tee_driver_ops structures are only stored in the ops field of tee_desc
structures, which is const, and in turn tee_desc structures are only passed
as the first argument of tee_device_alloc, and this argument is const as
well. Thus the two kinds of structures can be const.
Done with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
---
drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
index 58169e5..7609ec6 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static void optee_release(struct tee_context *ctx)
}
}
-static struct tee_driver_ops optee_ops = {
+static const struct tee_driver_ops optee_ops = {
.get_version = optee_get_version,
.open = optee_open,
.release = optee_release,
@@ -268,13 +268,13 @@ static void optee_release(struct tee_context *ctx)
.cancel_req = optee_cancel_req,
};
-static struct tee_desc optee_desc = {
+static const struct tee_desc optee_desc = {
.name = DRIVER_NAME "-clnt",
.ops = &optee_ops,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
};
-static struct tee_driver_ops optee_supp_ops = {
+static const struct tee_driver_ops optee_supp_ops = {
.get_version = optee_get_version,
.open = optee_open,
.release = optee_release,
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static void optee_release(struct tee_context *ctx)
.supp_send = optee_supp_send,
};
-static struct tee_desc optee_supp_desc = {
+static const struct tee_desc optee_supp_desc = {
.name = DRIVER_NAME "-supp",
.ops = &optee_supp_ops,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote:
> tee_driver_ops structures are only stored in the ops field of tee_desc
> structures, which is const, and in turn tee_desc structures are only passed
> as the first argument of tee_device_alloc, and this argument is const as
> well. Thus the two kinds of structures can be const.
>
> Done with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
This has already been proposed by Bhumika Goyal in a more or less
identical patch. I've already picked up Bhumikas patch and will send
it upstream via arm-soc.
Thanks,
Jens