From: luo penghao <[email protected]>
Subsequent if judgments will assign new values to ret, so the
statement here should be deleted
The clang_analyzer complains as follows:
fs/nfs/callback.c:
Value stored to 'ret' is never read
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: luo penghao <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/callback.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback.c b/fs/nfs/callback.c
index 86d856d..1c1c82a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/callback.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/callback.c
@@ -209,7 +209,6 @@ static int nfs_callback_up_net(int minorversion, struct svc_serv *serv,
goto err_bind;
}
- ret = 0;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NFS_V4_1) || minorversion == 0)
ret = nfs4_callback_up_net(serv, net);
else if (xprt->ops->bc_setup)
--
2.15.2
Hi Luo,
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 5:05 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: luo penghao <[email protected]>
>
> Subsequent if judgments will assign new values to ret, so the
> statement here should be deleted
>
> The clang_analyzer complains as follows:
>
> fs/nfs/callback.c:
>
> Value stored to 'ret' is never read
The "else if (xprt->ops->bc_setup)" branch doesn't touch 'ret', so it
seems to me like the clang_analyzer is falsely reporting this.
Thanks,
Anna
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: luo penghao <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/nfs/callback.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback.c b/fs/nfs/callback.c
> index 86d856d..1c1c82a 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/callback.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/callback.c
> @@ -209,7 +209,6 @@ static int nfs_callback_up_net(int minorversion, struct svc_serv *serv,
> goto err_bind;
> }
>
> - ret = 0;
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NFS_V4_1) || minorversion == 0)
> ret = nfs4_callback_up_net(serv, net);
> else if (xprt->ops->bc_setup)
> --
> 2.15.2
>
>