Hi Alexandre,
On 9 November 2017 at 09:26, Alexandre Belloni
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/11/2017 at 17:16:15 +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> +static int sprd_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
>> +{
>> + struct sprd_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + time64_t secs;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>
> I would have expected a check for SPRD_RTC_POWER_RESET_FLAG here.
Actually I want to create one separate patch to add this feature. But
like you suggested, I can add this checking in here in next version.
Thanks for your suggestion.
>
>
>> + ret = sprd_rtc_get_secs(rtc, SPRD_RTC_TIME, &secs);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + rtc_time64_to_tm(secs, tm);
>> + return rtc_valid_tm(tm);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sprd_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
>> +{
>> + struct sprd_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + time64_t secs = rtc_tm_to_time64(tm);
>> +
>
> And you need to reset SPRD_RTC_POWER_RESET_FLAG here
>
>> + return sprd_rtc_set_secs(rtc, SPRD_RTC_TIME, secs);
>> +}
>> +
--
Baolin.wang
Best Regards
From 1583549943182348340@xxx Thu Nov 09 01:28:29 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583489318920086911
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread