2018-05-25 21:09:51

by Arnd Bergmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] pwm: stm32: fix build warning with CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE disabled

Without dmaengine support, we get a harmless warning about an
unused function:

drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c:166:12: error: 'stm32_pwm_capture' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]

Changing the #ifdef to an IS_ENABLED() check shuts up that warning
and is slightly nicer to read.

Fixes: 53e38fe73f94 ("pwm: stm32: Add capture support")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
index 60bfc07c4912..97bbc1f18fd6 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
@@ -484,9 +484,7 @@ static int stm32_pwm_apply_locked(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
static const struct pwm_ops stm32pwm_ops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.apply = stm32_pwm_apply_locked,
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE)
- .capture = stm32_pwm_capture,
-#endif
+ .capture = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE) ? stm32_pwm_capture : NULL,
};

static int stm32_pwm_set_breakinput(struct stm32_pwm *priv,
--
2.9.0



2018-05-28 07:21:11

by Fabrice Gasnier

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: stm32: fix build warning with CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE disabled

On 05/25/2018 11:08 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Without dmaengine support, we get a harmless warning about an
> unused function:
>
> drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c:166:12: error: 'stm32_pwm_capture' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>
> Changing the #ifdef to an IS_ENABLED() check shuts up that warning
> and is slightly nicer to read.
>
> Fixes: 53e38fe73f94 ("pwm: stm32: Add capture support")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Hi Arnd,

Acked-by: Fabrice Gasnier <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Fabrice
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
> index 60bfc07c4912..97bbc1f18fd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
> @@ -484,9 +484,7 @@ static int stm32_pwm_apply_locked(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> static const struct pwm_ops stm32pwm_ops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .apply = stm32_pwm_apply_locked,
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE)
> - .capture = stm32_pwm_capture,
> -#endif
> + .capture = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE) ? stm32_pwm_capture : NULL,
> };
>
> static int stm32_pwm_set_breakinput(struct stm32_pwm *priv,
>

2018-06-06 08:19:12

by Thierry Reding

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: stm32: fix build warning with CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE disabled

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:08:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Without dmaengine support, we get a harmless warning about an
> unused function:
>
> drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c:166:12: error: 'stm32_pwm_capture' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>
> Changing the #ifdef to an IS_ENABLED() check shuts up that warning
> and is slightly nicer to read.
>
> Fixes: 53e38fe73f94 ("pwm: stm32: Add capture support")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

Lee, I applied this on top of your immutable MFD/PWM branch because it
depends on the capture support that you applied. I wasn't sure what your
PR timing was going to be, so I thought I'd do it this way since I'm
pulling in some last minute fixes for v4.18.

Thierry


Attachments:
(No filename) (871.00 B)
signature.asc (849.00 B)
Download all attachments

2018-06-07 05:17:16

by Lee Jones

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: stm32: fix build warning with CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE disabled

On Wed, 06 Jun 2018, Thierry Reding wrote:

> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:08:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Without dmaengine support, we get a harmless warning about an
> > unused function:
> >
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c:166:12: error: 'stm32_pwm_capture' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> >
> > Changing the #ifdef to an IS_ENABLED() check shuts up that warning
> > and is slightly nicer to read.
> >
> > Fixes: 53e38fe73f94 ("pwm: stm32: Add capture support")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 4 +---
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
> Lee, I applied this on top of your immutable MFD/PWM branch because it
> depends on the capture support that you applied. I wasn't sure what your
> PR timing was going to be, so I thought I'd do it this way since I'm
> pulling in some last minute fixes for v4.18.

I don't see a problem with that.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

2018-06-12 07:26:25

by Geert Uytterhoeven

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: stm32: fix build warning with CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE disabled

Hi Arnd,

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:09 PM Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Without dmaengine support, we get a harmless warning about an
> unused function:
>
> drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c:166:12: error: 'stm32_pwm_capture' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>
> Changing the #ifdef to an IS_ENABLED() check shuts up that warning
> and is slightly nicer to read.
>
> Fixes: 53e38fe73f94 ("pwm: stm32: Add capture support")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

Thanks!

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
> @@ -484,9 +484,7 @@ static int stm32_pwm_apply_locked(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> static const struct pwm_ops stm32pwm_ops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .apply = stm32_pwm_apply_locked,
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE)
> - .capture = stm32_pwm_capture,
> -#endif
> + .capture = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE) ? stm32_pwm_capture : NULL,

Cool, I didn't know IS_ENABLED() can be used in static initializers.
I guess it's too late/much work to use this trick in e.g. SET_*_PM_OPS(),
as there are lots of places protecting the functions by #ifdefs?

> };

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

2018-06-12 10:44:05

by Arnd Bergmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: stm32: fix build warning with CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE disabled

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<[email protected]> wrote:

>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
>> @@ -484,9 +484,7 @@ static int stm32_pwm_apply_locked(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>> static const struct pwm_ops stm32pwm_ops = {
>> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> .apply = stm32_pwm_apply_locked,
>> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE)
>> - .capture = stm32_pwm_capture,
>> -#endif
>> + .capture = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE) ? stm32_pwm_capture : NULL,
>
> Cool, I didn't know IS_ENABLED() can be used in static initializers.
> I guess it's too late/much work to use this trick in e.g. SET_*_PM_OPS(),
> as there are lots of places protecting the functions by #ifdefs?

It's one of those things I've been planning to do for a long time, but as
you noticed, we can't just change the macro but have to come up with a
replacement that works without those #ifdefs. Unfortunately, nobody has
come up with a good /name/ for those macros, which is still the main blocker ;-)

Arnd