2019-07-29 15:16:11

by Chuhong Yuan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] power: Replace strncmp with str_has_prefix

strncmp(str, const, len) is error-prone.
We had better use newly introduced
str_has_prefix() instead of it.

Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <[email protected]>
---
kernel/power/hibernate.c | 8 ++++----
kernel/power/main.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/power/hibernate.c b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
index cd7434e6000d..49d4bfdb2b67 100644
--- a/kernel/power/hibernate.c
+++ b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
@@ -1188,15 +1188,15 @@ static int __init resume_offset_setup(char *str)

static int __init hibernate_setup(char *str)
{
- if (!strncmp(str, "noresume", 8)) {
+ if (str_has_prefix(str, "noresume")) {
noresume = 1;
- } else if (!strncmp(str, "nocompress", 10)) {
+ } else if (str_has_prefix(str, "nocompress")) {
nocompress = 1;
- } else if (!strncmp(str, "no", 2)) {
+ } else if (str_has_prefix(str, "no")) {
noresume = 1;
nohibernate = 1;
} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX)
- && !strncmp(str, "protect_image", 13)) {
+ && str_has_prefix(str, "protect_image")) {
enable_restore_image_protection();
}
return 1;
diff --git a/kernel/power/main.c b/kernel/power/main.c
index bdbd605c4215..5e5f64bb3a43 100644
--- a/kernel/power/main.c
+++ b/kernel/power/main.c
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ static suspend_state_t decode_state(const char *buf, size_t n)
len = p ? p - buf : n;

/* Check hibernation first. */
- if (len == 4 && !strncmp(buf, "disk", len))
+ if (len == 4 && str_has_prefix(buf, "disk"))
return PM_SUSPEND_MAX;

#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
--
2.20.1


2019-07-29 19:32:35

by Pavel Machek

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] power: Replace strncmp with str_has_prefix

On Mon 2019-07-29 23:14:54, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> strncmp(str, const, len) is error-prone.
> We had better use newly introduced
> str_has_prefix() instead of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <[email protected]>
> ---
> kernel/power/hibernate.c | 8 ++++----
> kernel/power/main.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/hibernate.c b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> index cd7434e6000d..49d4bfdb2b67 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> @@ -1188,15 +1188,15 @@ static int __init resume_offset_setup(char *str)
>
> static int __init hibernate_setup(char *str)
> {
> - if (!strncmp(str, "noresume", 8)) {
> + if (str_has_prefix(str, "noresume")) {
> noresume = 1;
> - } else if (!strncmp(str, "nocompress", 10)) {
> + } else if (str_has_prefix(str, "nocompress")) {
> nocompress = 1;

Ok, old code is bad, too... but this makes the error visible. We do
not want "noresumenextmonday" to set noresume = 1, right?

Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.18 kB)
signature.asc (188.00 B)
Digital signature
Download all attachments

2019-08-01 09:03:59

by Chuhong Yuan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] power: Replace strncmp with str_has_prefix

Pavel Machek <[email protected]> 于2019年7月30日周二 上午3:15写道:
>
> On Mon 2019-07-29 23:14:54, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> > strncmp(str, const, len) is error-prone.
> > We had better use newly introduced
> > str_has_prefix() instead of it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > kernel/power/hibernate.c | 8 ++++----
> > kernel/power/main.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/power/hibernate.c b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> > index cd7434e6000d..49d4bfdb2b67 100644
> > --- a/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> > +++ b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> > @@ -1188,15 +1188,15 @@ static int __init resume_offset_setup(char *str)
> >
> > static int __init hibernate_setup(char *str)
> > {
> > - if (!strncmp(str, "noresume", 8)) {
> > + if (str_has_prefix(str, "noresume")) {
> > noresume = 1;
> > - } else if (!strncmp(str, "nocompress", 10)) {
> > + } else if (str_has_prefix(str, "nocompress")) {
> > nocompress = 1;
>
> Ok, old code is bad, too... but this makes the error visible. We do
> not want "noresumenextmonday" to set noresume = 1, right?
>

I am not clear about the semantic of the code.
Therefore, what is the right way to fix this error?

> Pavel
>
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html