add_event(dp, EV_IRQ_HPD_INT, 0, 1); /* delay = 1 */
- mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
- return 0;
- }
-
if (state == ST_CONNECT_PENDING || state == ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING) {
/* wait until ST_CONNECTED */
dp_add_event(dp, EV_IRQ_HPD_INT, 0, 1); /* delay = 1 */
@@ -1116,14 +1077,6 @@ static int hpd_event_thread(void *data)
dp_display_send_hpd_notification(dp_priv,
todo->data);
break;
- case EV_CONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT:
- dp_connect_pending_timeout(dp_priv,
- todo->data);
- break;
- case EV_DISCONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT:
- dp_disconnect_pending_timeout(dp_priv,
- todo->data);
- break;
default:
break;
}
@@ -1160,8 +1113,6 @@ static irqreturn_t dp_display_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
dp_add_event(dp, EV_HPD_PLUG_INT, 0, 0);
if (hpd_isr_status & DP_DP_IRQ_HPD_INT_MASK) {
- /* stop sentinel connect pending checking */
- dp_del_event(dp, EV_CONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT);
dp_add_event(dp, EV_IRQ_HPD_INT, 0, 0);
}
@@ -1529,8 +1480,11 @@ int msm_dp_display_enable(struct msm_dp *dp, struct drm_encoder *encoder)
mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
- /* stop sentinel checking */
- dp_del_event(dp_display, EV_CONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT);
+ state = dp_display->hpd_state;
+ if (state != ST_DISPLAY_OFF && state != ST_CONNECT_PENDING) {
+ mutex_unlock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
+ return rc;
+ }
rc = dp_display_set_mode(dp, &dp_display->dp_mode);
if (rc) {
@@ -1593,8 +1547,11 @@ int msm_dp_display_disable(struct msm_dp *dp, struct drm_encoder *encoder)
mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
- /* stop sentinel checking */
- dp_del_event(dp_display, EV_DISCONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT);
+ state = dp_display->hpd_state;
+ if (state != ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING && state != ST_CONNECTED) {
+ mutex_unlock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
+ return rc;
+ }
dp_display_disable(dp_display, 0);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-04-14 14:03:43)
> Two stages are required to setup up main link to be ready to transmit
> video stream.
> Stage 1: dp_hpd_plug_handle() perform link training to set up main link
> stage 2: user space framework (msm_dp_display_enable()) to enable pixel
> clock and transfer main link to video ready state.
>
> At current implementation, when dongle unplugged dp_hdp_unplug_handle()
> has to wait until stage 2 completed before it can send link down uevent
> to user space framework to disable pixel clock followed by tearing down
> main link. This introduce unnecessary latency if dongle unplugged happen
> after stage 1 and before stage 2. It also has possibility leave main link
> stay at ready state after dongle unplugged if framework does not response
> to link down uevent notification. This will prevent next dongle plug in
> from working. This scenario could possibly happen when dongle unplug while
> system in the middle of suspending.
>
> This patch allow unplug handle to tear down main link and notify
> framework link down immediately if dongle unplugged happen after
> stage 1 and before stage 2. With this approach, dp driver is much
> more resilient to any different scenarios. Also redundant both
> dp_connect_pending_timeout() and dp_disconnect_pending_timeout()
> are removed to reduce logic complexity.
>
> Fixes: 8ede2ecc3e5e ("drm/msm/dp: Add DP compliance tests on Snapdragon Chipsets")
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Some questions below but doesn't seem like it will hold up this patch.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> index 01453db..f5bd8f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> @@ -615,24 +598,21 @@ static int dp_hpd_unplug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
> if (dp->link->sink_count == 0) {
> dp_display_host_phy_exit(dp);
> }
> + dp_display_notify_disconnect(&dp->pdev->dev);
> mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
> return 0;
> - }
> -
> - if (state == ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING) {
> + } else if (state == ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING) {
> mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
> return 0;
> - }
> -
> - if (state == ST_CONNECT_PENDING) {
> - /* wait until CONNECTED */
> - dp_add_event(dp, EV_HPD_UNPLUG_INT, 0, 1); /* delay = 1 */
> + } else if (state == ST_CONNECT_PENDING) {
I take it that ST_CONNECT_PENDING is sort of like "userspace hasn't
handled the uevent yet and modeset hasn't been called but the link is
setup and now we want to tear it down". The state name may want to be
changed to something else.
