Commit f122a08b197d ("capability: just use a 'u64' instead of a 'u32[2]'
array") attempts to use BIT_LL() but actually wanted to use BIT_ULL(),
fix it up to make the test compile and run again.
Fixes: f122a08b197d ("capability: just use a 'u64' instead of a 'u32[2]' array")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_deny_namespace.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index b677dcd0b77af..91a4e61b61f6d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ endif
CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES = $(call get_sys_includes,$(CLANG),$(CLANG_TARGET_ARCH))
BPF_CFLAGS = -g -Werror -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) $(MENDIAN) \
-I$(INCLUDE_DIR) -I$(CURDIR) -I$(APIDIR) \
- -I$(abspath $(OUTPUT)/../usr/include)
+ -I$(abspath $(OUTPUT)/../usr/include) -I$(TOOLSINCDIR)
CLANG_CFLAGS = $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
-Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_deny_namespace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_deny_namespace.c
index 591104e79812e..0a619c34d692d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_deny_namespace.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_deny_namespace.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <linux/capability.h>
+#include <vdso/bits.h>
struct kernel_cap_struct {
__u64 val;
@@ -19,7 +20,7 @@ SEC("lsm.s/userns_create")
int BPF_PROG(test_userns_create, const struct cred *cred, int ret)
{
struct kernel_cap_struct caps = cred->cap_effective;
- __u64 cap_mask = BIT_LL(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
+ __u64 cap_mask = BIT_ULL(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
if (ret)
return 0;
--
2.39.2
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 5:36 AM Sasha Levin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Commit f122a08b197d ("capability: just use a 'u64' instead of a 'u32[2]'
> array") attempts to use BIT_LL() but actually wanted to use BIT_ULL(),
> fix it up to make the test compile and run again.
This got fixed differently by e8c8361cfdbf ("selftests/bpf: Fix
progs/test_deny_namespace.c issues").
I wonder what drugs made me think BIT_LL() was ok. Maybe my wife puts
something in the coffee?
Linus
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 9:49 AM Linus Torvalds
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 5:36 AM Sasha Levin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Commit f122a08b197d ("capability: just use a 'u64' instead of a 'u32[2]'
> > array") attempts to use BIT_LL() but actually wanted to use BIT_ULL(),
> > fix it up to make the test compile and run again.
It would only fix the compilation error, but the test would still fail.
> This got fixed differently by e8c8361cfdbf ("selftests/bpf: Fix
> progs/test_deny_namespace.c issues").
exactly. It's not just the macro that had to be adjusted.
> I wonder what drugs made me think BIT_LL() was ok. Maybe my wife puts
> something in the coffee?
$ make C=2 kernel/bpf/core.o
kernel/bpf/core.c:1822:43: error: arithmetics on pointers to functions
kernel/bpf/core.c:1827:48: error: arithmetics on pointers to functions
kernel/bpf/core.c:2073:77: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
:)