Ron,
On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 18:37, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm trying hard not to get sucked into this argument, but it is, at
> least, impolite, to accuse us of engaging in hand-wavery. There's
> probably more UEFI expertise in coreboot and oreboot than most
> places, and that's precisely why we want a non-UEFI
> option. Familiarity with UEFI did not breed respect.
If my reply was interpreted as rude, please accept my apologies. That
was not my intention.
> So can we get back to the business at hand? bytedance may be the
> company proposing this change, but they are certainly not the only
> company interested in seeing it happen. A project I'm involved in
> needs this work to go through.
I noted that the discussion continued from Ard's reply (which, no
surprise, resonates with my worldview :-)):
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAMj1kXFZren0Q19DimwQaETCLz64D4bZQC5B2N=i3SAWHygkTQ@mail.gmail.com/
Let's continue there.
Björn