> + dp_ctrl_off_link(dp->ctrl);
> + dp_display_host_phy_exit(dp);
> + dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECTED;
> + dp_display_notify_disconnect(&dp->pdev->dev);
> mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
> return 0;
> }
>
> - dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING;
> -
> /* disable HPD plug interrupts */
> dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(dp->catalog, DP_DP_HPD_PLUG_INT_MASK, false);
>
> @@ -640,10 +620,13 @@ static int dp_hpd_unplug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
> * We don't need separate work for disconnect as
> * connect/attention interrupts are disabled
> */
> - dp_display_usbpd_disconnect_cb(&dp->pdev->dev);
> + dp_display_notify_disconnect(&dp->pdev->dev);
>
> - /* start sentinel checking in case of missing uevent */
> - dp_add_event(dp, EV_DISCONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT, 0, DP_TIMEOUT_5_SECOND);
> + if (state == ST_DISPLAY_OFF) {
> + dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECTED;
> + } else {
> + dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING;
> + }
Nitpick: No braces needed for single line if clauses.
>
> DRM_DEBUG_DP("hpd_state=%d\n", state);
> /* signal the disconnect event early to ensure proper teardown */
> @@ -1529,8 +1480,11 @@ int msm_dp_display_enable(struct msm_dp *dp, struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>
> mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>
> - /* stop sentinel checking */
> - dp_del_event(dp_display, EV_CONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT);
> + state = dp_display->hpd_state;
> + if (state != ST_DISPLAY_OFF && state != ST_CONNECT_PENDING) {
Is this to guard against userspace doing an atomic commit when the
display isn't connected? Is that even possible?
> + mutex_unlock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
> + return rc;
> + }
>
> rc = dp_display_set_mode(dp, &dp_display->dp_mode);
> if (rc) {
On 4/20/2022 3:38 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-04-14 14:03:43)
>> Two stages are required to setup up main link to be ready to transmit
>> video stream.
>> Stage 1: dp_hpd_plug_handle() perform link training to set up main link
>> stage 2: user space framework (msm_dp_display_enable()) to enable pixel
>> clock and transfer main link to video ready state.
>>
>> At current implementation, when dongle unplugged dp_hdp_unplug_handle()
>> has to wait until stage 2 completed before it can send link down uevent
>> to user space framework to disable pixel clock followed by tearing down
>> main link. This introduce unnecessary latency if dongle unplugged happen
>> after stage 1 and before stage 2. It also has possibility leave main link
>> stay at ready state after dongle unplugged if framework does not response
>> to link down uevent notification. This will prevent next dongle plug in
>> from working. This scenario could possibly happen when dongle unplug while
>> system in the middle of suspending.
>>
>> This patch allow unplug handle to tear down main link and notify
>> framework link down immediately if dongle unplugged happen after
>> stage 1 and before stage 2. With this approach, dp driver is much
>> more resilient to any different scenarios. Also redundant both
>> dp_connect_pending_timeout() and dp_disconnect_pending_timeout()
>> are removed to reduce logic complexity.
>>
>> Fixes: 8ede2ecc3e5e ("drm/msm/dp: Add DP compliance tests on Snapdragon Chipsets")
>> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
>
> Some questions below but doesn't seem like it will hold up this patch.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> index 01453db..f5bd8f5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> @@ -615,24 +598,21 @@ static int dp_hpd_unplug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
>> if (dp->link->sink_count == 0) {
>> dp_display_host_phy_exit(dp);
>> }
>> + dp_display_notify_disconnect(&dp->pdev->dev);
>> mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
>> return 0;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (state == ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING) {
>> + } else if (state == ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING) {
>> mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
>> return 0;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (state == ST_CONNECT_PENDING) {
>> - /* wait until CONNECTED */
>> - dp_add_event(dp, EV_HPD_UNPLUG_INT, 0, 1); /* delay = 1 */
>> + } else if (state == ST_CONNECT_PENDING) {
> I take it that ST_CONNECT_PENDING is sort of like "userspace hasn't
> handled the uevent yet and modeset hasn't been called but the link is
> setup and now we want to tear it down". The state name may want to be
> changed to something else.
yes, how about change to ST_MAINLINK_READY?
