Read reset phandle as optional instead of exclusive so that all the DT's
passing the reset phandle can be used to assert/deassert the reset line.
With this change we don't have to differentiate the RZ/G2L SoC.
With the above changes we no longer need the "renesas,riic-r9a07g044"
compatible string, so drop it from riic_i2c_dt_ids[]. No changes are
required to the r9a07g044.dtsi as we already have "renesas,riic-rz" as a
fallback compatible string.
While at it, check the return code of reset_control_deassert() as it might
fail and also add a devres action to assert the reset line.
Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
index 8dfd27dc6149..cded77e06670 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
@@ -88,11 +88,6 @@
#define RIIC_INIT_MSG -1
-enum riic_type {
- RIIC_RZ_A,
- RIIC_RZ_G2L,
-};
-
struct riic_dev {
void __iomem *base;
u8 *buf;
@@ -396,6 +391,11 @@ static struct riic_irq_desc riic_irqs[] = {
{ .res_num = 5, .isr = riic_tend_isr, .name = "riic-nack" },
};
+static void riic_reset_control_assert(void *data)
+{
+ reset_control_assert(data);
+}
+
static int riic_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct riic_dev *riic;
@@ -404,7 +404,6 @@ static int riic_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct i2c_timings i2c_t;
struct reset_control *rstc;
int i, ret;
- enum riic_type type;
riic = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*riic), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!riic)
@@ -421,16 +420,18 @@ static int riic_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return PTR_ERR(riic->clk);
}
- type = (enum riic_type)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
- if (type == RIIC_RZ_G2L) {
- rstc = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, NULL);
- if (IS_ERR(rstc)) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error: missing reset ctrl\n");
- return PTR_ERR(rstc);
- }
+ rstc = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(rstc))
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(rstc),
+ "Error: missing reset ctrl\n");
- reset_control_deassert(rstc);
- }
+ ret = reset_control_deassert(rstc);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, riic_reset_control_assert, rstc);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riic_irqs); i++) {
ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, riic_irqs[i].res_num);
@@ -492,8 +493,7 @@ static int riic_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
static const struct of_device_id riic_i2c_dt_ids[] = {
- { .compatible = "renesas,riic-r9a07g044", .data = (void *)RIIC_RZ_G2L },
- { .compatible = "renesas,riic-rz", .data = (void *)RIIC_RZ_A },
+ { .compatible = "renesas,riic-rz", },
{ /* Sentinel */ },
};
--
2.17.1
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 11:22:32PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> Read reset phandle as optional instead of exclusive so that all the DT's
> passing the reset phandle can be used to assert/deassert the reset line.
> With this change we don't have to differentiate the RZ/G2L SoC.
>
> With the above changes we no longer need the "renesas,riic-r9a07g044"
> compatible string, so drop it from riic_i2c_dt_ids[]. No changes are
> required to the r9a07g044.dtsi as we already have "renesas,riic-rz" as a
> fallback compatible string.
>
> While at it, check the return code of reset_control_deassert() as it might
> fail and also add a devres action to assert the reset line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
Looks good to me. Chris, Philipp what do you think?
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
> index 8dfd27dc6149..cded77e06670 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
> @@ -88,11 +88,6 @@
>
> #define RIIC_INIT_MSG -1
>
> -enum riic_type {
> - RIIC_RZ_A,
> - RIIC_RZ_G2L,
> -};
> -
> struct riic_dev {
> void __iomem *base;
> u8 *buf;
> @@ -396,6 +391,11 @@ static struct riic_irq_desc riic_irqs[] = {
> { .res_num = 5, .isr = riic_tend_isr, .name = "riic-nack" },
> };
>
> +static void riic_reset_control_assert(void *data)
> +{
> + reset_control_assert(data);
> +}
> +
> static int riic_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct riic_dev *riic;
> @@ -404,7 +404,6 @@ static int riic_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct i2c_timings i2c_t;
> struct reset_control *rstc;
> int i, ret;
> - enum riic_type type;
>
> riic = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*riic), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!riic)
> @@ -421,16 +420,18 @@ static int riic_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(riic->clk);
> }
>
> - type = (enum riic_type)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> - if (type == RIIC_RZ_G2L) {
> - rstc = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> - if (IS_ERR(rstc)) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error: missing reset ctrl\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(rstc);
> - }
> + rstc = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(rstc))
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(rstc),
> + "Error: missing reset ctrl\n");
>
> - reset_control_deassert(rstc);
> - }
> + ret = reset_control_deassert(rstc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, riic_reset_control_assert, rstc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riic_irqs); i++) {
> ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, riic_irqs[i].res_num);
> @@ -492,8 +493,7 @@ static int riic_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id riic_i2c_dt_ids[] = {
> - { .compatible = "renesas,riic-r9a07g044", .data = (void *)RIIC_RZ_G2L },
> - { .compatible = "renesas,riic-rz", .data = (void *)RIIC_RZ_A },
> + { .compatible = "renesas,riic-rz", },
> { /* Sentinel */ },
> };
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:22 AM Lad Prabhakar
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Read reset phandle as optional instead of exclusive so that all the DT's
> passing the reset phandle can be used to assert/deassert the reset line.
> With this change we don't have to differentiate the RZ/G2L SoC.
>
> With the above changes we no longer need the "renesas,riic-r9a07g044"
> compatible string, so drop it from riic_i2c_dt_ids[]. No changes are
> required to the r9a07g044.dtsi as we already have "renesas,riic-rz" as a
> fallback compatible string.
>
> While at it, check the return code of reset_control_deassert() as it might
> fail and also add a devres action to assert the reset line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 11:22:32PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> Read reset phandle as optional instead of exclusive so that all the DT's
> passing the reset phandle can be used to assert/deassert the reset line.
> With this change we don't have to differentiate the RZ/G2L SoC.
>
> With the above changes we no longer need the "renesas,riic-r9a07g044"
> compatible string, so drop it from riic_i2c_dt_ids[]. No changes are
> required to the r9a07g044.dtsi as we already have "renesas,riic-rz" as a
> fallback compatible string.
>
> While at it, check the return code of reset_control_deassert() as it might
> fail and also add a devres action to assert the reset line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
Applied to for-next, thanks!