>
>> + dp_ctrl_off_link(dp->ctrl);
>> + dp_display_host_phy_exit(dp);
>> + dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECTED;
>> + dp_display_notify_disconnect(&dp->pdev->dev);
>> mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> - dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING;
>> -
>> /* disable HPD plug interrupts */
>> dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(dp->catalog, DP_DP_HPD_PLUG_INT_MASK, false);
>>
>> @@ -640,10 +620,13 @@ static int dp_hpd_unplug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
>> * We don't need separate work for disconnect as
>> * connect/attention interrupts are disabled
>> */
>> - dp_display_usbpd_disconnect_cb(&dp->pdev->dev);
>> + dp_display_notify_disconnect(&dp->pdev->dev);
>>
>> - /* start sentinel checking in case of missing uevent */
>> - dp_add_event(dp, EV_DISCONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT, 0, DP_TIMEOUT_5_SECOND);
>> + if (state == ST_DISPLAY_OFF) {
>> + dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECTED;
>> + } else {
>> + dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING;
>> + }
> Nitpick: No braces needed for single line if clauses.
>
>> DRM_DEBUG_DP("hpd_state=%d\n", state);
>> /* signal the disconnect event early to ensure proper teardown */
>> @@ -1529,8 +1480,11 @@ int msm_dp_display_enable(struct msm_dp *dp, struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>>
>> mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>>
>> - /* stop sentinel checking */
>> - dp_del_event(dp_display, EV_CONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT);
>> + state = dp_display->hpd_state;
>> + if (state != ST_DISPLAY_OFF && state != ST_CONNECT_PENDING) {
> Is this to guard against userspace doing an atomic commit when the
> display isn't connected? Is that even possible?
No, it used to guard follow scenario in timing order,
1) plugin had been handled and mainlink is ready,
2) userspace hasn't handled the uevent yet and modeset hasn't been called
3) unplugged happen, mainlink be teared down
4) user space start to response to uevent and try to enable display.
(it too late since mainlink had been teared down)
>> + mutex_unlock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>>
>> rc = dp_display_set_mode(dp, &dp_display->dp_mode);
>> if (rc) {
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-04-25 15:29:30)
>
> On 4/20/2022 3:38 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-04-14 14:03:43)
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> >> index 01453db..f5bd8f5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> >> @@ -615,24 +598,21 @@ static int dp_hpd_unplug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
> >> if (dp->link->sink_count == 0) {
> >> dp_display_host_phy_exit(dp);
> >> }
> >> + dp_display_notify_disconnect(&dp->pdev->dev);
> >> mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
> >> return 0;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - if (state == ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING) {
> >> + } else if (state == ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING) {
> >> mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
> >> return 0;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - if (state == ST_CONNECT_PENDING) {
> >> - /* wait until CONNECTED */
> >> - dp_add_event(dp, EV_HPD_UNPLUG_INT, 0, 1); /* delay = 1 */
> >> + } else if (state == ST_CONNECT_PENDING) {
> > I take it that ST_CONNECT_PENDING is sort of like "userspace hasn't
> > handled the uevent yet and modeset hasn't been called but the link is
> > setup and now we want to tear it down". The state name may want to be
> > changed to something else.
> yes, how about change to ST_MAINLINK_READY?
Sure.
> >> @@ -1529,8 +1480,11 @@ int msm_dp_display_enable(struct msm_dp *dp, struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> >>
> >> mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
> >>
> >> - /* stop sentinel checking */
> >> - dp_del_event(dp_display, EV_CONNECT_PENDING_TIMEOUT);
> >> + state = dp_display->hpd_state;
> >> + if (state != ST_DISPLAY_OFF && state != ST_CONNECT_PENDING) {
> > Is this to guard against userspace doing an atomic commit when the
> > display isn't connected? Is that even possible?
>
> No, it used to guard follow scenario in timing order,
>
> 1) plugin had been handled and mainlink is ready,
>
> 2) userspace hasn't handled the uevent yet and modeset hasn't been called
>
> 3) unplugged happen, mainlink be teared down
>
> 4) user space start to response to uevent and try to enable display.
> (it too late since mainlink had been teared down)
>
Ok. Thanks for clarifying.